Mini 595 - Game Over
-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
vote firechicago
im not a big soccer fan-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
then you can call me fluffy, for some reason certain people have taken a liking to that shorteningalvinz95 wrote:Vote: LlamaFluff
Doesn't sound appealing
im not sure how you also can call a random wagon pro-town really. while they are good for getting conversation going and seeing who jumps to and from wagons, they have a scum/players chance of being sucessful. Given that educated votes have a higher chance then that, I consider random wagons anti-town-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
alvinz95 wrote: Random vote wagons are silly, but not anti-town.
So are wagons pro-town, anti-town or completely neutral in nature. You claim they *might* bring out scummy behavior, and you only list usually uneffective as the downfall.alvinz95 wrote:I didn't say random wagons were protown, I said they weresilly.
What is your stance on these early wagaons? Silly is not an answer im looking for.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
wait what? So not only do you FoS the two people for making no lynch votes which are stopping our conversation, but say you might also vote a no-lynch?firechicago wrote:FOS: Firestarter and Iron Manfor trying to shut down the conversation just as it's getting rolling.
I might vote for a no-lynch eventually, but proposing one on page 2 is extremely premature.
Im not quite sure why you would consider a no lynch while the main reason for the FoS is the no lynch votes of FS (two fires, great) and IM. I also dont really agree that they shut down the conversation. They took the anti-wagon stance way to far, but there is still a convsersation going.
So Zombie is scum for calling you two out on voting no lynch? I would of done it too if I got here first.firestarter wrote:Im just wondering if a scum(bag) has hopped on the Fos of me & IM....
two questions to you
1) Should we no lynch today?
2) If IM didnt vote no lynch first, would you of voted it?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
One of my problems with what you said though was you left the door wide open in your post for your eventual no lynch vote, you had not only the ability to throw a no lynch on later, but because of your current stance on the vote, use that as evidence to anyone who eventually would vote for a no-lynch. In a game like this, especially where there may not even be a cop, I see no point in a no-lynch, except for possibly a F4 situation. Im also not quite sure how that conversation was derailed by the comments, because we still are talking about the best D1 course of actions.firechicago wrote:My point was there's a world of difference between proposing a no lynch when conversation peters out on page 10 and there are no good options for a lynch, and proposing a no lynch in the midst of a conversation on page 2.
I agree with Iron Man and Firestarter that a no lynch is preferable to a completely random lynch, but vigorous scum-hunting followed by a non-random lynch is vastly preferable to either. I just think they're crazy and probably scummy for trying to derail what was a relevant conversation in favor of an early no lynch.
Just at this point we are no longer talking about wagons, but no votes, we are slowly covering different topics of D1 actions that people have stronge feelings about. They are not scummy for derailing a conversation, the conversation has just changed topics as the first one was nearing an end. They are scummy for a vote no lynch though, especially as it was tied for majority option at one point.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Why would you want to make a quick lynch? As the day goes on we are able to make a more informed choice because we know more about other players.Iron Man wrote:With no deadline, we could go on for many pages and get pretty much no where, and I'm an impatient guy.
Why does a no lynch option need to be thrown out there?Iron Man wrote: Yes, there was no danger of lynch on Crazy Vlad but I felt that the "No Lynch" option had to be thrown at least once.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well im going to go out on a limb and say you are wrong. A "Day" here is not 24 hours, there is a lot of information gathered by the end of the day, from that an informed decision is obtainable. I trust that I can come to an informed decision about who should be lynched day one, and I hope that you will be able to as well.Iron Man wrote:it is my view that a person's reactionaftera potentially deadly night phase is more telling than base discussion on Day 1. Granted, I may be wrong about this, but I hope I'm not.
I also dont see how seeing how people react to night mode really helps us in the search for scum. Maybe you can explain what actions you look for there, because im not too sure what you could be looking for.
FoS Iron Man-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Why are you so intent on seeing a no lynch today? And a quick one at that. By just rushing through day one we are just going to be in the same spot tomorrow we are now, this time though we will have one player missing and according to you logic, use that to decide the lynch.Iron Man wrote:I'm just doubting how much information we can really gather after just Day 1. I severly doubt that anyone is gonna drop a ballbuster that reveals everything, but comparing the Day 1 statements, the outcome of Night 1, and any Day 2 statements, we could formulate a much better image on who may or may not be scum. This opinoin may be result of my lack of expirience in MS games, but this is how I am currently seeing it. So why throw a random lynch that has a good chance of hitting a townie when we could wait one night and have a better chance of lynching scum tomarrow?
Also you are jumping to the poor conclusion that any lynch today would be random while it would not be. I was pushed to L-2 early on randoms, but am not there anymore. At this point we are starting to vote based on peoples actions and comments.
Two more questions
1) Do you still think a no lynch is the best option
2) Let say we dosomehowget to a no lynch, I get NK. Does that mean everyone else should lynch you since I am challenging you?
--------
Other things
- I would like firestarter to answer my Q1 as well
- I would like to hear more from jas, reaper and reality-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Hypocritical much here? You yourself have just breadcrumbed to a vote on alvin, now if anyone starts a wagon you can say "hey look I had suspicions of him D1!" Just like what he did to you here.Firestarter wrote:
You see, although theres been a couple of guys here to make a big deal of the 2 "No Lynch" votes, they have decided to ask questions first, and possibly lynch later. You on the other hand, are going straight for the kill.alvinz95 wrote:Question to all: Why not firestarter? He followed ironman his possible scumpal.
Why dont you start the voting on me alvin, instead of seeing what others might do first. You've left your breadcumb to jump on anything that may start against me with this post... and although its early in the game, so to speak, youve jumped to the top of my list.... which, by the way, contains no-one else.
So you claim your vote isnt suspicious but a third is? Was your vote a ingenius sceme to trick mafia into voting no lynch then too?firestarter wrote:For a "no lynch" vote to occur, it will take more than just 2 votes xast to make this happen, so really, your barking up the wrong tree on this one.
However, if others follow, then you could ask the questions of those.
I still dont see your reply, unless what ive already quoted was it. I agree with reality though, you did seem to deflect my question back to me without really answering it as I had hoped you would.Firestarter wrote:I take it you didn't see my reply then....
I think its time to
unvote,
vote firestarter-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
This was interesting to find during a read-throughcrazy_vlad wrote:Unvote Iron Man
I agree he has raised some suspicions, but thing are evolving a little too quickly for me
I'm thinking aFoS Xanatoswould not hurt for the time being. I hate easy bandwagons...
Well lets break this down a bit (heh break down a 30 word post). You say that the case on Iron is evolving too fast for you. Looking back at the time of your post, Iron had three votes on him, one of which was yours, and one FoS. That is hardly a quickly evolving case. For some reason though it credited an unvote.
So you decide to vote Xan, because he voted for Iron. You agree with the suspicions on Iron though, so why is Xan scum for deciding to vote him? You call the third vote a bandwagon, im not so sure having three votes on someone for doing an ascenine move such as a no vote really calls for the b-word. Its a perfectly valid vote to me, and I want to know why someone is scummy to you for attacking an already scummy person?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Why is this unfortunate that they are looking scummy? You seem to imply that you are planning to vote one of them in the future so you sure think that one or more is scum. By saying unfortunate, it makes me sound like you know that they are citizens and dont want to vote one out, or, one is your scumbuddy that you dont want to lose D1crazy_vlad wrote:@llama
I did not vote xanatos, I made a FoS.
and that it is because not like others around here I'm not rushing for a speed lynch. not even of Ironman. Other options should be analyzed. To me it seemed that at this point Ironman was registering four votes, maybe I was wrong and there were three. however, as I've given initially a random vote, I felt properly to make a more proper guess. The fact that xanatos acted so quickly for me it was worthy enough for a FoS, again, not a vote. I hope it's clear now...
unfortunatelythrough what they've said yesterday, ironman and firestarter are looking now more suspicious, at least to me. their replies only deepened their problem. again, I would no rush for a hasty vote. until a deadline will be set we have all the time...
---Questions---
What has made Iron and firestarter more suspicious?
Do you feel Xan deserves a vote or FoS from you now for his vote?
If the deadline was tomorrow who would you vote?
