Open 543: Pick Your Poison (Game Over!)

[LeMidget]

VOTE: Acidic_TACO because tacos aren't meant to be acidic, yo!

[LeMidget]

Oh shit,

she's

playing?

UNVOTE: Acidic_TACO
VOTE: goodmorning

[LeMidget]

Hahaha... lucky it's a daystart or I'd be killed N0.

You better get that reference.

[LeMidget]

UNVOTE: goodmorning
VOTE: Powerofdeath
because of posts 27 & 28

[LeMidget]

lemidget is town, scum don't sheep a bw just like he did.

What do you mean by that? I'm town yeah but I'm still mostly new to Mafiascum, and trying to figure out how to think here.

[LeMidget]

UNVOTE: Powerofdeath
VOTE: RationalMadman

[LeMidget]

@Mod: I will be V/LA from the 31st to the 2nd.

I might post once or twice but probably not so don't prod me please.

Noted. ~Mod

[LeMidget]

I'm sheeping, yeah. A little bit. It's kind of my playstyle. I agree with the posts above me so I vote them. RationalMadman seems like a good lynch because of all the stuff that has been mentioned about him, and he doesn't look town because there isn't much there at all.

[LeMidget]

UNVOTE: goodmorning
VOTE: Powerofdeath
because of posts 27 & 28

I kinda don't like this.

UNVOTE: Powerofdeath
VOTE: RationalMadman

Or this.

VOTE: LeMidget

In response to this

[LeMidget]

I kind of just want to lynch RationalMadman because of his posting style.

[LeMidget]

I'm sheeping, yeah. A little bit. It's kind of my playstyle.

Do you recognize that it's a very scummy playstyle? Are you not willing to take steps to stop that playstyle and play in a moar pro-town fashion?

I haven't played enough to really learn how to form opinions myself and make good reads, so I'm kind of just reading everybody's thoughts and seeing if I agree with them. That's the only reason why I sheep. I'd love to not sheep, I think I need more practice. Anyways I will post again once I get back home - I'm in a shitty hotel right now and I'm on my phone.

[LeMidget]

Sorry, I've been away. UNVOTE: RationalMadman

I will look at the posts more now and tonight and will get back to you all on that.

[LeMidget]

19- This feels fake. Did you not look at the playerlist before joining/posting? Why is it a big deal that gm is in the game anyway?
21- I don't like this either. This feels like an awkward town softclaim.

We played together on a different site and it was normally a Night start. I almost always died N0.

34- More blatant sheeping!
56- Sheep vote #3. Why RM?
70- Eh, playstyle excuse is null; it doesn't mean you aren't replicating that element of your playstyle as scum. Self-meta isn't that helpful.
97- Eh, playstyle excuse is null. Self-meta is bleh.

LeMidget: Null. I want to meta Midget too to see if Midget's self-meta looks legitimate, but Midget hasn't done much besides sheep, which is worrying.

I'm sorry that I sheep. That is my self-meta, it might not be helpful to you but maybe some other people might have better luck reading me with that.

34 This might sound strange, but LeMidget didn't reference posts from powerofdeath that he didn't like. He referenced other people's cases against powerofdeath.
That comibined with the naked vote in 56 gave me a feeling of sheeping scummily if that makes sense. It's hard to get much out of 3 pages, but I felt good enough about the vote at the time (and still do I think).

I honestly feel more null about RM now that I know he has a history of getting replaced out this way.

OK again this is kind of a hunch, but I imagine a townie reading 27 and 28 and thinking "hmm, I like these cases, I'm going to look back at powerofdeath's posts/iso. Oh yeah post 25 was scummy I didn't like how X Y Z etc."

Where I imagine a scum reading 27 and 28 and thinking "hmm, I like these cases, I'm going to link to them. That will look good."

I didn't know that was how I was supposed to think? My thoughts were "I probably should have some reasoning, and these posts are my reasons, so there." Also I guess since I didn't explain it until later but,

I kind of just want to lynch RationalMadman because of his posting style.

So it was more of a policy lynch bandwagon than a "I think you're scum" vote. Did I think he was scum? He could have been. I don't think Misaka is though.

[LeMidget]

My thoughts were "I probably should have some reasoning, and these posts are my reasons, so there."

@LeMidget
I have to say this rubs me the wrong way. Why say "I should probably have some reasoning?" If you didn't have a reason to vote, why did you vote?

By that I meant "I should probably be able to show why I'm going to vote for them" if that makes sense. I mean, obviously I'm not going to vote for someone seriously without good reason. 176 meant that I should back up my vote, in a way. Does that make sense?

Also, powerofdeath seems dangerously close to a lynch. I don't know if he's scum, he could just be... what's the phrase? Village Idiot? I don't remember. I'm conflicted, because I want him to be scum, but I don't know. His posts seem kind of stupid. I can see 215 being scummy.

[LeMidget]

VOTE: Powerofdeath

I looked at it again. 85% of the vote is "I think you're scummy," 15% "OMGUS."

[LeMidget]

What the frick frack is even going on, jesus. BoroPhil, your town-scum reads post wasn't organised? Also you seem to be avoiding KK's post 248. Dunno what to go on but

FoS: BoroPhil