Why? Other than his post on Gamma, he hasn't done much else. Like if we are wrong on gamma, he doesn't look great.In post 727, Creature wrote:So Gamma wagon so far looks all town.
Scumreads. Cool. Progress I guess.In post 729, Börk Börk wrote:Top lynches for me today would be Snarky or CK, though I can't see the latter happening.
Hapahauli is probably my top townread.
Even if you scumread me, i cant be a higher priority lynch over gamma in any town mindIn post 729, Börk Börk wrote:Top lynches for me today would be Snarky or CK, though I can't see the latter happening.
Hapahauli is probably my top townread.
Omfg, seriously? Replace out, go back to 4chan, and never play mafia again. PleaseIn post 734, CloudKicker wrote:just ingore bork
In post 735, Börk Börk wrote:I think Cloud is scum because his reasoning for why I'm scum was shitty and sounded fake. Why? Because it basically amounted to picking at wording and at the fact that I posted a post with additional inforight aftera previous one, even though that's basically my posting style. Scumreads picking exclusively at syntax or wording of a few posts are shit and should be ignored.
I think Snarky's lack of posting is worse for a couple of reasons. For one, literally nobody gave a damn D1 and D2, and it's rather surprising thatnobodynoticed. I'd expect at least one person (other than me) to call it out. That slightly hints to me that perhaps his scumbuddy was trying to distract from it, because lurking is normally something noticeable. Secondly, he makes votes, which would give a lot of people the illusion that he's being active and voting, but at the same time he doesn't really push his votes, so he can't be scrutinised that much if whoever he's voting for flips town.
Why are they both worse than Gamma? Firstly, I wouldn't say they'rea lotworse than him, but I just don't think scum would be that obvious/nonchalant. Like, I just get the impression that he can't be bothered with the game and is half-assing his posts, which makes him kinda lynchbait. I just feel like scum would be making more of an effort to get things done in a setup such as this where being lynchbait as scum is especially bad.
Who do you think is scum there?In post 725, JasonWazza wrote:[3] Gamma Emerald: TheSoldier, hapahauli, CloudKicker,
We're supposed to lynch mafia, not people who make "bad plays." Who is mafia?In post 741, SnarkySnowman wrote:I don't actually think cloud kicker is scum, I just hate the hammer on nl yesterday. Yes it was the right move logically BUT also we had SO MUCH TIME to figure things out and then nl.
Gamma wagon irks me a little but it could be scum, I want to think on it for a bit. I don't think the people on it are town but I could be wrong.
Alright, so you think he has a bad scumread on you. Townies are perfectly capable of making bad scumreads. What makes CK mafia? That his reasoning "sounds fake" to you isn't very convincing to the rest of us.In post 735, Börk Börk wrote:I think Cloud is scum because his reasoning for why I'm scum was shitty and sounded fake. Why? Because it basically amounted to picking at wording and at the fact that I posted a post with additional inforight aftera previous one, even though that's basically my posting style. Scumreads picking exclusively at syntax or wording of a few posts are shit and should be ignored.
The problem I have with your reads, is that your reasoning for reading Gamma and Snarky scum vs. lynchbait are completely interchangeable.I thinkSnarky'sgamma'slack of posting is worse for a couple of reasons. For one, literally nobody gave a damn D1 and D2, and it's rather surprising thatnobodynoticed. I'd expect at least one person (other than me) to call it out. That slightly hints to me that perhaps his scumbuddy was trying to distract from it, because lurking is normally something noticeable. Secondly, he makes votes, which would give a lot of people the illusion that he's being active and voting, but at the same time he doesn't really push his votes, so he can't be scrutinised that much if whoever he's voting for flips town.
Why are they both worse thanGammasnarky?? Firstly, I wouldn't say they'rea lotworse than him, but I just don't think scum would be that obvious/nonchalant. Like, I just get the impression that he can't be bothered with the game and is half-assing his posts, which makes him kinda lynchbait. I just feel like scum would be making more of an effort to get things done in a setup such as this where being lynchbait as scum is especially bad.
Also, this rationale doesn't make a lot of sense.In post 737, Börk Börk wrote:Whoops, missed this question. Honestly, he's just making more sense than most people in this game.Why is hapahauli top town?
You should probably care, since your options for swinging a lynch are very limited. Let's assume that both you and I are town, and that CK is mafia. Then you'd have to convince all three other townies to vote your case, with no margin for error. That's pretty ambitious. That doesn't even take into account what happens if you're wrong about scum-reads.In post 747, Börk Börk wrote:And CK is mafia because, as I previously stated, I don't care if my argument isn't convincing to you. I'm hoping it'll just convince enough people to lynch him so that we can actually win this game.
Yes you keep saying that, by why the distinction? Why is it that you think Snarky's posting is giving the "illusion of effort", whereas Gamma's is genuine? I cannot argue or corroborate with your feelings. Only facts suffice.And I don't think my reads on Gamma and Snarky are interchangeable. Snarky is trying to give the illusion of effort hidden behind minimal posting. Gamma seems to post more but half-ass the content openly. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.
