Ok
VOTE: Flair
Ok
Deadlines are guidelines. We can end day tomorrow. I’ve already caught a scum. I’ll reveal when the clock strikes 12.In post 33, Flair wrote:I’ve never played a game with two week-long Day phases.
This is going to be the most difficult game I’ve ever played.
Now probably. I am about to claim though.In post 99, Flair wrote:When is the best time for me to claim?
How does this imply 4 scum? I have my own thoughts on a potential implication, but I want to see others’ thoughts before I reveal because it could have role consequences.In post 130, Flavor Leaf wrote:if this is true, this might imply the existence of 4 scum, which kinda sucks. I usually assume 3 scum in a 13 player, which means this would be given knowledge if that were the case.In post 128, gobbledygook wrote:I am informed townie I have weird and probably not useful information. But it is my opinion that informed townies should put their information whether discretely or indiscreetly as soon as possible. Since my information doesn’t have any noticeable role implications here it is.
At least 1 of ABR, NoPowerOverMe, Blair, and iamusername are town.
I guess that is the point. Why make me informed in the first placeIn post 141, Sakura Hana wrote:But if it's 3 scum, then what's the point of gobble being informed that in a group of 4 there's at least 1 town.
If any of my four are on multiple others’ lists of 4 it increases the chance that those overlapping names are the “at least 1” townieIn post 155, Sakura Hana wrote:And how does that help us?In post 153, gobbledygook wrote:I think that this is the design of the game and that there are other informed townies whose lists may overlap
As FL said before, you can pick any list of 4 players at random and there will always be at least 1 townie if there's 3 scum.
In post 154, Firebringer wrote:I am fine with calling gobbles town.
I’m drink on rice wineIn post 156, Firebringer wrote:Gobbles, lead us to victory with ur informed mind.
I blushedIn post 192, Blair wrote:One night of unmitigated passion.In post 183, Firebringer wrote:It seems ur in the market for sheep. How much u willing to pay for sheep?In post 182, Blair wrote:Flair, sheep me.
Claire and Flair are clearly alt accounts made to troll Blair.In post 277, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:That is exactly why I didn't express my opinion immediately. If anyone is paying attention, the Joined: date under the accounts Clair and Flair are June 05, 2020. Both of them. Hence my suspicions. They may very well be actually three different players, though.In post 272, Sakura Hana wrote:If they are the same person wouldnt the list mod have caught that?
What do you mean opportunistically jumping on Fred? I don’t see a vote from NPOM on Fred.In post 322, iamausername wrote:NPOM is the scum opportunistically jumping on Fred's conspiracy theories to try to push a mislynch.
Ah, this makes more sense.In post 327, iamausername wrote:yes, this.In post 326, Blair wrote:Jumping on(board) Fred's conspiracy theories, I believe, was what he was saying.In post 324, gobbledygook wrote:What do you mean opportunistically jumping on Fred? I don’t see a vote from NPOM on Fred.In post 322, iamausername wrote:NPOM is the scum opportunistically jumping on Fred's conspiracy theories to try to push a mislynch.
as in, he saw Fred suggesting that Blair/Clair/Flair might be the same person, thought to himself 'i can use this', rubbed his scummy little hands together with glee and voted for Clair.
Yes.In post 331, iamausername wrote:is scum daytalk standard practice these days? do scum typically run their posts by each other before posting them?
What's wrong with transparency?In post 463, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I am starting to wonder if it is a good idea to make my thought process this transparent. Well, won't know till I see its effects.
Why did you think this was a policy lynch and why did you single out only me for that?In post 488, Looker wrote:Is this a policy lynch?
What other questions did you ask me other than your question about thinking Fred is naive?In post 590, Looker wrote:Why did you cut out and ignore the rest of my questions? Why didn't you give a reason for your vote? Who else do you feel is playing as poorly as you?
Nani?
Why do you find me to be your top town?In post 812, Flair wrote:We can agree that the Turkey is our top villager, Blair.
UhhhhhhhIn post 670, Flair wrote:If ABR, FB, and FL are “objectively” the best players in the game, colour me unimpressed.
This is a terrible vote.In post 989, iamausername wrote:ok, read the pages that appeared overnight. now feel like i have at least some kind of read on every player besides stanley, who is yet to exist.
FL, could you clarify what you mean by the bolded?In post 966, Flavor Leaf wrote:I just played with scumABR and it feels drastically tonally different than his scum game, albeit,I am now just on another side, but he sheeped me all Day 1 in it, and by Day 3 I still caught him and his partner out as scum, but I got mislynched. I actually caught him on Day 2.
.
Firebringer's 'i'm going to effort post to convince you all to lynch Clair' and getting disillusioned with his own case halfway through feels real town to me. just don't see scum Fire bothering to put the effort in to do all of that when he's been getting away fine with coasting to this point.
on the subject of coasting, i'd had a gut town feel from gobbledygook before, but 816 gave me bad vibes. does not feel like a question to try to figure out anyone's alignment. feels like a question to look like they're contributing and, as an added bonus, get some people to post about how town they are.
so i looked at their iso to try and figure out where my initial read came from, and found it to be incredibly lacking in substance. there's no effort to push anything, there's just a bunch of fairly meaningless questions with no follow up and the occasional random declaration that someone or other is town.
pop quiz everybody: without checking, can you tell me who gobbledygook is voting for right now? do you rememberanyof the votes gobbledygook has made in this game? if no,why do you think that is?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: gobbledygook
You don’t feel like the town in partition.In post 1106, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The problem with scum is they overestimate the ability of someone who is technically correct, but can be outmaneuvered, mislynched, or susceptible to change their minds, and underestimate someone like me, who openly talks about how I easily find scum, easily convince everyone to sheep me, win the game for everyone lucky enough to play as town, and then I write an article about it to share with the fans. I frequently get PMs thanking me for these articles. I once got recognized by a girl I was talking to at a party who saw my play on the internet and made the connection from our conversation. It's freaky. Well,In post 1103, Blair wrote:Yes, I can see how pointing it out repeatedly would help that strategy succeed.I'm not someone who likes to toot my own horn.Call me anti-town, but I'm giving scum advice about my strategy, maybe as a form of handicap to myself, so I can be more entertained, because winning too fast gets old.
