Have we massclaimed already? If not, we should now.
I'm pretty sure that the mafia can in fact waive a kill.In post 1622, WillReplace4Food wrote:Mafia can't holster a shot can they? We would be in a stalemate.
I'm pretty sure that the mafia can in fact waive a kill.In post 1622, WillReplace4Food wrote:Mafia can't holster a shot can they? We would be in a stalemate.
What does that even mean?In post 1631, WillReplace4Food wrote:No claiming in f4
I have thoughts on the setup but that can only be confirmed after seeing your claim. I don't really understand your hesitance here.In post 1643, WillReplace4Food wrote:Have you puzzled out the setup?In post 1641, OceanWind wrote:Great. Now that we established that, I'd like to see your claim and thanks.
What is it telling you?
What purpose does this serve exactly?In post 1647, WillReplace4Food wrote:Just vote no lynch and make them (or you) no kill again like a bitch
I don't give a shit what you are locked in to. Claim your role explicitly.In post 1657, WillReplace4Food wrote:From your POV I'm locked into being a PR, right????In post 1652, OceanWind wrote:Oh really? Is that because I asked for a massclaim when without it, we are as good as throwing the game or is it because I think it's so stupid that I even have to argue this point?
I don't know how much experience WillReplace4Food has but if he's hinting at a PR and not claiming, that's the stupidest thing he could possibly do at this point, not to mention, he could be mafia stalling.
What the fuck do you hope to gain from this?In post 1660, WillReplace4Food wrote:Just vote no lynch thenIn post 1650, Nahdia wrote:We're not no lynching when we have all but one claim. It's pointless, you'll just die.
At this point I just want to fucking finish this.
Give it one more try
Why do you want to vote no lynch if you think mafia will no kill again? The entire point of no lynching is to narrow down the pool of possible mafia. So if we no lynch, we are hoping that they DO kill someone.In post 1647, WillReplace4Food wrote:Just vote no lynch and make them (or you) no kill again like a bitch
No. I'm asking you to claim your role. The thing in your role PM that the mod sent you that specifies what role you have.In post 1667, WillReplace4Food wrote:You're asking me if I explicitly know who the mafia is based on last nights results.
Lol wat
I've played C9++ several times offsite and once here. I understand it very well. I'm aware that you can deduce the setup once you have some roles out there.In post 1676, WillReplace4Food wrote:You apparently don't understand c9++In post 1674, OceanWind wrote:I don't want to POE your fucking role. I want you to state it. I want to hear it from you.
I want every piece of possible information out there before deciding what to do. I don't trust WillReplace4You to be smart enough to disseminate the information himself.In post 1683, Nahdia wrote:This is a really pointless argument.
I don't think we should go to night with the PR outted, but if WR4F doesn't want to claim his specific role that really doesn't matter.
How about telling us your exact role so that we can see for ourselves rather than offering up your little nuggets of wisdom about which setup it is?In post 1686, WillReplace4Food wrote:Lol this is an alt I have over 30 completed long games.
And this is TTT dude
I mean that there's two possibilities of the missing letter in TTT
You are completely missing the point. You think you are so smart that you want to "trick mafia" into not knowing what role you have or what night action you have but you fail to understand that the way to solve the game is to have all the information out on the table.In post 1691, WillReplace4Food wrote:Now that your giant brain has gotten there, do you see what I've been getting at
It makes all the difference in the world to know exactly what we are dealing with.In post 1693, Nahdia wrote:Or, or, you stop dwelling on setup spec that won't make any freaking difference.
What I wanted was for him state "My role is [insert role here]. My night actions are [N1: xx, N2: xx, etc].In post 1702, Nahdia wrote:He already said he doesn't have any game solving info for us, so he doesn't. Your entrance being 5 pages of arguing about setup spec is rad tho.
This makes zero sense. He CAN'T know whether he has game solving info. That's for the town to determine and debate and analyze.In post 1702, Nahdia wrote:He already said he doesn't have any game solving info for us, so he doesn't.
That's an abundantly stupid strategy. You want to handicap the town by having us solve the game with only some pieces of information rather than all of it.In post 1709, Masquerade wrote:And I don't. They're wifom because of the possibility of scum no-killing. All we can do is talk about who our scumread is and then Will can consider those with his results and if he feels it's necessary to share something he can do that.
If we are lynching today and everyone has already claimed or are conftown, there is no reason to conceal anything.In post 1710, Nahdia wrote:I agree with you about lynching today but you're wrong about something else, so please drop this subject.
You mean the previous night? Because as far as I can tell, mafia doesn't have daytalk.In post 1713, Nahdia wrote:I'm wondering if zefiend asked his buddies to help him push Ranger since he really wanted that wagon to go through.
So, you are not just a moron. You are a moron with an attitude.In post 1722, WillReplace4Food wrote:Listen jabroniIn post 1714, OceanWind wrote:No, seriously Masquerade - instead of all of us operating with complete information, you want to handicap us into operating with incomplete information and make it so that Will is the only one with complete info?
