Open 70 - Two of Four (b9) (Game Over!) before 595
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
dcorbe - Lots of voting within the first page, but since it's also random voting it's excusable.
Looking to speed up the day?dcorbe wrote:Mod,
It's been almost 24 hours since the last post. Can we put a time limit on the day please?
farside22 -
unvote:Some looking for a no lynch = scum[/quote]
vote: dcorbe
How was asking for a deadline = looking for a no lynch? Quick to assume, hn?
Interesting policy.farside22 wrote:I say we should vote those not trying to promote activity.
Sounds pretty condemning.farside22 wrote: Get in and start hunting scum or you are scum.
Oh? Why the claim? You're nowhere close to being lynched or anything.farside wrote:Claim townie (bolded this)
The self vote makes it seem like you're fishing for sympathy because you're being attacked.farside22 wrote:
Why would I be blamed for his lynch if most people agreed with it? I read his response to his claim and comments and said he is aggressive, but also stated page 3 is not enough info. I never didn't say that and you keep missing that to make yourself sound good. Whatever helps you sleep at night or makes you think your scum hunting is good is no skin off my nose. Remind me the next time I see you in for a game to out myself because your scum hunting is terrible. You are looking for something that isn't there and letting the scum fly off.armlx wrote:What you did and what you say you did are conflicting.
What you did: Put dcorbe at L-2, then jumped off after he claimed townie on the basis of "I just think you are aggressive"
What you say you did: Pressured dcorbe and then hopped off to extend the day.
These are conflicting issues. The former implies that you wanted him to be lynched then backed out right before we could lynch him so you weren't blamed. The second implies a lot more tact, which I think you are retroactively trying to add to your actions.
I would wish the town good luck, but if you are listening to Armix you are screwed.
unvote:
vote: farside22
I hope you are happy this is the first game I ever voted for myself because you just made this a miserable experience for me.
Getting a bit personal, aren't we?farside22 wrote:
I'm frustrated with you. Get it right. I'm also not putting so poor person in my place to answer stupid questions that don't make you happy.armlx wrote:
If you are that frustrated with the game, would you mind asking for replacement rather than going about your current course of action?farside22 wrote:
Already claimed. Not unvoting myself. I have nothing else to say to you.armlx wrote:By not voting him, if he turns up town, you distance yourself from the blame.
Also, claim please andUnvoteso no one hammers before this occurs.
Also, self voting is 100% anti-town. Just saying.
If anyone has any other questions for me, or anything else - go ahead and ask.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Uh no, I'm not voting for anyone - my coding sort of messed up on that post. And yes, I was doing read - and I did read after those quotes but I didn't find anything particularily scummy.farside22 wrote:@Shawdow girl. I was I believe at L-2 when I claimed and Armix asked for a claim. Are you voting for me are just going over a bit of the read? Did you finish reading everything that was stated after those quotes?
Since I can't mention bringing current games into discussions I will say one thing about Armix. He likes to push people day 1 with little to no information and push buttons. I hadn't realized that was his playstyle, but I felt the attack and comments were unjustified. I don't like the way he plays day1 being the person that he comes after and people just follow like lap dogs.
That said who are you top 3 suspects and why?
Thank you for the tip.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
My top three suspects:farside22 wrote:@Shawdow girl. I was I believe at L-2 when I claimed and Armix asked for a claim. Are you voting for me are just going over a bit of the read? Did you finish reading everything that was stated after those quotes?
Since I can't mention bringing current games into discussions I will say one thing about Armix. He likes to push people day 1 with little to no information and push buttons. I hadn't realized that was his playstyle, but I felt the attack and comments were unjustified. I don't like the way he plays day1 being the person that he comes after and people just follow like lap dogs.
That said who are you top 3 suspects and why?
Moreso:
dcorbe - Leaving Max at L-1, despite warning people about it, definitely brings up a red flag in my head.
Max -
Mr.Blonde getting killed seems like such a odd choice, and something about this post seems off to me. He points out these two people without any evidence.Max wrote:I'm vanilla which means I'm going to get lynched, you haven't got a case for me to defend against and I believe that Mr Blonde is scum, avinyl is town and jtdyer is the second scum.
Mr.Blonde was probably killed by someone he accused.Mr. Blonde wrote:Grimmy, alvinz95 - What do you guys think about Max & Farside? Do you think they are townies or scums?
Say something, vote somebody.
Not so much:
Armlx -
Considering Max practically dissapeared, the hammer isn't so suspicious, however, it didn't come longer after dcorbe's post.armlx wrote:Yeah, nothing convincing.
Vote Max
Hammah time.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Hn. He posted a little content on page five, but other than that... He is being pretty lurkerish, though I don't know if that's because he has time contraints? [Though, he is posting in other games...]farside22 wrote:@Shawdow: What about alvinz lack of comments. I admittedly don't like people who have nothing to offer to the game it always comes across as scummy.
