Open 607 - Friends and Enemies - Game Over
-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
VOTE: Ika for being scum in WDPT
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@Mod: Plotinus head of Rainbow Unicat is V/LA until Sunday. not afk though and will still be trying to participate somewhat.-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
She is! Bella's the other head of this hydra. The heads are listed in our signature.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 31, Varian- wrote:I mean, he could have not voted but made a comment on someone else's vote or asked a question or something. Vedith's entrance was about as unobtrusive as it possibly could have been without just making a blank post or not posting at all. Which sounds like exactly the kind of posting I want to drag someone into the limelight for.
Yeah, I thought so too. It was like he wanted the game in his egosearch but couldn't be arsed to skim the 15 posts before his and contribute to the game.
VOTE: Vedith L-2
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Vedith, how do you feel about the wagon that has formed against you?
Varian, ika was already on the wagon so there was less danger of a lolhammer.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Checking in!
Early town-lean on Varian and random. worried about donut's vote most of all on that wagon. Veidth's response to pressure looks ok for now. Interested in hearing more from Heartless <3
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 56, Heartless wrote:her
Where did that pronoun come from? Because I am a person with a gender ambiguous nick, a gender ambiguous avatar, and a they pronoun in the pronoun field on my main account, and people who don't know me usually default to male pronouns because of that so it makes me suspicious someone's been talking about me.
I stand by the idea that Vedith's first post is a "i want this in my ego search but i'm not actually playing" and i think that's scummy but I liked 40 from Vedith well enough.
VOTE: Firebringer entrance has been pretty fluffy.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Hi TTH
You used the awkward rvs thing on me on bees - we were both town. Sometimes, peeps are just awkward. I understand where plotti is with Vedith's laziness - it doesn't look like he was that bothered about the thread, but his recent posting is better.
I feel similarly to you about Donot, though. However, Random's not explained clearly enough about what he learnt from the vote - @random, expand on what you got out of this? Wanderer's question was good, but I don't think you quite explained.
@ika: hi! Gut top town and top scum rn? xx
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Ika, explain your reads (one sentence will do).
fire...wow. got any scum games? linky?
@Vei - if you ain't sure about town-reads, who's scum? Your vote ain't doing much rn. (I think. VC?)-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
catching up!
vedith65 I think being lost in RVS is a sign of being new rather than anything. The votes before you weren’t throw away votes to the people who wrote them probably.
uneasy about firebringer still.
page 4!
thecow, how many games have you played?
i’m townleaning varian.
heartless85 lol.
heartless86 then why aren’t you voting us?
random95 what felt opportunistic about it? it was page 2 and they put you at L-6?
page 5!
random100 that’s part of why I voted Vedith too!
persivul108 I reacted the same way in Refraction to Bella calling me she because we hadn’t interacted much before that game. And you played in refraction so yeah I am not surprised that you noticed that some people call me by that pronoun. Neither head of heartless has ever played with me before.
You’ll notice I didn’t vote Heartless over the pronoun (though it wouldn’t be out of character for me, I have been getting better at not death tunnelling people over smileys like when I was a newb), I just wanted to know where the pronoun came from and why they are using it.
this reads list isn't ordered very precisely within the groups.
—Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Wow, this page is kinda filler-y. Pers, what you getting out of that set of questions?
Ika's response to wanderer is good.
Anti...what? The post pinged to me because it seems to be a line that has been used 2/3 times around me, and I was trying to work out if it had any bearing on alignment. How is it a powerplay? Is 'feeling threatened' a sign of town or scum? Last time we played we connected well, wondering what is different rn.
People seem to have a polarised read on The Cow - why?
-bx-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 130, Firebringer wrote:Are you the narrator?
Yes.
--Plotinus
An omniscient narrator.
--Bella-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Hey Ika.
You = vibe town. Don't think your vote is on the right player rn.
Heartles = Feels really scummy to me, but it's a 'gut' thing and might improve with more tth
Wanderer = asks really good questions, her interaction with you over our slot made me town-read you both.
Montosh = who? Still rvs-ing as well. nully
Firebringer = I can't read them. Have herd the phrase 'too scummy to be scum' bandied around :S
randomidget = :S 112 doesn't give me town-vibes. scummish.
Vedith = town. reacted really well to pressure.
TheCow = ?
Persivul = ?
DonotTrustMe = need more, leaning scum
Simple Hope = Need more info, leaning town
Varian = prolly town. Mainly gut. want more
I've got a few decent town-reads, but there's a wash of nully/scummy/more content please in there. Sorry!
-bx-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
I felt you were being overly defensive. I thought it was weird that you felt simple hope was being opportunistic considering their early position on your wagon which was a fairly small wagon so you seemed prematurely upset about it. I think you've spent too much time rehashing the L-1 pressure vote thing and am wondering why you haven't moved on to scumhunting.
In post 116, Heartless wrote:In post 109, Rainbow Unicat wrote:heartless86 then why aren’t you voting us?
/burp
we are
so you are, my bad. I missed that when I went back to look.
In post 139, Heartless wrote:In post 133, ika wrote:bella, what are your reads?
Because I know that you have a part of your brain that wants to ignore all reason in favor of your crush on Bellaphant, I will allow you to gather your thoughts and make a read on her. As a sign of good faith, I'll move the vote. I really think sorting this hydra should be one of the top priorities here, and don't give me some procrastinating bullshit about "wait until Day 2" or some such. Do it now.
Bella and I are both strong enough players that not being able to sort us on day 1 makes sense. I don't think I've done anything alignment indicative at all yet. Nothing's come up that I feel i would have reacted to differently if I were scum. Bella and Ika know each other pretty well and they've hydraed together. Ika was dead by the time I replaced into WDPT and I don't think we've played together otherwise so it makes sense he'd be better at sorting her than sorting me.
In post 141, Heartless wrote:
I actually saw your post in the "Hands with a Name" thread of GTKAS. Your hands look feminine and your nails are well-manicured, so I thought you were a woman.
