In post 1392, Paragon wrote: In post 1389, Klick wrote:These sorts of things shouldn't require a long explanation that can be fabricated with a large amount of time. If you're town, you had a thought process, and it doesn't take long to give it.
VOTE: votato
^This though
I just don't get what this "effort post" will show, it's why I want to see it so much.
KAAG, you shouldn't stop posting just because it looks like we're lynching votato.
I'm happy to answer questions but I haven't been asked any. I checked in repeatedly. I didn't think cluttering up the thread while you guys were doing good analysis on the past days was helpful.
I am happy to do the "he said this, well you said that" thing if it will help you, but I tend to find come D6 that all the evidence is in the past.
Paragon wrote:
Tonally speaking, votato is a lot more towny than KAAG. Content and action-wise (before these last few posts)... it's a different story.
I don't find votato's tone to be even remotely towny, but I have the advantage of reading it knowing he is scum. My tone is as ever. I have no alts: every post I have ever made on this site is under this account so you can check it.
votato wrote:the effort post will show why i think i solved the game. it woulda been nicer yesterday, but for some reason we decided to put fwesnid at L-1 despite knowing that he'd likely self-hammer
Paragon, how long were we in twilight? How long did he have? It was over 48 hours. He was posting elsewhere.
You haven't aked me about it, but regarding votato's posts on me:
1) When I joined the game, fwesnid vs Pete was established, before my first post. votato hasn't quoted me probing Pete about his thoughts on votato's RB claim (because that's scum hunting and would hardly help his cause)
2) After fwesnid was outed, I asked as many questions and tried to get content as much as anyone else that day.
3) My result from last night coupled with votato's lie meant I caught the scum today. No more hunting to do.