Mafiascum.net

In post 1224, Epic Fial wrote:

In post 1215, Quick wrote:I think it was Epic who made an excellent point on Flubber.

Let's see what happens when I do this:

VOTE: Flubber

I did? What was it?

This is what I was talking about:

In post 1201, Epic Fial wrote:

In post 1103, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1072, Epic Fial wrote:

In post 978, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 976, Maki Harukawa wrote:Top tr flips town? Shocked.

I will have to make time to ISO you and Lalendra.

Please not to forget
To make time for these ISOs
I will try also

Just did lalendra iso

Focuses way too much on Jamie, who we now know was a very convenient slot for scum to target

Also meh

In post 1145, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1143, Flavor Leaf wrote:Lalendra is a compromise lynch and will flip town.

Yep

Flubber, can you explain how you got from the first quote to the second please?

In post 1202, Epic Fial wrote:

In post 1189, Flubbernugget wrote:D1 was a no lynch
D2 was a compromise lynch

I see a perfect reason for scum to kill someone that wasn't making much of a difference in the game

Can you explain this? Why would scum kill someone who hasn't made mych impact?

You'll notice that Flubber never answers you.

Damn! You're right! I should pay more attention to myself...

Let's see what he has to say for himself next time he checks in...

Btw, I'm experimenting with lucidity technique this game Day...

Flavor's expert reads I'm fine calling him scum with flub

So why is Flubber being voted again? This game has a popular trend of unexplained votes/wagons it seems.

In post 1204, Flubbernugget wrote:I wasn't hard sold on lalendra being scum (I listed my scum team later that day too) and compromise lynches are for the sake of flips, making them likely to land on town

This town is very uncooperative with each other. Scum doesn't want that to change, so it's in their interest to kill someone who wasn't changing the state of the game much.

Hey look at that it's the answers to the questions I didn't answer

So I got a bit of time now and this can't wait till I have more time tomorrow when I get my laptop in the mail.

So.. to explain my initial post today.

If I keep my hard TR on Quick, the only remaining players are: Epic, Maki, Flubber, Aubrey, Flavor, Lucca, and Chisa. 3/7 of these are scum. But I can do one better. Literally, unless Chisa, Lucca and Flavor are scum together, there was scum on me and Quick 100%.

Now I can break this down even more. Jamiet was an easy mislynch and potential pawn for the scum. With all but one person on his wagon flipped, I feel comfortable saying it was an all town wagon. So Lucca gets that pass.

Now we're down to 2 main groups here and I can give us a 50/50 shot in both. Epic, Maki, Flubber, and Aubrey are the 4 living ones on both Quick and myself D1. I can guarantee at least 2 scum in this group. Excluding Lucca, there are Chisa and Flavor outside of our wagons, one of them is likely scum avoiding being on the top wagons.

Now lets jump to D2's mislynch. Lucca, Aubrey, Chisa and Epic. I'll drop Lucca again from thought process on D1 ending wagon. So we're left with Aubrey, Chisa and Epic, at least one of these are scum, possibly two. Two are from group A and one from group B from the previous day's eliminations. I still sorta townlean on Aubrey so I we can go for the one from Group A that was on the mislynch or the one from group B that was on the mislynch.

The thing is, I early townread Chisa,

(Whoops, posted before I finished).

Anyway, I early townread Chisa. So I'm going to go with the guy that has been constantly pushing bad pushes and has contributed very little.

VOTE: Epic

Group A? Check. 50% followed by a 33-66% chance? Check. Low grade content and voting? Double check.

He's scum.

You guys didn't listen to me in the days prior... so listen to me today. Because I do not mind ripping into town post-game for ignoring every single of my pushes and going with someone they think is scum who has turned out to be town like I said they would be.

Sure, I’ll bus.

VOTE: Flubber

That’s L-1.

Fial, I gave you prime spot to come in and hammer for town cred.

In post 1228, Epic Fial wrote:Btw, I'm experimenting with lucidity technique this game Day...

I have not idea wtf that is...

In post 1236, Flavor Leaf wrote:Sure, I’ll bus.

VOTE: Flubber

I wouldn't doubt it based on how low impact you have been this game.

