Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:14 am**

In post 600, Flavor Leaf wrote:CommKnight was one of the players that I recognized yet didn’t have a lot of experience with, as the game I did play with him, I replaced in, targeted him, didn’t put a lot of effort into it, then got night kill. Aubrey is kind of the same way. I don’t play a lot of open games. Not my thing. Generally I recognize the majority of players in games, maybe just not one or two, but over here that is not the case. Even the players I’m more familiar with I don’t have much experience with.

This is a very poor explanation in light of my question / observation regarding Assemblerotws being all "Comm is so great at reads!! You should all trust him!!" and then your first post about Comm basically being a declaration that you'd townread him all day today regardless.

How do you read him now?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:15 am**

MY TR on Quick comes from the posts I indicate that I like.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:19 am**

In post 651, Jamiet99uk wrote:MY TR on Quick comes from the posts I indicate that I like.

I guess I'm not understanding what you like about them, they sound pretty null/fluffy to me when you recap them that way.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:19 am**

You also didn't include any information about WHY you liked those posts, as Awoo pointed out.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:29 am**

In post 653, Lalendra wrote:You also didn't include any information about WHY you liked those posts, as Awoo pointed out.

If you can't see why, that's your problem.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:40 am**

Yes, god forbid I fail to see how phrases like "not town indicative," "looks weird on re-read," "wasn't properly reading the thread" and "not great" translate somehow to having a town read on someone.

352 and 513 are the only ones you seemed to get a good feeling from, and you don't say why. Not sure what town-you has to gain from being so evasive in the face of questioning.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:11 am**

"He's town guys, here's the proof"
"What do you mean that's just a used napkin, are you stupid or something?"

~ Town ~ doesnt ~ do ~ shit ~ like ~ this ~

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:21 am**

I'm not seeking to persuade you that Quick is town. I'm telling you that that is how I read him.

But if you've played enough Mafia, I've given you the clues.

Lalendra almost got there a moment ago.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:22 am**

You may draw your own conclusions.

Just try to make them the right ones.

Anyone who strongly townreads CommKnight: Why? Do you like being shouted at? Do you enjoy bright colours?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:36 am**

In post 352, Quick wrote:
In post 286, Quick wrote:
In post 252, Jamiet99uk wrote:
In post 240, Epic Fial wrote:
In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can. They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.
What steps shall we take to keep the masons alive?

Let's try not to lynch them.

This is where I first started thinking a lot of you posts are just really low impact. Like given the conversation around you bringing up "don't lynch Masons" and then (I think) Aubrey saying "OK how do we do that" and then you respond like this here... its just kinda Scumm because it looks like you are trying to be helpful without really adding anything.

In post 345, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Quick: Why are you voting me? Why am I scum?
Mostly for posts like this that make it look like you are doing more than you really are:

In post 307, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Aubrey - Okay sorry, I really had just missed your question there... kinda buried in a big block of text and not directly addressing me.

I think you are right that since my vote is still on Awoo it would be prudentbto re-read her. Give me a little time to do that.

In post 314, Jamiet99uk wrote:Dammit this game is packed with quitters.

That's like the 5th replacement in a 13 player game. Is that normal here?

In post 316, Jamiet99uk wrote:@CommKnight:

Do you trust your gut enough to stake your own neck on it?

In post 320, Jamiet99uk wrote:Assemble tells us to follow CommKnight's gut / Assemble's vote is not on the same target as CommKnight....

Hmm.

In post 340, Jamiet99uk wrote:Because if that's normal here, I probably just need to leave this website.

In post 342, Jamiet99uk wrote:@CommKnight: While I'm still playing: So, do you agree to the following?

- If I sheep your vote this turn, and (y)our target is lynched, and flips TOWN, then you agree that YOU will be the lynch tomorrow, and to that ens, will vote for yourself tomorrow in those circumstances?

In post 343, Jamiet99uk wrote:@Awoo

I'm not quitting. I just don't see the point in this website if the games are so shit that half the players quit during the course of an average game like CommKnight has suggested. This game has already had what I'd regard as a worryingly high level of replacements...
It just seems like you are spreading your posts out too much at the least and alternatively I can see you doing this on purpose to make it look like you are having a bigger impact on the game than you really are. Like, your content just doesn't really go that deep, no offence. It just looks Scummy because this game is pretty dense with detailed stuff to talk about and it looks like you are still asking surface level questions.

