Open 713: Jungle Republic [Game Over]
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Can you explain why you think Beefster is worth a policy lynch? I've never played with him before, but I'm getting Town vibes from him at the moment.In post 38, Thor665 wrote:Why couldn't I be scum and also honestly consider you a valid policy lynch?-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
This comment is very weird to me, I'm not sure how to place it. Why did you feel it was so important to point this out?In post 48, Korina wrote:Ew, metareading. I don't like metareading tbh, because, I can manipulate my meta quite easily.
I'm just gonna point this out. Ok, going back to lurking.
(Aside: If you can help it, would you mind not quoting a giant post just to put a one line question at the end? It makes the thread easier to read and it's easier to see what you're actually referring to in the post if you only quote the part that is relevant)
Korina wrote:It seems actually quite scummy to me you'd do that.
VOTE: Thor
Do you think this is what Thor was actually doing?
I'll have a look later if I think it is pertinent. I was more interested in your reasoning for wanting to policy lynch him since you were apparently serious about it.Thor665 wrote:
He becomes a blind unreadable sheep.In post 40, LaserGuy wrote:
Can you explain why you think Beefster is worth a policy lynch? I've never played with him before, but I'm getting Town vibes from him at the moment.In post 38, Thor665 wrote:Why couldn't I be scum and also honestly consider you a valid policy lynch?
Go ahead and ISO a few of his recent games and get back to me if you love his play.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
What's interesting about this is that Thor was not framing this as "Paradox is wrong and therefore scum". That leap was made by you in 33, with skitter drawing the opposite implication in 46. I don't actually think that the rightness or wrongness of the initial argument is particularly alignment indicative for either player, nor do I think it is a particularly important argument in the grand scheme of things, so it's interesting to me that people who are not Paradox/Thor are the ones trying to raise the stakes here.In post 54, BuJaber wrote:As for "being forced to choose": whenever two people go at it in a mafia game and accuse each other it naturally puts the other players in a situation where they have to decide whether it is SvT or TvS or TvT or SvS. I decided it was T (you) v S (paradox). Players can't really ignore a fight because a fight is an elephant in the room. It needs to be resolved in some way. Either the two sides reach some sort of conclusion and it stops or one of them gets lynched or attention turns away to somebody else and the fight is suspended to deal with the new issue.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I'm not surprised that people are engaging in it. I am suspicious of people who see an argument and immediately infer that one of the participants must be scum. This feels opportunistic to me.In post 62, Montosh wrote:
It seemed to be more "Paradox is wrong and therefore disingenuous". But given that town have no reason to be disingenuous as a rule, the implication is along the lines of "Paradox is wrong and therefore disingenuous".LaserGuy wrote: What's interesting about this is that Thor was not framing this as "Paradox is wrong and therefore scum". That leap was made by you in 33, with skitter drawing the opposite implication in 46. I don't actually think that the rightness or wrongness of the initial argument is particularly alignment indicative for either player, nor do I think it is a particularly important argument in the grand scheme of things, so it's interesting to me that people who are not Paradox/Thor are the ones trying to raise the stakes here.
On "raising the stakes", whatever that means. It's probably not an important argument overall... unless it is. We don't know, it's the first argument of the game. Why would people not engage with it? What is so interesting about that?-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Unfortunately, yes, Town do this as well. I don't think all of the participants are necessarily scum, but I think it's more likely that we'll find scum in {BuJabar, Korina, skitter} than in {Thor, Paradox}. Unless, I suppose, both you and Paradox are scumbuddies and this is all theatre, which is certainly possible for D1, but I don't think that's what happening here.In post 65, Thor665 wrote:@Laser - I sort of liked the core idea of yours behind 'maybe scum are egging it on' but the permutation of the inference is leaving em a bit colder.
That's a super common logical fallacy that town do all the time, no?
I already pointed to 33 and 46 as examples of people trying to frame this as TvS.Montosh wrote:
And where did anyone declare someone as definitely scum in this argument? I just saw people saying certain behaviour seemed like it could be scummy.In post 64, LaserGuy wrote: I'm not surprised that people are engaging in it. I am suspicious of people who see an argument and immediately infer that one of the participants must be scum. This feels opportunistic to me.
