i'll probably catch up on this game after sleep.
i've only read this page. ykv and wake are town. regfan could be scum.
actually i'll do this and the others when i wake up tomorrow. i can barely keep my eyes open atm.regfan wrote:but if you could pull up specifics and quotes on your Aptil town read it'd be help me a lot when going through her again.
yes, please.aptil wrote:Will give detailed reads later if you want.
that's a really shit question to ask, actually. there's only one reasonable answer for anyone with any role PM to give.viera wrote:Interesting question I'd like to echo.
which reads andviera wrote:reasoning behind some scumreads are weak, the read feels manufactured
It is.viera wrote:It's not.
2.2% chance of DDDviera wrote:The odds for 3 would be somewhere along the lines of 1/1000
i'm not currently reading you as town and am thinking you could be scum by poe. i have no strong reason for this though. i didn't like your predecessor's play and haven't seen anything i think looks particularly tonw from you. only reason you might be town is if regfan is scum, which also means i've gone wrong with one of my town reads.viera wrote:is it too much to ask "why?"
Was your vote purely for pressure? What's your actual read on Zebe?ykv wrote:That's the activity level expected of Zebe. Additional pressure fail to increase his contribution, meaning that's his max.
Even if this were actually true, what's your point?viera wrote:D1 reads are never too accurate.
Really? Because I'm currently thinking he could be scum.viera wrote:My point is that your read on Regfan is probably wrong.
His lurking has nothing to do with why I think he's scum.ykv wrote:His lurking is not because his is trying to avoid attention.
Are you currently reading him as town? What do you like about his "contribution"?ykv wrote:For now, I'm satisfied with his contribution.
*shrug* I was saying that if regfan is scum then you are probably town. that's all.viera wrote:Your last post didn't imply that but oh well.
Why?viera wrote:Forget about lynching Wake and Zebe.
Why?yessiree wrote:hmm ok so VA is town
do you think fireflies is scum? if so, why aren't you voting him? how have your reads changed since 634?zebe wrote:I see that [fireflies is] just wagoning, in a really scummy way.
i have seen scum comment on someone being "pr or scum" so i'm not reading it as a town thing. it could be a town thing, but there is nothing inherently town about it. and backing off from someone that they think is a pr is something scum often do (because, hey, backing off from someone you think is a pr potentially makes you look better when they claim the pr).viera wrote:Thing is, would scum really be carefree enough to comment like that?
if he wanted this, he didn't need to be obtuse about it. he could have just given them in the first place.viera wrote:He wants people to ask him for townreads.
in addition to this, when he backed off from wake, he didn't try to discourage the wagon in any way. which is, again, something i could see him doing as scum because he wants the claim to happen (to confirm wake is a PR) but doesn't want to be involved in the wagon that makes him do this.viera wrote:and backing off from someone that they think is a pr is something scum often do (because, hey, backing off from someone you think is a pr potentially makes you look better when they claim the pr).
:/ then how do you find scum?viera wrote:I don't find scum purposefully making suspicious comments.
it's null because town doesn't have any more motivation to say this than scum.viera wrote:I also don't feel that scum would really run up and say "Hey, don't shoot me."
this would make sense if it was about explanations, but the reads themselves? no.viera wrote:Laziness
i'm not currently scum reading shamrock. i saw your points about him, but there was nothing particularly convincing about it.ykv wrote:Are you going to pile your votes on Shamrock then?
no, i think he knows what he said, i just don't think he understands that it could be interpreted as scummy. just like players who have said this in past games...viera wrote:So you think scumZebe unknowingly said "oh he was scum or PR"?
in both cases, because they don't want to die. this seems rather basic. :/viera wrote:Why would town say it, in your opinion?
Why would scum say it?
he didn't refuse to give them, he just didn't give them. that's the point. i don't think it's scummy for someone like beastcharizard to say he doesn't give them, because that's a mentality he has about it. but that's an entirely different situation.viera wrote:I don't think it's scummy since I personally refused to give out townreads in my first few games on-site. I can sorta see where he's coming from.
i don't really consider this valuable information when it's highly likely that going into night phase without a lynch only allows scum to dictate what the want us to know. (e.g. assuming wake and ykv are town, it's likely this is a <=4T setup, so scum probably have a roleblocker, and any information we learn from kills is what scumhp wrote:With flips, we can start analyzing interactions, voting patterns and other things. As of now, I think we are fairly in the dark.
the main reason for this is the amount of people currently lurking/coasting. i dunno if it's because some sort of apathy has set in due to all the replacements. *shrug*hp wrote:I haven't seen anything that seems too productive or focused.
my thoughts on beastcharizard are mostly based on the tone of his posts and not the content. the content can be quite meh, but the way in which it's written makes me think town. i gave some examples of this earlier in a spoiler wall if you want my thoughts on this. i'm a bit worried that he's among the players that are suddenly under the radar, but eh.shamrock wrote:beastcharizard's ISO is quite scummy
Some theory discussion here:beastcharizard wrote:I would like to state that I will give town reads but I don't see the point in telling people them.
yeah, that is what I was saying about scum generally being about to figure out who is thought of as town...beastcharizard wrote:Now that I think about it you can most likely PoE my town reads from my scum reads
i'm pretty sure no one has even mentioned this as a point against you.zebe wrote:I hope none of you think I'm scum because of my inactivity.
pending night kills and any flips there, i'd assess the reasons and inconsistencies in people's reads on you. i don't currently have a pick. reassessing my reads on aptil and venrob would prob be first port of call.pa wrote:We're talking about my wagon and we're trying to figure out where scum helped tie the noose. What's your pick?
when was this?ykv wrote:OBF seemed to be "guiding" jane.
i'll be going back over jane's posts some time either tonight or maybe tomorrow, but i don't think it's wise to try to infer buddies from a single post by jane.ykv wrote:I'll make an assumption that jane is not using a lot of WIFOM. Thus:
i really don't like posts like this. it's equivalent to congratulating the doc.aptil wrote:Good shot. Killing 1 scum at night is pretty awesome.
when? explain it again. have any of your reads changed because of flips? what are your reads outside of ykv?venrob wrote:My YKV has been explained.
how would he even know he was roleblocked if he didn't target either Regfan or HP?VA wrote:Then he needs to claim his target and claimed roleblocked.
keep calm, muffin.aptil wrote:What did you do night1?
are you serious? that was over 700 posts ago. over 28 pages ago. are you seriously telling me that nothing about your read/s has changed since then?venrob wrote:This is my YKV vote explaination. Since you had to ask, I must assume you are not even reading anything.
i don't think VA is scum with regfan.yraelz wrote:So that would be a VTL VierraAssasin next.
the biggest issue i have when i see anyone say something like this is that it's usually hypocritical.beastcharizard wrote:You should be scum hunting and not liability to town hunting. We got plenty of info now so use it to find SCUM.