No information for later.In post 32, davesaz wrote:Jodaxq, why the self vote in RVS?
VOTE: Jodaxq
Do I detect a subtle note of sarcasm in your tone?In post 38, Jodaxq wrote:So good to see you again ChipIn post 37, Chip Butty wrote:No information for later.In post 32, davesaz wrote:Jodaxq, why the self vote in RVS?
VOTE: Jodaxq
Yeah, replace me. If you can understand it, deal with it. Also, if olayers have a problem with Tone, they cab pl him.In post 68, Jodaxq wrote:Chip Butty did not put my username in his unvote.In post 67, momo wrote:Votecount 1.5 #ReadTheRules
Once upon a time, I was in a game....it was some sort of jungle oligarchy or republic...I don't remember at this point. An user just registered on this site and started stalking all my games, especially this jungle one. He got us both kicked out of the game, ruining the experience for me. This just proves that reading the rules is important. So I ask that all of you take the time to carefully read the rules...thank you. If anyone can figure out where the rules were broken, I will allow them to make a "bah" post when they die. (TBH, I don't care about this infraction...it isn't a big deal. This was just a good opportunity for a story.)
Votes
Jodaxq: (3) --- Jodaxq, havingfitz, Elmo TeH Azn
Elmo Teh Azn: (2) --- cytheflyguy, Sleepless Assassin
Sleepless Assassin: (2) --- Voyc, Schism
Almost Chara: (1) --- northsidegal,
xXTonereaderXx: (1) --- davesaz
northsidegal: (1) --- Assemblerotws
Not Voting: xXTonereaderXx, Almost Chara, Chip Butty
(expired on 2018-01-01 22:49:29) until deadline
And we have a winner! You now have the right to make a bah post once you are dead
Actually that is a total misrep. I have only ever replaced out of one game, and I gave the reasons in my post game comments, ie mainly RL stuff. I know it is hard to believe but I've encountered dozens of players who are more annoying than you were there. Anyway, you seemed to have dropped your bad habits, which included constant walling and a pretentious stuffy prose style, so well done, I guess.In post 124, Jodaxq wrote:I think it's just typical Chip Butty to complain and replace out whenever he doesn't get his way and it's NAI. In the last game I played with him, we got into an argument. He kept calling me too "thin-skinned" to play this game and then proceeded to replace out because I was irking him too much. Lol. He was doctor.In post 123, Schism wrote:wtf is #120? Is that scum?
Definitely need to hear more, but low activity is typical for Assembler.In post 44, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Northsidegal
Because she cast the first vote in the game on the Innocent Child.
In post 110, Schism wrote:He's useless, but not scum. Find someone else.In post 51, davesaz wrote:VOTE: xXTonereaderXx
This is not a gimmick I like, and it's early enough in the game to express that dislike in the traditional way.
I donotapprove a policy wagon here.
In other news Jodaxq plays with fire, will she get burned?
I love this read list and I hope your other head agrees. Fitz goes up and Assemble Down IMO.IC wrote:davesaz
Jodaxq
xXTonereaderXx
cytheflyguy
Schism
Voyc
northsidegal
havingfitz
Assemblerotws
Elmo TeH AzN
Chip Butty
Sleepless Assassin
@ToneReaderFuck you, Fuck this alt, and Fuck the fact that you are town.Fucking Useless. He voted Assassin, who is mafia. I stand Corrected.
This. Joda, unvote yourself and got on Scum.In post 98, xXTonereaderXx wrote:In post 96, Jodaxq wrote:Looks like sheepIn post 77, Almost Chara wrote:davesaz
Jodaxq
xXTonereaderXx
cytheflyguy
Schism
Voyc
northsidegal
havingfitz
Assemblerotws
Elmo TeH AzN
Chip Butty
Sleepless Assassin
that's all from me for now. i'll be back later. probably!
~Chara
In the first quote you recommend changes to Chara's list but are content to leave me in the scum rank. Yet a bit later you have me as null to slight scum. Why?In post 118, Schism wrote:Chip slight/null.In post 117, Almost Chara wrote:why are you scumreading Chip Butty, Sleepless, and assemble?In post 110, Schism wrote:I love this read list and I hope your other head agrees. Fitz goes up and Assemble Down IMO.
