Riddleton - droog, dragon, guile (L-2)
droog - Heartless, 2birds, riabi, riddleton (L-1)
Not Voting - beast
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch and 4 to no-lynch.
Deadline is in (expired on 2014-12-25 23:31:48) or by 9:30 PM on December 25th, 2014.
In post 623, Heartless wrote:Before we go on the werewolves I have to ask you something.
What exactly were we expecting out of Pine in terms of decision making dynamics here? The mafia was easier because mrstrife, with barely enough posts to qualify for the title "Mafia Scum" under his username, wasn't going to have much juice in that decision making process for the night actions. The one already there was clearly going to call the shots. Does Pine have a reputation of being good, a power player?
If so, it's going to be a little tougher because with the mafia we were comparing reads of an entity vs a non-entity. Now we're trying to account for reads that could potentially come from the black box of whatever Pine said and thought. Antihero thought the mastin targeting pointed to droog being the mafia seer, which could have merit. droog certainly was scumreading mastin, mostly centered around what he perceived to be a bad attack on egg, Post 389. He also scumread goblin for the L-1 egg vote in Post 370, which goes a way toward explaining the kill. Both these reads would very likely be reinforced with an Egg town flip. There's some reasonable doubt here, though, because it's possible that Pine is responsible for the choices of night actions. Regardless of what you think about what Pine may or may not have done, you have to admit droog's reads and the actionsdoline up awfully well with what the wolves ended up doing.
Personally, I think droog himself is fairly scummy as well. The entirety of droog's ISO is very thin to begin with and he reads as a lot more muted both in terms of posting style and posting frequency than the last game I played with him where he was town. His vote remains completely idle, but it's not like he doesn't have any scum reads. mastin was one, but oddly enough droogremovedhis predecessor's vote on him never to return it. He was also a very vocal detractor of the Egg wagon; we see that in Post 379, Post 389, and Post 424.Not once this entire timedoes droog vote the Goblin counter wagon to this Egg wagon he apparently loathes so much. The words are there, but when the chips hit the table, he was nowhere to be found when it came time to actually vote. This is a calculated passivity in the face of what he's predicting to be a town flip. (I'm kind of surprised Anti didn't mention that because I learned this tell from him...) And don't tell me that multiball mitigates this at all because there'splenty of utilityto scum making themselves appear to be passive non-threats to their rivals.
-TTH
-TTH
In post 797, Heartless wrote:In post 788, guille2015 wrote:I Might be biased, but when I read through Math's ISO I thought that He was prepping me up to be his buddy. Like his defense for me and then a bit of suspicion later, while still defending me from fink. Although, I might be giving him too much credit here, but that's how I see it. When I play scum I try to not generate associate tells with my buddies, and I actively try to manufacture associative tells on other players.
Nihil sapientiae odiosius acumine nimio.
There are so many things that says droog is scum:
Both the Goblin nightkill and the mastin investigation make sense with what we know droog's reads were. You can say what you want about what you think Pine's input was, but there's something to be said for actually*being herethe whole game. I bet the wolf who was already here had the most sway.
The associatives between droog and MathDino are there. You don't have to look far to find the chumminess I was talking about earlier: Post 184 and Post 191. The townread on droog is never explained beyond "gut" (Post 350) and MathDino is sure to qualify it as his "weakest" read (Post 354) even though he's adamant about not wanting to lynch the slot (Post 246). It's a non-sequitur and unsupported read in the middle of an otherwise reasoned set of reads, and that sticks out.*
There's the matter of droog being a naysayer on the Egg wagon but not actually doing anything about it.*
Overall, droog's ISO isn't anything to write home about. The current reads are in absolute disarray and the resulting vote doesn't make much sense. He presented associatives with our slot, Riddleton's slot, and beastcharizard's slot. Surprisingly, the one with the least support and vaguest outlining, Riddleton's slot, ends up with the vote (Post 746). The stronger cases lie elsewhere, but Riddleton gets the vote because "Sorry bro It's makes sense associatively"?*
In post 845, Mathdino wrote:there were no associatives to be made there,
In post 848, guille2015 wrote:Droog drew sufficient attention for him to get enough scrutiny and there was a lack of association between everyone else.
So, tell me Math. Was I right in thinking that you were framing me to be your partner? Or was it my paranoia?
Also, Happy Holidays!