I can't get a read on him considering how few posts there is to read.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I've at least posted a little bit content, albeit it isn't the best - he's posted only as so he doesn't get prodded.dcorbe wrote:
You've also posted to avoid being prodded. If it's a scum tell for alvinz, should it be a scum tell for you as well?ShadowGirl wrote:And I agree that alvinz needs to post more. Saying that you're here doesn't help the town.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
To me, anything that is said in a post is a tell of someone's alignment. Also, I don't see how it's odd that me and jtyder think differently - we are different people.Now in ShadowGirls first big analysis post, there are only two people mentioned, dcorbe, which I find interesting given how jtyder did a quick and unexplained “townie read” on him. Also there is mention of farside, for mostly being emotional, which again seems really unusual because emotional isn’t indicative of alignment. No vote was included on this first post.
Just because someone has slipped from my top three doesn't mean I've forgotten about them. Seeing as how alvinz has practically dissapeared from the thread and farside is active, it makes him seem as if he's hiding.In the second analysis post, the scum from SG are dcorbe, Max (?!) and Armix. Dcorbe again is interesting to me for previous reasons, max is just stupid and I don’t know what to make of that, and then armix for a quick hammer, which is a much more sensical suspicion to me. No vote again from SG. Farside also has disappeard from this list, making me wonder why she was included on the first post.
And yet he conviently posts right after me with a large PBPA after I've just pointed him out for dissapearing.When challenged on the fact that Max was the D1 lynch, SG throws in alvinz as a suspicion, because he is lurking, and that’s really all the case that got built up there.
Anyway, how's that coming along?alvinz95 wrote:Well, I attempted to get some scumtells, but when going through it, I got nothing. I plan on investigating someone else today.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I agree with dcorbe. I don't see what information we can possibly get out of Max's lynch - he hardly put up a defense and he was practically asking for it. How is speculating on possible scum partners for Max doing any good either - he didn't flip scum, no matter how much he seemed like it.
This discussion is getting us nowhere and only seems to be stirring things up for just the sake of it.
Vote: farside22-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Lurking on purpose? How am I lurking? Also, why did you ask me to be prodded?farside22 wrote:
Have you even discussed anything yet? Are you lurking on purpose and just looking for BW to join.This discussion is getting us nowhere and only seems to be stirring things up for just the sake of it.
dcorbe
shadowgirl
scum pair. Shadow following dcorbe vote should look damn shaddy to many.
Prod to Grimmy and Lama
I would like other peoples input on what just happened.
If I was scum I wouldn't be quite as stupid to follow him after in a vote.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I apologize for not posting - my phone and internet went out for some inexplicable reason and it took a few days before a repairmen came to fix it.
Nonetheless, out of all the games I'm playing this is the one that I've clearly played horribly nor is my heart into it - if you wish to lynch me, then go ahead. However, I would prefer I be replaced - for town's sake.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Thank you for the advice.armlx wrote:
For future reference, saying this means nothing.For what it's worth - I am not scum. That is why I prefer to be replaced.
Why do you need someone else to justify as to whether your vote is good? You should know whether it or not.Also what do you think of my vote on SG? Is that a good vote? What about Arimx's Grimmy vote?-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I apologize for taking awhile to answer this post - I haven't forgotten it.
I'm not ignoring what happened, I'm just saying that we can only get so much from it. Considering how brash Max was playing, he was practically asking for it.LlamaFluff wrote:
Im really pressed for time but I will comment on this later tonight when I have more then five minutes.ShadowGirl wrote:I agree with dcorbe. I don't see what information we can possibly get out of Max's lynch - he hardly put up a defense and he was practically asking for it. How is speculating on possible scum partners for Max doing any good either - he didn't flip scum, no matter how much he seemed like it.
This discussion is getting us nowhere and only seems to be stirring things up for just the sake of it.
Vote: farside22
I think there is plenty of information to get out of the Max lynch. I did an analysis post on it and from what I figured out, Avinyl became my top suspect over SG.
The willingness of SG to ignore what happened there, especially as I didnt like the player she replaced in what he did during the Max lynch, a concern. I still see a much higher chance of SG scum the dcorbe, as ive seen him play this wierd reckless scummy play in ever game that I look at.
I would still say a lynch should be SG or avinly at this point though.
I do realize that I'm not getting a completely clean slate - a new beginning. As I've already said, me and jtyder are different people - I don't see why I need to think like him.Llama wrote:First of what will probally be at least a double post
You still are responsable for anything that jtyder did, just like I am responsable for anything alvinz did. The thing that was odd to me was that while jtyder seemed to dismiss him as a scum suspect too fast, you decided to make him one of your top picks. While dissention between replacees and replaced are common, the fact that it was to this much of an extream is noteable.ShadowGirl wrote:
To me, anything that is said in a post is a tell of someone's alignment. Also, I don't see how it's odd that me and jtyder think differently - we are different people.Now in ShadowGirls first big analysis post, there are only two people mentioned, dcorbe, which I find interesting given how jtyder did a quick and unexplained “townie read” on him. Also there is mention of farside, for mostly being emotional, which again seems really unusual because emotional isn’t indicative of alignment. No vote was included on this first post.