In@Thor: If it's a T v T, some scum might egg it on sure but I feel like scum are more likely to try and not get too involved with it Day 1,given that a mislynch is generally pretty likely anyway first day.thissetup? Mmm... This comment bothers me.-
-
LaserGuy
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I'm looking for scum. I do not think that there is anything of particular interest in the argument itself.In post 86, Montosh wrote:Neither of those posts demonstrate someone framing it as Town vs Scum. I don't know where you feel you're getting this from. This feels like you're trying to stay above the argument while framing all those who do engage as suspicious.
Your perspective is wrong. For Town, the odds of hitting scum D1 in this game are ridiculously good. In a typical setup, it's like 20%. In this game, it's nearly 50%. Your comment makes sense coming from the point of view of scum, but not of Town.In post 86, Montosh wrote:
Statistics bother you? Yes, InLaserGuy wrote:
In@Thor: If it's a T v T, some scum might egg it on sure but I feel like scum are more likely to try and not get too involved with it Day 1,given that a mislynch is generally pretty likely anyway first day.thissetup? Mmm... This comment bothers me.thissetup. 12 people, 3 mafia, 2 werewolves, 7 town.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
All of these things are true in any setup. The fact that this is multiball increases the odds of us hitting scum compared to a single team, in fact, and if the odds were really that much worse than chance, then we'd be better off letting random.org do the lynch, because then the odds would be exactly chance. But that isn't really the point. The point is that your perspective on how the lynch is going to go is not that of Town. Your post hoc rationalization doesn't change the initial error.In post 108, Montosh wrote:
Scum are not going to try and lynch their partners. With that in mind and noting that this setup is majority town means that a mislynch remains the most likely scenario Day 1. Yes, scum groups targeting each other raise the odds of a scum lynch, but nowhere near the levels you're suggesting. A cursory glance at the previous game played with this setup listed on the wiki reveal this to be the case.In post 90, LaserGuy wrote: Your perspective is wrong. For Town, the odds of hitting scum D1 in this game are ridiculously good. In a typical setup, it's like 20%. In this game, it's nearly 50%. Your comment makes sense coming from the point of view of scum, but not of Town.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Quick thoughts...
I'm getting strong Town vibes from Beef, Thor, Espeonage. I see reasons why people might interpret Thor's play as aggressive scum, but I don't really get the sense that this is likely to be the case.
I don't really care for the wagons on wilky and skitter. There's been a few pings here and there from both of them, but nothing I see really stands out as a strong case for either. Feeling TvT on Thor/skitter at the moment.
Null on Fanta and NM. More content needed from both.
Korina is nullscum. Very little content, and her tone feels kind of strange to me.
Golden Paradox has been giving me some weird vibes. 80 is awful. I get the vibe that Paradox is deliberately focusing on unimportant issues rather than actually engaging the thread.
BuJaber looking like scum to me. I think Espeonage and Beef are making a good case here; I don't like the deliberate attempts to force skitter vs Thor, and earlier paradox vs Thor as a TvS. I don't have strong reads on skitter or paradox, but I am suspicious of this framing. I am struggling to see really good reasons why Town would be so intent on narrowing the lynch pool in this manner.
I think Montosh is scum as per 90-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
No, I was specifically referring to Thor and Paradox being aligned scum here. But your defense of Montosh is noted.In post 148, skitter30 wrote:
Honestly, I think that people might sometimes forget that they're playing multiball, and just play like it's singleball.In post 127, LaserGuy wrote:All of these things are true in any setup. The fact that this is multiball increases the odds of us hitting scum compared to a single team, in fact, and if the odds were really that much worse than chance, then we'd be better off letting random.org do the lynch, because then the odds would be exactly chance. But that isn't really the point. The point is that your perspective on how the lynch is going to go is not that of Town. Your post hoc rationalization doesn't change the initial error.
Like you also sound like you forgot we were playing multiball here in the bolded below; you're ignoring the possibility that thor/paradox might be s v w.
I think you're reading too much into that statement by montosh tbh.In post 70, LaserGuy wrote:Unfortunately, yes, Town do this as well. I don't think all of the participants are necessarily scum, but I think it's more likely that we'll find scum in {BuJabar, Korina, skitter} than in {Thor, Paradox}.Unless, I suppose, both you and Paradox are scumbuddies and this is all theatre, which is certainly possible for D1,but I don't think that's what happening here.
