Open 680: C9++ (Abandoned due to mod error. See new thread)

[FireScreamer]

Lynching 1shot claims based on my actual read on the player from now on.

[FireScreamer]

I mean worse you do is turn someone into an IC. If only there was a player in the thread telling me this the whole time.

[RoryMK]

My reads were terrible. How sad

[Umlaut]

The only true hard-claim in this game came from scum.

[Umlaut]

I mean mine was honest but arguably not true.

[Narna]

That BeeBoy slot was on fire btw. Let that carry over into the real deal.

[Titus]

The master of setup analysis didn't consider this possibility at all.

Oh

and I still get to tell Titus "neener you can't read me" in our next game, so that's fun.

I did.

That's why the PR or VT massclaim is tomorrow, in case of CommKnight being a liar.

Having someone get the wrong role pm and lie would have gotten my analysis wrong. Based on my calculations, lynching you was 100% the right play if everyone had their correct rolecards as they claimed them to be.

[Titus]

Lie is the wrong word. Give mistatements is better.

[Titus]

Lynching 1shot claims based on my actual read on the player from now on.

I mean worse you do is turn someone into an IC. If only there was a player in the thread telling me this the whole time.

Lol. I love you too. But that is only true for rb and doc 1 shots. (1 shot rb = autolynch if there are two other probable/confirmeds) 1 shot doc should almost always be lynched the day after it claims.

I'm supposing the required roles are not already dead when I say that.

1 shot cop and vig do not require a full one sooo they should use, wait until a lynch is near decided, reveal.

[FrankJaeger]

Ha

[davesaz]

I was going to come back from the lock to remind everyone that CommKnight's claim was impossible to prove (existence of a full doc makes 1-shot possible, it does not confirm it) and therefore more than 3 VT's were possible. That was a pretty good fakeclaim but I always kept it as possibly fake. And by early behavior I had that slot nailed looking for a hammer.

I had tojam's 1st replacements bungee thing nailed as someone uncomfortable with scum. F.E.C. bailed quickly as scum on the game I just modded. But I don't like using mod-derived meta during games.

2/3.

[Titus]

I was going to come back from the lock to remind everyone that CommKnight's claim was impossible to prove (existence of a full doc makes 1-shot possible, it does not confirm it) and therefore more than 3 VT's were possible. That was a pretty good fakeclaim but I always kept it as possibly fake. And by early behavior I had that slot nailed looking for a hammer.

Correct. That's why on d2 you lynch the 1 shot. Puts the scum in a shitty position ala the IC.

[Alchemist21]

I feel bad about a lot of things here. Mostly about scumreading Titus. Now if you'll excuse me, I just heard the name Dovahkiin coming from yonder mountaintop.

[Umlaut]

F.E.C. bailed quickly as scum on the game I just modded. But I don't like using mod-derived meta during games.

I almost mentioned this too once the game ended (I was on the scumteam he bailed from) but on further inspection noticed he had signed up for a ridiculous number of games, so it stood to reason he'd be dropping a lot of them.

[Umlaut]

The master of setup analysis didn't consider this possibility at all.

Oh

and I still get to tell Titus "neener you can't read me" in our next game, so that's fun.

I did.

That's why the PR or VT massclaim is tomorrow, in case of CommKnight being a liar.

Having someone get the wrong role pm and lie would have gotten my analysis wrong. Based on my calculations, lynching you was 100% the right play if everyone had their correct rolecards as they claimed them to be.

To be clear I was calling myself the master of setup analysis, not you.

Unless by "I did" you mean you did secretly townread me?

[Alchemist21]

So you guys think any of the replace-outs will lead to a ban?

[FireScreamer]

If Titus flips green I'm going to scream so loud as to propel me into a parallel universe where they flipped red.

I mean not quite but did this happen?

[Alchemist21]

I mean she was green. It would have happened.

[FrankJaeger]

A ban?

[Titus]

The master of setup analysis didn't consider this possibility at all.

Oh

and I still get to tell Titus "neener you can't read me" in our next game, so that's fun.

I did.

That's why the PR or VT massclaim is tomorrow, in case of CommKnight being a liar.

Having someone get the wrong role pm and lie would have gotten my analysis wrong. Based on my calculations, lynching you was 100% the right play if everyone had their correct rolecards as they claimed them to be.

To be clear I was calling myself the master of setup analysis, not you.

Unless by "I did" you mean you did secretly townread me?

I was aware of the possibility. I calculated it in, which is why I said a few times, regardless of your alignment, scum would not want to lynch you.

[FrankJaeger]

U fellas ready for 3000 d1 posts this time.
Btw going to soft claim mason D1 telling you now so its NAI

[FireScreamer]

Titus fatal flaw in scum reading was assuming we wernt all idiots

[Alchemist21]

A ban?

I'm pretty sure at least one of them qualifies as a strategic replace-out. Looking at Tojam's ragequit as the most likely candidate here.

[FireScreamer]

Hopefully this isn'tall a horrible omen of Franks engagement

[Alchemist21]

Hopefully this isn'tall a horrible omen of Franks engagement

Define "engagement." Cuz that could mean 2 things for Frank now.