Who is more scummy, Iron or Firestarter?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Answer me this then: Do you think either one, or both, of these players are scum. Given what I have bolded, you seem to either be dead set that each of them is a citizen, or, do not want to vote for them given some information that we do not know.crazy_vlad wrote:@llama
unfortunately for them, because in my opinion their messages from page 2-3 seemed to be moresuspicious than the previous ones. with every message both of them seemed to godeeper into their problem. I said is unfortunately thatI have given them a chance by canceling my vote, and after that they only seemed to move from worse to worser,
Why are you not voting them if you yourself are admitting that they are looking increasingly scummy? Why are you not asking them questions to either confirm or reject your suspicions? Right now you seem perfectly content with letting me and zombie be ask the questions, as you from the sidelines shake your head.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
well im certaintly analyzing for you right now, ive already done some analyzing for chicago earlier so you cant really call me on getting tunnel vision at this point. You just happen to be related to my top suspect with some odd words, and im sure you can see how this would provoke questions from me like I have been asking.crazy_vlad wrote:@llama I 've got the feeling you don't get. I said that right now they may seem most suspicious, but this doesn't mean that I should just accept this and don't look anymore. I thought it was pretty clear. If you are positive that this two guys are mafia, ok, I'm not sure. for ex. XaN didn't post anything since I've put the FoS on him. but this is of no interest for you i suppose...even you may be regarded suspicious as you insist just on his without any regard to other's messages, or lack of messages. If you analyse, do it for everybody not just for 2 players.
then we have people like you, who seem to just be doing as little as possible you have a (joke?) OMGUS random of iron, and the unvote/FoS. After that you said nothing untill I came and challenged you. How is not scumhunting a pro-town move in this game? You always need to be trying to figure things out. If you think Xan is scum, post, ask him questions, analyze! Dont just sit there and disagree with me for trying to do things.
You say that iron/FS are the most suspicious, im certaintly not going to disagree. I dont really get why you have not asked them one question though. Going back to what ive said already, you are not scum-hunting. It does not matter one bit if you agree or disagree with the way im playing this game, and how I choose to look at my suspects, you need to play your part. If you never are going to scumhunt, you never are going to be of use in this game.
You also are misrepresenting me. I am not 100% Iron/FS scum pair OMGZ!! I think that there is a very high chance that one of them is scum yes, but im not ready to say "hey they are our next two lynches ok guys!" Part of my reason for pushing the FS lynch here, is I get a scummy feeling from his answers to the questions people have been asking him.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Im pushing you because I thought your actions were wierd, you seem to be more or less torn on FS/iron. Ive been prodding you to see exactly where you stand on them, because you havent done a great job in my opinion laying out what exactly you feel is going on with both of them, and your guesses at their alignment.crazy_vlad wrote:@llama...frankly I don't know if it worth to enter with you on a page to page debate. of course you can play however you like. i was just trying to make you to consider, not necessarily to make, other options. I admit that for me it's a little strange that you have pushed on me from the moment I take back my random vote...so if let's say hypothetical iron and fire are not mafia, and you are scum, than your action is understandable.
You are saying that you are trying to push me to find other suspects. That is all well and good, I have others in you and chicago, so mission accomplished there.
Also, lets not play they "you are scum and this is what you did game" if you want I can return fire there, but that usually is just a waste of time and posts.
I am pushing you for the actions regarding these two players of course. You yourself said that Iron/FS are scummy many times in this game, there seems to be a lack of movement either way from you though in pushing for a lynch of them, or of anyone else. I personally see no real reason for you just sitting back and not taking any action regarding these two players, especially if you think they are either a bad lynch, or are scum.crazy_vlad wrote:on the other hand you forced me to sound very pro to both of them and if either one of them is getting to be lynched and prove to be though mafia, I'll be a good lynching candidate for being the first one to make any doubts and peeing against the wind, as I've said earlier.
I didn't say that they are mafia or not, they look pretty scummy, I just didn't want, and still don't want to see things rushed.
I do agree with dont rush things, but you seem to be trying to delay things and not getting the needed conversation done at the same time. I guess what I am saying is; if you are trying to slow things down, thats fine with me, just make use of the extra time. There is no reason to slow the day while only FS/Iron are being pushed, and you sit back doing nothing.
A question though: Deadline is today, who do you vote?
I criticized your FoS because it made no sense to me. You still seem to hold by the fact that Iron and Xan are scummy, but when Xan threw on a vote to someone you already considered scummy, it made him even more scummy?crazy_vald wrote:and I'm saying once again, you criticized me for putting a FoS on XaN, but he didn't post anything since....
for me it was odd that until amor no one else had at list consider other options and that everybody was satisfied with their votes...
And im considering you now, and have been since pg. 4, so once again, lets not start complaining about everyone getting tunnel vision, especially as you seemingly are locked in on Xan.
Im going to run through some things about your play and I want you to tell me if they are true or not.
1) Iron, FS and Xan are the scummiest players.
2) You seem to want to delay a D1 lynch for as long as you can.
3) Everyone else has asked everything you feel is needed to be asked.
4) Is Iron or FS a bad lynch?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
I just would rather there be more conversation then a quick lynch, right now im pressuring previously lurky CV to post, since I stopped asking FC questions he has gone lurky, in fact most players are at this point.Firestarter wrote:In contradiction to one of your questions LF, you seem pretty intent on getting a lynch done, and getting it done as quickly as possibly.
1. why do you want this, when clearly no info has been gathered from alot of other players?
To me, there are lurkers here, and your lack of "picking anything up" from my last post, makes me even more suspicious of you.
If tomorrow there was a sudden explosion of posts and we hit page 10, I would be perfectly fine with someone being lynched. Right now you are the main concept of discussion, so I am pushing people to act on you, which in turn causes people to talk and stimulates discussion.
While I wish that people would pick up other suspects, this is partially your job too. Right now you are just dicking around it seems hoping that your softclaim saves you. You are up for lynch, and you really arent taking a big pro-town stance over it. I want to see you do something here, make a suspect, push a case. Just dont insult my gameplay because you feel it just targets you.
In addition, if there was a deadline today, you certainly would be in consideration for my vote as one of my pet peeves is softclaiming. I however am not becoming a snarling beast just attacking you. If you have at all been paying attention to what ive been doing, im content with asking CV questions concerning his thoughts on the whole no lynch situation we had.
The lurkers are annoying of course, jas, RF, FC, SD are the ones I can name off the top of my head, if I can make them post I sure would, I dont have that ability though, so will do what I can with what has been presented to me. Hint hint mod, prods please.
So im not sure what you really want from me with that question. Im not only asking you questions, im not trying to get people to vote you this instant, im trying to stimulate conversation over you.
If you have any other questions then "why are you trying to get my lynched", I will be happy to answer them though.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
thats not me , thats vladAmor wrote:LlamaFluff, why are you so suspicious of Xan right now? He's made 1 serious post, which was jumping on a bandwagon. DOesn't seem like a lot to go on, looks to me like he just flaked.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well we haven’t heard much of you for a long time, and a lot has progressed on FS since you posted this. You still aren’t voting at this point so are doing a great job of staying noncommittal to this whole No Lynch incedent. It would be nice to know where you stand on this soon.SD_Reaper wrote:
True is definitely looks scummy, but it could also be interpreted as Firestarter being really careful and not wanting to look scummy by following behind someone. He could be mafia, but he could also be a an intimidated town. You your bold sent can apply to almost anyone mafia or not.You know what I find weird? Firestarter posted reasoning for his voting no lynch, then Iron Man posted reasoning and a vote, than Firestarter posted his vote. It almost seems like Firestarter is following Iron Man's lead. Unless two people were struck by the stupid idea to no lynch at the same time, this is rather suspicious.Alternately Firestarter wanted to vote no lynch, but waited until another person did it so that he wouldn't stand out for accusation.Either way, this makes FS look scummy, so I'll Vote: Firestarter
QFT, time to do some scumhunting dudeFirestarter wrote:Realityfan... One who likes to ask questions, thats been his core post in this thread, but they have been questions that have already been asked before him. IMO, offers nothing with his posts, and does not follow them up having been answered, again, others are picking up from his initial poking... another one who's in the shadows and needs to show more.
@vald (again I know)
Xan voted for Iron, not for FS. You seem to say that Xan is scum for pushing the bandwagon onto Iron. What does this make you think about FS though, as he was not the chosen target? Does the person chosen even matter to you in this situation or are they both still town and Xan still scum.
@FS Im really bad at picking up roleclaim hints so I consider more then most people do softclaims, especially in this type of game where not all roles are even known. For that reason I tend to still be adverse to anything but coming straight out and saying a role.
