Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:25 am
Trust me if I agree Flubber needs pushed I will push there.
In post 1605, MathBlade wrote:In post 1299, MathBlade wrote:CommKnight
Making a reads list and not following through is horrible. Asking if someone is scum and then not sorting them in a potential world is ridiculous. Kindheartedly your reads are shit.I will place a vote here until I figure out if your reads are Town shit or scum shit.
VOTE: CommKnight
Sell me on the current wagons people. Why are they a thing?In post 1301, MathBlade wrote:In post 1288, CommKnight wrote:Because your reasoning would be shit.Moving on.Again, Comm Knight scum claims here.Seems like Comm really wants to throw shade onto Epic.On top of that he asks what it could be. It could be anything.No townie post of Comm's I have seen says. "So you don't agree with my posts?" You're scum.
Comm knight has played and seen me enough to know that disagreeing with a reason doesn't justify this.
What has to happen is finding the heart and the intent of people.
I don't get this comment at all. Why would you just kick back when you haven't hardly lifted a finger all game?In post 1619, Maki Harukawa wrote:so I can just kick back and let them carry because someone in this game can finally read me
In post 1563, Epic Fial wrote:In post 405, Epic Fial wrote:In post 347, lucca261 wrote:
Fial:304 - expected more from the Fial return. more in depth reads, as he did for Jamie, instead of just naked reads.Maybe you can tell us why you like naked votes but not naked reads? Another player has replaced in since my last post. Seems like a backward noob. One who might help crack the case if his heart is pure. Now how do you feel about that slot?In post 360, lucca261 wrote:it's quick and it creates content. sometimes you can even apply pressure with them. what's not to like?In post 354, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Lucca: Tell me more about naked votes and why you like them?
In post 1565, Epic Fial wrote:In post 1191, Epic Fial wrote:Lol I'm bored with haiku technique. Obv frame is obv. On the other hand, unless there is scum on NK's scumlist then he would presumably have been more valuable alive to scum. Killing him seems to indicate he was onto something. At the moment I don't have a clear picture of who that might be. To be honest, though, I have reason to believe both he and scum have been quite unobservant this game. My reason for saying that is something I don't want to disclose right now. Even now i remain suspicious of Comm. I notice on his colour-coded VC he doesn't even notice I have two votes recorded. My votes on him and Lalendra. So if he is really looking for scum that is quite a thing to miss. Obviously it's not damning in itself, but it's not nothing. That's about all i have right now. One thing i urgently need to do is reread. When i have some time today I will. Now I'm going to be busy for a few hours at least.
Epic ain’t a mason lol.In post 1636, CommKnight wrote:In post 1565, Epic Fial wrote:In post 1191, Epic Fial wrote:Lol I'm bored with haiku technique. Obv frame is obv. On the other hand, unless there is scum on NK's scumlist then he would presumably have been more valuable alive to scum. Killing him seems to indicate he was onto something. At the moment I don't have a clear picture of who that might be. To be honest, though, I have reason to believe both he and scum have been quite unobservant this game. My reason for saying that is something I don't want to disclose right now. Even now i remain suspicious of Comm. I notice on his colour-coded VC he doesn't even notice I have two votes recorded. My votes on him and Lalendra. So if he is really looking for scum that is quite a thing to miss. Obviously it's not damning in itself, but it's not nothing. That's about all i have right now. One thing i urgently need to do is reread. When i have some time today I will. Now I'm going to be busy for a few hours at least.
In post 1635, CommKnight wrote:In post 1563, Epic Fial wrote:In post 405, Epic Fial wrote:In post 347, lucca261 wrote:
Fial:304 - expected more from the Fial return. more in depth reads, as he did for Jamie, instead of just naked reads.In post 360, lucca261 wrote:it's quick and it creates content. sometimes you can even apply pressure with them. what's not to like?In post 354, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Lucca: Tell me more about naked votes and why you like them?Maybe you can tell us why you like naked votes but not naked reads?Another player has replaced in since my last post.Seems like a backward noob.One who might help crack the case if his heart is pure.Now how do you feel about that slot?
Calling confirmed mason scum.In post 1578, Epic Fial wrote:SAFIn post 1576, MathBlade wrote: Looking forward to the likely scum flip.
Your gut sucks...In post 1630, CommKnight wrote:Actually, I'm not going to wait. Maki, Quick, and Aubrey all showed they aren't your mason buddy through their posting. I doubt Flubber is. So we have our masons.
Moving on... You realize I was against BOTH town lynches for the past two days and have been pushing other people who were scummier. Town (and mafia) kept lynching the people I was reading as town and have been openly doing so before their lynches.
So if I'm not locked town to you already, then I suggest rereading the entire game since post 1.
Now, the fun part because I like solving shit.
I assumed Quick was town based on interactions and the "fake hammer" that Aubrey gave. This is the fun little bit here, I townread Quick based on what Aubrey did. But the KICKER? Only one of them could actually be town in the first place now that we're at LYLO here.
Want to place a bet on both of them being scum? I will. There's a thing called too townie to be town. I nearly caught Aubrey last time with this thought train and this time I'm going through with it. You dug your own grave Aubrey, but nice job being town read yet again until LYLO situation presents itself and a real townie only needs to put 1 and 1 together.
Chisa dead? WHy not Quick, Aubrey, or even Maki who town has refused to lynch up to this point?
See, I already hinted at who I scumread between Maki and Flubber. It's MAKI. I've been pushing Maki for a long time now and NO support. Why no support? Because the people I townread were on their side. With the people I scum read being reluctant to push another of my scum reads.
Scum Team: Aubrey, Quick, & Maki. Flubber is VT. Epic and Math are Mason. We're done here.
In post 1642, CommKnight wrote:THEN HARD CLAIM YOUR PARTNER. HE CLAIMED MASON, NOW YOU'RE CC'ING HIM. SO FUCKING CLAIM.
In post 1632, MathBlade wrote:In post 1605, MathBlade wrote:In post 1299, MathBlade wrote:CommKnight
Making a reads list and not following through is horrible. Asking if someone is scum and then not sorting them in a potential world is ridiculous. Kindheartedly your reads are shit.I will place a vote here until I figure out if your reads are Town shit or scum shit.
VOTE: CommKnight
Sell me on the current wagons people. Why are they a thing?In post 1301, MathBlade wrote:In post 1288, CommKnight wrote:Because your reasoning would be shit.Moving on.Again, Comm Knight scum claims here.Seems like Comm really wants to throw shade onto Epic.On top of that he asks what it could be. It could be anything.No townie post of Comm's I have seen says. "So you don't agree with my posts?" You're scum.
Comm knight has played and seen me enough to know that disagreeing with a reason doesn't justify this.
What has to happen is finding the heart and the intent of people.
In post 1299, MathBlade wrote:CommKnight
Making a reads list and not following through is horrible. Asking if someone is scum and then not sorting them in a potential world is ridiculous. Kindheartedly your reads are shit.I will place a vote here until I figure out if your reads are Town shit or scum shit.
VOTE: CommKnight
Sell me on the current wagons people. Why are they a thing?