In post 513, Quick wrote:
In post 512, Awoo wrote:VOTE: Quick Nope, votes on my wagon look good. Except for quick. 344 was just a wagon building vote. Your vote on me is just a wagon building vote. 352 is weak reasoning for joining the wagon. Like the other guy said, it's a weak hypothetical that relies on... what? I like him for scum here.

You vote him since his content is not deep enough but he's pretty town though? voting, pressuring for good reasons. I was just despairing in my post over jamie being doomed not to live to endgame because of silly/annoying things he does and that town won't look past that. But we can though, you know? So I'm happy I made that post.
First, I am not going to explain my Town read on Jamie, I'm just not. Second, I did actually state that I thought your post when you voted Jamie was all kinds of wrong. I aslo stated a reason the other people didn't. But others saw that post was bad as well, so if anything, I was just agreeing with my previous post by voting for you.

I assume when you say I "almost got there" you were referring to my comment about the two posts you seemed to like. Since you didn't link the posts in your giant list, I quoted them for everyone's convenience here. Still not seeing what about these two posts gives you a townread, unless it's gut, and I don't buy the "anyone who doesn't see it my way must be a noob" mentality, so I guess that's the end of our conversation since you're not willing to explain further.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:46 am**

It Halloweeeeeeeeeeeen! Which meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeans, this game will be dead to me for most the night! Unless I get back to the home early.

Be safe, and have fun to those who celebrate. Horror movie night with the friends I gooooooooo!

(as soon as I leave work, cry*)

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:48 am**

Oh, while it'd be funny, don't lynch someone on a holiday plz. K, and thanks.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:57 am**

Ew. Lalendra is on the Quick wagon, and has been engaging with a slot that makes it easy for her to produce content. Great. Can't wait to do a deeper read on all this.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:48 am**

I don't really worry too much about level of content, lurking is NAI - life gets busy and I know I have lurked as both alignments. Active lurking/fluffposting is different imo. But I don't feel that's what I've been doing. You are obviously entitled to disagree.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:48 am**

Jamiet that was gross

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:02 am**

VOTE: Lalendra

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:05 am**

Another D1 lynch, lovely.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:07 am**

not really feeling this CommKnight lynch. having doubts on the wagon. Jamie is voting him 'cause he doesn't like him, Fial is wanting Comm to OMGUS him and I don't even remember why Chisa is voting him.

the Quick lynch feels manufactured too, and it's on a top townread of mine. the start of the wagon was really weird with the whole awoo L-1 vote, and Lalendra/Maki jumping on him at the last time make me question both wagons. I'm currently thinking both are on town.

let's quick lynch Lalendra.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:08 am**

I'll hammer CommKnight if it comes to this.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:13 am**

meh, Jamie is probably scum.

@jamie, 580: name your post. point to it. I don't like this one bit.

answer.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:13 am**

Oh, I'm not hammered, nice.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:40 am**

In post 667, lucca261 wrote:not really feeling this CommKnight lynch. having doubts on the wagon. Jamie is voting him 'cause he doesn't like him, Fial is wanting Comm to OMGUS him and I don't even remember why Chisa is voting him.

the Quick lynch feels manufactured too, and it's on a top townread of mine. the start of the wagon was really weird with the whole awoo L-1 vote, and Lalendra/Maki jumping on him at the last time make me question both wagons. I'm currently thinking both are on town.

let's quick lynch Lalendra.

What makes you want to lynch me over Maki, since you say we both "jumped on" the Quick wagon?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:43 am**

and just like that lucca loses towncred

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:55 am**

In post 672, Maki Harukawa wrote:and just like that lucca loses towncred

Why?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:58 am**

In post 673, Quick wrote:
In post 672, Maki Harukawa wrote:and just like that lucca loses towncred
Why?

I think his stance is really bad

Mafiascum.net

Open 695: Making Friends and Enemies [Mafia Win!]