I don't see why I'm obliged to vote Especially considering at the time I had just come in - I wanted to see the people in play.Llama wrote:
Well what is your current stance on farside then if you still are thinking about her? It seems something that would of been addressed in a second post of who is scummy given your thoughts in the first post that did mention her. Again the failure to vote here also is interesting, you have done two analysis posts and failed to vote in either.shadow wrote:
Just because someone has slipped from my top three doesn't mean I've forgotten about them. Seeing as how alvinz has practically dissapeared from the thread and farside is active, it makes him seem as if he's hiding.In the second analysis post, the scum from SG are dcorbe, Max (?!) and Armix. Dcorbe again is interesting to me for previous reasons, max is just stupid and I don’t know what to make of that, and then armix for a quick hammer, which is a much more sensical suspicion to me. No vote again from SG. Farside also has disappeard from this list, making me wonder why she was included on the first post.
Farside just seems a bit brash with every post she makes, and the things that happened page six sticks in my head. A breakdown and a self vote? This is a game - you shouldn't take things personally.Llama wrote:
Well I am alvinz 2.0, a more reliable, more efficiant and with improved scumhunt(TM) abilities. My analysis of the thread says that you and avinyl are the best candidates for scum.shadow wrote:
Anyway, how's that coming along?alvinz95 wrote:Well, I attempted to get some scumtells, but when going through it, I got nothing. I plan on investigating someone else today.
All jokes aside though, I would like to hear a case from you sometime soon, and thoughts on farside. As well as answers to anything I asked in this post.
I didn't vote for farside for looking in further to the Max lynch wagon, I voted for her because nothing productive was coming out of probing into it.Llama wrote:The vote on farside for trying to get people to look at the Max lynch wagon also bugs me. It gives a bit of a bad vibe, sort of like a guard saying "no you arent going in there" as they put their hand on a gun. A preimtive OMGUS if you will. I would like to hear an answer to 317 when you get the chance too.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Hm. The post is said with an immense amount of confidence, but I'm not quite sure if he would throw Grimmy under the bus. He'd be down one partner but he would be pretty much vindicated of any scumminess. I'm trying to think of likely the possibility of him being a cop is, but I don't see it as very high.What ShadowGirls opinion on the slip is
I'd like to hear from him about that statement.
Grimmy doesn't seem to have been posting that much, and his last post that actually contained something useful was his PBA of dcorbe on page nine - with the verdict that dcorbe was a townie.What ShadowGirls opinion on Cass/Grimmy is
Cass seems to be be doing a lot of 'ifs'. And the phrase:
rubs the wrong way. Is there ever really a safe choice in a game of mafia? Unless you're mafia where lynching just about anyone is pretty safe.I still think a vote on her is the safer choice.
With the posts he's made he hasn't been scumhunting very aggressively, and as I've been in other games with him I find this a bit odd. He seems to want to veer away from the Max lynch by deeming it's a waste of time, but so is arguing over whether to look at it or not.What ShadowGirls opinon on dcorbe is-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
More so the former [that it was a waste]. I've been in a game with dcorbe before and I don't see his reaction as odd - I've seen him get into fights with people and act like that.farside22 wrote:
You never stated that in your post vote. You just said it was a waste. Now you think his reaction odd or you think it is both?ShadowGirl wrote:Ick. Pressed reply by accident.
What I meant is that if anyone found something of note in the Max lynch they would have said it already.
This game is now first on my reread list.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Farside/Armlx:
Farside:
Asking for a deadline anti-town move, but I wouldn't say scummy. He merely wants to get more activity. Also, nowhere does it say that he wants a no lynch.farside22 wrote:
Asking for a deadline does not help if people aren't posting. This is by far the scummiest thing to do. You should be asking for a prod on those not posting in the last couple of days first.dcorbe wrote:Mod,
It's been almost 24 hours since the last post. Can we put a time limit on the day please?
unvote:Some looking for a no lynch = scum
vote: dcorbe
Wants to get off the wagon before he gets hammered and it shows that he's not scum. Not the best reason for voting alvinz.farside22 wrote:
That was post 35 not 22 and towards alvin95 who has done nothing and said nothing helpful or trying to promote conversation in anyway which does not help the town.dcorbe wrote:In post 22 where farside says: "I say we should vote those not trying to promote activity." sounds a little like scum not trying to sound like scum to me. Nothing around that post seems to warrant her saying that.
Vote: farside22
Meh you could be town. I think 3 pages isn't really telling me anything about you except you are aggressive.
unvote:(for now)
vote: alvinz95
Get in and start hunting scum or you are scum.
Mr. Blonde wrote:Hmm, farside22 changes his vote right after getting accused by dcorbe (who had most votes) and then farside22 tries to make us look somebody else than himself.