Apologies if I'm incorrect in that deduction.
Thank you for the explanation. I try to stay on top of who knows what about me and I tend to get a little paranoid if someone knows more than they should because it can indicate pregame chat of some sort. Not just gender stuff (and there are plenty of innocuous reasons why someone might use a pronoun that's why i ask before I start tunnelling) but also people knowing more than they should about my playstyle is something I look out for (people who haven't played with me yet but are not underestimating me despite my fairly recent join date, etc.)
There are also offline reasons why I'm a bit paranoid about infosec but I'm not willing to explain that further.
Spoiler: plotinus' gender
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
You can snip the parts of longer quotes that you aren't replying to. Just saying.
Ika'll be easy to sort because he's got a really obvious tell that he doesn't seem to want to work on. He's town for now.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 160, ika wrote:In post 152, Rainbow Unicat wrote:You can snip the parts of longer quotes that you aren't replying to. Just saying.
Ika'll be easy to sort because he's got a really obvious tell that he doesn't seem to want to work on. He's town for now.
--Plotinus
my activity levels?
yeah. i mean i'm not going to 100% conftown you just for being active; that would be reckless. But you being active is a positive sign in your favour. I'm mostly going to trust Bella to be able to read you because she knows you better than I do, but I'll be trying too.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
139 140
Don't worry, TTH, you know I only have eyes for you.
I feel like you are pushing us over silly things, then getting a 'flustered' reaction when we try to explain. Rather than try and work out what we mean, you are interpreting things in their worst degree. We're gonna get ourselves into an extra feedback loop if we carry on like this, so: why don't you leave reading us for today, and we'll both focus on scum outside me/you.
(Also, if we are scum, baiting us into slipping won't work, it just makes me wanna crush town )
I will answer your questions, though, 'coz we've worked together well before. I said I was trying to work out what it meant for your alignment - not that it was a scum tell, but that it had surprised me you'd used the same thing on us twice, when you knew we were town before. You've kinda explained that.
(This game? I was still town-reading you from your entrance, ironically, and having happy flashbacks to 603. Where, I believed, we mostly interacted with TTH, which is why I wanted 'more tth'. I actually want to sort your slot. I'm finding both heads slightly scummy, but I think some of is failure to communicate rn)
Let's not let scum hide under our noise - we've got firebringer for that
-bx
also, mod, I'm vla-ish til monday. Plot's got it.-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Welcome Aristophanes, nice to see another ancient greek. I was born two centuries after you so it is nice to meet in the afterlife.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Are we scumreading you for the wrong reasons?
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Who are your scumreads and why, DoNotTrustMe?
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
randomidget 203 wrote:
@rainbow unicat don't avoid my question.
which question? this one that we responded to and then you responded back?
In post 112, Randomnamechange wrote:There was a decent chance of a wagon forming on me, scum would want to get on early.
Why is everyone scumreading me for a post that wasn't particularly good but was in no way scummy? Only way in which that could be scummy is if vedith was scum, and why would you vote me rather than an existing wagon?
Also rainbow you didn't explain your scumread on me.
Rainbow Unicat wrote:I felt you were being overly defensive. I thought it was weird that you felt simple hope was being opportunistic considering their early position on your wagon which was a fairly small wagon so you seemed prematurely upset about it. I think you've spent too much time rehashing the L-1 pressure vote thing and am wondering why you haven't moved on to scumhunting.
In post 151, Randomnamechange wrote:
I felt the timing and style of the vote was opportunistic, not just the position. I keep re-hashing the L-1 thing because people keep asking me about it.
In post 186, Randomnamechange wrote:Please can someone actually give a valid reasob for scumreading me?
In post 187, Rainbow Unicat wrote:Are we scumreading you for the wrong reasons?
Is the answer to our question in 187 yes or no?
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Ok, catching up:
@firebringer, explain your read on ika? You gonna vote soon? You don't seem to be sorting the game.
@ika - I'm pretty sure you are town. Yay. Thoughts on ^? Right now I'd kinda like to lynch him as a) he's not scum-hunting and b) to avoid the noise. (Also, your vote is doing nothing rn. Same for random.)
Ari's posting looks really town to me on the surface, but I paranoid about buddying. @Ari, top scum/town reads? (Are you an alt, your ika comment seemed like you had knowledge ) Can you talk to me about Random some more?
@Veid - I'd like to think you were town, but what's so good about our readslist?
@Montosh, ASP - I have no idea where your heads are at. Questions, thoughts, comments?
Lots of questions, will be around for any you wanna throw this way.
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Fire, that is not an answer to our question, but you picked up on the voting hint
@veid, cool, what does your reads list look like, and why?-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
if that were anybody but jeanne I'd vote that.
@ASP, you have my sympathy. You tried to do her a good turn for her AtE in the signups thread and this is how she repays you, eh? Anyway, I know this sort of behaviour isn't alignment indicative for her and I'll try to read you based on your own play.
@Jeanne don't talk about ongoing games.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@Heartless: So you write a post saying that you think people's problem with anti is his playstyle, and then you write a post basically attacking us for ours. That's nice.
Neither of us are particularly enjoying this game; maybe that's what you're picking up on about us.
Spent a while reading the thread in order to see if I could see where anti was coming from about the newbie game and where you were coming from about people scumreading anti for his playstyle, because I hadn't remembered there being anybody scumreading you (except for firebringer's 25 which looked more like a joke) before anti's newbie game post, but there were quite a few people voicing unease about him in particular after his newbie game post, right before your post about his playstyle (aristophanes, fire, montosh, not sure if I should include bella or not.) So that's fair enough, and I know how frustrating it is to be scumread for non alignment indicative playstyle reasons that I cannot help.
Anyway, I stared at your ISO for a while to see if you were doing more than just tunnelling us and you have in fact interacted with all the slots in the game so far. You don't seem to have the right amount of townreads, but it's early yet I suppose.