Given what has been going on though, its time tounvote-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Ok, this game has gotten too quiet. Time for some thinking.
Im liking alvin95 a lot more given his question to Amor about his unvote of FS. The whole
that usually isnt coupled with an unvote. Right now FS has two votes I think, maybe three (Amor wrote:Deflecting onto lurkers? Firestarter is so scum.mod votecount hint hint), so you really arent going to be putting him at L-1 or hammering him.
While I normally would regard this change of stance due to the claim we had, this post was after the claim. This means that Amor was uneffected by it.
I would like to know your current stance on FS.
-----
jas - you really need to do something helpful here soon. You made a condecending comment at Iron for his bad post, and you seem to jump on reality for his response. This confuses me a bit because your post has some suggestion to it that both of these players are scum. Your comment seems to be a bit of a streach to smear reality a bit too, he didnt seem to imply that he wanted a FS lynch to me. You also are very lurkey to me, only emmerging to put pressure on Iron (post 66) and then to pressure reality for what I still say is a very good post (121)
vlad - I still want an answer to 115. Also Xan seems to be headed for replacement, will that cause an unvote given your reasoning for vote, or will you persue this case.
reality - I like your question to Iron, I just want to see more out of you in the terms of case building in the future, you seem to be holding back.
Iron - As reality said, I dont like the way you returned to the game by admitting a lurker attitude in order to cast suspicion on others. I would like it if you started contributing more
For now though, at least untill I hear more from him, I am going to go and
vote [jas]-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well it really wasnt intended to make reality look better, so that only leaves one option to me.[jas] wrote:Also:
Actually no smear intended at all, just wanting to clarify something. Reality's post seemed to assume we were soon going to see FS's alignment (read: he was going to be lynched). I was wondering why he was so sure this was going to happen.LlamaFluff wrote:Your comment seems to be a bit of a streach to smear reality a bit too, he didnt seem to imply that he wanted a FS lynch to me. You also are very lurkey to me, only emmerging to put pressure on Iron (post 66) and then to pressure reality for what I still say is a very good post (121)
I also had a problem with the who and how aspects of what happened, now a little more so.
THE WHO - You attacked reality, who had been fairly lurkey for this game. When I saw his post on Iron, I had hoped that he was starting to become more active. As a newer player which given his style of play im assuming he is, it would be fairly traumatic for him to immediately be brought under some suspicion himself for trying to build a case on Iron. Your actions here could very well of been a passive defense of him.
THE HOW - A gun and run situation occured. When you really suspect someone or want more information about what had occured, you follow up on their response with another post. Given how fast you dropped the whole reality situation, I dont think that you really thought that the comment was that big of a deal.
Now im left with the confusing situation of your last few posts. In 66 you put pressure of Iron, but in 121 you put pressure on reality, for putting pressure on Iron. Now given your lack of posting (grrr) you may think that now Iron is not suspicious, or reality is a great scum pick, I really dont know which it is, since I know next to nothing about your thoughts. This is why I want you to post a little more too, even if its a brief thought on a player.
So a few questions:
1) Is Iron or Reality more scummy?
2) Is FS or Iron more scummy?
3) If you could auto-lynch anyone, who would it be right now?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
I am going to disagree with that statement. A vote is a vote, it implies everything, it forces people to act, it becomes evidence in later rounds. To me, if you really think he is scum, you should be voting him right now. There is a big difference in; I think FS is scum and I am voting FS because I think he is scum.Amor wrote:It's true that he's not presently in danger of lynch, but if so, my voting him is pretty useless anyway, right?
FS is not at L-1 right now, in fact he is at L-4. I see no reason for you not to be voitng him right now. It increases pressure on your scum suspect and strengthens your stance. The only two ways I can see you not wanting to vote him involve you being scum.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well I didnt mean to offend you with my post, and im sorry if I did. I found the fact that jas finally opened a bit of an attack on a player who was exhibiting lurker tendancies odd.RealityFan wrote:
Please dont treat me like a baby, even thought I am a newer mafia player. If you find something I say scummy, tell me about it, and I'll explain why I said it. Honestly, I would rather have you disagree, and then I would have something to respond to.LlamaFluff wrote:THE WHO - You attacked reality, who had been fairly lurkey for this game. When I saw his post on Iron, I had hoped that he was starting to become more active. As a newer player which given his style of play im assuming he is, it would be fairly traumatic for him to immediately be brought under some suspicion himself for trying to build a case on Iron. Your actions here could very well of been a passive defense of him.
From what I saw, you were making a push to become actively involved in the game, and jas very quickly turned suspicion on you, which I think was not the right move there. You comment to me didnt scream scum, so I found it odd that its the first thing in a long time that jas decided to comment on.
My response there was due to the concern that jas was trying to intimidate players out of becoming active, and trying to push cases. Then again I dont know enough about jas right now, especially regarding the fact that he seems to find Iron suspicious and you suspicious for the push against Iron.
So again, sorry if I offended you, it wasnt my intention. I guess if this is going to make you more active thought I really cant complain!-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Not really...Iron Man wrote:Sorry for not contributing. (Also sorry for the unnessecary double post.)
Vote Firestarter
Happy now?
This is not what I had in mind when I said that you should be actively contributing. Anyone can just slap on a vote and then disappear, we saw that with Xan who is now replaced, and zombie/FC are both not too active anymore, but are voting. In fact they are both voting FS, interesting fact.
So lets start with a pretty bigFoS Iron Manfor your wierd little move here.
Now, when I asked for actively contributing, I ment aiding the discussion that is currently in progress, or starting a new one. So If you could answer these three questions:
1) Why are you voting firestarter, even after his claim?
2) What are your thoughts on; jas, FC and amor?
3) If you could auto-lynch firestarter right now, would you?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Let me modify that question so you cant avoid it:Iron Man wrote:3. No, I wouldnt auto-lynch. An auto-lynch takes away from the town what is rightfully theirs: the power of majority. When a majority of people decide that such and such is scum, then such and such is lynched, but discusion shall have ensued. Just because I voted for FS doesnt mean that he is 100% scum. I could be wrong. But the fact is, with my vote, more wheels begin to turn in other people's heads as to whether or not he is scum or not.
If you could hammer firestarter would you?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well, you honestly are the center of attention at this point in the game. If I am asking people questions about you its because I want to know where people stand on you. I am not necessarily trying to make people vote for you, what I am doing is pressuring people to ACT on you, like Iron, vlad and amor. They just come to the conclusion that you are the best vote.firestarter wrote:I would also like to mention LlamaFluff in here too...
Altough it would seem that he is doing the right thing by asking questions to everyone, and trying to get them to post, and in the odd post, making reference to other players who might be scum.. I dont think there has been a post from him where he hasn't put pressure on me with trying to get others to vote for me... There may be one or two, but he has the majority posts in here, and 1 or 2 posts is a small ratio compared to the amount of times my name has been mentioned in his posts.
These people are not acting accordingly to what their posts say they are planning to act, and I am trying to get them to take a stance. Are they citizens unsure of themselves? Mafia afraid to be on the early wagon of a citizen? Mafia not wanting to bandwagon if they can get a mislynch? I dont know, and thats what im trying to determine at this point.
You're defense isnt the greatest in the world either, although I have to say I like what you pointed out against me, its something I wasnt aware that I was doing to the extent I am, plus it shows that you are paying attention. While that in itself by no means absolves you of a lynch, it lessens the need for one. Simply put, if I had the option on a hammer on you right now, I wouldnt be taking it.
The best thing for you here is to find a suspect and start pushing a case, it proves that you are actively scumhunting. I am doing that with jas right now, you seem to be starting to do that with Zombie in...
Now see, that a great thing, just build up a case and push it, convince me, convince others. That is what you try to do in this game, get people lynched.Firestarter wrote:ZS is a good candidate for looking into at this stage, because as soon as my "No Lynch" was cast, he has been the single most "tunnel-visioned" player to jump on my BW! He's also been curiously inactive here since he last placed his vote on me... maybe he's happy with what he's seeing from a distance? I dont know....