"So lynch all lurkers is your policy?" I kind of like that policy...
And what post would that be? As you said before, he's been contributing nothing and that's why you voted for him.farside22 wrote:I'm not lynching lurkers policy. I'm stating that people need to promote conversation and not just say I don't know.FOS Armix. Because of all the players here you should know that. I moved back to alvinz95 because of his post. I unvoted dcorbe because he is a newbie and as I stated it was page 3 and nothing much was going on.
Unless you meant this post:
Which still does not constitute a vote.alvinz95 wrote: Sorry, I was at Islands of Adventure the past weekend...
So lynch all lurkers is your policy? Obviously an attempt you deflect attention...
You expect to be lynched at L-2? There's still awhile to go. Yet, after everything you don't believe that he is scum but still expect that town will think he is after you flip town.farside22 wrote:
Talks from everyone. Get a feel for everyone to see what they say and not just saying the same thing over and over again.armlx wrote:
No info? What more do you want from a day start lynch?farside22 wrote:
I'm uncomfortable with a page 3 no info lynch. You keep missing that. Putting him at L-2 for good reason. Leaving it because sometimes (most times) scum look for an easy and quick lynch to cause confusion.armlx wrote:
Again, this all comes back to the idea of you voting (and putting at L-2 I might add) someone you weren't comfortable with lynching or thought was town.farside22 wrote:
Leaving him at L-1 which is uncomfortable when I've seen some people with quick hammers some games.armlx wrote:
Not my point. My point is abandoning his wagon based on the info at that point in time was EXTREMELY odd.farside22 wrote:
So he should be lynched without more discussion?armlx wrote:
He was wagoned for legitimately scummy reasons and didn't have a saving claim.farside22 wrote:
With 3 pages and no info? That is terrible idea. Unless I'm certain he was scum why let him get lynched by a quick hammer? Sure maybe it will flush out a newbie scum day one, but if dcorbe is townie it just gives the scum an early first kill with no discussion. You logic fails.armlx wrote:He was at L-1 and claimed townie. Correct procedure is pretty much always lynch.
Nice try in purposely misunderstanding me. Look forward to hearing you try and convince people day 2 why you were so hard up on my lynch when I have stated over and over my reasons and you keep misunderstanding. Sad part I think you are town.
Also, nice trying to scare me off voting you b/c of the "consequences" while simultaneously buddying by saying you think I'm town.
Honestly your argument is getting on my nerves because you aren't reading anything I am saying and find your shortsightedness sad. I've explained my unvote and thoughts you just don't agree. I don't care that you don't agree I care that you seem to think it's scummy when I'm doing more searching. I expect to be lynched and want it on record I don't find you scummy, but your shorsightedness will have people looking at you when I'm lynched and come out town just as I said I would.
And now you finally think he is scum after his irrational actions even though he had been like this before and you didn't think he was scum - if and when he's lynched it would look better on you.farside22 wrote:
QFT. I did. My opinion hasn't changed. He is not making any sense on his thought process and attacked anyone for asking him about it. He voted for me with little no reasoning. Overall I get scummy vibes from him.dcorbe wrote:
I think she had her vote on Max already before she unvoted and voted herself.armlx wrote:Vote Farside.
Also, no previous suspicion of max stated. Wagon much?
I'm sure if you go back far enough in the thread she at one point made a pretty small case against.
-Daniel
And now you change your stance on him once again, saying that he is town for the same reasons you previously thought was scum.armlx wrote:
I'm starting to think this as well.farside22 wrote: I don't think Armix is scum I just think he is narrow minded.
Unvoteof hypocrisy.
I endorse a Max lynch now. He has been actively scummy as opposed to subtlely as I have accused dcorbe and farside of.
And of course, an unvote from Armlx - so flip floppy.
A way to shift away from his very few comments.farside22 wrote: Not to give all my trade secrets but not everyone who dies at night died because of what they say. Some scum kill those who aren't suspicious. I wouldn't say Mr. Blonde was a great choice (usually a more pro town player is targeted) so I suspect someone who hasn't played as much mafia if I were to pick anyone as scum.
How does lurking trump a hammer? If anything, voting armlx to pressure him would be a better idea.farside22 wrote:Armix:endorses a lynch of Max, but I don't really see a reason why
jtdyer/ShadowGirl: Also lurkerish with nothing to add. I didn't really like his reasoning for his vote for max. I would like to add that Armix could you please post your reasons for your vote because you too are on my list for your hammer and suspicion without real reason radar.
vote: shadowgirl
Which is what he’s being doing to you basically the whole game.farside22 wrote:
You were arguing with me about my unvote on dcorbe. I think you two may be scum partners and I do believe you to be the type of person to buss your scum partner.armlx wrote:
What does this mean?As much as Armix beat me up for not keeping my vote on dcorbe I wonder if it wasn't bussing.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Armlx:armlx wrote:I agree with the dcorbe stuff so far. Max is null on my list so far as is Avinyl for their interaction (or more max's random push on him for something not really that scummy).
dcorbe, claim and/or die.