So far you've pushed everyone at least a little bit, except for ika, varian, vedith, and wanderer. I guess those are your townreads.
There are a few concerns with your ISO but I'll wait another 10 pages before pointing them out because it's premature at this time. If you're town, they'll fix themselves.
The firebringer complaint was fair enough, especially given wanderer's experience with him. Also, I've been growing uneasy about sharing a wagon with DoNotTrustMe. I could do Random or DoNotTrustMe toDay.
VOTE: RandomMidget L-2
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Yeah, I can't tell you apart because you're both looking at the game from a very similar perspective and taking similar stances to each other. Also, I've never played with either of you before. All I know about anti is that sometimes keyboard mashing so if he does that then I know it's him, but otherwise no clue. Keyboard mash more often if you want Plotinus to know who's talking.In post 253, Heartless wrote:In post 249, Rainbow Unicat wrote:@Heartless: So you write a post saying that you think people's problem with anti is his playstyle, and then you write a post basically attacking us for ours. That's
congrats on showing you have no idea which one of us is posting
I'm in 6 games and this game is literally last priority. That's just how it worked out. I'm still playing but myHeartless wrote:GIVE ME A POST WITH A HEARTisn't in this one. I'm sorry.<3
Anyway last night I had either a gamesolving stroke of genius or a flight of fancy (probably the latter because lol page 11. + day 1 preflip associatives are terribad, but Bella sees it too for one of the links; the other is more tenuous and it's complicated by the fact that they're townreading me and I'm going through this phase or something where I react to being townread with extreme paranoia that I then have to figure out how to resolve without polluting the gamethread with it).
UNVOTE: randommidget just in case it was the former.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Not reading the thread is a towntell?
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@firebringer, why is heartless town? What changed from 185? What happened to make you switch off your montosh vote so early? Random only made one post inbetween...
@Veid, thoughts on mont and asp? Them, with donot and random do seem like 'okay' lynches, but a lot of your 'ok' lynches are lurkers. (Wondering why Ika gets your top 'not lynch spot', tbh)
@heart, heart comments are noted, but the game seems slow and I'm wondering what you wanted out of us with the early push. I'm a little frustrated at the fact the top three posters are ika (who hates day 1), your slot which I'm having trouble sorting, and firebringer who is, at times, incomprehensible We'll do better tomorrow. <3-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 281, Bellaphant wrote:Hey, I meant Simple hope, I forgot they were hydra-ing
Little interest means vt? I can't agree with you there - can you expand?
picking up bella's post-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
let's go back to wagonning vedith. I'm going to make a case. This PR hunting thing is just the cherry on top. There's a lot more to talk about in his ISO.
VOTE: Vedith
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 15, Vedith wrote:Evening all.
weak entrance.
In post 40, Vedith wrote:I'm not worried about the votes on me. A little too easy of a wagon without a real reason, but hey.
I townread him this initially but now it looks like "hey look at me not being worried"
Vedith 40 wrote:As for a vote, i'll go with the theory of 3rd vote is always scum.
VOTE: TheCow
Weak reason for a vote. Did you find this on some wiki page that hasn't been updated since 2006?
In post 68, Vedith wrote:I guess you missed the 'votes before me' part. Meaning the votes before my post. Couldn't see one from you so my comment still stands.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not worried to if you find me scum or town yet because in my opinion, no one should be read as town yet anyway. I'm just making sure that people don't think I'm not interested in the game.
Overly concerned with how he looks and wanting to appear nonchalant, yet most of his comments to this point are about the wagon on him and about how unconcerned he is about it. This is reminding me of the time when I was 8 that I was trying to be quiet and sneaky so i talked out loud about how quiet and sneaky i was being as if doing so would make me invisible.
In post 155, Vedith wrote:Going through the posts, there is so much waste that Mafia can hide easily under this imo. I'll be looking through to anyone who looks additionally quieter than before hand.
That hasn't been my impression of this game at all. If anything, it's been overly quiet.
Vedith, 155 wrote:Given that, if Ika can read certain people well that is always good for us unless he is Mafia of course (I can't see a bold move like to being structured so early without pressure).
This is doubtcasting and i see it a lot in games where a newer player is trying to keep the lynch pool open as wide as they can, being suspicious of the more experienced players or being suspicious of players who will be an asset to the town if they're town. If you're town, the player you're saying that has a 75% chance of being town. Casting suspicion on people with experience or who are coming out and taking responsibility for being able to read other people is not getting us closer to solving the game.
Vedith, 155 wrote:I'm not sure what Firebringer aims to gain with his actions, but saying that you are trying to buddy with people as a strategy could be to divert attention from being scum.
what does this even mean?
In post 190, Vedith wrote:In post 188, DonotTrustMe wrote:Haven't really seen much from Firebringer.
I agree with Firebringer. How can you vote him for being not posting a lot when he has been more productive than yourself?
And in fairness, so many posts on here have side tracked from scum hunting which is partially the reason it is a lot slower now imo.
In your last post, it looked like you were attacking Firebringer when you said you're not sure what he's aiming to gain with his actions. The tone of that disapproving so it looked like you were pushing him. Now you're agreeing with him and trying to work together with him. hmm.
In post 226, Vedith wrote:
As I said earlier, DNTM is a low poster in general but his vote on Firebringer is such a weak vote as there are many players without proper participation.
I see Firebringer as too bold to put him higher on my scum list, but it looks like that he is trying to push attention over to someone who will stand out.
What? You're agreeing with DNTM in one sentence that we haven't seen much from Firebringer -- you say the vote is only weak because there are other people who are acting similarly, not because it isn't true. But in the next breath you say that he has been too bold in his contributions to be scum, which means you feel you have seen much from Firebringer. And then the "but" clause towards the end so that you can position yourself to go back on this read later if you have to. This reeks of "I don't want to mislynch him...yet."