Good job misrepresenting my argument. That's sure to earn you lots of townie credit.In post 149, Montosh wrote:Translation: I'm scum because I read the setup
This whole sequence of posts is just awful.In post 142, BuJaber wrote:My reading prowess is unmatched. Unmatched.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I think you're making the same mistake as Montoge here... you aren't correctly accounting for the number of scum in the game and it's leading you to make some really weird conclusions. Let's suppose you're right and there's exactly one scum in {Thor/Skitter/Paradox} and one in {Laser, Espeo, Beef}. Who should we lynch? From the point of view of Town!you, we should lynch one of {Not Mafia, Dr Fanta, Korina, wilky and Montosh}. According to your reads, three of those five players are scum. You have a much better chance of hitting scum in that pool than you do in either of the pools that you're interested in.In post 163, BuJaber wrote:The 2/5 is explained in the posts I made earlier: (actually 2/6 I mentioned.. 1 from thor/skitter/paradox, 1 from laser, espeo, beef) but it could also be more - say 3 or 4 from those 6, but that's statistically a much lower chance.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
You don't seem to have any trouble keeping up. Any time someone mentions you, you respond quickly. You just aren't actually engaging in discussion beyond that, and your answers are extremely evasive. Working on a giant reads post for several days is not nearly as useful as actually interacting with people and trying to find scum.In post 179, Korina wrote:
Try 72/24 and 48/24 hour games, plus this game, which is 168/48.In post 173, BuJaber wrote:People need to post now. I refuse to be lynched just because half the players waited until the last day and there wasn't any time to change the wagon.
Korina playing 3 games is pretty small you need more I thought it would be a lot but it's very underwhelming. Site meta is slow for most games so it's not that hard to catch up. On average days obviously. When RL is kicking your butt or you would have no internet access there is VLA. And the prodding policy of the site is quite lenient.
This is the only site where I could fesibly get away with doing 3+ games at once.
Liking this at the moment.
VOTE: Korina-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I understand you have other obligations and are playing other games. That's fine. The problem is that in basically every post you've made recently, you've just made excuses for not playing this one.In post 189, Korina wrote:Because there's certain times I'm actually active on one thread. I try to reply quickly whenever someone mentions me.
(Sarcasm kinda intended) I'm also sorry that I have a real life, I go to school, I have a job, and that I can't really focus all my attention onto one thing for long periods of time. (Plus if my school didn't block this site, I would be able to post more often).
@Thor, I will comment on your post in a bit. I'd prefer to reread the whole discussion first, and, well, there's a lot of it.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Upon review, I'm still seeing this mostly as TvT. I get a couple of pings here and there, but nothing that I feel is strongly scum-indicative at this point.Thor665 wrote:@Laser - what are your thoughts on viewtopic.php?p=9975923#p9975923 ?
She is arguing that the manner that you were framing the argument implicitly encourages people to pick sides. She mentions this specifically in 46. I don't believe she ever suggested that you were explicitly calling for people to jump to one side or the other (which would, IMHO, be pretty scummy were you to do that). I also do not believe you did this, and in fact have been quite fastidious in focusing on your points and not trying to solicit opinions on the arguments.In post 184, Thor665 wrote:She has not actually shown me encouraging people to pick a side in any way.
She did call out BuJabar for saying that exactly one of the two of you is scum in 181, which is a similar sort of thing.She has not questioned anyone else for setting up any sort of disagreement.
So after you've argued this out, she basically agrees with your accounting of events, and she was probably scumreading your tone and aggression more than anything else. Unfortunately, this is not really alignment indicative as townies scumread aggressionShe agrees I wasn't unfair in my question.
She has now agreed that there was already inherently conflict (indeed, it was created by the person she is claiming is town in this exchange)
She agrees that her best examples of how I could have questioned the player *also* caused conflict.
So her basic claim is, I asked a question that was a little more standoffish than it should have had to have been.all the time. I have a bit of experience with this from some more aggressive games I've played on my homesite, and it is very annoying, but it is not usually indicative of scum, especially this early in the game.