Also, no one is to hammer dcorbe before he claims.armlx wrote:Yeah, just leaving him chilling there is awkward. Waiting on claim still.
Seems a bit bussy.armlx wrote:Umm, yeah, Farside just abandoning the wagon is pretty sketchy.
Vote Farside
3rd on the wagon and what not. Been forever since I used that one.
You asked dcorbe to claim, but not farside?armlx wrote:Unvote
Definitely did NOT realize that was L-1.
You voted for her for doing the same thing you just did.
Oh? Because he claimed town?armlx wrote:I think a dcorbe lynch at this point is counter productive. A page ago it wasn't.
And now you ask a claim for her, despite you were quick to ask dcorbe for one.armlx wrote:Waiting on a Farside claim, then I will vote based on that.
She hadn't claimed townie at that point.armlx wrote:Pushes dcorbe wagon and just randomly abandons it post townie claim for no reason.
If you truly think she is scum you shouldn't be so hesistant to put at L-1.armlx wrote:Vote Farside. Didn't vote earlier as she was at L-2.
You are fine with lynching dcorbe but don't do so yourself, but you're hesistant to put farside at L-1.armlx wrote:He was at L-1 and claimed townie. Correct procedure is pretty much always lynch.
farside22 wrote:
Why would I be blamed for his lynch if most people agreed with it? I read his response to his claim and comments and said he is aggressive, but also stated page 3 is not enough info. I never didn't say that and you keep missing that to make yourself sound good. Whatever helps you sleep at night or makes you think your scum hunting is good is no skin off my nose. Remind me the next time I see you in for a game to out myself because your scum hunting is terrible. You are looking for something that isn't there and letting the scum fly off.armlx wrote:What you did and what you say you did are conflicting.
What you did: Put dcorbe at L-2, then jumped off after he claimed townie on the basis of "I just think you are aggressive"
What you say you did: Pressured dcorbe and then hopped off to extend the day.
These are conflicting issues. The former implies that you wanted him to be lynched then backed out right before we could lynch him so you weren't blamed. The second implies a lot more tact, which I think you are retroactively trying to add to your actions.
I would wish the town good luck, but if you are listening to Armix you are screwed.
unvote:
vote: farside22
I hope you are happy this is the first game I ever voted for myself because you just made this a miserable experience for me.
You ask her to claim when she's already claimed, and you mentioned that the reason you thought she was scummy was because of that claim.armlx wrote:By not voting him, if he turns up town, you distance yourself from the blame.
Also, claim please andUnvoteso no one hammers before this occurs.
Also, self voting is 100% anti-town. Just saying.
You are still unwilling to let her go to L-1 but you were fine with lynching dcorbe. By this point I can gather that you would think farside scummier then dcorbe after that heated discussion.
Appears to be an appeal to the emotions, and trying to ease suspicion off her because of her outbursts are purely emotion driven.armlx wrote:
If you are that frustrated with the game, would you mind asking for replacement rather than going about your current course of action?farside22 wrote:
Already claimed. Not unvoting myself. I have nothing else to say to you.armlx wrote:By not voting him, if he turns up town, you distance yourself from the blame.
Also, claim please andUnvoteso no one hammers before this occurs.
Also, self voting is 100% anti-town. Just saying.
And you finally vote for her because she's voting max, not because of the discussion that just came up - and she had already been voting him, at that.armlx wrote:Vote Farside.
Also, no previous suspicion of max stated. Wagon much?
armlx wrote:
How about we wait for a claim before we do anything rash.dcorbe wrote:I'd also like to hear if anyone has anything positive to say about max. Speak up now or forever hold your piece
Mr. Blonde: You are wrong. Such lists are made by both alignments, backed by both, etc. Usually, making such a list is detrimental to any sort of grouped scum however.
An easy hammer considering everyone wanted it, however, you're the one who suggest to wait for a claim and then you chuck that out the window seeing the opportunity.armlx wrote:Yeah, nothing convincing.
Vote Max
Hammah time.
We never do hear about this 'scenario'.armlx wrote:I'm trying to figure out who would have killed Mr. Blonde in this scenario
Not liking that last Grimmy post, on top of what farside said there the "oh no, 2 dead townies" thing.
Mr. Blonde wrote:Avinyl and armlx. When I've seen these type of lists, you can rest assured that there's either:
(1) scum who makes this list (to control on who could be suspicious)
or
(2) townie makes a list to which scum says "good list".
Hmm..
Farside is back to town and use the Weather Mafia as a way to justify her reaction.armlx wrote:alvinz- Null. More content needed.
Avinyl- Mildly scummy. Hisscum list is very non-commital towards most people, and he was the only person with a legit reason to kill Mr. Blonde (or more accurately, the only person who would think it was a legit reason)
Dcorbe- In retrospect, pro-town. Hasn't done anything really scummy besides that one contradiction. Seems very interactive as well.
