Let the
VOTE: tictac
Aw, shucks.In post 15, Hectic wrote:Side note: I'm honoured to play with you, sir. I heard about your 50 player large game, and I'm a huge fan.In post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?
Because I'm impatient, I want to know, and I want people to get real nervous.In post 15, Hectic wrote:Well, yeah, but why do you want to discuss those tells before the people potentially make them?In post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?
How early is too early to start scumhunting and figuring out the game in your opinion, Morning Tweet?In post 46, Morning Tweet wrote:this is a wacky thing to say. do you usually commence the metadiving within the first couple of dozen posts?In post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?
At the moment, I don't really remember. I spent initially started the process of getting that 50p game started way back in early December, so I haven't played since November.In post 51, Hectic wrote: Wake, have you rolled scum in the last year?
Seems like a reach, but OK.In post 59, bob3141 wrote:
if waka hasnt rolled scum this year
gambler's fallacy here i come
VOTE: waka
This is true.In post 60, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Some of usIn post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?HATEday 1.
OK, I remember that one now.In post 86, AaronFrost wrote:Waka flocka flame has rolled scum in the last yearIn post 59, bob3141 wrote:In post 51, Hectic wrote:I've seen/read though like 6 Wake games, but they were all town. I may or may not have gained some knowledge while impersonating him in the 50 player large for a bit. Wake, have you rolled scum in the last year?In post 48, davesaz wrote:I think it's a reference back to the 50p that Wake modded where metadiving was a very big thing.In post 46, Morning Tweet wrote:this is a wacky thing to say. do you usually commence the metadiving within the first couple of dozen posts?In post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?
if waka hasnt rolled scum this year
gambler's fallacy here i come
VOTE: waka
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=81560
I don't see an issue with it provided he's correct.In post 93, tictac wrote:Why r u answering for wake?In post 86, AaronFrost wrote:Waka flocka flame has rolled scum in the last year
rude.
Eh, lying is Scummy so I don't much like seeing it from Town unless there's a very good reason for it.In post 94, tictac wrote:well, u gonna suck if ya scum, since ya think lying is naughty. that's what ya told me last time ya were scum anywhey.In post 14, Wake1 wrote:So, of course it's a reach, but do we have any hard info on meta-tells on any of these people?
speaking of: are ya scum here? I'm gonna be sad if ya lie.
You probably shouldn't dish out Town points that easily. Just my opinion.In post 95, profii wrote: Weird that Wake went for meta instead of declaring his hatred for day 1. Town points there I think
Could you explain that confidence here?
In post 121, Hectic wrote:Oh God lol. I remember reading a bit of that when it was happening and I thought Wake's entrance felt a lot townier than usual.In post 86, AaronFrost wrote: Waka flocka flame has rolled scum in the last year
viewtopic.php?f=53&t=81560
Seems awfully reasonable of you.In post 133, Morning Tweet wrote:At first when he proposed doing meta dives out of the blue, i starting having a slight crackpot theory that scum!Wake wanted to gain town cred in a way that sticks out really well
Someone (you i think actually) asked him for an explanation of why he would want to out metas before people have a chance to even display them (which was a good point).
His answer of wanting to make people nervous and change their playstyles from the outted meta rather than simply observe whether their meta was the same seemed like a pretty good idea to me actually. And then dave answered my question of why he was so eager on the proposition. Overall I like him doing it as town better
Am I?In post 142, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wake coming out strong this game, hrm.In post 21, Wake1 wrote:I do have some ISOs on some of the players here that were in my 50p game mwa ha ha...
I think, on reflection, I'm more reserved and my anger looks faked as Scum because I already know who's who.In post 147, Hectic wrote:I agree. I also liked his eagerness to use this 50 player large game as a resource.In post 133, Morning Tweet wrote:At first when he proposed doing meta dives out of the blue, i starting having a slight crackpot theory that scum!Wake wanted to gain town cred in a way that sticks out really well
Someone (you i think actually) asked him for an explanation of why he would want to out metas before people have a chance to even display them (which was a good point).
His answer of wanting to make people nervous and change their playstyles from the outted meta rather than simply observe whether their meta was the same seemed like a pretty good idea to me actually. And then dave answered my question of why he was so eager on the proposition. Overall I like him doing it as town better
Wake, as scum you play a little more reserved and your anger looks a lot more faked. So be nervous if you're scum.
