This is a lie, but it doesn't make them Scum.In post 49, Truth wrote:Yes, I have played a few games on a forum mafia site for my university.
Otherwise,
I will try not to be too obnoxious, but no promises.
This is a lie, but it doesn't make them Scum.In post 49, Truth wrote:Yes, I have played a few games on a forum mafia site for my university.
No, much worse.
Yeah, it's kinda a memey type thing that people say they "play on university" or whatever.In post 76, redtea wrote:In post 74, LicketyQuickety wrote:This is a lie, but it doesn't make them Scum.In post 49, Truth wrote:Yes, I have played a few games on a forum mafia site for my university.
Otherwise,
I will try not to be too obnoxious, but no promises.
a lie, huh....
He claimed Miller Mason in his first post in a game I played with him. He was VT and lost us the game because Town didn't lynch him until like D4 or something.In post 77, Gypyx wrote:I mean, truth would be a fitting name for a crazy-lies only account yeah
Okay, I just don't have any incentive to believe you.In post 80, Truth wrote:That is not a lie, LicketyQuickety. It is where how I learned how to play mafia.
I don't have one and it will be hard for me to get one.In post 84, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:what is your read on Truth so far?
I think this is a decent point, but the confusing thing about it is that Truth also claimed to be miller. So the correct play would be to claim there if that was their actual role. That's why I think Truth has this sort of lying gimmick as someone else pointed out already.In post 97, superbowl9 wrote:I'm confused as to Truth would know to fakeclaim mason and reference buddies and crumbing, yet not know enough to fakeclaim D1 - kind of lends credibility to the off-site stuff imo.
I might see your point, but I would still like to see your reasoning for making this read. Also, how strong is this read on a scale of 1-10?In post 103, 0verki11 wrote:wolfy self meta
Hi. I have no idea how to read this post in terms of Townie/Scummy. Could you tell me why you wanted to make this post?In post 105, osuka wrote:walter's post rubs me off the wrong way for some nondescript reasonIn post 84, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I see frustrated town vides with Osuka for sure, Overki11
LicketySplit, what is your read on Truth so far?
but most importantly let me draw attention to thisIn post 84, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I see frustrated town vides with Osuka for sure
BRÖTHER
i'm not frustrated yet, i'm literally just fucking around. when i'm annoyed, you'll know
That's actually a way better answer than I was expecting, thanks.In post 107, osuka wrote:felt like it
More like give some BS answer why you did what you did. Seems everyone is immensely concerned with BS these days.In post 109, osuka wrote:You’re welcomeIn post 108, LicketyQuickety wrote:That's actually a way better answer than I was expecting, thanks.In post 107, osuka wrote:felt like it
were you expecting me to flame you or what
I didn't really see many people pressuring Truth on the veracity of their claims last game, fwiw. I saw people talking about Truth, but didn't really pressure him.In post 115, Dunnstral wrote:LQ, pressuring truth really didn't do any favors in the last game you played
Biases are inherent to our psychology as humans. Bias isn't a dirty word, contrary to what you may have heard.In post 119, Dunnstral wrote:That's not a good thing thoughIn post 117, LicketyQuickety wrote:Currently though, I have a bias towards SRing Truth.
Nothing I haven't already said about Truth. That comment on playing forum Mafia for university was really weird and it rubs me the wrong way.In post 122, Gypyx wrote:@Lickety, any idea why you are SR'ing truth?
So how do you suggest we sort Truth beyond pressuring them?In post 126, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i get that's probably a lie, but honestly i think we just have to accept that there will be no sort of coherence in truth's posting
Could I ask based on what, exactly?In post 129, Psyche wrote:imo he's already more or less sorted, at least relative to other people playing
What is your evidence of this if I might ask?In post 134, Psyche wrote:what i see is a player who at least in the context of our site meta is lowkey bad at this (maybe they'll improve), and has been recently traumatized by an experience (mistakes in a previous game) that made this kind of obvious even to them.
LOL.In post 139, osuka wrote:quick, when have i ever been known to bs?
Okay, little bird.
Riiiiiggggghhhhhtttt.In post 167, bugspray wrote:my pronouns are they/themIn post 165, Dunnstral wrote:No, he's going to pretend he didn't see, and say if he was scum his team would have told himIn post 155, Gypyx wrote:Man, is bugspray jest?
I will not hold it against you.In post 209, bugspray wrote:Wow I should read sorry about that lq
Different people will have different takes on this, naturally.In post 225, 0verki11 wrote:are we letting bugspray of the hook with the townslip, or is that something they may do as scum.
I probably will not vote as I do not want to dictate things too much. I feel being IC I have a lot of sway and I don't want to abuse it.In post 302, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Lickety, since you are town, when you have caught up on thread, do you have any reads?
Why have you not voted?
LOL.
Has to be a large for any kind of SK.In post 474, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I just checked the wiki and it says that ninja is only for serial killer for a normal game?
Wouldn't you like to know.In post 501, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Then who?
Oh, you want to lynch a lurker? What tells you the lurkers are Scum?In post 504, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I know we have some town lurkers, this is not easy to sort out
Based on what?In post 564, Gypyx wrote:Psyche is an IC