I like omgus votes best!!
VOTE: juckter
In post 21, ika wrote:In post 20, duppin wrote:I forced no one. I asked him to confess. I take it you have something to confess as well?
yes, im a vt
In post 28, ika wrote:In post 25, duppin wrote:Dying is not very enjoyable though.
actualy i would fine it to be the best thign to happen to me
In post 32, The Enigma wrote:I don't like duppin's posts commencing Ika's vote on him. It feels awkward and rather emotionless. I get the feeling he's trying too hard to not react to it which makes it strange.
VOTE: duppin
I'll sheep.
In post 34, Vedith wrote:@Firebringer - How many games have you played with Duppin and what did he flip?
In post 36, The Enigma wrote:Firebringer, how can you be so confident to say "That's not a duppin post" if you've only played one game with him that's still ongoing?
In post 97, Yimmy wrote:Duppin for top town read.
Firebringer has posted mostly fluff.
VOTE: Firebringer
In post 102, 4nxi3ty wrote:Why, do usually get read as scum in games?
cause from my pov your posting has been fairly transparent
In post 113, Yimmy wrote:It's alot harder to do things when one doesn't understand half the things said.
Is there something wrong with making people talk? As far as I know to scumhunt, people need to have said things, and the more things the more info to go on. Frankly, I don't fancy lynching people based on one thing they've said.
Fluff will never accomplish anything, questions will get info.
In post 127, Yimmy wrote:Forwhomthejellyrolls, sorry I missed your question about what I learned.
My first question started like half the discussion in the game.
I learned what duppin meant
I learned what firebringer was trying to say.
The rest where ignored or avoided
Yes, 3 of those where so I could understand what people where saying
firebringer oh man 1 question out of 6 sentences is 100% questions also I'm good at math
In post 140, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Are you scumreading him? My vote is a day one policy lynch for declaring intention without acting on it.
If you are scum reading ASP, you are pretty much guilty of the same crime.
In post 148, A Simple Plan wrote:
Null at worst, slight town lean. I think his posting has at least been more productive than the "fluff" Firebringer is claiming it is. In particular, 90 follows my line of thinking, and 42 at least offers a good comment toward Ika that I agree with. Granted, he could be more active, but by the same line of reasoning, I probably ought to be, myself.
In post 151, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:I have 4 possible scum I am reading, which is my criteria for day one having gone on long enough. Wow, mafia really sucks at this game!
In post 164, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:lolzies
Heretic scum!
Realizing its not necessarily scummy to be sassy makes me rethink that Vedith vote by Random a bit.
You have been playing under that account for 2 years, and just now you had the revelation that sassiness isn't scumminess? What influenced you without a flip?
In post 184, Titus wrote:I like Vedith as scum and Druppin as town. Vedith I cannot get a feel for him taking a position anywhere.
VOTE: V
Also how did y'all not notice Hermit asked to lynch Doctor Vahlen who isn't even playing while scumreading him?
In post 183, Yimmy wrote:In post 169, Firebringer wrote:I honestly didn't know you were in this game till you posted lol. How can someone with your name be under radar that much lol
So what I'm reading is you're barely even paying attention to the game.
In post 294, Titus wrote:I resign myself to being right.
I will vote any of those three. No one else.
In post 275, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:@Titus
If town lynches a town Titus on day one, we are not doing ourselves any favors
If you actually look at #259 though, Yimmy did not make a case on me. Your claim that Yimmy made a case makes me question whether the wagon on me is staged.
In post 310, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:This I am actually pretty passionate about.
For whatever reason, players on MS do not find it scummy or anti-town when someone purposefully signs up to a wagon that is unreachable. Scum do this a lot to avoid being associated with being on a wagon that flips town, but it is also anti-town, because one of the few powers you have in this game is your vote, and it is wasted when you put it on an unreachable wagon!
In post 316, TheWorst wrote:I thought you hated questions! I fear for another question rant if I ask you something.
In post 382, Vedith wrote:Well, not much to go on and 2 people need replacing...
I think Titus being killed was an over shot, there was no need with how the day was left.
The kill on Titus is more of a setup I think rather than taking out a good player.
I would rule Vampirate and 4nxi3ty out for this.
Myself and Firebringer had strong town reads on here so this is where we should go today imo.
VOTE: Firebringer
In post 386, Vedith wrote:I mean strong town reads on Titus...
In post 404, TheWorst wrote:St Constantine the Hermit wrote:C)Kill Titus with the intention of making Vedith, 4xty, and Hermit look guilty
#WIFOM
So you're telling me that mafia wouldn't kill Titus because she's top town, instead would throw a kill at someone on the off-chance that somehow town will find all three she suspected nearly a hundred posts ago guilty? And mislynch them one by one for mafia win?
Gonna call Occam's Razor here for logic.
In my memory and experience, mafia always goes for top town or one of them, after the lynch flip. Or take away a threat to themselves. No WIFOM.