However (note this is what im doing to other people, it just involves you) you are voting Iron. Now, are you more suspect of Iron or Zombie right now, you are posting that you want people to look at ZS, but havent taken the initiative to vote him yet, or build a more in-depth case.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Its been quite a few days now, and still no post, still no vote, still no vocal opinions. You still are playing a lurker game, we are continuing on without you. This applies to SDR too of course, but you I have suspicions of.[jas] wrote:Llama, my lurkiness has been due to being really busy of late and not having the time to devote to this. I'm hoping to have a chance to do a full read-through come Monday night, I'll post complete thoughts then. Until thenI'll drop a comment inif I notice something(like I did for reality...), but I'll go and read through completely in a couple of days. Hope that's okay with you all.
Your line I bolded really bothers me though. You claim that you are busy, yet will act if you notice something. I really am concerned that one of the only things you have noticed is a post by reality that I think you blew way out of porportion. There have been lots of other things going on in the game, you havent been wieghing in, these have occured before and after the RF quote.
FS and Iron seem to be the ones moving to a lynch, but I encourage people to take a look at jas here, he is a great mafia suspect to me, and I think that everyone owes it to the town to take a look at him.
@Firestarter: You seem suspect of Zombie, me and FaerieLord, you should try and make some convincing cases to try and start getting them/me lynched.
@Zombie: Firestarter already said it, but I will say it too. Your post is horrible, it just wreaks of tunnel vison and scum. The timing of your post is odd, right after FS threatened you a bit. You drop Iron without really giving us a good reason. You say FS gets scummier, without any decent reasons. So to me, answering what FS asked you is a good start, but it would be nice to hear more of you on other subjects.
Also Zombie, what is your thought on Firestarters claim? You left that out completely and its something that I consider pretty important at this point.
Finally - I havent said it yet so welcome FaerieLord.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Its now six days... im still waiting for you, and still voting for you[jas] wrote:Llama, my lurkiness has been due to being really busy of late and not having the time to devote to this. I'm hoping to have a chance to do a full read-through come Monday night, I'll post complete thoughts then. Until then I'll drop a comment in if I notice something (like I did for reality...), butI'll go and read through completely in a couple of days.Hope that's okay with you all.
I will do an analysis of the FS/ZS/FL banter later tonight when I have more time.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Ok first of all, that whole debate was very painful to read. A few words of advice for my sake and yours, first for ZS, Paragraphs are your friends, they make things easier to follow. Secondly, consider numbering questions AND responses, once again, it makes it easy for us to follow.
Before analysis though, to FS. You need to calm down a bit, you are coming across as crazy to me in your posts by the end of this argument. It is just a game after all. Sometimes the best cure for it is to go take a jog/walk/drinking binge (only if you are of age) and just come back to the game the next day.
Some points I have seen that do make some sense though -
1) Breadcrumb situation is just over the top confusing to me, I cant tell what FS is arguing, and what ZS is responding. FS you did seem to make an attempt at breadcrumbing early in the game, so you cant deny that you really have been playing with your cards close to your chest this whole time. When you are at L-1, you should claim, not breadcrumb.
2) Zombie, being "99% sure" that FS is scum is to me insulting when you realize that the question was are you 100% sure im scum. That just is asking for a bit of a flame war. Also, if you are 99% sure he is scum, lets have the whole case laid out.Firestarter wrote:LF, mine was not a softclaim at all.... but my post with my claim needs to be read carefully...
3) Zombie, your stance of “I don’t want to share my suspicions” is about as untown as you can get. There should be no reason to fear putting your thoughts out in the open. We are not going to lynch you for giving us ideas, I am more inclined to lynch you for refusing to share. I am out here coming up with ideas, piecing together cases, and you sit back and agree. This is easily described as scum trying to not accidently incriminate their partner when they flip.
4) Firestarter again. Don’t get so whipped out over FL’s comment of don’t be a comedian, while saying that was not necessary, for EITHER of you (FS it takes away from the case, FL you made his case look weaker by pointing it out). Still, by attacking her like you are, once again you are really detracting from what your goal should be, which is to lynch scum. FS with the quote you changed up, that also is a slander attack. Neither of you should be doing that as town.
5) Again the breadcrumb argument surfaces. I don’t know WHAT either of you were even trying to prove here, honestly. I don’t know if the debate is someone accusing another of breadcumbing or what. I will say this though once and squiggly it
~~~~~~~In my opinion, the bolded words in post 101 were an attempt at breadcrumbing~~~~~~
So wrapping up… you guys are confusing. Its hard to get a good read on what happened due to the confusion going on during most of the posts. However
I like the emotion from FS, that usually is a town tell
Can you make a revamped case against Zombie that has NO MENTION of the breadcrumb?
Zombie, can you lay out a case against Firestarter?
Faerie (odd spelling) you seem to make a lot of nonpartisan comments, but lean to FS being scum. Which of these two players would you vote for as a tiebreaker?
And not related to any of you… jas! Once again, after I comment on your inactivity, you come back fairly soon and say why you have been inactive. I look forward to a writeup within the week.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
*opens lid*Firestarter wrote: With that said, I will point to the fact I was not breadcrumbing with my claim.
Its in black & white,it may make sense at a later stage, but for now, Ill put a lid on that one.
To me what I bolded is an acceptable definition of breadcrumbing.
So then, if it is not breadcrumbing, why did you need to say it cryptically?
Also, why do you feel the need to withhold information from us? Its something that you faulted zombie for, and you seem to be doing it too.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
I actually would say dont answer this unless you are at L-1, claiming when you arent close to a lynch inst a good thing.RealityFan wrote:
How about this, are you a vanilla townie?Firestarter wrote:But I was not breadcrumbing.
At this point though I think its time for a recap of the players in the game, as most of our leads are losing momentum. I will try and do a reread tonight.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
no jas? I still consider him to be a high suspect and he just keeps posting reasons for not contributing, the analysis post he promised just keeps getting delayed.Amor wrote:Okay, Firestarter has been discussed to death, so I'm going to look at some of the people who have posted less frequently.
alvinz97: 11 posts in total. Seems to follow the majority opinion, I'm not seeing a lot of original ideas. One to keep an eye on.
firechicago: 8 posts in total. Raised the curious idea of eventually voting for no lynch after there's more info. Admits that he's been lurking. I dunno, not really seeing much scummy here.
RealityFan: 12 posts in total, all of them are one- or two-liners. Nothing especially scummy in there, but he really isn't posting much of anything.
SD_Reaper: 4 posts in total. The last one was two weeks ago. Needs to be replaced if he doesn't post soon.
Of these four, the only one who's suspicious to me is alviz, for echoing others a lot. The rest are all standard lurkers, really can't say one way or the other. I'd like all four to post more, and give us their views of the game.
I realize that I am not the most active player myself, which is no one's fault but my own, but I'll try to make solid contributions.
I agree that SDR needs another prod or replacement though at this point-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
modcan we maybe get a round of prods here, would be nice to bring some life back into this game since it is dying out right now-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Im reminded of a politicians speech here – I promise you good times, I promise you economic growth, I promise no new taxes. And much like those politicians, we get screwed and nothing comes true.firechicago wrote:Sorry for not posting, just wrapped up the process of leaving my job, and my mind's been other places.
But now that I don't have silly things like a job to distract me from what's really important (i.e. mafia) you'll have my undivided attention.
A more substantive post to follow as soon as I do a readthrough, and have some analysis to post.
So Firestarter is scum, lets hear why. Like Zombie, you should lay out a case, not just scream at us for being ignorant enough not to lynch him because so say so. At least you are voting him, but I see no real backing to your vote.firechicago wrote:Hmm, so I had hoped that my reread would bring exciting new insights, but unfortunately, it didn't. I still think Firestarter's defenses of himself have been unconvincing, and I think he's the most likely scum, with Iron man a close second.
It seems to me that there are only two options at this point, with the conversation winding down. Either we go ahead and lynch Firestarter and cross our fingers that he's scum and not just a townie who doesn't know what he's doing, or we table that whole discussion for the moment and starting using our votes and posts to put some pressure on the lurkers.
Personally, I'm 50/50 on either, so my vote's staying on Firestarter and I'll encourage others to join unless someone comes up with a plan to get some more (and more varied) activity in the thread.
Then you go on to talk about how IM is probally scum, same concept applies, you aren’t pushing very hard for his lynch is you think he is scum.
Now you give us two options, both which I don’t like. You first say we lynch FS andcross our fingersthat he is scum. I really don’t know about you, but if I am going to lynch someone, im doing a hell of a lot more then crossing my fingers and hoping they are scum.
You second choice is prod-vote basically, which I really don’t like. Prods are the mods job. If someone is inactive they get replaced with someone who is active. Throwing away a vote to simply prod someone is just another way to take a neutral scum stance on what is happening in the game.