In post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1204, Flubbernugget wrote:I wasn't hard sold on lalendra being scum (I listed my scum team later that day too) and compromise lynches are for the sake of flips, making them likely to land on town

This town is very uncooperative with each other. Scum doesn't want that to change, so it's in their interest to kill someone who wasn't changing the state of the game much.

Hey look at that it's the answers to the questions I didn't answer

Great, than you lynched town because ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In post 1238, Quick wrote:

In post 1228, Epic Fial wrote:Btw, I'm experimenting with lucidity technique this game Day...

I have not idea wtf that is...

I get that a lot, believe it or not.

In post 1237, Flavor Leaf wrote:That’s L-1.

Fial, I gave you prime spot to come in and hammer for town cred.

I politely decline, at least until I've reread, which will happen in the next 24 hours...

In post 1232, CommKnight wrote:So I got a bit of time now and this can't wait till I have more time tomorrow when I get my laptop in the mail.

So.. to explain my initial post today.

If I keep my hard TR on Quick, the only remaining players are: Epic, Maki, Flubber, Aubrey, Flavor, Lucca, and Chisa. 3/7 of these are scum. But I can do one better. Literally, unless Chisa, Lucca and Flavor are scum together, there was scum on me and Quick 100%.

Now I can break this down even more. Jamiet was an easy mislynch and potential pawn for the scum. With all but one person on his wagon flipped, I feel comfortable saying it was an all town wagon. So Lucca gets that pass.

Now we're down to 2 main groups here and I can give us a 50/50 shot in both. Epic, Maki, Flubber, and Aubrey are the 4 living ones on both Quick and myself D1. I can guarantee at least 2 scum in this group. Excluding Lucca, there are Chisa and Flavor outside of our wagons, one of them is likely scum avoiding being on the top wagons.

Now lets jump to D2's mislynch. Lucca, Aubrey, Chisa and Epic. I'll drop Lucca again from thought process on D1 ending wagon. So we're left with Aubrey, Chisa and Epic, at least one of these are scum, possibly two. Two are from group A and one from group B from the previous day's eliminations. I still sorta townlean on Aubrey so I we can go for the one from Group A that was on the mislynch or the one from group B that was on the mislynch.

The thing is, I early townread Chisa,

You're either scum or you need a big dose of alkaselzer for that gut of yours, big fella. That's the worst chain of pseudo-logic I've seen in a long time. It's just heuristic piled upon heuristic and the uncertainty increases as you go along, to the point where your conclusion is useless.

In post 1241, Epic Fial wrote:

In post 1238, Quick wrote:

In post 1228, Epic Fial wrote:Btw, I'm experimenting with lucidity technique this game Day...

I have not idea wtf that is...

I get that a lot, believe it or not.

LOL. Oh, I def believe it.

In post 1233, CommKnight wrote:(Whoops, posted before I finished).

Anyway, I early townread Chisa. So I'm going to go with the guy that has been constantly pushing bad pushes and has contributed very little.

VOTE: Epic

Group A? Check. 50% followed by a 33-66% chance? Check. Low grade content and voting? Double check.

He's scum.

Actually, this is not a bad point at all. Prolly Comm's best post of the game IMO.

Epic's reaction isn't great either.

Still happy with my vote tho.

In post 1240, Quick wrote:

In post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1204, Flubbernugget wrote:I wasn't hard sold on lalendra being scum (I listed my scum team later that day too) and compromise lynches are for the sake of flips, making them likely to land on town

This town is very uncooperative with each other. Scum doesn't want that to change, so it's in their interest to kill someone who wasn't changing the state of the game much.

Hey look at that it's the answers to the questions I didn't answer

Great, than you lynched town because ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Why is there no wagon on a player trying to promote two back to back no lynches

In post 1248, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1240, Quick wrote:

In post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 1204, Flubbernugget wrote:I wasn't hard sold on lalendra being scum (I listed my scum team later that day too) and compromise lynches are for the sake of flips, making them likely to land on town

This town is very uncooperative with each other. Scum doesn't want that to change, so it's in their interest to kill someone who wasn't changing the state of the game much.

Hey look at that it's the answers to the questions I didn't answer

Great, than you lynched town because ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Why is there no wagon on a player trying to promote two back to back no lynches

I have no fucking idea what you are talking about...