This is the only part of your case that I really agree with as possibly scum indicative, but isn't strong enough for me to really feel an urge to put down a vote. It could be frustrated Town. On the whole, I think this is most likely TvT. I'd suggest you both back down from your tunnels for awhile and see what else is going on that you find interesting... you can always come back to this later if you feel the need.And she's doubling down on it as a valid issue to call me scum over this.
(and has now expanded to me misrepping her)-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Yes, I believe your post came from the perspective of scum. I'm not sure what aside you are referring to. My point on you is based on the point you made about mislynches being likely in this setup.In post 211, Montosh wrote:What exactly is your argument? That my post seemed like it was from the perspective of scum? Because as I recall the whole point of my little aside to Thor there was to think about what scum were likely to be doing.
BuJaber specifically said that he felt it likely that there was one scum in each pool, and therefore lynching from those pools makes sense. That's the argument I was responding to.In post 211, Montosh wrote:Oh now I really don't like this. You seem to be trying to associate me to an argument I didn't make, and one which is completely different from the one I made.
I also don't like how Bujaber backed off after you said this, as this is a bad argument because youaren't correctly accounting for the number of scum in the game.Those three person groups could easily be S vs W under Bujaber's argument rather than T vs S. It feels like he was using any excuse to get off a wagon he didn't feel was working.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Beef's tone was (and still is) very townie.In post 229, Korina wrote:laser:
Do you care explaining yourself?In post 40, LaserGuy wrote:
Can you explain why you think Beefster is worth a policy lynch? I've never played with him before, but I'm getting Town vibes from him at the moment.In post 38, Thor665 wrote:Why couldn't I be scum and also honestly consider you a valid policy lynch?
Pretty sure I already talked about this. tl;dr is that mislynch is actually, compared to typical mafia games, much less likely, so it is very strange that somebody from Town would not recognize this. It makes more sense coming from scum, who might be mentally lumping the other scum team in with Town in their internal calculations.
Why does it bother you?In post 70, LaserGuy wrote:
In@Thor: If it's a T v T, some scum might egg it on sure but I feel like scum are more likely to try and not get too involved with it Day 1,given that a mislynch is generally pretty likely anyway first day.thissetup? Mmm... This comment bothers me.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
@skitter, @thor
I think you are both Town, but I am seriously contemplating pushing for a policy lynch on one of you at this point in time just so we won't have to put up with you bickering for the rest of the game. You are aren't getting anywhere and are making the thread more difficult to read and keep up with. Please move on.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
In post 258, Thor665 wrote:
We are getting somewhere.In post 256, LaserGuy wrote:@skitter, @thor
I think you are both Town, but I am seriously contemplating pushing for a policy lynch on one of you at this point in time just so we won't have to put up with you bickering for the rest of the game. You are aren't getting anywhere and are making the thread more difficult to read and keep up with. Please move on.
Other than skitter, who are your scumreads?Also, what else would you like to see addressed?-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Interesting. I need to think about this.In post 300, Korina wrote:Also, I hardclaim Citizen rn. I'm a fucking citizen once again, and literally out of half the rolelist being non-citizen roles, I get citizen again. I really don't care if I'm ML'd d1, happens all the time, and idgaf tbh.
UNVOTE: Korina
for now-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
In post 313, Korina wrote:It's real. At this point, I have played around 14 games. Excluding 4 of them, because one of them I replaced into confirmed scum slot, the other was a pure Jester game, the third one was late game, and VT wasn't a possibility that late in, and the last one because it was canned, I have rolled Citizen in over half of them. Probability would beg to differ at this point, that I would get a non-town role. I still haven't and that pisses me off to no end, because I want to finally play as fucking scum. 11H on ToS forums was the closest I've ever gotten to playing a legit scum game, and even if I played scum well that game, I highly doubt I would've won it. So, let's break down the rest of those games then: that leaves 10 games. 1 of them, I got BG. 1 of them, I got Arso (11H), 1 of them, I got vig, but because of someone else in thread, I got force-replaced. That leaves 7 games, this one included. I have played VT in 70% of all my fm games. You don't think I get sick and fucking tired of it, or at this point probability would be in my favor on a literal coin flip? I may be following the gambler's fallacy here, but I honestly think that probability would go my way at this point.