Vedith, 226 wrote:
The top 3 people that I feel would be a beneficial lynch overall are obviously TheCow, RandomMidget and DNTM.
If anything, these 3 will provide information imo without voting for someone that I feel less scum about.
You want to lynch these three people "for information"
Spoiler: obligatory meme
This is a lukewarm temperature sweep of current suspicions, nothing more.
In post 228, Vedith wrote:Well, I mainly mean the voting. My main point to that comment was that I feel these 3 are scummier than the others, any lynch will give information overall.
They're the 3 people who had the most heat on them, that's for sure.
Vedith 228 wrote:It's interesting that you are stating that you don't scum read TheCow. If TheCow flipped scum, I would expect this too be far too obvious for you to also be scum considering they are currently in vote lead.
What does this even mean? A minute ago you also didn't include TheCow in the acceptable lynch pool, now you find it interesting that someone else doesn't?
Vedith, 228 wrote:Well, I'm starting to lean to DNTM, just because of his last vote, but TheCow hasn't really done enough to justify the easy swap from myself to RandomMidget without an actual reason (Even if he did unvote after people questioned).
you are thinking waaaaay too much about who you're properly positioned to vote. This is not a town mindset.
Vedith, 228 wrote:RandomMidget is my least favorite to lynch out of those 3. I think the reason most people suspect him more is because of putting me to L1, right? Well, I don't think that's an unreasonable move from him.
He's in your lynch pool, but you don't have your own reasons for wanting him lynched. You only have other people's reasons that they found him suspicious for putting you at L1. And you want to stress that you don't mind being put at L1, that you are nonchalant and laid back about this whole thing. Look at me I'm so sneaky nobody can see me if I talk loudly about how sneaky I am.
Vedith, 228 wrote:I also think that if either Ika or Firebringer were to flip Mafia, the other would most likely flip town.
Preflip associatives are bad. If one of these two flips town and Vedith goes after the other one, remember this post.
In post 234, Vedith wrote:In post 232, Rainbow Unicat wrote:@Veid - I'd like to think you were town, but what's so good about our readslist?
As in who is scummier than others. A few tweaks and I it's a long the lines of what I think.
okay this was interesting both because I checked and I couldn't find any mention of us in Vedith's ISO before this post, so bella must have been confused about who had complimented our readslist, but Vedith himself doesn't notice this either, doesn't say "I haven't said anything about your readslist" (please someone linking me if he said something after all but I checked his ISO and I used ctrl f and the word "reads" doesn't even appear in his ISO before now, same for "rainbow" which is what he calls us later so idk). Instead he just casually accepts it as if he'd said something about our reads list and tries to substantiate what he thinks he said about us.
So what's good about our reads list? he doesn't know; he vaguely thinks he agrees with it, would change a few things but doesn't say what those things are, doesn't ask us to explain the reads he disagrees with or try to convince of us anything. It's almost like he hasn't read our readslist at all.
In post 252, Vedith wrote:@Rainbow, here are my reads (Although I'm more of a bad lynch good lynch rather than town or Mafia).
ok, but you could just call bad lynch = town, ok lynch = null, good lynch = scum.
Vedith, 252, the bad lynch aka town category wrote:Ika - Can be read well apparently by Rainbow. (I would suggest that this is looked out for later game for if both are Mafia). Ika seems to have a lot of wasteful posts but I'd like to give the benefit of the doubt here.
You put Ika in the town category but you talk about him the way you talk about a nullscum read.
Vedith,252, the bad lynch aka town category wrote:Firebringer - Comes across as scummy but as I already said, far too bold imo.
Too scummy to be scum? I mean, I agree with you that Firebringer is probably town and making waves like he is doing is beneficial but.
Vedith, 252, the bad lynch aka town category wrote:Aristophanes - Only 5 posts, but they seem to be good posts with decent information.
Aristophanes had a predecessor; Persivul. Persivul had 13 posts. Persivul had the same role PM that Aristophanes now has. I'm also townreading them but why are you ignoring Persivul's contributions?
Vedith, 252, the bad lynch aka town category wrote:Heartless - Just makes it into this slot, pretty active and in your face with opinions, however, I think that some of the opinions seem like they are all over the place.
translation: "they're scumhunting and being active and having opinions but I need to be able to turn on them later." Keep sitting on that fence and you'll go the way of Humpty Dumpty.
Veidth, 252, the ok lynch aka null category wrote:Varian- - The focus on RandomMidget worries me. He says that a part of the reason if because he hasn't been scum hunting but that could be said for a few.
This is not an ok reason to lynch someone before there are flips to work with.
Vedith, 252, the ok lynch aka null category wrote:Montosh - I haven't really seen much information which can be classed as useful so far.
the lurker, yeah.
Vedith, 252, the ok lynch aka null category wrote:A Simple Hope - I haven't seen anything that hasn't already been said. This is one of the main people that I mean in Varian's comment. I haven't yet seen any scummy actions either but it is hard when they only have 7 posts.
another lurker.
Vedith, 252, the good lynch aka scum category wrote:TheCow - Well, I'm voting for TheCow so I would obviously think a good lynch. Al though I would appreciate involvement once he is back for me to change my mind. Still unhappy with how easily he voted for me and unvoted.
You've been voteparked on TheCow since . Voteparking is scummy. TheCow's just another lurker like Montosh and Simple Hope.
Vedith, 252, the good lynch aka scum category wrote:DNTM - I really just don't like his vote reason, apart from that I haven't seen him play any differently to when I last played with him.
another tepid opinion about a slot that has been getting some attention.
Vedith, 252, the good lynch aka scum category wrote:RandomMidget - I still think that this argument against him was formed too easily. That being said, now he is at L2, I would like to see what he has to say.
translation: "everyone else is voting him, but i wouldn't mind voting him too, but he's probably not scum" this is really fencesitty.
In post 259, Vedith wrote:Post [post]45, Post 64, Post 75, Post 109, Post 134, Post 149 And I think you can see my point.