Well that's, well, that's interesting...In post 154, AaronFrost wrote:I went ahead and compared Wake's entrance in this game to his scumgame that I modded and I think I agree with a townlean there. I think he's tonally different compared to that game and here he has a better interest in solving than he did there, specifically by bringing up the meta thing.
Nah, let's try this again.In post 179, Aloratom wrote:Let me double check.
@bob -- are you scum this game?
Evading a question, to me, is not Townish whatsoever.In post 283, SirCakez wrote:What makes you think Alo not answering the question is a scum move?
I don't know whether it makes Hectic town or scum that he ignored my comment about him not inspiring confidence.
In post 289, Aloratom wrote:Is it that you missed this or is it that you didn't like what you saw?In post 231, Aloratom wrote:@Wake -- Bob told me to stuff it. This decreases my confidence level significantly.
Misunderstanding onIn post 309, Hectic wrote:I can never tell with Wake. I've had my fair share of scumreading him because of his aggressive/overconfident style he adopts the longer the game goes on. You question whether he actually believes the stuff he's saying at times, a lot due to the way he says it. Though, in this case actually, I think the misunderstanding on his part is completely NAI.
Then he shouldIn post 316, AaronFrost wrote:I don't think Aloratom actually believes that he's 'definitely scum'In post 306, Wake1 wrote:How is he definite Scum?
Basically this.In post 317, AaronFrost wrote:I think scum!Wake is a little more reserved and cautious with his approach. Aggressive Wake = town Wake.In post 309, Hectic wrote:I can never tell with Wake. I've had my fair share of scumreading him because of his aggressive/overconfident style he adopts the longer the game goes on. You question whether he actually believes the stuff he's saying at times, a lot due to the way he says it. Though, in this case actually, I think the misunderstanding on his part is completely NAI.
"Wake vs All may be TvS" implies that he thinks I'm Town and Alo's Scum. However, if that's incorrect I'd like Cakez to clarify that.In post 352, HoldenGolden wrote:Based on your questions back towards Wake you think wake is the scum in this exchange. I'm I correct in this? Or have you change from when you raised the counterpoint about playstyles and dodging questions?In post 330, SirCakez wrote:Wake vs Alo may be TvS
Aaronfrost mentioned one in here earlier.In post 366, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Wake can you link a couple of your recent scumgames?
All I want to know from Aloratom is why he said that other guy was definite Scum.In post 367, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:also are you still feeling scum on Alo?In post 366, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Wake can you link a couple of your recent scumgames?
I see we have an alt-slip.In post 238, ofrhz wrote:What do you think was Wake's intent behind his question in 180?In post 230, davesaz wrote:The content is almost always less important than the reason for having a question. This is also a clue on how to read me.
Wait, what?In post 399, profii wrote:But what if his explanation is scummy?In post 369, Wake1 wrote:All I want to know from Aloratom is why he said that other guy was definite Scum.In post 367, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:also are you still feeling scum on Alo?In post 366, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Wake can you link a couple of your recent scumgames?
Him evading my question only makes me suspect him more.
If he explains why, I'm more likely to relent.
That question is rhetorical & facetious in equal measure.
I'm pressuring tictac because he's posted the least, and too-oftenly-to-be-comfortable they tend to flip Scum.In post 497, bob3141 wrote:Waka since your now voting tictac. How does your belief that tictac is scum thats shut down affect your ealier belief to vote Alort?
In post 606, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why the scare quotes?In post 558, Wake1 wrote:"Guys, GUYS, I don't know why A-Tom is being voted."
This.In post 772, Aloratom wrote:You think there are two mafia?In post 751, Morning Tweet wrote:I thought you were leaning it not being SvS? what are the chances both partners got ran up for the entirety of the day?
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Bussing is right though. i'm inclined to think it's elsewhere than Alo
In post 775, Hectic wrote:In post 770, Wake1 wrote:Profii, what did you do last Night?Why are you asking this, Wake? Do you have reason to know about them in particular?In post 774, Wake1 wrote:Morning Tweet, what'd you do last Night?
It was a distractor, and it looks like it distracted.In post 792, AaronFrost wrote:Oh neat.In post 790, Wake1 wrote:OK cool, have it your way. Not.
I'm a full Town Watcher.
I watched Hectic Night 1.
Both Morning Tweet and Davesaz targeted him.
Both evaded me when called on it.
Why'd you ask about profii then?