*Sigh*, I kind of believe this, at least enough not to want to lynch Korina right now. He's such lynchbait it's going to be a very low information flip regardless of his alignment.
VOTE: The Golden Paradox
@Paradox:Can you explain why you were so bothered by Thor's initial policy vote, when in Mini 1981 you pushed for a policy lynch on Not_Mafia in your first post?-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Can you explain your townread on Montosh?In post 321, skitter30 wrote:
Um, I didn't realize that deadline was so close.In post 303, mutantdevle wrote:Day 1 ends in 4 days, 9 hours, 33 minutes
K, here's where I'm at:
{Montosh}
{Laserguy}
{}
{beef, wilky}
{NM} ------ null
{Korina, paradox}
{dr fanta, A50-slot, esp}
{}
{Thor}
I very much want to lynch Thor, but if that's not happening, I could move to Dr Fanta or A50 or esp at deadline.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
In post 324, Dr Fanta wrote:Wait, you're in this game??? What the fuck
I mean I know I've been a ghost but jesus your posts read like blatant active lurking, full of fluff and fencefitting galore.
You're already convinced Thor is scum and skitter is Town. What more information do you expect to get than that?In post 324, Dr Fanta wrote:
"Waaaah people are giving us information by disagreeing with eachother and giving actually detailed arguments against eachother. This makes the game harder to read for me because I'm a lazy fuck. Boohoo."In post 256, LaserGuy wrote:@skitter, @thor
I think you are both Town, but I am seriously contemplating pushing for a policy lynch on one of you at this point in time just so we won't have to put up with you bickering for the rest of the game. You are aren't getting anywhere and are making the thread more difficult to read and keep up with. Please move on.
While I think this opinion is stupid, it's town stupid.
Interesting that you appear to have read skitter vs. Thor in great detail, but apparently missed all of skitter's other reads. Actually, I'm pretty sure you're actually getting all of this from page 11-13 and haven't read the rest of the thread at all.Spoiler:
Ohoho, what the fuck is this?
Active lurker as your only other townread besides Montosh, fucking wilkyabovenull somehow?
I would not be surprised by a skitter-Laserguy-wilky scumteam just because of this shitty readslist even if I'm currently TRing skitter for skitter v thor. In fact, skitter v thor might actually be SvS.
Annnd now I'm caught up.
This is such a strange interaction.
Apparently Pepper has been reading the thread a little bit at least.In post 341, Dr Fanta wrote:Are you going to scumhunt at all this game or continue filling it with giant shitposts? I'd be happy to PL you.
-Pepper-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Do you ignore questions to you on purpose? I addressed you in 316. You're quoting from 300 and 325 here, and your name is in big bold letters in my post, so I have a hard time imagining you missed it.
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
How does this make sense? If he is Mafia, why would Werewolf kill him if his slot looks scummy?In post 409, Almost50 wrote:Mate, I would be hard SRing you now if I didn't see your play in that game first hand. You REALLY need to stop tunneling and start reading and evaluating stuff. Like, if you're scum here you're a likely NK (if you're Mafia), likely investigation target (if you're a WW), and if you're Town you're a detriment to Town regardless because you're likely to BOTH draw the NK AND the investigation, let alone the (mis)lynch if you're still alive in 2 days.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
-
-
LaserGuy
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I think you missed my question in 443.In post 473, Almost50 wrote:
I don't know about you, but I assume someone I'm SCUMREADING isn't the same alignment of me. If I thought they were I wouldn't be STing them, would I??In post 469, wilky wrote:Am I looking into this too much or is the bolded part a slip? Seems to me like Almost already knows for sure that skitter doesn't have the same alignment as him.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I think the only way your logic here and in 409 makes any sense at all is if you believe that WW can tell the difference between Mafia/Town or Mafia can tell the difference between WW/Town. I suspect that this is probably not true at this stage of the game. But I don't know that I believe you would be making this assumption if you were scum.In post 476, Almost50 wrote:In post 443, LaserGuy wrote:How does this make sense? If he is Mafia, why would Werewolf kill him if his slot looks scummy?