All of these posts are giving reads on people or questions that seem to follow up with the reads. I haven't really seen anything scummy, even after your idea of the reaction to being called 'her'.
I feel like you're white knighting us here but I'm also going through a really annoying paranoia phase where I overreact to being townread or defended so IDEK but I'm trying not to pollute the thread with it because I know it's not going to make things better.
In post 265, Vedith wrote:What's the rush?
I'm not the type to keep flicking backwards and forwards with votes. I'll say my peace, and vote accordingly.
piece.
Also, you're not in danger of flicking backwards and forwards with your votes. You've been voteparked on TheCow since 40. You've spent so much time worrying about whether you've positioned yourself properly to vote somebody else or not and hemming and hawing that you've fallen into the other scummy category of not moving your vote often enough.
Also the rush is that the deadline is in 3 days (5, at the time of your post).
In post 276, Vedith wrote:I'm hoping that with all of these prods that there will be a lot more input within the next 4 days.
(Going to sound like a broken record) I'm not really sure what more there is to go forward without more participation in productive posting.
This post does not further the game state or contribute to it and its only purpose is to improve your image.
In post 280, Vedith wrote:Well, Montosh seems to have little interest in the game so I would lean to VT.
And here the PR hunting starts. (Also, I think you're bad at PR hunting but you should get one of your buddies to explain it to you tonight. I'm guessing you don't have daytalk or someone would have yelled at you in private by now.)
Vedith, 280 wrote:Aristophanes has good posts for me so far and hasn't posted for the sake of posting, or so it seems.
Unlike you.
In post 283, Vedith wrote:@Wanderer - How is me saying that putting me at L1 is reasonable countering against having pressure on him? You have just put different comments together to make them look like one. Not sure I like this scum like tactic from you, buddy.
Even if a person from my bad lynch section was on L2 I wouldn't object.
Because you don't really care who gets lynched, do you?
Vedith, 283 wrote:@Rainbow - Not much to expand on. Keep in mind I only said lean to VT, not "He is VT". Just reading to what little he has said makes me think that even if you disagree.
lol, no.
In post 287, Vedith wrote:Again... I never said "I THINK THIS GUY IS A VT". I was asked my opinion and I gave it.
I guess you chose to ignore that part.
Right, but town isn't trying to differentiate the VTs from the masons. We're trying to differentiate the masons from the scum because both groups will have associative tells (which is another reason that preflip associatives are going to be lolbad in this game.)
Scum very much want to differentiate the VTs from the masons. And that's what you're trying to do. Even if you're wrong about Montosh, you're not helping town by speculating on the topic, you're helping scum. But I think you are scum so it's understandable.
In post 289, Vedith wrote:Well that's the thing, there are many things this could be productive for. However, going into detail would easily benefit scum.
SEE YOU DEMONSTRATE THAT YOU KNOW THAT PR HUNTING HELPS SCUM AND YET YOU DID IT ANYWAY.
Vedith, 289 wrote:Let me ask you this, If most people say "X is town", how does that help town? If they are, won't they be a prime target?
If most people say "X looks scummy" If they are town, isn't that giving scum a shield to play on?
lol, no. I could explain what was wrong with this but I'm not interested in coaching you on your nightkill choices. You should have asked your buddies to explain it to you tonight; now you'll have to ask in the dead thread because you're getting lynched.
In conclusion, Vedith is scum, let's flash wagon him.-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
lol i messed up the post tags in one part. should have previewed probably.
tl;dr: Vedith is scum because:
weak entrance
overly concerned with how he looks
voteparking
reads progression doesn't make sense (and barely exists)
reasons for his reads are pretty bad too
temperature sweeping
PR hunting
scum mindset not town mindset-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
--Plotinus obviously. Bella could have said it more concisely.-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@Vedith: I have made a lot of points against you. If I'm wrong, engage with some of the points. I am not infallible, but I do think I'm right about you.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Vedith wrote:weak entrance - Explained this, last (completed) game I just voted someone as RVS and I was called scum for doing it.
overly concerned with how he looks - I'm more or less concerned now because with less time now to go, I can see this giving a mis lynch, before hand it was more of a case of me answering or trying to be involved rather than concerned how I look.
voteparking - I don't understand this one from you. I'm happy where my vote is, why would that be a reason for me being scum?
reads progression doesn't make sense (and barely exists) - Well, they obviously make more sense to myself as I wrote them, but I can see where you are coming from on here. This thread has been harder than others I've seen to express full opinions on people because of the amount of wasteful posts early on.
reasons for his reads are pretty bad too - As above
temperature sweeping
PR hunting - That is hardly PR hunting.
scum mindset not town mindset - Really not the case, scum mindset would be watching you lot have half the town inactive and just join in, imo of course.
As I said, to why I'm not scum that's my opinion above. However, if each day it's going to ping back to me making me a scum shield, then you might as well just get the lynch over with.
I'll just learn going forward to lurk more in future games and not try to force talk.
I've been thinking about you seriously for three days, actually. Since sometime on page 10, though I'm not sure I could put my finger on it anymore what exact post started me thinking about you.
The answer isn't to lurk more in future games and I'm sorry that I've made you feel that way. I don't think you're bad at mafia. If you're town, I will appologise to you in depth in the postgame or the dead thread. A lot of the things I'm accusing you of are subtle things, not obvious mistakes, so take it as a compliment to your scumgame.
entrance: yeah, RVS is hard at first. people will call you scum in RVS no matter what you do but they're mostly doing it to see how you respond to them doing it. I thought youdidrespond well to it this game, but then all this other stuff happened that made me change my mind on you.
voteparking: you put your vote on the cow in post 40. since then, you've mostly ignored them. you talked about them some but you haven't tried to interact with them (which is hard with a lurker but you can always ask them questions and see if they respond eventually or not). you didn't announce that you read was now serious at some point. they're a lurker. a few people said they're always just kinda like that. also, since they're a lurker and haven't really been around to feel pressured by your vote, your vote on them isn't doing much at all. your vote is half of your arsenal in scumhunting if you're town.