Then you actually complain that there are no targets apart from FS, while this is alarming, your wording sits poorly with me. I don’t want FS lynched right now, I have him leaning town in my book. Because I don’t feel like he is the right lynch, I am looking for scum, not waiting for people to bring me suspicions that I can analyze later.
Right now you are just kicking back, even with the “extra time” you now have on your hands. I look forward to hearing cases on FS and anyone else that you feel needs one.
A big ol’HoS Firechicagofor now, if it wasnt for jas needing extra motivation it would be a full-fledged vote. Lets see a case.
----------
[jas] hows that post coming? I know you have a few more days but it would be nice to hear something soon.
FaerieLord – Who are you voting? I was skimming posts and it looked like Iron inheritance still but might of missed something.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Ok welcome shadowgirl first off. I have some general questions though that I feel that you should answer given that you just replaced into the game. You really never did give a good recap of what happened to me, just zeroed in on FS, which really doesnt help alieviate my suspicions of CV who you just replaced.
1) What is your take on the FS/ZS argument?
2) What are your opinons on [jas] and firechicago?
3) Who else part from FS is scummy?
-----
Firestarter, I think this will be the last time that I open this can of worms, but what did the bolded parts of post 101 mean, if anything. There is no reason to not reveal what they ment at this point unless its a role claim, that is L-1 material.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
@modmaybe prods on firechicago, realtiyfan, jas and ironman would be good here.
-------
continuing on to the brunt of the post though: Shadowgirl, a few questions ive came up with given what you have presented us from the re-read.
I will start with the obvious of: Why arent you voting? You have called zombie, FS suspicious flat out. However you also seem to hint at amor and firechicago pretty suspicious, but a lot more subtley. By calling nearly every player in the game suspicious, you are able to easily shuffle around your vote to the player who lynch fits you bets.
Its time to pick a top suspect, and start presenting a case.
Second - You have failed to mention me, alvinz, realityfan and FaerieLord in your recaps. Are we just pro-town to you?
Next - What is making Zombie seem so scummy to you? You seem to be alluding to wanting a FS lynch, but fell back on zombie as more suspicious.
Last - Pretend you are a one shot vig, who is your target and why?
-----
FaerieLord - At first pass you look to be a good contributor to the discussion, which mostlyinvolved the incomprehesable conversation between FS and ZS, the basic equivilant of a tornado hitting a newspaper plant. Upon a reread though, there are certain aspects of your play that ring bells for me.
It started with Iron man. Everything regarding him has been wierd to me. You replaced in voting him, and in your first big post, looked like you were going to be turning up the pressure. You even list him as "probable scum".
Your attention snaps right to FS though, Iron is no longer an issue for you. In my three questions to Iron, which I still feel the answers to were sub-par, you just ignore. Instead you fall back on Iron answering your megapost questions.
Then comes the squabble between FS/ZS. You never voted either of them to my knowlage, Iron was your vote for this entire conversation. This did not stop you though from taking sides and really fueling this fire for a while. Things like
I just dislike bad cases.What the hell? Way to go to turn a serious case into funny farmYou see, this is another bad case.
They seemed to help fan the flames. You never did take a strong stance on this either way though. You simply seemed to criticize both players, and keep having them post ill about eachother.That's what I told you before! At least you're taking it into reasoning now
Going back to Iron though, you voted him all the way up to the moment I brought up who are you voting. Only then do you unvote, and only because he has gone quiet. He STILL hasnt answered the questions that you posed to him. He just went lurky on you. I dont see how that moves him down your suspicion list and not up it.
I feel you should be voting though, you were involved closely with the FS/ZS conflict, you had a whole list of town/neutral/scum when you replaced in, and now you are just picking at FS.
Who is scum? Why?
Its time for you to vote and make a case
unvote
vote: FaerieLord
Im going to still keep a
FoS [jas]though-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
ergh, forgot to add on, alvinz and jas, im looking forward to a recap post and vote from both of you here soon.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Two reasons from me, first I consider what you did, standing back while you wind up two players to eachother scummy. That is basically asking for chaos which ended up happening, and I for one got nothing out of it. Second, this one is more me though, I think you were knowingly pitting two town aligned players against eachother, and waiting for one of them to slip up.FaerieLord wrote:
Precisely. The longer the debate, the longer one can slip. What's bad about that?fluffy wrote:They seemed to help fan the flames. You never did take a strong stance on this either way though. You simply seemed to criticize both players, and keep having them post ill about eachother.
I think you also know that getting someone really worked up is a great way to have someone say something stupid that gets them lynched, town or scum.
Decent enough evasion. The point I was trying to make is Iron has done nothing to alleviate suspicions that you laid out when you first arrived, and to me everything he has done only furthers your inital reasons to vote him. So where do you stand on him now?Faerie wrote:
What I said before. I never voted this game. I vote only when I'm pretty sure someone is scum, and right now, I'm not sure anyone is scumfluffy wrote:Going back to Iron though, you voted him all the way up to the moment I brought up who are you voting. Only then do you unvote, and only because he has gone quiet. He STILL hasnt answered the questions that you posed to him. He just went lurky on you. I dont see how that moves him down your suspicion list and not up it.
Now lets not be smug with is/think here. You seem to say that Iron and FS are scum with a point back at the first list. Lets hear a case against them then.Faerie wrote:
I ask you the same question.fluffy wrote:Who is scum? Why?
Now, to whoI thinkis scum. Just look at the first list. It hasn't changed-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Yes the whole argument would of happened, I feel that you intentionally prolonged it though, in such a way that either player, regardless of alignment, had a higher chance of saying something scummy out of anger.FaerieLord wrote:It was their debate! I had nothing in it. Firestarter accused Zombie of Tunnel Vision, did you expect me to go in and defend ZS? Also, stop making a big deal out of their tirade between each other. Had I not been in there, the tirade would have still happened. At best all I did was "fuel the fires", but tell me, what use is it to fuel the fires against someone that is highly suspected by town anyway (firestarter) or someone that nobody other than firestarter is attacking. If I wanted to fuel fires, I'd do it on someone with medium suspicion like Jas.
You yourself said about fueling fires "It gives them a higher chance of slipping up". If you really agreed with that, it seems that fueling fires is of more use against high suspects like FS instead of people like jas as you say later in the quote.
I thought he was scummy though from your inital post?Faerie wrote:You are missing the point. I never had initial reasons to vote him. I rarely vote and what Iron Man has done does not make me think "Yepp, he's scum!" so I wasn't, am not and will not vote Iron Man until I have that thought
You want cases? Let me point to them for you.Faerie wrote: Oh come on, don't be hypocritical now. What cases have you put up? All you have done is prod Jas for posts and agree with everyone else, while posting more content. Telling me to post a case is calling the kettle black.
I pushed CV (now SG) case early in the game quite a bit
Case against jas - post 130
Case against firechicago - post 214
Case against you - ongoing
I guess in the end one of my biggest problem is despite how much you have been contributing to this game, you still have failed to take any strong stace towards an lynch. That is a safe spot for scum as they are not going to take mislynch heat, or be called for defending a scumbuddy since they can easily vote them.
Now I hear a lot of "I want to be sure" comments from people like you, lets be honest though, we NEVER will be 100% sure on anyones alignment unless they are confirmed scum by a confirmed cop with a confirmed insanity. We make cases to try and get as close to that 100% as possible, but we never are 100% sure.
I dont see how you can fail to make any cases though, am I 100% sure about any of my suspects? Of course not, but thats why I make cases and ask questions, it raises the certainty aspect of the game. Just answer me this; Why dont you make a case on anyone?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Ok for FaerieLord, I think a lot of my scumtells coming from you may really be a complete difference in playstyle. I more enjoy a hyperagressive game style where I vote and make cases quite a bit. You seem to be a very conservative player who really would rather plan out their moves perfectly before you take action. Just one final question: When will you be ready to vote?
---
For now though this game just seems near dead with only four or five active players.modcan we get a prod on just about every player, and at this point probally a replacement for SD_Reaper
---
Jas still hasnt posted much if at all, and firechicago as once again gone missing. I personally think that the lynch should be one of these two players today. They both are high on my scumlist, and are not showing signs of being active and helpful.
unvote
vote firechicago-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Maybe you should look at it this way; no one posts, no one comments, we get no where. You can always stimulate discussion too.Amor wrote:Sorry I haven't been posting more, I haven't seen a lot to comment on recently.
