1. Despite your arrogant beliefs, the way to win isn't always whatever waydramonic wrote:1. I'm assuming scum wants to win.
2. That's a sure way to lose
3. You = second person plural, its the players as a whole I'm accusing here
4. The wagon has to be brought down and someone else has to get a wagon built on them, takes longer, much longer.
5. Considering your reads in the game, I don't think with you leading we'd have lynched anyone close to being scum, but that's just me. Also, day 1 lynch are more often than not on townies, we'd have at MOST lynched 1 scum, saved no townie.
And again, DLA didnt provoke the no lynch by himself and this "mess" the town is in is more a result of your anti-town, reticent play that his plea for lover claims.
you
think is best.2. Well, your style of play got town into where it is now. I think I would have rather play blind and scumhunted like normal instead of getting in this mess.
3. If you don't like how everyone is playing the game then gtfo.
4. Assuming people don't lurk and post frequently, this shouldn't be a problem.
5. Right, that's just you. And at least my lead would have lynched SOMEONE. Lynching one scum is at least as good as preventing one townie from dying, and we wouldn't be in the minus one townie off the bat position we are in now.
Maybe DLA wasn't alone, but the other players who didn't prevent no lynch were either lurkers or also fairly scummy. I'm still not seeing how I'm in any way responsible for every single lover claiming.
And is it just me, or does the existence of a confirmed "townie" sort of game breaking?
