Page 26 of 83

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:14 am
by Jamiet99uk
@Awoo: You think CommKnight *isn't* full of it? You think his posts are more substance than ego? Really?

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:16 am
by Lalendra
In post 612, CommKnight wrote:
CommKnight
(6):
Chisa Yukizome
,
Epic Fial
,
lucca261
,
Quick
,
Maki Harukawa
,
Jamiet99uk

Quick
(6):
CheekyTeeky
,
Awoo
,
northsidegal
,
CommKnight
,
Aubrey
,
Flavor Leaf


Not voting:
Lalendra


Town

Neutral

Scum


Placing my bets now since I might not get the chance later and so I can't back out at end of game and say I read people differently.
I like this. This, more than anything else Comm has said so far, gives me warm town fuzzies.

VOTE: Quick

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:41 am
by Awoo
If we don't lynch quick today I am going to deathtunnel him

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 am
by Maki Harukawa
VOTE: Quick

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:55 am
by Maki Harukawa
When your top sr's are the top wagons I love it

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:08 am
by Awoo
mwah

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:22 am
by Torque
Flubbernugget replaces CheekyTeeky.

vc coming in a bit.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:24 am
by Torque
Votecount 1.11


CommKnight (5): Chisa Yukizome, Epic Fial, lucca261, Quick, Jamiet99uk
Quick (6): CheekyTeeky, Awoo, northsidegal, CommKnight, Lalendra, Maki Harukawa

lucca261 (1): Flavor Leaf
Lalendra (1): Aubrey

Not voting:

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch!

Day 1 will end in (expired on 2017-11-03 10:00:00)
[/color]

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 am
by Flubbernugget
Hi all.

Might skim a little bit but I'm not typically one to do a catch up

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:29 am
by Flubbernugget
Would typically unvote but deadline is close

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:44 am
by CommKnight
In post 626, Lalendra wrote:
In post 612, CommKnight wrote:
CommKnight
(6):
Chisa Yukizome
,
Epic Fial
,
lucca261
,
Quick
,
Maki Harukawa
,
Jamiet99uk

Quick
(6):
CheekyTeeky
,
Awoo
,
northsidegal
,
CommKnight
,
Aubrey
,
Flavor Leaf


Not voting:
Lalendra


Town

Neutral

Scum


Placing my bets now since I might not get the chance later and so I can't back out at end of game and say I read people differently.
I like this. This, more than anything else Comm has said so far, gives me warm town fuzzies.

VOTE: Quick
Honestly this threw me off. I was ready for Lale to be the hammer on me.

Also Maki's switch is noted. It should be noted for everyone. I mean I'm glad it's not 100% mislynch on me now. But not standing firm in their vote and just wanting to lynch one of the two top-wagons. If Quick somehow flips town, I'd be questioning that slot a bit more going into tomorrow (if I am there tomorrow).

@Flubber. Hello, you're town. Your predecessor already convinced me of that. It's either me or Quick today since he was so eager to 1v1 me that all other wagons dissolved today. So I suggest while reading/skimming through you pay attention to both of our posts a bit more. (My ISO is a lot shorter and quicker to read than his, I promise. I don't have 80+ posts). Also look for possible associates pending flip and how people decided to vote on each wagon. Anything really that will help you analyze both wagons pending flips.

Also... Quick is at L1, if he's lynched and not me, whoever intends to hammer, give him a chance to claim Mason/Not Mason. if he's hammered before he claims. i will rip right into that person tomorrow 150%. This is meant for those new to this site *cough* Jamie *cough*. So no bullshit about meta from your previous sites. You hammer him without a claim, I'll rip you a new ass tomorrow.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:56 am
by Maki Harukawa
If you checked my reads list I have both comm/quick at last tier if there mason they better claim it cause I will hammer it right away

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:08 am
by Flubbernugget
VOTE: quick

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:10 am
by Lalendra
In post 635, CommKnight wrote:This is meant for those new to this site *cough* Jamie *cough*. So no bullshit about meta from your previous sites. You hammer him without a claim, I'll rip you a new ass tomorrow.
Not gonna lie, this made me lol.

P-Edit: Weren't you already on the wagon?

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:10 am
by Lalendra
Yes, you were. But I am happy to see you're staying.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:11 am
by Flubbernugget
you ruined it

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:11 am
by Flubbernugget
commknight I don't have any recollection of you being so adamant about flips before

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:12 am
by Lalendra
You're right, I should have let Comm deathtunnel you and then realize his mistake. That would have been a lot funnier.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:13 am
by Flubbernugget
?? comm just said he was town reading me

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:15 am
by Lalendra
In post 635, CommKnight wrote:Also... Quick is at L1, if he's lynched and not me, whoever intends to hammer, give him a chance to claim Mason/Not Mason. if he's hammered before he claims. i will rip right into that person tomorrow 150%. This is meant for those new to this site *cough* Jamie *cough*. So no bullshit about meta from your previous sites. You hammer him without a claim, I'll rip you a new ass tomorrow.
@Flubber - Thought you were playing a joke by re-voting the slot with a new name after replacing in and having a predecessor who was already on that wagon. If not then I misinterpreted. I'll sit down and shut up now.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:18 am
by Flubbernugget
oh,

that makes sense also

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:44 am
by CommKnight
In post 641, Flubbernugget wrote:commknight I don't have any recollection of you being so adamant about flips before
Kill All Townies - Remember this game? You died D2, but I was pretty damn set on flips in this game.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:05 am
by Jamiet99uk
A re-read of Quick up to Page 22, citing only posts which are of significance
================

#13: Queries Assemblerotws' vote. Wonders why there isn't more participation in the early stage.

#17 #18: Wants to know what alts are in play and posts a link to players in a previous game identifying their alts - including his own.

#25: Gives a logical answer to Aubrey's question about his own questioning of Assemblerotws.

#47: Doesn't think I should be lynched.

#49 (and again at #123): Explains his policy on quicklynches - seems a sound and logical policy (but is not town indicative as he himself says he always has this position).

#86 / 88 / 90 / 92 exchange with CheekyTeeky looks weird on re-read. Quick's vote on Cheeky for Cheeky's vote on Lucca being "horrible" either indicates Quick wasn't properly reading the thread, or... I dunno.

#144: Questions my first set of reads.

#220: Summary of current feelings. Explains his thought processes on several players so far.

#232: Questions Lalendra for having a vote parked on someone (me) they didn't scumread. Fair comment.

#245: Tries to get more participation from Epic.

#270: First inklings of a battle with CommKnight over CommKnight's "gut".

#282: Clogs up the thread by re-posting a lot of low-content crap from Aubrey. Not great.

#284: I didn't townread Lucca at this time but in retrospect Quick's discussion of Lucca's attack on Cheeky makes sense.

#302: Calls out CommKnight's bullshit. He's right. It's bullshit.

#352: Interrogates me, perfectly legitimately. At the time I was seeing how people would react to my gambit vs CommKnight, as you'll all recall.

#495, 498: Jumps from me to Awoo because of Awoo's awful PL post. Fair enough.

#513: I like this post.


On balance I still think Quick is more likely to be town than CommKnight, and if CommKnight is town, which I doubt, his attitude stinks.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:09 am
by Lalendra
I lot of that commentary says you find his content to be lacking or NAI so I'm not sure where you are getting the townread from. Is it just because you think CK is scum and their 1v1 makes Quick town?

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:10 am
by Awoo
Jamie that was a summary not an analysis.

IIOA