Alright, I did not mean lynch the lurkers because they are lurking. I said lynch the lurkers because I think they are scum. At this point in the game my 214 on firechicago is *sadly* one of the stronger cases in the game to me, and I wouldnt mind at all seeing him lynched. [jas] seems to be purposly avoiding the game, and I still got wierd vibes off his post attacking RF.I don't agree with LF's stance that we should lynch the lurkers. Lurking (including jas's "Will post later" posts) is generally a null tell. I also don't see anything super-scummy about FC. I would prefer to lynch someone who is actually acting scummy (FS or IM) over someone who probably just forgot about the game or can't keep up with it or whatever. And given that FC hasn't picked up his prod yet, that would seem to be the case.
So out of the actives, I could deal with an Iron lynch right now, but my gut keeps pulling me back to firechicago, and im not quite sure why, I am willing to trust it though for now.
On this topic, im not quite sure alvinz is at a high content post style yet, he did lay down feelings on all the players though, which is benificial. However, I dont think he is voting right now, given that he only listed Iron as scum/neutral leaning scum, this is odd. If only one player leans scum a vote is more practical then an FoS.Good to see Alvinz posting more content here.
Now im not sure if you have and ive missed it, but can you answer my questions n 225 SG?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Im going to be gone for the next few days with limited access at best, but my to lynch list would be. You better not hang someone without me though
firechicago
iron man
jas
last few questions though -
Alvinz, shadowgirl and megatron - Why arent you voting? All of you are fairly vocal of your suspicions, a vote is the next natural step.
Reality - You mention that Amor looked scummy, does this change any opinions about Firestarter?
Amor - I have to agree with Reality but for a different reason. You are drawing a IM->SG connection right now. Yet you seem to still support an FS lynch more then an IM lynch. Why are you making connections of scum to scum if you arent voting the scum?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Ok lets try this, you log in tomorrow morning and its all tied up between Iron and FS. It looks like you hammer FS?Amor wrote:Well, the IM/SG connection isn't very strong right now, and outside of the quick vote ShadowGirl hasn't been acting too scummy. Really, at this point I would only seriously suspect her as scum if we knew for sure Iron Man was also scum. And I still think that Firestarter is acting the scummiest, although Iron Man has been giving him a run for his money. His argument with ZS and other recent play hasn't made him seem town to me, he just looks like scum looking for any sort of angle. I haven't been commenting on him much lately because I feel it's all been said, and his recent posts have been long and hard to get through, but I would still like a FS lynch.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Im offically tired of Iron hiding to avoid getting lynched and not contributing to any of the discussion. This has gone on long enough and its time to force him to do something.
unvote
vote Iron Man
I believe that this is L-2, but be careful about a hammer people, its been a while since an offical vote count.
Iron, lets hear a case, why are you not scum, and who is.
Alvinz, im waiting for that case on Iron you promise in 275-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
unvote
vote firechicago
Im going back to my last suspect for now. Ive read through games on this site though but never seen a mason claim. Do we have his partner claim if he has one now? Because outing two roles just seems stupid to me, but its the only way to prove his role short of a lynch.
With the claim though I am willing to fall back on firechicago though, as he still seems to be a good scum bet.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
OK tell me if this idea sounds good or not, Ive been thinking and its the best I can come up with. Tomorrow we wont be at lylo, no matter who we lynch today, so this should work;
Today we dont lynch Iron, even if no one claims his mason partner. If he is telling the truth it would expose two roled players D1, which I dont think is too good, I am sure you could agree with me here alvinz.
Now we probally will not have Iron be NKed if no one claims his partner, regardless of him telling the truth again, because if he lives the night its a WIFOM situation of why isnt he dead, and he still isnt cleared. Here is the good part though, tomorrow his partner claims. At that point we will have both masons out in the open to verify the roleclaim, and we can take the validity of it from there. If no one claims then Iron is obv scum and we just lynch him.
If Irons partner wants to come out today, I cant really condone that course of action, but I think the above plan works a little bit better, and would rather see that put into action then lynching a possible mason, or having both masons exposed day one.
In laments terms
1) DONT lynch Iron today
2) TOMORROW a possible mason partner claims
Thoughts on this plan?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
This is the problem, if IM is a mason and outs his partner, we have two confirmed townies out in the open. Now what is stronger, a confirmed townie who is out in the open or a confirmed townie who isnt exposed. I dont think Iron should out his partner, and I dont think his partner should claim. The role is stronger hidden.Amor wrote:Nor do I see the harm, if IM is dead, of having the second mason (who will just be a vanilla townie in this case) uncovered.
Right now the town has a hidden ace in the hole, if we flip the card, mafia knows exactly who they are up against, why given them more information then needed.
I guess we can put this to a mini-vote, but I say that a partner should be claimed or outed untill D2 at least-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well then lets explore all the possible things that can happen with this situation
1) Iron is scum, we lynch him today
2) Iron is mason, his partner doesnt claim, we lynch him today
3) Iron is mason, his partner claims, we have both masons out, we lynch someone else
4) Iron is mason, his partner doesnt claim today, we lynch someone else
5) Iron is scum, we dont lynch him today, a second scum claims mason tomorrow
6) Iron is scum, we dont lynch him today, we lynch him tomorrow
Now, lets say we hold off on a lynch for a partner claim D2 (D2 is a must). If a scum claims his "mason" partner, we will have to get over that hill when we get there, but will have two scum caught, I trust myself to figure out a BS claim. The other thing that can happen is a real mason partner claims, in which case we have two confirmed town out in the open. From here I strongly disagree with the fact that both will be kept untill lylo unless his partner is someone like zombie (harsh but true). Because if the two scum were unable to convince the last town that they were faking mason thats the game.
So to me I will say it again, an Iron lynch today, or Irons partner claiming, are mistakes. There is no reason to have two confirmed power roles out in the open, and even if IM is the nightkill, that leaves a mason to claim down the road when they need to. If both masons come out, its a one two NK killfest, how does that benifit us?
Everyone who wants Irons partner to claim definiantly moves up on my suspicion list.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
more powerful then vanilla town, everyone knows they are clear, even the vanilla town. Scum already knows who is town and who isnt, but dont know roles.FaerieLord wrote: 1) Masons are not power roles. They are just confirmed townies and are as confirmed as the rest of the players to scum
I would rather get NKed then a confirmed mason. They are CONFIRMED, much more valueable then me.2) Who cares if they kill the masons? It's better letting them kill masons, such as Iron, then letting them kill someone who adds to the discussion.
It lays fine with me, worst case scenario we have his scumbuddy claim tomorrow, then we figure it out from there. I would be surprized if neither of them breadcrumbed at all.3) I'm not really worried about a scum claiming mason later on, because at worst it's a 1 for 1, which is good for the town, but letting Iron Man lay here unconfirmed doesn't sit well with me.
Well tomorrow no claim from a partner and yes, lets lynch Iron. However if someone does claim, we really need to take it from there. This same logic says "dont belive any role". If I claimed doctor it sure isnt confirmable, so would that qualify as a lynch too?4) If he is scum, he will live longer, at which point, it might be impossible to tell if he is lying because Cops might die
And I am perfectly fine with that, tomorrow we will have one of three situationsThe only way I could have seen Iron Man stay alive would have been if we had an outed cop already to claim results on Iron Man. But as it is, we are leaving an unconfirmed person live just because he might be confirmed town.
1) Iron confirmed scum by no partner claim
2) Two scum outed in mason claim
3) Two confirmed town outed
You also seem to me to be missing the point of why I dont want a partner claim. Lets say you are the other mason, if you claim his partner, who is going to be night killed? I would much rather leave Iron who isnt as into this game as the sole claimant and have him get NKed with a mason still in hiding then outing a second mason and having a more valueable player get NKed.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Well yeah its the second masons choice to claim or not, if they even exist. I still would say that they should not claim though, as if they do we now have two obvious NK targets. My main fear is the mason is someone like FaerieLord, who already is a higher NK chance. A claim would finish off any of these people night one.
