In post 68, Chisa Yukizome wrote:definitely town: chisa yukizome
town: jamie, awoo
probtown: lucca, quick(this read will probably shoot to "town" or "scum" soon enough)
eh: lalendra, assemble(please don't do your normal shit assemble i can do better than that
while 500 posting over the course of 3 IRL days
), aubrey, cheeky
bleh: comm(this isn't a real bleh i'm just appeasing the host)
In post 48, Awoo wrote:Why would you post that, quick? You should know RVS wagons are for gathering information, not for quicklynching.
I am going to VOTE: Awoo for piling onto an easy wagon formed during the shitposting phase. Scum love easy lynches.
Nice, looks like the game is on, baby
VOTE: Quick
I've seen quicklynches happen and Scum got away with it because "oh I didn't know that was the hammer". I have this policy in all my games and its not because I am Scum. On top of that, I have never seen a quick wagon really amount to anything significant in a game. Some people will Town read the slot that is Quickwagoned, some will Scum read it. It just sucks for reading people actually, and there is the chance it ends in a quick lynch so I just try and avoid them altogether.
This could be legit town concern or it could be afraid his buddy gets lynched.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:25 am
by Torque
Vadim and Thomas of the Tiels have been prodded.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:25 am
by Torque
[/color]
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:41 am
by Aubrey
In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can. They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.
no, I think we should hunt them down vigorously until they see the rope
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:19 am
by Jamiet99uk
Right Aubrey, you're so very, very clever, you win the game on you own. I'll just sit here and not post anything.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:29 am
by CheekyTeeky
Lol Jamie you can't take people trolling to heart or you're going to have a very rough time on MS. Honestly it's probably better for town not to talk about the masons just yet. By saying you think you should keep them alive you're effectively narrowing the pool for scum by soft-claiming VT. That's usually considered anti-town behaviour just so you know.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 6:06 am
by Aubrey
In post 107, Jamiet99uk wrote:Right Aubrey, you're so very, very clever, you win the game on you own. I'll just sit here and not post anything.
I'm not trying to be a complete dick, but saying "
Guys let's try and not kill the masons
" is basically equivalent to saying, "
Guys, to beat the game we need to kill scum.
" It's just not progressive talk whatsoever, but rather stating the obvious. Once again, it just comes off as talk for the sake of seeming active.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:10 am
by Quick
In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can.
They effectively have a 1-shot copscan
.
What do you mean?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:20 am
by Aubrey
X person, scummy as hell. Masons attempt to recruit, and see if it is successful. Yes, town. No, scum.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:40 am
by Quick
In post 111, Aubrey wrote:X person, scummy as hell. Masons attempt to recruit, and see if it is successful. Yes, town. No, scum.
K.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:04 am
by lucca261
yeah, not liking the last posts from jamie. I mean, 102 reads to me like: "look how townie I am, talking about our masons, the town masons" meh.
hey, cheeky, how a naked omgus vote without any pressure would give you a reaction? talk to me.
hey, comm, why would an experienced player like quick be afraid of a rvs lynch? I think you are trying to appear active. there was no need to make that post.
I like aubrey so far. and chisa.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:07 am
by Quick
Truth be told, I'm more of a donkey than a vet.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:08 am
by lucca261
overall, I think a scum!jamie that would be concerned with the meta wouldn't be so defensive like he was with aubrey, so I don't like that explanation at least.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:37 am
by CheekyTeeky
In post 113, lucca261 wrote:hey, cheeky, how a naked omgus vote without any pressure would give you a reaction? talk to me.
I'll show you mine if you show me yours. Why did you naked vote me?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:46 am
by lucca261
because I think you are scum. who says I wanted a response.
you, on the other hand, wanted one. what response?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:52 am
by CheekyTeeky
In post 117, lucca261 wrote:because I think you are scum. who says I wanted a response.
you, on the other hand, wanted one. what response?
This response. Which really isn't good enough. Town would give a less bs reason for a vote to get others on board with their line of thinking. This is just lazy and says to me that you don't actually have one.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 10:06 am
by Awoo
VOTE: Cheekyteeky
Funny you mention that, I'm townreading lucca and you're the one with a nonsense vote.
Funny you mention that, I'm townreading lucca and you're the one with a nonsense vote.
Why are you townreading lucca?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:04 am
by Jamiet99uk
@Aubrey - My point was more about the importance of the Masons having a 1-shot copscan than the basic "let's not kill them", but we got there in the end.
In post 48, Awoo wrote:Why would you post that, quick? You should know RVS wagons are for gathering information, not for quicklynching.
I am going to VOTE: Awoo for piling onto an easy wagon formed during the shitposting phase. Scum love easy lynches.
Nice, looks like the game is on, baby
VOTE: Quick
I've seen quicklynches happen and Scum got away with it because "oh I didn't know that was the hammer". I have this policy in all my games and its not because I am Scum. On top of that, I have never seen a quick wagon really amount to anything significant in a game. Some people will Town read the slot that is Quickwagoned, some will Scum read it. It just sucks for reading people actually, and there is the chance it ends in a quick lynch so I just try and avoid them altogether.
This could be legit town concern or it could be afraid his buddy gets lynched.
Its a legit concern, period and I would prolly say the same the same thing as both Town and Scum.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:33 am
by CheekyTeeky
In post 122, Awoo wrote:He's scumhunting, town usually does that.
Well glad to see I'm going to be playing with a brick wall Awoo.