Farside- Town, comparison to Weather Mafia mainly.
Grimmy- Scum, see above
jtdyer- Possible scum, voting record is pretty opportunistic.
I'd also like to point out you seem to pin mine and my predecessor's votes as opportunistic but not anyone else's.
I think that Armlx thought that farside slipped.farside22 wrote:
You were arguing with me about my unvote on dcorbe. I think you two may be scum parnters and I do believe you to be the type of person to buss your scum partner.armlx wrote:
What does this mean?As much as Armix beat me up for not keeping my vote on dcorbe I wonder if it wasn't bussing.
The two people fighting are the two people who you think as scum.armlx wrote:Yawn, this sounds like a fight among townies.
More lynching Grimmy would be my solution.
armlx wrote:
This is an example of having the fear of being wrong, though I agree with you analyzing the Max lynch right now is pretty useless.At best it's going to lead us to a WIOFMy mis lynch. I'm concerned about the consequences of us mis-lynching a power role because we got some bad intelligence from the Max lynch.
If you are pretty assured that scum was on it, I wouldn’t say that info is useless.armlx wrote:I wouldn't say its useless, but more that right now is not the optimal time to try and draw info from the max wagon. I mean, its pretty assured both scum were on it, but so was almost all the town.
Voting intentions and voting are not the same thing. You’re just trying to make it seem that it could be basically anyone so that there’s no point in looking over it.armlx wrote:Farside: The only people who did not endorse a Max lynch were Max and alvin95, who didn't even post. I am counting Grimmy and Avinyl as on the wagon as they definitely showed worthy voting intents. The odds of the sole person who didn't attack max being scum are 2/7, not even accounting for scum having incentive to join the mass wagon. Thats pretty assured to me.
Then speak up and say why he is your choice. Just going along with it, hm?armlx wrote:
Actually you was my current choice, but its pretty weak and I am no where near confident enough to lynch anyone other than Grimmy right now.LlamaFluff wrote:
I still think we have better options in SG (who replaced jtyder) and strife (who replaced avinyl). What are your views on the other wagons that are appearing though (SG and farside), grimmy has to be scum buddies with someone.armlx wrote:Did a full reread, and I still agree with my current course of action: Lynch Grimmy then move from there.
That was that game, this is this game.armlx wrote:
There are 2 reasons behind this.I understand why you would re-route to attack Farside, but if your suspicion of Farside drops, the logical thing to do seems to be go back after DCorbe. Like you said, he got to L-1 for a reason, and the vanilla claim shouldn't have effected anything.
1) Everything Max had done up to that point was suspicious.
2) Meta-based information from an ongoing game where he was revealed as town.
Buddying up to me a little?armlx wrote:
This is a decent point. Asking what people think of a case you make is good, but not asking for direct support in a vote.Why do you need someone else to justify as to whether your vote is good? You should know whether it or not.
Seems like two partners talking to each other.armlx wrote:
I'm confused as to why you want to lynch dcorbe before grimmy for that.That is not only lining up lynches that is a big slip in saying hey guess what grimm's flipping scum.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
My thoughts exactly. It's like... my posts never even happened.strife220 wrote:
Anxious much? Shadowgirl just made two monster posts, Goatre is still planning an analysis on me, and you want the day ended already?LlamaFluff wrote:Cass is todays lynch, the scum tells are through the roof, the relationship with strife is off the scale. Someone please hammer.
Her playing style seems newbie-ish: dropping cases by dismissing some facts because other people say they are null tells or are other things - like hunting pairs aren't a good idea.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Sorry, I've been watching E3 for the past... oh so many hours.
Whatever other questions/remarks towards me I'll answer the next time I come on.
I would say WIFOM, really.LlamaFluff wrote: For your farside-armix interactions though, they are good. I may be impartial to them a bit because I have had a town read on farside since I replaced into this game, but if Armix flips scum its something to look into. The other fault I really see with that pairing is that Armix seems to be the one that caused farside to breakdown and selfvote. That seems much much farther then scum would take it with another scum. WIFOM I know but I dont see scum taking it that far, ever.
Unvote, Vote armlx.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I made a case against him, I didn't realize I couldn't vote for him.farside22 wrote:
That isn't the first time either. Seems that happened way back when with dcorbe putting a vote on me for poor reasoning.Goatrevolt wrote:
Jumping on the new armlx wagon that fast? Really?ShadowGirl wrote:Unvote, Vote armlx.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I agreet that it isn't the most conclusive evidence for it, but I think it go either way.Goatrevolt wrote:Ok, so just myself, farside, and cass have claimed.
I wouldn't dismiss that as WIFOM. I agree with LlamaFluff. I don't see scum taking it that far. This isn't a conclusive indication that farside/armlx aren't a scum team, but it certainly seems to be a point against it.ShadowGirl wrote:
I would say WIFOM, really.LlamaFluff wrote: For your farside-armix interactions though, they are good. I may be impartial to them a bit because I have had a town read on farside since I replaced into this game, but if Armix flips scum its something to look into. The other fault I really see with that pairing is that Armix seems to be the one that caused farside to breakdown and selfvote. That seems much much farther then scum would take it with another scum. WIFOM I know but I dont see scum taking it that far, ever.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I haven't brushed them off - please read post 506.Goatrevolt wrote:Ok, so just myself, farside, and cass have claimed.