I know I am not quite on line with most people for the second mason claim, but I still hold to the fact that we shouldnt force them out. Even if we lose town today and tonight, a mason pair would make 20% of the town confirmed, if not more from other power roles. I am going to hold by the fact that mason is more valueable then vanilla. As vanila, it should be a goal to keep the confirmed alive, and anyone who doesnt want to keep confirmed alive is not pro-town
For the next lynch though... that is a tough one. My top few picks are Firechicago (who is now getting replaced) and jas. I think the best plan of action though is just for everyone to do a reread though, that way we might be able to uncover some new things that we missed before.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Confirmed townies arent useful!? They are confirmed! That means they are not scum! That means there is a lower chance of a mislynch! Confirmed townies are extreamly useful!alvinz95 wrote:Llamafluff, the point is, confirmed townies aren't useful after they are confirmed.
Power roles are the towniest players, no one can be more townie then a confirmed role. Ive seen some of the best looking town people flip scum, ive never seen a confirmed townie flip scum.What do scum want to do the most? Lynch POWER ROLES or lynch the TOWNIEST players.
Scum will kill a confirmed townie easily if there are only unkown power roles. With a probable mason pair in this game, I really think there will be few power roles left, probally a doctor at most. A confirmed town is a better kill then a stab at the power role or the most town person.Scum know whenever someone from the town claims a role, they usually are that role. Therefore, they are confirmed to them (tho the town has no clue until an investigation or they get killed). When the town knows they are confirmed (via cop investigation or no counterclaiming), they are ONLY useful for the town, not scum, unless its a claimed power role. Why would scum waste a kill on them?
Not really, I see zero reason for a partner to claim still, or why a confirmed townie is not useful.Do you get what I'm saying? I tend to be unclear.....
This is stupid to me. A last mason would know who they are, if they are brought to L-1 they claim like Iron. If a second mason never is in danger of being lynched, they should not claim.With this, our best plan would be tohave the partner claim(it doesn't even matter if they are scum). This would hopefullynarrow down the group, and we would have a better chance at scum.
I really dont like trying to control a role which may or may not exist here. This puts WIFOM on a possible doctor and cop.After a good though-out lynch, during the night phase,if we have a cop, he/she should investigate Iron Manto see if he really is a mason.
I think its a win-win situation without the cop investigation. We will have two people claimed mason. However if the second mason claims today, one mason will, with almost 100% certainty, die tonight. Actually as I think about it more, Iron will die tonight without some unforseen intervention. If this happens I really doubt that his partner should claim because there is no need for them to go too. I am starting to think out loud and ramble though now.Therefore, during Day 2, its a win-win situation.Either we find 2 scum, or have a significantly greater chance at scum.
Confuzzled again here, here are the two things that can happen (I included knowing im town)Basically, if Iron Man is the mason, it would be like Day 3 but with more people. If Iron Man is scum, we would win or have 1 scum left (i think this set-up should have 2-3 scum). It would be basically 8/12 on day 2 which gives us a 2/8 chance or 3/8 chance.
1) Iron dies N1, we have one hiding mason, we have a 2/9 or 3/9 chance
2) Iron lives N1 (assuming other mason lives), we have a 2/8 or 3/8 chance like you say.
Now this means that Iron will die N1 with all likelyhood, harsh but true, it needs to be said and prepared for. Now to me this means that there is no real reason for the mason partner to claim. Now if they claim we go from a setup of 1 mason 9 others D2 to 0 masons 8 others D3. I would rather have the shot at 1 mason 7 others.
A claim is BAD here. Ive been looking at this more and think that the mason claiming is a big mistake here. It is there choice but its setting us up for a lot of problems starting D3 when the pair is dead.Basically its either win the game or get a better chance and be better off than without a claim.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
First off,EVERYONE should reread the game. There are a lot of interesting posts when you look back at it, I also feel much more comfortable about Irons claim after the reread. So I highly encourage alvinz and zombie (as well as anyone else doubting/asking for a partner claim) to reread.
*Disclaimer* These are my opinions on what is relevant and how scummy it is. I probally missed some things, left out some things you dont agree with leaving out, and scored things different then you would. Tough.
[jas] – Total (+.5)
+1 bandwagon removal with excuse (24/25)
-1 against no lynch (66)
+1 attack on RF for condoning lurking (121)
+.5 failure to post when promised
+1 post convienantly after pressured (197)
+0 posts analysis, only through pg 7, if no post by tomorrow +1
-2 good logic on mason claim (297)
alvinz95 – Total (+1.6)
+1 makes case on FS, refuses to put at L-1 (95)
-.5 puts FS at what he thought was L-1 (100)
-1 analysis post with no vote (231)
+.1 Iron vote (275)
+1 wants mason partner to claim (289)
+1 reitterates want for partner claim (306)
Firestarter – Total (+1)
+1 no lynch vote (41)
+.5 accuses voters of being scum, blanket OMGUS (50)
+.5 OMGUS vote (80)
+.5 lurker FoS (112)
-.5 calls Iron on lurking (129)
-1 ZS exchange
Iron Man – Total (-infinity)
-infinity mason claim
Megatron (replacing SD_Reaper) – Total (+1.6)
+1 bandwagon removal with excuse (33/35)
-.5 Questions no lynch (43)
+1 takes netural stance on FS (87)
-replace-
+.5 analysis with no vote, just FoS (246)
+.1 Iron vote (271)
-1 unvotes Iron (291)
firechicago – Total (+2)
+.5 Criticizes early no lynch but is open to late one (45)
+1 Calls FS situation WIFOM, leaves vote on FS (54)
+1 wants to vote inactives (148)
-.5 calls FL limited analysis (144)
ShadowGirl (replacing crazy_vlad) – Total (+2.1)
+.1 Iron vote (31)
-replace-
+1 immediate vote of FS, changed soon after (219/223)
+1 votes Iron post-claim (301)
ZombieSlayer54 – Total (+2.6)
+.1 votes Iron (15)
+0 attacks random wagons (26)
+1.5 contridiction – defends random wagons (39)
-1 calls FS on deflection (62)
+1 tunnel vision
-1 FS exchange
+1 leaves vote on Iron for “sake of sakes” (300)
+1 wants Irons partner to claim (313)
FaerieLord (replacing Xanatos Roulette) – Total (+2.1)
+.1 vote Iron
-replaces-
+1 Fueling fire of FS/ZS
+1 wants Iron to claim his partner (294)
Amor – Total (-.5)
-1 Speaks out against no lynch (42)
-.5 calls out lurker FoS (116)
+1 hesitant to vote FS (131)
-1 analysis of inactives (209)
+1 tell Iron to claim partner (292)
RealityFan – Total (-2)
-1 calls out FS on deflection (68)
-1 calls out iron for lurking (119)
So my list ends up looking like:
Zombie
Faerie
Shadow
Firechicago
Alvinz
Megatron
Firestarter
Jas
Amor
Reality
Iron
The main flaw in this is the more inactive people commonly end up near the bottom of the list, so jas might be up higher if he posted more.
My gut and recent actions tells me alvinz is too low though, and faerie may be up too high.
I am perfectly fine with zombie at the top of my list though, his recent play looks bad
unvote
vote ZombieSlayer-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
If you do a close enough reread im sure you will see what I see and change that stance. Even without what I found though, lynching a claimed role that hasnt been counterclaimed or put into serious doubt very scummy.FaerieLord wrote:You know, I don't like how people that disagree with you on the mason claim, are automatically scummy.
That doesn't sit well with me.
At the beginning of this game we essentially had two confirmed townies that have been hidden from the mafia. We are now at one hidden and one exposed. Anyone who would rather make that two exposed, confirmed townies IS highly suspicious to me. That wont change and you can quote me on that.
If you want Iron to claim his partner that does make you scummy to me. It may partially be my play style, much like your unwillingness to vote without near ensured reason, but im not going to budge on that stance.
If you havent reread closely yet though, I seriously suggest it.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Never said you wanted a partner out, you just voted Iron after he claimed. What I bolded though is exactly what should be happening to me. People are yelling for Iron to out his partner so we dont mislynch someone right now. Lets really look at that closely though. If I was Irons partner, what are the benifits of me claiming it right now? Given that I am a higher profile player, my chance of being nightkilled goes near 100% and what do we gain? Nothing. Now lets say that someone like Zombie is the mason partner. If Zombie goes to L-1, THEN he should claim. The only way an outed mason will prevent a mislynch with higher odds is if they were about to be lynched.ShadowGirl wrote:
Hn? Nowhere in my post does it say that I want him to out his partner? [Though, I think I'm reading the wording wrong.]LlamaFluff wrote:ShadowGirl (replacing crazy_vlad) – Total (+2.1)
+.1 Iron vote (31)
-replace-
+1 immediate vote of FS, changed soon after (219/223)
+1 votes Iron post-claim (301)
After a reread, I seeing the light on this IM thing -I truly do believe that he is mason, but I don't think his partner should claim at this moment - only if we get close to lynching them. If they do at this moment, then the mafia can make better informed hits.