Also in one of my games one of the scum spent more than half of his ISO talking about how his votepark on somebody else (who happened to be opposing scum team but that's not why he was voting him).
reads progression: as the game plays out, people post stuff and you read it and then your opinion of them changes based on what they post. For town aligned players, changes of mind make some amount of sense given the game state even if they're ultimately wrong. There are a few different ways scummy reads progressions can look. The problem with your reads progression is primarily that we can't see where you're coming from or why you go from defending a slot to scumreading it or visa versa:
You go from weakly defending donot in 65 to negative on him in 190 but it's not really clear what happened to change your mind. you flipflop a lot on firebringer (-155 +190 -+226 -+228 -230 +252), ika goes from negative in 155 to positive in 226 to positive and negative both at the same time in 228 and then positive in 252), montosh is null in 252 and positive in 280. the cow is consistently negative except for 226 which is a bit of both positive and negative at once. Your opinion on other slots has not changed yet.
You're not being graded on accuracy (scum after all can be 100% right about their reads if they choose to be and we can only judge your accuracy on our own slots of course). Townies are wrong about their reads all the time anyway.
Temperature sweepingis something scum do to try to figure out which (mis)lynches are viable and which of their buddies are in danger, then they can decide to signal boost lynches that are popular. Only scumreading people who are popularly considered scummy is a sign of temperature sweeping and/or going after low hanging fruit. (You didn't reply to this one so I'm assuming you're not familiar with the buzzword.)
about the PR hunting: well, no, technically it's the reverse, vanilla hunting. I don't have an opinion on whether montosh is vanilla (town or mafia goon) or pr, though I think your reasons for thinking he's vanilla are weak. But vanilla hunting narrows the pool of potential masons, so it's antitown.
scum mindset: not about the trying to get people more active thing[1]. it's more about posts that look like you're positioning yourself to vote one way or another in the future.
[1] my complaint aboutthatwas that it wasLAMIST(look at me i'm so town) to which the obvious counter is how can I tell whether you're doing it because you're actually town or because you're trying to imitate your town meta, and the answer is that I can't but fortunately it's not the cornerstone of my case against you.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
I agree that the lurkers should be poked and prodded until they start participating, but I also think we should be consolidating and avoiding a deadline scramble, so they should probably be pressured with words rather than votes at this stage.
Donot, cow, asp, montosh, your slots have less posts than the mod does. Asp has posted recently, looking forward to seeing more from him. The rest of you need to start having opinions and sharing them.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
...no? What about my posting gives you the impression that I think he's town?
I'm being civil towards him, but I think he's scum.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@Wanderer: hope it gets better and hope you'll be able to stay, but no hard feelings if you can't. Take care of yourself.
@Heartless: can you unpack that a bit for me? Why do you like where our heads are at if you think the person I'm pushing will flip town?
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@wanderer, *hugs*
plot's added everything else
@random, what was your plan? :S-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 340, Wingback wrote:VOTE: Rainbow Unicat
Their case on Vedith in Post 295 is poor and reeks of opportunism.
- Scumreading Vedith for a "weak entrance" is bad when spending 30 seconds to look at Vedith's other games will tell you that Vedith has entered the game in a similar way before as town (here's a sample).
- Townreading Vedith for Post 40 and then scumreading him for the same post doesn't make any sense. But the initial townread occurred when the RVS-wagon was dissipating. The scumread occured when other players threw around the possibility of a Vedith lynch.
- The criticism of Vedith's Post 155 and Post 190 is unwarranted. Firebringer said something that doesn't make sense and Vedith questioned it. Firebringer then correctly accused DNTM of hypocrisy. So, Vedith agreed with him. Rainbow twisted a perfectly normal thought process into a scummy contradiction.
- Taking a minute to look at a Vedith reads list in another game where he was town will tell you that there's nothing to be concerned about. He just thinks in terms of good/bad lynches, is hesitant to lynch active players and thinks lurkers are good lynches.
- The PR-hunting accusation is terrible. Scum will keep what they learned about PRs to themselves to talk to their partners at night, not post it in the thread for all to see.
- Asking Firebringer for links to scumgames in Post 75 show they care about meta. But for whatever reason, they cbf to spend 2-3 minutes looking over Vedith's meta.
The entire case looks like an opportunistic way to jump on the Vedith suspicion floating around without taking any care to understand Vedith's thought process.
Other stuff I found scummy:
- Their push on Firebringer was weak and they keep their vote there while calling him "too scummy to be scum."
- Their stances for the most part just go with the flow. Despite having an early townread on Random in Post 45, they switch him to a scumread in Post 109 which is suspicious considering Random was getting a lot of pressure and attention and the reasoning is pretty weak (random didn't explain what he learned from a vote).
- Their play this game reads like scum trying to mimic the direction that the town's going in and playing it safe.
nice chainsaw. If Vedith flips scum, I'm coming after you toMorrow.
Guys, the scumteam is Vedith/Wingback/Heartless. I saw it on page 10 but the connections just keep getting stronger between them. Trust me please. You can try to lynch me toMorrow if you still want to but we need to lynch Vedith toDay.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 352, Vedith wrote:So what's the connections?
If I were lynched and then flip town, would that stop focus on Heartless and Wingback?
Why are you saying for us to lynch you day 2 if people still want to. You seem so sure that I am scum, and surely if I flipped scum then people wouldn't vote you tomorrow?
This shows me that you have either doubt of knowledge of your claim on me.
I'm not a daycop, so of course I'm not 100% sure. But I'm pretty sure.
And this very post has you assuming that you'll flip scum! What I was actually saying was that if you flipped town I would understand why people would be suspicious of me and might want to try to vote me tomorrow for being wrong. But I don't think I'm wrong about you, and clearly you don't either.