Considering his skill level, I don't even trust him to accurately piece together that information and even if he was a good player, I wouldn't trust anyone else to solve the game for me.
The ONLY reason for Will to conceal anything is if we no-lynch. So, Nahdia's logic is pretty flawed because she's both advocating we lynch today AND saying that Will doesn't have to claim. If today is the final day of judgment, why should we not have access to all information? Why do you want to solve the game with half the puzzle pieces and trust Will to do the rest?
If I was an RB, then I'd only have info if I RBd last night and there was a kill. I could clear the person I blocked. As there was no kill, it's possible that mafia no killed or I blocked the kill attempt. I would share the target of my block in this case.
Suffice it to say I'm not a RB.
If I was a 1-shot doc, you're positing that I still had my shot as of last night (night 5?). You really think that's likely? I mean, holstering 4 nights is risky on the border of outright dumb. So, if I used my shot, assume there is no relevant info from that because the person I protected is dead..or alive but I didn't protect them on the night is the missing kill so there is no info to be gleaned from that.
So, you expecting that there is some info that is being withheld is extremely frustrating to me, so much so that I'm compelled to laugh at you for insinuating that I'm the one lacking skill and/or intelligence.
I am left wondering if there is really a persona out there who, as scum, would take this dumbass line while also insisting that we lynch today.
Your pig headed ignorance almost makes me want to just clear you and end this.
But now that it's basically narrowed to you and Masq, I guess I'll just have a read back. Probably just masq though.
If you are town, this is stupid. You should re-evaluate Nahdia.In post 1723, Masquerade wrote:I'm not touching my townread on Nahdia
Like how stupid do you need to be to post a wall full of rubbish to answer a simple question.In post 1722, WillReplace4Food wrote:Listen jabroniIn post 1714, OceanWind wrote:No, seriously Masquerade - instead of all of us operating with complete information, you want to handicap us into operating with incomplete information and make it so that Will is the only one with complete info?
Considering his skill level, I don't even trust him to accurately piece together that information and even if he was a good player, I wouldn't trust anyone else to solve the game for me.
The ONLY reason for Will to conceal anything is if we no-lynch. So, Nahdia's logic is pretty flawed because she's both advocating we lynch today AND saying that Will doesn't have to claim. If today is the final day of judgment, why should we not have access to all information? Why do you want to solve the game with half the puzzle pieces and trust Will to do the rest?
If I was an RB, then I'd only have info if I RBd last night and there was a kill. I could clear the person I blocked. As there was no kill, it's possible that mafia no killed or I blocked the kill attempt. I would share the target of my block in this case.
Suffice it to say I'm not a RB.
If I was a 1-shot doc, you're positing that I still had my shot as of last night (night 5?). You really think that's likely? I mean, holstering 4 nights is risky on the border of outright dumb. So, if I used my shot, assume there is no relevant info from that because the person I protected is dead..or alive but I didn't protect them on the night is the missing kill so there is no info to be gleaned from that.
So, you expecting that there is some info that is being withheld is extremely frustrating to me, so much so that I'm compelled to laugh at you for insinuating that I'm the one lacking skill and/or intelligence.
I am left wondering if there is really a persona out there who, as scum, would take this dumbass line while also insisting that we lynch today.
Your pig headed ignorance almost makes me want to just clear you and end this.
But now that it's basically narrowed to you and Masq, I guess I'll just have a read back. Probably just masq though.
Why do you want to solve the game with incomplete information?In post 1728, Masquerade wrote:Ocean go rtfg instead of getting Will to share his info of which he is explaining it's useless. Nobody is cc'ing him. What is the fucking point? Explain, in deatil, what you would gain from his info.
I'm not sure whether or not I agree. I'll know after I read the thread.In post 1728, Masquerade wrote:No I don't. I'm happy with this townread. If you don't agree, point out to me why she is scum.
This is not an answer to who you protected and when. This is why you are a tool. But I'm going to work around that and figure out the game anyways.
So, you want to lynch without information because you are worried that your brain can't handle additional info?In post 1741, Masquerade wrote:OMG OCEAN HOW MUCH OF AN IDIOT CABN YOU BE WE ALL KNOW THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF A NIO_KILL AND WILLS INFO WILL ONLY CAUSE WIFOM IF HE EVEN HAS INFO ABOUT LAST NIGHT TO SHARE SPO STOP AKING HIM TO CONFUSE ALL OF US AND GET LYNCHED ALREADYIn post 1730, OceanWind wrote:And I'm aware of the implications if you used your role last night. You just didn't strike me as a bright enough guy to make the same conclusions I made i.e. if you blocked someone last night, I wasn't sure whether you had the brainpower to understand that that meant that that person was the remaining mafia. I wasn't sure where you had the brainpower to know that if you doc'd someone, that they were clear. You come across to me as a mental retard. Expecting me to assume that you function like a normal person is unreasonable.