OK. Why wouldn't they? WWs want to get rid of theinformedother faction too. The more the Mafia lives and the townies die the more influential the Mafia "bloc" votes become. The more the Mafia votes become influential the harder it is for Wolves to push their agenda, and the harder it becomes to actually lynch Mafia.
It's a matter of "balancing" the powers for the WWs. Their only danger from Town is the Seer. Once that is gone no other townie really matters. Mafia know each other and will protect each other from the lynch and -probably- hunt for the Wolves too. Got it?-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I think if we end up settling on a 3rd or 4th choice compromise lynch, 95% chance it's going to be on Town. I think we're much better off committing to pushing through a wagon on someone that is likely to be scum. It isn't going to get any easier to build wagons as the game goes on.In post 482, Espeonage wrote:Just as a heads up. I will not be around at 4am for deadline. So I'd like things settled before then especially if A50 is not the choice for the day.
Also, show of hands on people down to lynch NM as a policy compromise?
: Neither Thor nor skitter is going to happen today. I would strongly urge you to join one of the other wagons. We will never get a lynch if the vote is split five ways.@Korina, Montosh, Thor, Almost50
I don't think wilky is going to happen either, but I don't expect NM or Fanta to listen to me-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Sorry I'm late to the party. My posting on weekends is usually very light, and this weekend was just crazy for me so mafia kind of fell by the wayside. Let's see what's going on.
My gut is probably 2 mafia + 1 wolf on the wagon.(7 LYNCHED)Dr Fanta- voted by: wilky, Beefster, LaserGuy, Thor665, Almost50,TheGoldenParadox, Not_Mafia.
(4) Thor665 - voted by: Montosh, Korina,Dr Fanta, skitter30.
(1) Almost50 - voted by: Espeonage.
I agree with NM here. I don't like this post by wilky.In post 570, Not_Mafia wrote:
This is wolfIn post 569, wilky wrote:Paradox is a weird one there's not really anyone it implicates or points in a direction too.
There were five wagons at the time: You, Thor, wilky, Dr. Fanta, and A50. I had Town on you and Thor, so I wasn't going to vote there. I was suspicious of everyone on the wilky wagon and didn't want to sheep them. It was a toss-up for me between A50 and Dr. Fanta, and my scumread on Fanta was stronger.skitter wrote:In post 576, Montosh wrote:LaserGuy and Beefster's votes were less reasonable. LaserGuy mostly voted to pressure people into consolidating votes onto wagons near deadlines, which rarely ends well for town. Beefster was just blatantly sheeping. I'd put money on scum there.Why'd you pick Dr Fanta here to consolidate votes on?
So, are we actually going to see some real content out of you today? Or are you just going to keep active lurking and prod-dodging like you did for all of D1?In post 616, Korina wrote:NM, are you a lyncher with Wilky as your target? Why are you death-tunneling him?
Good of place to start as any.
VOTE: Korina-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
You're going to need to explain this. Why are you voting NM? Why were you just sheeping him on wilky in your previous post?
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
@Not_mafia: Can you answer Fanta's question here?In post 551, Dr Fanta wrote:
Are you getting annoyed that the entirety of my wagon composition is more scum than can be on one team therefore making more likely to be town? I asked you earlier why you're scumreading me this time around, as you've never been wrong before and I'm honestly intrigued. Is it because I'm hydra'ing?In post 527, Not_Mafia wrote:Fuck these wagons
-Pepper-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
This is a weird interpretation. Wilky didn't seem too bothered by Fanta voting for him. He didn't like Fanta's read on skitter flip-flopping based on her reads list, and didn't like Fanta accusing me of active lurking. See 331 and 332.In post 576, Montosh wrote:But Fanta actually went after wilky for no reason, other than the fact that he was high up on skitter's readlist and they didn't like the readlist, which seems totally bonkers to me. Wilky had some reason to vote for them.-
-
LaserGuy
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I don't know that killing Paradox puts suspicion on wilky directly. Although Paradox did vote park wilky for awhile, he was lurking for most of D1 and never pushed anything, so I don't know that I believe WW!wilky would feel threatened by him. What I find suspicious about this post is more that I feel wilky is immediately trying to dismiss possible connections with other players.In post 656, Montosh wrote:Why though? Beyond what's already been said, the paradox kill doesn't really tell us much. Why would WW!wilky kill paradox when it would clearly cast suspicion on him?