Montosh's replacement chainsaw defending you is one connection. His ties to you were weaker until that happened. I was on the fence about whether I had actually solved the game or not until I read that post.
If I explain too much, you'll start trying to avoid doing the things I'm looking at, which would be telling in its own way. I'd rather go after you one at a time. You're first.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 354, Vedith wrote:I was giving a scenario, obviously I won't flip scum, you just seemed so sure but yet basically saying to lynch you tomorrow.
yet you didn't even consider the scenario in which you might flip town. I said they cantryto lynch me tomorrowif people still want to. If I'm right about you, why would they still want to? If I stop being right at a later point in the game then they could start wanting to again understandably. I am anticipating that people will neither still want to lynch me nor will they succeed if they try, but they can call my bluff on that if they choose to. You on the other hand are anticipating that you'll flip scum.
[qoute="Vedith 354"]Does that mean that shaddowez is also my buddy? I mean, his comment on me was more for than against, right?[/quote]
nah. I think now that he's probably mislynch bait. you're looking at this in an overly simplistic way. And he didn't chainsaw defend you.
I asked for what connections, you have only provided the latest comment on Wingback as one but yet you said Heartless is linked with me?
It's too easy to say XX and YY have connections but I won't say because I don't want them to change what they are doing.
I don't want to do it toDay. I cannot lynch all 3 of you toDay and focusing on all 3 of you at once isn't going to work. We'll talk about associatives after you've flipped.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Maybe they're saving him for later? But you're right, I have no reason in particular to think that donot was bad town instead of scum (I haven't seen enough of shaddowez by himself to make a decision about him yet). If I'm wrong about Vedith, I'll look at cases like donot/shaddowez more closely (not because there's any interaction that says if vedith is town then donot is more likely to be scum, but because if i'm wrong about vedith then obviously it's not vedith/montosh/heartless, so it'll be time to re-evaluate the whole game, even though i do also have reasons for thinking each of them are scum independently of the others. but one person at a time)
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Guys, we're nowhere near a lynch rn and we've got 22 hours. With masons in the game we don't wanna scramble for a quick lynch, so we need to consolidate now. Wingback, heartless, aristo, wanderer, fire, dup and veid your votes need to be being more useful (and heartless is on vla).
Fire, especially: your vote on us is sheeping and came out of no where. What has happened to your other reads?
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
1) My case on Vedith is not built on associatives. I could build an independent case for any of you but I'm focusing on Vedith today.
2) It is not bananas when Plotinus does it.
3) the associatives are only getting stronger between the people actually posting, obv.
4) defending Vedith is only a small part of it.
5) i'm not getting lynched today please vote vedith.-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
lol
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
You're just scared of my town game.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
No, I take that back, since I'm not scumreading you. I'm sorry, I'm a bit touchy right now because of offline stuff. You're scared because you find me hard to read. But you should just take my word for it today that Vedith is scum and if I'm wrong then you can come after me tomorrow.
pedit: heh.
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Or assume i'm bussing and hop on. whichever.
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
If I'm right about you today that you are scum, then I'm going after someone else that I think I'm right about tomorrow.
If I'm wrong about you today and you are town after all, then I am willing to face the wrath of the rest of the town (they can try and fail to lynch me tomorrow if they want), and I will be more open to listening to who other people want to lynch (like shaddowez).
What is so hard to understand about this. There is no contradiction.
--Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Veid's vote too way too long to get to us, if he thought our case on him was scummy.
@mod, how long 'til deadline?
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Okay, the real reason I’m being cagey and not explaining my opinions in detail is that my cat is dying and I’m having trouble focusing on anything but her right now. Details in the sad thread if you care. I was trying to not go on v/la until she actually died but it’s becoming clear that I’m not fit for company right now.
I will continue trying to post as I’m able. I will stay caught up enough to have opinions in the hydra pt at the very least. I’m sorry.
Plotinus head is v/la for a while, more la than v.
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
@Veid - do you know what, I forgot ika was even here they haven't posted content in a week. Why is this a bad lynch?
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Fire's random vote is terribad.
@ika, thoughts and feels now you are back?
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
i'm v/la, but i'm not too v/la to be active in a private thread if i have access to one and/or submit night actions if I have them. I have some of the +- done from yesterday's day phase; I'm behind on it but I did have it complete for several slots. Also, because of the way I work, +- is a lot easier than actually interacting with people and it's a soothing distraction and stuff. I probably could have hit a mason even though I didn't manage to hit a scum yesterday. I am sorry about Vedith and about my behaviour in general yesterday.
I have no idea why the fuck I wasn't nightkilled when I was pretty clearly baiting the nightkill. There are several reasons I think my remaining scumreads would have killed me if they were scum and while I am getting paranoid that I've been left alive so that I'll incorrectly reconsider my reads, Ijusttried doing that in a recently completed scumgame (n1628) and it backfired really badly so I don't even know.
If it's not wingback/heartless/???? then who the fuck is it? Meanwhile, there are people who towards the end of yesterday clearly thought I could be mislynch bait today but I was kinda townreading them for it at the time and now I have to either reconsider that or figure out if they're being framed. ffs I was supposed to be in the dead thread and then I'd be down to a much more manageable 3 ongoing games.
I had suspected wingback was an alt, and now clearly they're someone who has either played with me before or seen me around and respects me as a player despite having just learned that my day 1 play is weaksauce. (I'm not prying; the information that I already have is sufficient for me to draw my own conclusions about your alignment.) People who have played with me before have the sense to night kill me.
It's really hard for me to unsee a pattern once I see it and inertia makes it hard for me to change tracks but I'm trying to reconsider stuff.
@Wingback, I'd had a response typed out to your post 340 but I didn't get it posted before the night phase happened. I saved it, and I'll post it behind a spoiler, but editing it to take into account that vedith flipped town is beyond my capabilities right now. Your defense of vedith was clearly not a chainsaw, though. I'm sorry for saying that it was.
