Opportunistic scum over here.
VOTE: Jaydragon
Opportunistic scum over here.
If you trust yourself to not be a mislynch bait and be considered a voice of the reason, then you would have a survivor mentality.In post 36, UnaBombaH wrote:..but honestly though Elsa, you should learn how to scumhunt and forget this "I'm here to just survive"-mentality.
I have like a lot of games I was one of the most useful town members.In post 272, Almost50 wrote:so he's going to be useless both by day and by night, regardless of his alignment.
Yeah, that's really stupid.In post 299, Almost50 wrote:And it's damn too funny to call me scum with the guy I'm advocating a policy lynch on.
Where did I go from policy lynch to scumread?
Pretty sure I answered Almost50's proposal to policy lynch me.In post 297, RedFlavor wrote:When jay voted creature he suddenly became too active looky but not really active, he just said reasons to be inactive
VIs.In post 313, havingfitz wrote:And ironically they are both voting you.In post 308, Creature wrote:They look more like VIs and easy mislynches for me.
Nah, I don't really mean you're an idiot, just doing stuff players (for some reason) think are scummy.In post 344, JaydragonKing wrote:Also, him calling us Village Idiots ≠ he thinks we're Town. It means he's dismissing us as actual players and is also trying to make it so you just leave him alone.
I feel like the mistake you're commiting is thinking the game is solved.In post 351, momo wrote:Like both of them know they are caught scum so they bus so that whoever is lynched first has been effectively distanced from the other one
I can become active whenever I want, as long I become active.In post 360, JaydragonKing wrote:Creature becomes fucking active when I mentioned his name and Almost50 started to make image hurting points about him.
I mean I shouldn't worry about when I'll become active, I may have become active regardless of whether you mentioned me or not.In post 365, JaydragonKing wrote:Please tell me you all see what the points Almost and I have made so far about him? He literally doesn't give a shit. This is not a town response at all.In post 363, Creature wrote:I can become active whenever I want, as long I become active.In post 360, JaydragonKing wrote:Creature becomes fucking active when I mentioned his name and Almost50 started to make image hurting points about him.
I did contribute, just not the way you want.In post 508, Mathdino wrote:Creature hasn't contributed shit
Since when Hawk was town? He seemed opportunistic for me.In post 567, Mathdino wrote:We've effectively strong-townblocked Jay, momo, me, Hawk, fitz, sheep.
What do you make out of RedFlavor wagon losing steam?In post 578, Mathdino wrote:The RedFlavor wagon seems to have lost all momentum, even in my mind. Seems like there's always a better fad.
I feel like the current wagons are just pretty malleable (everybody seems fine with any).In post 581, Almost50 wrote:What do YOU make of that?In post 580, Creature wrote:What do you make out of RedFlavor wagon losing steam?In post 578, Mathdino wrote:The RedFlavor wagon seems to have lost all momentum, even in my mind. Seems like there's always a better fad.
Sure, the scumteam is pretty fine with the three of them being the top three wagons...In post 590, momo wrote:So yeah, my current scum team is assemble, creature, and red
Not townleaning him anymore. Though, not very sure on him being scum.In post 592, Almost50 wrote:1- Do you think Red is Town or Scum?
Assemble, Redflavor and me.2- When you say "current wagons" which wagons do you refer to? (list the players names, please)
I agree with the townblock besides Hawk, so that leaves RedFlavor, Assemble, Kop, you, UnaBombaH and Impede. I'd probably remove Impede by myself.3- According to you, you have been working by PoE. Who do you still have in your lynch pool after removing your Town leans?
*and HawkIn post 597, Creature wrote:so that leaves RedFlavor, Assemble, Kop, you, UnaBombaH and Impede.
Why? Can't we organize now and be ready to join a backup wagon if needed?In post 951, momo wrote:Are you claiming scum, vt..................In post 950, Creature wrote:Okay, I finally got back to computer.
Probably Surreptitious which ended, but whatever.In post 948, JaydragonKing wrote:"I just don't got the motivation rn" isn't cutting it this time, especially with two people seeing you have motivation in another game just now.
What's wrong with it?
Doesn't make sense. It's like saying "if X is town he will be mislynched today".In post 978, momo wrote:if he was town, scum would have pushed it through
I have these moments in most of my town games, but here's a decent example: viewtopic.php?f=54&t=67186In post 977, Mathdino wrote:Creature please link a towngame where you similarly lost inspiration and played like you did here.
but it's the best example I remember.In post 985, Almost50 wrote:That's an 18 months old game!
The only consensus here is the townblock I proposed (which already has oppositors). I have townreads outside of that townblock I proposed, so no, it's not consensus.In post 985, Almost50 wrote:I feel Creature's readlist is more of a "consensus" of everyone else's reads.
I don't see a reason why I should claim now when I can still hold this info from scum.His reluctance to actually explicitly SR anyone could point to him being the SK + "would rather not claim" after I sated intent could be ANY scum wanting to buy some time with more flips to decide on a safer fake claim.
Gonna make it easier:In post 988, Mathdino wrote:Creature, please link posts from that game where you make it clear that you'd lost inspiration in that game.