I wouldn't dismiss that as WIFOM. I agree with LlamaFluff. I don't see scum taking it that far. This isn't a conclusive indication that farside/armlx aren't a scum team, but it certainly seems to be a point against it.ShadowGirl wrote:
I would say WIFOM, really.LlamaFluff wrote: For your farside-armix interactions though, they are good. I may be impartial to them a bit because I have had a town read on farside since I replaced into this game, but if Armix flips scum its something to look into. The other fault I really see with that pairing is that Armix seems to be the one that caused farside to breakdown and selfvote. That seems much much farther then scum would take it with another scum. WIFOM I know but I dont see scum taking it that far, ever.
I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on ShadowGirl. I personally am seeing this last vote on armlx (the timing if nothing else) to be quite suspicious. She makes a huge post against armlx, but doesn't vote armlx until Cass does (basically waiting for other support). She also ignores armlx's response to her case and brushes aside LlamaFluff's objection as WIFOM without any real explanation there. This, in addition to my previous case, makes me feel fairly confident that ShadowGirl is scum.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
No, I intend to answer them the next time I got on and have time. I'd answer them now but I have to head off to sleep.Goatrevolt wrote:
You didn't address armlx's response. All you said about LlamaFluff's statement was that it was WIFiOM, without any real explanation. I'd say that's pretty much brushing it aside.ShadowGirl wrote:I haven't brushed them off - please read post 506.
Also, you voting armlx wasn't really the issue. It was the timing and convenience of doing so. Rather than vote armlx when you pushed your case on him, you instead waited until someone else voted him before hopping on. It looks a lot like you're looking for an easy bandwagon rather than scum.
I didn't even notice she had been voting armlx. My original answer to that was that it wasn't a wagon because I was the only one on it, but then I read up and saw that she had as well. Anyway, not my point - I wanted to see what everyone else thought of it as well. Make of it what you will. It could go the other way around as well - with me making a case as well it gives her a reason to vote that way.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I didn't vote for her for looking into the lynch, I voted for her because she and dcorbe were arguing about whether as to do so. As I said, if someone had anything to say about it they would have said it already.LlamaFluff wrote:
SG is my third scum by far right now. First odd thing was her replace in LoSs which went from dcorbe/Max(who was dead)/armix to a vote of farside, for trying to look at what the Max lynch could tell us.Goatrevolt wrote:I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on ShadowGirl.
Also I explained that putting Max in my top three was an oversight from me balancing so many games at that point.
@Farside: The set of quotations about the Max lynch were supposed to be set in 'armlx's side'. When I must have copy and pasted it wrong.
@Goat: I'm not ignoring the case against her, I'm just not sure if this is newbie playing or genuinely scummy playing. Which means I'm going to do a small reread of the last few pages and her comments.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I protected Llama last night seeing as he's pretty much the driving force of the town - or seems to be, anyway. Very strong and vocal.farside22 wrote:
Who have you tried to protect and why?ShadowGirl wrote:
Then let's hear the claim.LlamaFluff wrote:Im down with a massclaim and that ordering
*taps foot waiting*
I am doctor.
Strife should be next then LlamaFluff. But I will let them fight out who does what when.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Unfortunately I do not have lots of time since I have to head off, but I'll pop in on this thread somewhere within twenty four hours of this post.
I don't think it needs to be mentioned, but make your vote carefully - if the scum is quick enough they can tack on two more and it's over.
Llama, I would swear you've already acknowledged that I made a good choice in trying to save you but I'll look through the thread once more.
Weren't you the one that said that I was basically confirmed seeing as how there has to be at least one PR?- I'm confused why the general assumption seems to be that SG's claim is guaranteed truth. Am I missing something here?
I'll say this - I don't think farside was the best choice of a block, really. Catching a kill versus possibly blocking a power role? Well...
Llama, as you've said that strife, armlx and me were likely to have a power role - who do you think was more likely to have it?-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I apologize for not a lot of posting - I was off seeing Batman yesterday. Good movie.
[quote="strife']First off, the chance of her getting counter-claimed is reasonably low (around 50%), regardless of who her scum-buddy is. Secondly, even if she did get counterclaimed, that wouldn't mean she would get lynched. It's lylo with 2 scum alive - getting counterclaimed is not a concern. [/quote]
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't consider around 50 % to be low.
@Llama: What is your current list of lynching?-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I apologize for not a lot of posting - I was off seeing Batman yesterday. Good movie.