~Chara
Sleepless voting someone who voted IC and sounded too serious for an RVS Vote.
Assemble shitty Opening Vote.
In post 44, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Northsidegal
Because she cast the first vote in the game on the Innocent Child.
Okay, when I get back I'm gonna be checking who is scumreading Assemble based on all of two posts. I said before LA is NAI for him. LA = easy target for scum.In post 222, Assemblerotws wrote:Just caught up. Surprised I wasn't prodded given how much I let this game slip.
I slightly townread Jo for their reaction test and agree with the IC's reads on Schism. I am also curious why people haven't unvoted the IC.
You haven't answered Almost's question about why Assemble's 2 posts are scummy. Now you're making a big noise about Tone. Doesn't look to me as if you're really interested in finding scum.In post 227, Schism wrote: I suggest to those who think Im town or not worth a vote today to look at Assemble right now. Hes scummy.
In post 44, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Northsidegal
Because she cast the first vote in the game on the Innocent Child.
In post 222, Assemblerotws wrote:Just caught up. Surprised I wasn't prodded given how much I let this game slip.
I slightly townread Jo for their reaction test and agree with the IC's reads on Schism. I am also curious why people haven't unvoted the IC.
In post 252, Assemblerotws wrote:GTKAS is the Get to Know a Scummer subforum, where you can ask users about their personal lives, experiences, and opinions. That was harsh as hell, but you have a point that he shouldn't be bribing people with in-game rewards for visiting his GTKAS, and it honestly looks pathetic that he felt he had to resort to this to get traffic on his GTKAS.In post 251, xXTonereaderXx wrote:Mods mod and players play. Unless you know what you are doing (which you completely don't btw) what you are doing is beyond unacceptable because this is basicly Out of Game influence. No one cares about your stupid minitheme so you're not getting reviewers for it, and certainly no one cares about you. FYI your post was reported. Have a nice day and see you again hopefully never.In post 250, momo wrote:btw...all those who make 3 posts on my GTKAS over the course of their life earn the right to make a bah post
In post 328, Assemblerotws wrote:UNVOTE: Northsidegal
Sorry, let this slip while finishing the game I was modding.
In post 340, Schism wrote:And where is your vote on?In post 337, Chip Butty wrote:Apart from low activity ( this is Assemble's complete ISO), can someone tell me why this is scummy enough to lynch? Are people policy voting?
Don't worry, I will be voting within 2 hours. This is the start of the process. Like i said before, I won't oppose an Assemble lynch. I just want to be clear that it is purely a policy lynch.In post 341, Almost Chara wrote:Apart from you probably being his scum p, can you give a good reason why you're not trying to find a better lynch with 52 hours left of the day?In post 337, Chip Butty wrote:Apart from low activity ( this is Assemble's complete ISO), can someone tell me why this is scummy enough to lynch? Are people policy voting?
~A50
Are you protecting havingfitz by boosting a policy countertrain perhaps?In post 343, Schism wrote:Glad you figured what I did Hydra.
Its too bad we cant nail Elmo/chip right now
I need to ISO havingfitz. That's the next step in the process, and will start sometime in the next hour.In post 345, Schism wrote:Stop stalling and vote fitz if you dont want a policy wagon.
The resistance to Assemble is amazing
Get fucked. I'll vote when I'm ready.In post 349, Schism wrote:Nope, been tunnelling this guy before Fitz was a wagon, but keep stallingIn post 346, Chip Butty wrote:Are you protecting havingfitz by boosting a policy countertrain perhaps?In post 343, Schism wrote:Glad you figured what I did Hydra.
Its too bad we cant nail Elmo/chip right now
So you think Assemble is town?In post 254, Schism wrote:Probably. I dont think Assemble is even paying attention to what he is posting. Assassin has done better I admit, to where I think we can move elsewhere for now.voyc wrote:@Schism, as I asked before, are you confident that Assemble will flip scum? +and if yeah, why? He's posted twice, and Chip+Assemble's own signature seem to indicate activity is really NAI for him.