In post 653, Not_Mafia wrote:wilky or TChill todayIn post 655, Almost50 wrote:
Agreed. (and it worries me much to find myself agreeing with someone all that much, tbh).In post 653, Not_Mafia wrote:wilky or TChill today
These posts seem like overreactions to something that is funny, but probably NAI (if anything this kind of dumbtell is probably Town). Almost50 at least saw the humor in it. Tchill's early posting is already better than anything Korina had produced, actually.In post 673, Thor665 wrote: I'm not dictating anything to you, it's a question.
I brought up number of posts because you claimed you looked at the post count to pick - why look at the post count to pick if number of posts was meaningless?
Also, you didn't pick people to randomly ask - you're claiming you randomly picked people to sheep reads on/agree with.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
You're a strong Townread.In post 664, skitter30 wrote:
OK fair enough. What's your present read on me/thor/A50?In post 635, LaserGuy wrote:There were five wagons at the time: You, Thor, wilky, Dr. Fanta, and A50. I had Town on you and Thor, so I wasn't going to vote there. I was suspicious of everyone on the wilky wagon and didn't want to sheep them. It was a toss-up for me between A50 and Dr. Fanta, and my scumread on Fanta was stronger.
When I started writing this, I was going to say that I have Thor as a Town lean and A50 as a scum lean, but in trying to wrap my head about the fact that we only have five townies in a ten person game, I think they're actually both PoE in my scum pile right now. Both are due for a reread at some point when I have access to enough scotch to get me through all of those walls.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Actually, I'm going to amend this. I'm getting a lot of buddy vibes between the two of them today that I find very suspicious. I don't think that it's possible all three of you can be Town at once.In post 695, LaserGuy wrote:
You're a strong Townread.In post 664, skitter30 wrote:
OK fair enough. What's your present read on me/thor/A50?In post 635, LaserGuy wrote:There were five wagons at the time: You, Thor, wilky, Dr. Fanta, and A50. I had Town on you and Thor, so I wasn't going to vote there. I was suspicious of everyone on the wilky wagon and didn't want to sheep them. It was a toss-up for me between A50 and Dr. Fanta, and my scumread on Fanta was stronger.
When I started writing this, I was going to say that I have Thor as a Town lean and A50 as a scum lean, but in trying to wrap my head about the fact that we only have five townies in a ten person game, I think they're actually both PoE in my scum pile right now. Both are due for a reread at some point when I have access to enough scotch to get me through all of those walls.
VOTE: Almost50-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
I have played with NM once before (him and the Viomi half of Fanta are the only people I've played with here, actually), and his play looks identical to that game, where he was Town. I was told in that game by the people who had played with him before that this was standard play for him and almost everything he does is NAI, but that he'd sort himself out later. Maybe there's some subtle differences in his Town/scum game, but I don't see it, so his slot was sitting in my null pile for just about all of D1. There's one post that I think is more likely to come from Town!NM (this one), and one or two that could be scum indicative (here and his lack of response to this), but beyond that I had nothing on him. The only reason that I would have been voting him D1 would have been a policy lynch, and I generally don't like policy lynching people for their playstyle.In post 735, Tchill13 wrote:Laser seems to be playing a game that makes sense so far so i was alarmed he didn't give anymore attention to NM over Fanta. He actually seems to defend NM at the end of day 1/ start of day 2. So that cought my eye.-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Why are you excluding NM and Thor from your partner read? Beef didn't vote for them either.In post 749, Almost50 wrote:Conclusion: Beefster is SCUM. His partner(s) is/are in Montosh/skitter30/LaserGuy-
-
LaserGuy Goon
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
-
-
LaserGuy
-
-
LaserGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 465
- Joined: November 2, 2017
Well done Mafia! Tricky setup but you guys managed to do a really good job of keeping everyone off balance.
Also:
LaserGuy wrote:
Putting down my predictions before I forget about this game:
Town: skitter, Beef, Not_Mafia, TChill
Mafia: A50, Thor, Esp
Wolf: wilky, Montosh
Good thing you guys killed me when you did. I had all of you at the end of N2, though I got Thor/Montosh alignments wrong
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-
-