Spoiler: reply to your points from 340
also i'm still on v/la for another week but i may be getting into a state where I need to use mafia as a distraction instead of not wanting to be distracted so maybe you'll see more of me.
—Plotinus-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Hi Ika, would appreciate input on where your head is at. Don't worry about FB, he doesn't have a case on is and is flinging votes around. @FB - stop being bad, as BBT likes to say. At least give us something to engage with about your vote.
Also, in terms of random, it's not a town-read per-se, it's just people's reason for wanting him to be the lynch were going for the easy option. I'll iso the slot and get back to you with a firmer read.
Heartless and Wanderer are prolly right about the NK. Also, Ika is alive day 2 so this slot can't be scum
@heartless, what are you implying about masons? I'm bad at subtext tonight.
@mod, I know we've had a night phase but Simple Hope and Random haven't posted in a few hours under a week - what's going on with those slots?
-b-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
Fire, do you want to talk? Is this about how you townread me in Lazy Mod Mafia? We can talk about that now that it's over if you want. Is this because you're mad that I was wrong about Vedith? Because I was wrong about Vedith. I saw something that wasn't there about Vedith. (Sorry Vedith, it's not you, it's me.)
It feels like you've unvoted us because nobody is listening to you, not because you're no longer scumreading us. I still mostly feel like this argument between us is TvT so I'd like to resolve it in some way if we can. You can ask me anything you like and I will answer to the best of my ability.
Do you have any other scumreads besides us and Ika who has been defending us?
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
oh, yeah, it's nighttime in America. I forgot.
I wasn't interpreting it as a grudge, more like "wow, I townread them incorrectly in that one game, maybe I've townread them incorrectly here, too," because you started getting paranoid of us right after we flipped scum there so that's why I thought that.
I didn't think Vedith was an easy target when I started suspecting him. There'd been early wagon against him but he'd defended himself pretty well and most of the suspicion had died down. It's true that some suspicion was rising again due to the PR hunting thing, and I did feel that I had more material on him than on my other scumreads to make a case with, but I thought donot, random, and thecow (and simple hope when I can remember that they're in this game) were all much lower hanging fruit at the time and I probably would have had an easier time lynching any of them than I did with lynching Vedith. I had to push pretty hard to get him lynched and that just confirmation biased me further because usually it's pretty easy to lynch town because scum will help you.
I went after Vedith because I believed that he was scum and because I had given into the siren call of preflip associatives when I do actually know better than to do that I was just...being bad. But the prefliip associatives were more like icing on a cake that I thought was already baked. It was nice that Vedith seemed to fit in with my other scumreads, but I left the reasons I thought he fit in with them out of my case on him because I did feel my case stood alone.
I'm now in the position of having to figure out if my other scumreads still make sense and if one of the people I had previously classified as low hanging fruit is actually scum instead, independently. It is also possible that I'm townreading someone incorrectly.
So that's where I'm at.
--P-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
In post 480, Heartless wrote:In post 473, Rainbow Unicat wrote:Fire, do you want to talk?
I definitely do because I've come back full circle into scum reading you. Now that Vedith flipped town and your credibility's taken a hit, you've bunkered down into this "uncertainty" loop and that wouldn't bother me if not for the fact that there's no evidence that Bella's making any attempt to clear the logjam.
Is there anything in particular you want to talk to me about?
I agree it would be nice if the head that wasn't v/la was posting more often.
town: wanderer, aristophanes
probably town: maybe ika, maybe firebringer
lurksacks: duppin, simple hope
still feel like they're scum but they would have nightkilled me probably: wingback, heartless
scummy but my read on them is kind of stale at the moment: randomidget, shaddowez
also I think I liked some of wingback's posts today. i've disliked quite a few of firebringer's posts today. there might have been a shaddowez post or two that I liked as well.
-p-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015
The reason the ika read is slipping is because Bella expected him to be paranoid of her after she won a recent scum game against him. He isn't showing signs of that so that worries me. The reason the firebringer read is slipping is because he still thinks we're mislynchable and also because he's having a hard time articulating why he's scumreading us, which can happen when you're trying to fabricate a read sometimes; I feel like if he were town I'd have an easier time seeing where he's coming from with his read on us even though it's incorrect. and his reads list doesn't match my understanding of the game state very closely.
There are several people that I'm perhaps giving too many points to for being obtuse. There is plenty of stuff in games that I only pick up on when I'm in an informed minority because having some of the information makes it easier to see what other people are doing and anticipate it and get around it.
The lurksacks are lurksacks and need to post more.
Montosh was pretty lacklustre. He was a lurker who all he really did was attack another lurker. Wingback seems competent enough so reading them accurately will take effort and I'll need to see more posts from them. I want to see how they respond to my response to 340. I think that even though Vedith was town, trying to start the wagon on shaddowez wasn't good because we were so close to the deadline we were in danger of a no lynch. They also didn't really stay around to drive the wagon which is what they would need to do if they really wanted another wagon to take off, so it looked like someone who knew that Vedith would flip town and wanted towncred for staying off the wagon. I think wanderer might have said something along those lines too? Their comment at me in 431 is why I thought they would have had the sense to nightkill but now i'm getting paranoid that the entire point of that comment was to say 'hey look i didn't night kill you but i would have'. ugh.
I'm wary of discussing you because I feel like if I tell you what in specific is bothering me you'll just take care to not do it again or to fix it. There are signs that worry me. Now that you have computer access again you might fix it all on your own. It's the sort of things that will usually solve themselves for a town aligned player who is reasonably active and paying attention to a game. I want to give you time to get your heads into the game without my telling you what you need to do to get me to townread you. But I will make an actual case and explain in plain English what I've been noticing when I'm ready.
I'll look at random and shaddowez again. Shaddowez may have been getting obtuse points and random was just the easy reasons like he wasn't scumhunting enough and mostly was being reactionary instead of proactive.
-p-
-
Rainbow Unicat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 264
- Joined: July 24, 2015