He now has 3 posts, which was about nothing. With the activity, this is either a scum lynch or a town lynch I won't sleep over (I think the Latter).
xXTonereaderXx wrote:In post 242, Almost Chara wrote: do something useful.In post 44, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Northsidegal
Because she cast the first vote in the game on the Innocent Child.In post 222, Assemblerotws wrote:Just caught up. Surprised I wasn't prodded given how much I let this game slip.
I slightly townread Jo for their reaction test and agree with the IC's reads on Schism. I am also curious why people haven't unvoted the IC.
..............
I fucking hate this game. I'm done giving it the attention it deserves. I'm willing to self to give town something to work with with my lynch and get the hydra to either die or make actual reads. We are probably not going to get much activity from enough players within the deadline to focus on the lynch. I plan on selfing the day after Christmas if Assemble/Chip/Elmo are not wagons. Assassin may be mafia but he deserves to live past D1 since hes actually playing the game. There are better lynches than him today.
Unfortunately i think that's how it's going to be today. I've been here with Assemble before, and I'm yet to see him flip red. Not that that means anything, I guess. I don't really understand what the guy gets from joining games and then not playing, but he seems to crop up a lot. I'm a bit surprised he hasn't replaced out.In post 354, Sleepless Assassin wrote:My vote is policy/compromise, yes.In post 337, Chip Butty wrote:Apart from low activity ( this is Assemble's complete ISO), can someone tell me why this is scummy enough to lynch? Are people policy voting?
Earlier you said Assemble is town. What changed your mind?In post 359, Schism wrote:You mean Assassin right?
Hes posting relevant content that gives him a free pass for today.
Tomorrows lynch when Assemble flips scum.Chip Butty wrote: I think his posts and activity level are NAI, but he is antitown.
Either way, what in those four posts gives you any conviction?In post 362, Schism wrote:Pretty sure I said its scum, and in the rare case im wrong, im not losing sleep over it.
This is where you say you think Assemble is town. 2nd para under the voyc quote at the top...In post 254, Schism wrote:Probably. I dont think Assemble is even paying attention to what he is posting. Assassin has done better I admit, to where I think we can move elsewhere for now.voyc wrote:@Schism, as I asked before, are you confident that Assemble will flip scum? +and if yeah, why? He's posted twice, and Chip+Assemble's own signature seem to indicate activity is really NAI for him.
He now has 3 posts, which was about nothing. With the activity, this is either a scum lynch or a town lynch I won't sleep over (I think the Latter).
xXTonereaderXx wrote:In post 242, Almost Chara wrote: do something useful.In post 44, Assemblerotws wrote:VOTE: Northsidegal
Because she cast the first vote in the game on the Innocent Child.In post 222, Assemblerotws wrote:Just caught up. Surprised I wasn't prodded given how much I let this game slip.
I slightly townread Jo for their reaction test and agree with the IC's reads on Schism. I am also curious why people haven't unvoted the IC.
..............
I fucking hate this game. I'm done giving it the attention it deserves. I'm willing to self to give town something to work with with my lynch and get the hydra to either die or make actual reads. We are probably not going to get much activity from enough players within the deadline to focus on the lynch. I plan on selfing the day after Christmas if Assemble/Chip/Elmo are not wagons. Assassin may be mafia but he deserves to live past D1 since hes actually playing the game. There are better lynches than him today.
Thanks. Read the post but didn't notice the change from "latter" to "former". Wasn't sure what he was on about there, tbh.In post 365, Almost Chara wrote:@Chip: So you ISO'd Schism, got to read and quote his #254 in full, but faile to see his subsequent EBWOP which is literally the following post in the thread (#25????
~A50
Indulge me and link to wtf you're talking about...In post 369, Schism wrote:If you read my iso, you should already know my opinion of confidence.In post 368, Chip Butty wrote:I still want to know what gave Schism such conviction after just 3 posts by Assemble. Yes, I've seen havingfitz's thoughts, and I'm not hugely impressed.
You obviously havent.