You take that back!!In post 1139, Albert B. Rampage wrote:My town range, while not as impressive as your momma's waistline, is about as wide as the gap between 2007 and 2020. You do the math.
FL would be lurking right now if scum I think.In post 1151, Flair wrote:I’m not not voting FL because of what they can do in the future, when they haven’t done anything now to deserve an extension.
So unless someone can give me a convincing case as to why they’re a villager, I’m staying out.
iamuser wagon is probably a good idea, haven’t seen them post under pressure yet.
In post 1440, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm down to lynch any of Flair/NPOM/Looker.
Let's consolidate bandwagons now.
???In post 1446, Albert B. Rampage wrote:i've articulated reasons for NPOM. By staying on looker you are working against town by fighting the momentum of the game, Flair.
how do you knwo thisIn post 1664, NoPowerOverMe wrote:and it is so against her normal personality.
SHC?In post 1927, Flair wrote:Thinking about it some more, Looker had to have been some sort of PR hunt.
Which is hilarious because the wolves killed a potential ML. Does MS use SHC mechanics at all?
Midway’s life?In post 1928, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I traded midways life for not only a scum life, but the scum leader, forced to show his hand under pressure.
If Looker was informed that someone was town he would not have flipped Vanilla town.In post 1941, Flair wrote:Seer Hunt ClearIn post 1930, gobbledygook wrote:SHC?In post 1927, Flair wrote:Thinking about it some more, Looker had to have been some sort of PR hunt.
Which is hilarious because the wolves killed a potential ML. Does MS use SHC mechanics at all?
tl;dr If Looker presented a read that looked like a Peek/Investigation, the wolves might have killed him thinking he was a Seer. Which would mean his read was accurate as the wolves believed Looker to be real.
So we can reliably assume the player he read villager with such confidence, is in fact a villager.
But if yesterday’s gameplay was indicative of the level of mechanical nuance MS plays with, I’d imagine SHC isn’t something used here.
There was literally no read stated in that post. How can a post contain a political read if there is no read to politicize?In post 1982, Flavor Leaf wrote:If ABR is scum, this is his partner.In post 1978, gobbledygook wrote:If Looker was informed that someone was town he would not have flipped Vanilla town.In post 1941, Flair wrote:Seer Hunt ClearIn post 1930, gobbledygook wrote:SHC?In post 1927, Flair wrote:Thinking about it some more, Looker had to have been some sort of PR hunt.
Which is hilarious because the wolves killed a potential ML. Does MS use SHC mechanics at all?
tl;dr If Looker presented a read that looked like a Peek/Investigation, the wolves might have killed him thinking he was a Seer. Which would mean his read was accurate as the wolves believed Looker to be real.
So we can reliably assume the player he read villager with such confidence, is in fact a villager.
But if yesterday’s gameplay was indicative of the level of mechanical nuance MS plays with, I’d imagine SHC isn’t something used here.
Looker was killed by a vigilante.
Gobbledygook knows better than anyone that that was a town hammer, not a scum hammer, and he even was arguing I was town yesterday.
This is a political read.
Retweet.In post 2044, Flair wrote:Somehow I thought this game couldn’t get any dumber.
But it just did. I am actually impressed.
Umm no? How Do you just randomly pick my name out of a hat?In post 2069, votato wrote:ok so i for sure thought that ABR was scum, but replacing out makes you 100% town.In post 2037, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Flair/Blair/Clair are just voting together as a bloc without any scumhunting because they are friends outside the game. this is getting ridiculous.
REPLACE OUT
gobbles must be scum
It is a part of my calculus, but I would rather deal with people still in the game.In post 2078, Flair wrote:That’s even more gross.In post 2076, gobbledygook wrote:To be fair I do not townread ABR’s replacement. I think he did it because he was upset two other townies did it and got townread.
That said we have bigger fish to fry.
Who are these bigger fish to fry? You’re suggesting ABR is a wolf, but believe there are others we should be eliminating?
I don’t know yet. Maybe Firebringer.In post 2091, Flair wrote:That’s fair. Who comes to mind?In post 2085, gobbledygook wrote:It is a part of my calculus, but I would rather deal with people still in the game.In post 2078, Flair wrote:That’s even more gross.In post 2076, gobbledygook wrote:To be fair I do not townread ABR’s replacement. I think he did it because he was upset two other townies did it and got townread.
That said we have bigger fish to fry.
Who are these bigger fish to fry? You’re suggesting ABR is a wolf, but believe there are others we should be eliminating?
Are you talking about me? I never claimed to be an informed townie.In post 2103, Flair wrote:When I first saw it I presumed he was the Vigilante, but he’s also claimed Informed Townie, so that can’t be the case. Can it?
What tiptoeing have I been doing? I voted both main wagons today.In post 2110, Flair wrote:I thought he was a villager the other day but his tip-toeing around each new wagon today has me a bit concerned.