And in a more readable format:strife wrote:First off, the chance of her getting counter-claimed is reasonably low (around 50%), regardless of who her scum-buddy is. Secondly, even if she did get counterclaimed, that wouldn't mean she would get lynched. It's lylo with 2 scum alive - getting counterclaimed is not a concern.
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't consider around 50 % to be low.
@Llama: What is your current list of lynching?-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Him choosing you as his RB target doesn't bode well with me, considering how sure he was that you were town. :/farside22 wrote:
Why Llama? He has claimed RB do you disbelieve him?ShadowGirl wrote:I just PMed the mod, but I don't know exactly when I'll get an answer.
Personally, I would prefer lynching Llama instead of strife today.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I do indeed think you're town. If you're not, then kudos - you've fooled me.farside22 wrote:
I dont know if you think I'm town or not. My thougt is that we choose goat if he us scum, which I think he is. We vote him out and then Llama should block strife which would lead to one less person being NK.ShadowGirl wrote:
Him choosing you as his RB target doesn't bode well with me, considering how sure he was that you were town. :/farside22 wrote:
Why Llama? He has claimed RB do you disbelieve him?ShadowGirl wrote:I just PMed the mod, but I don't know exactly when I'll get an answer.
Personally, I would prefer lynching Llama instead of strife today.
I know this means you have to trust me and believe me when I say I am not scum with this thought in mind. I don't know whether to believe Llama or not myself. I don't understand why he would RB me if he thought I was town the night before. However it is because of that lack of trust and watching Goat and Llama's interaction that I am leaning on voting Goat on this one.
Hn, that is an interesting plan. Goat and Llama seem to be arguing about everything except for voting strife and that strikes me as a bit odd.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
However, what if Llama is mafia and just submits a no kill, but claims that he RBed strife?farside22 wrote:
I find it odd too. That is why I'm leaning on Goat on this one. Plus the earlier interaction of votes I saw and pointed out on day 2.ShadowGirl wrote:
I do indeed think you're town. If you're not, then kudos - you've fooled me.farside22 wrote:
I dont know if you think I'm town or not. My thougt is that we choose goat if he us scum, which I think he is. We vote him out and then Llama should block strife which would lead to one less person being NK.ShadowGirl wrote:
Him choosing you as his RB target doesn't bode well with me, considering how sure he was that you were town. :/farside22 wrote:
Why Llama? He has claimed RB do you disbelieve him?ShadowGirl wrote:I just PMed the mod, but I don't know exactly when I'll get an answer.
Personally, I would prefer lynching Llama instead of strife today.
I know this means you have to trust me and believe me when I say I am not scum with this thought in mind. I don't know whether to believe Llama or not myself. I don't understand why he would RB me if he thought I was town the night before. However it is because of that lack of trust and watching Goat and Llama's interaction that I am leaning on voting Goat on this one.
Hn, that is an interesting plan. Goat and Llama seem to be arguing about everything except for voting strife and that strikes me as a bit odd.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I think it's all WIFOM at that point. I think if anything I will question Llama more on why he is leaning strife more then Goat and what his thoughts on the connection they had throughout the game. Plus I'm still thinking about day 1 and whether dcorbe (as scum) would have a partner trying to out him day 1. So trust me when I say Llama is not in the clear by a long shot.[/quote]farside22 wrote:
However, what if Llama is mafia and just submits a no kill, but claims that he RBed strife?ShadowGirl wrote: I find it odd too. That is why I'm leaning on Goat on this one. Plus the earlier interaction of votes I saw and pointed out on day 2.
Very true.
Yes, I think we need to hear from everyone a little more - and I especially want to hear from strife.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Well, I suppose he's entitled to disbelieving my claim. :/
@Strife: Well, this game is at lylo and we need your input.
@Farside: Oh no, there's no way I'm tacking on a vote before thinking carefully about it. Scum need only one person to be voting against a town member - and if they're quick enough to post they can end the game.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
I absolutely hate this.
I mean, on one hand why would Goat aggressively attack Llama's claim?WIFOM.
And if he was scum, why would he pick a target that he knew wouldn't look good? Still, WIFOM.
Llama being alive because he's a strong analyst and as such would make a good kill. WIFOM.
It's like there's a whole good cop/bad cop thing going on here but it could go either way.
Also, Llama, I'd like to mention that there's no gurantee there was another PR - as to you not wanting to choose anyone other then farside.
Ugh, I'm trying to not let any bias or any notions cloud my judgement - I've considered Llama my rolemodel, really. D:
I agree with farside, I think Goat is probably our best bet.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
Yes, he's very vocal and he is a rather good analyst.Goatrevolt wrote: Also, SG, I assume Llama is your role model because you respect his play? I'll let you in on a secret. He's really good at playing scum.. I've played with Llama when he's scum before and he had me fooled the entire game.
Then again, I looked up to dcorbe too. In another game if it wasn't for him we would have lost at lylo - or at least I wouldn't have seen the light on the situation.
Still, the fact that both you are so willing to lynch strife just doesn't sit well with me.-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008
-
-
ShadowGirl Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 8, 2008