Unvote.
One more thing, people seems to be fighting me on masons not being power roles, so think of it this way - Are masons more useful to the town then vanila town? (The answer is yes, masons are only 100% confirmed) Given that they ARE morepowerful, they arepowerroles.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Im confused a bit too here and this recent wagon means I need to think. While zombie seems like a good lynch on paper and gut to me, enough people who I feel have a legitimate chance at being mafia voted him in the last two pages.
I am going to do a temporaryunvoteuntill I can do a few rereads of zombie and the last few pages. And then probally ask some questions to specific players and the group as a whole, I will probally have that out later tonight.
*on his votecount* I am not sure if Firestarter is voting Zombie or not, off the top of my head I think he is though-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Questions to everybody
On a scale of 1-10 (10 being max) how much do you believe Irons claim?
Do you think Irons partner should claim?
Have you reread the game since it passed page 10?
Tomorrow you wake up with ZS at L-1 and he claimed vanilla, do you hammer?
Specific questions
To Faerie, Alvinz, Shadow – Are Zombies recent actions the primary reason for voting him?
To Alvinz – What are your views on Firestarter?
To Alvinz – I actually don’t like your 338. What was your case on Zombie before that post?
To RealityFan – Since Iron claimed, who is scum and why?
To Zombie – Please lay out your case on your top scum suspect.
To Firestarter – WITHOUT bringing up your exchange with ZS, what is your case on him?
To Megatron – Zombie isn’t at L-1 (L-3 at my count), why aren’t you voting him?
To Shadow – Why the reluctance to leave Zombie at a perceived L-1?
To Shadow – Why did you vote Iron post-claim?
To Amor – Can you elaborate on why you wanted a partner claim in 208?
To Amor – Why does a lack of cases come into play for your wanting a FS lynch, simply put why wont you scumhunt?
I am not going to vote yet even though I doubt anything will change my mind. I expect these answers to confirm all my suspicions.
~Side note to Alvinz~
I think that a confirmed citizen would not last long. If they make it to endgame the scum win chance crashed unless they have that player in their pocket. I would be surprised if Iron lives past N2-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
For now ive heard enough to go back and
vote ZombieSlayer
this probally wont change unless something big comes up, L-2 I belive but its been a while since a votecount, so anyone else voting be sure you arent hammering before a claim opportunity
If anyone has questions for me, feel free to ask too. After Zombie answers my general question I will answer them too.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
The top four in 349, plus any others that I directed towards youZombieSlayer54 wrote:
Which is...?me wrote: If anyone has questions for me, feel free to ask too.After Zombie answers my general questionI will answer them too.
@Alvinz - At this point I am treating the claim as legitimate so yes, Iron is confrimed town to me right now. I see no real reason to lynch him today and would rather lynch nearly any other player then him.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Complete recap on my question + my answers + a few cases coming tonight-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
I will start with apologizing if this is confusing at any parts, its 2 in the morning here and ive spent the last 30 minutes writing this post up. Without further ado though the answering of my own questions to the group –
1 – Right now I would say 8. Iron did act scummy pre and post claim, however I have seen little reason to doubt this claim, let alone call for his lynch. Everything fits to me, from reread comments to a split town on claim/no claim.
2 – Not until tomorrow
3 – Yes
4 – At this point it would depend who was voting him and when their votes were cast which I will explain later. Chances are I would though.
---
Now a few questions/comments directed at me
I would not take it if it was made public. Right now I am one of the more active players in the game, pushing people to post suspicions, votes and challenging people who I belive scummy. If I was a confirmed town on top of what I have done, I feel that it would be all the more reason to have me be NKed. I would prefer to be killed because I got scum lynched, not because I was confirmed.Amor wrote: I ask you, LF... if you had the ability to be instantly confirmed as town right now, would you? Why are you pushing so hard to take information away from the town?
It may be completely different then your way of playing sure, but I really don’t think a player who is not close to lynch coming out and saying “Hello, I am a confirmed town player” is bad if its not lylo. This just makes the mafias job at choosing an effective night kill target easier, and I am not going to do that.
Well I really didn’t see that as a loaded question, you are in tunnel vision mode on FS right now it seems, so lets try this question instead. Who do you think scumbuddies of FS are and why?Amor wrote:
Gee, what a nice loaded question. I think that FireStarter is scum. None of the cases presented on other people, or actions taken by those other people, have convinced me that another player is a better lynch than FS. I'm scumhunting, but I'm not making cases against people I think are town.LlamaFluff wrote:To Amor – Why does a lack of cases come into play for your wanting a FS lynch, simply put why wont you scumhunt?
Why?Amor wrote:Also, I'm not building a full case, but I took a quick look at your posting history and pulled out a couple of interesting things:
For an analysis on my questions, the last one was the only one I really cared about. The others were just to see if anyone had a change of heart from what they originally had said or at least alluded to, which from a skim reread, no one did.
Faerie and Mega both seem intent of a ZS lynch at this point.
Amor is the only one who expresses full intent not to hammer.
Shadow and jas both claim to not see the case enough on ZS
Shadow and alvinz both take a probable hammer, but cautious approach
Analysis from this point is a bit difficult, we don’t know what alignment ZS is with complete certainty, and even if we did its hard to say where scum would land. While the safer approach on shadow, jas and alvinz is probally the best town stance to take, it also is the best scum stance as they can hammer or abandon ship at will.
With that said, these questions seem to of just been more of benchmarks then anything serious for case making, however if Zombie is ever lynched or NKed, these should prove very valueable, as people took a forced stance on a player.
For other questions though, I really don’t like most of the answers SG gave, but given how she responded though it really confuses me. The wording of her responses, especially to the general questions, gives me “unconcerned townie” vibes, but the answers also give me scum vibes.
My main problem with these answers is her continued unwillingness to leave Zombie at a high amount of votes. I doubt that anyone here is dumb enough to quick hammer someone, and if people are never put at the brink of lynch, then we never really get the full extent of what they have to say. You seem to belive that Zombie is scum, but the reluctance to get him close to lynch is frightening.
Also can you elaborate on how the ZS/FS fight was set up? Does this mean that you think both players are scum and were trying to create wagons on both to clear one of them or something to that extent?
@Alvinz – So you suspect me for beliving the mason claim eh? Well you are voting ZS who I have been voting for a long time, I was one of the original pushers of ZS, so we cant both be scum now can we? Either make a case against me or vote me, don’t just say “omg you think he is conf town! Scum!”
---
After doing a lot of thinking though, my best picks I can come up with for scum are in the following quad; Zombie, Amor, Shadow, Firechicago. If there aren’t at least two anti-town players there I am shocked.
I think the case against FC I made a while ago is still relevant, and that he is a decent scum pick
Shadow replaced CV who I did have higher suspicions of, and hasn’t done a whole lot to alieviate what was originally there. Most of her answers to my aux questions are odd. I don’t like the suggestion that ZS/FS are both scum, it feels like a possible set up of a double lynch. I still don’t like her initial vote/unvote when she replaced in right off the bat. The extremity of her unwillingness to vote for Zombie seems a little too cautious, I get the feeling of scum telling scum to fake a claim. The most telling to me was the vote on Iron after he had claimed mason. Especially since she now belives that claim, no additional information has been added from Iron on his partner. Only town reactions where the concensus is don’t lynch.
Amor is little more than gut at this point really, but it feels right to me. He claims that FS is scum, and does feel very confident in that claim, however there was an instance early in the game where he was not voting FS under the fear of getting him lynched, after the breadcrumb incident I have not seem Amor actively pushing a lynch though. The constant pull for Irons partner irks me though. To me you seem to be setting up for one of two things; either exposing both masons, or being able to throw lots of doubt on anyone claiming mason of Iron dies. Both of these things benefit scum to me.
For Zombie, I think is still may be our best bet, his play after the mason claim has been really ugly
Willingness to vote claimed role which has not been counterclaimedZombieSlayer54 wrote:[My vote shall remain on you [iron], just for the sake of sakes. I will continue to observe carefully...
Willingness to not vote his top suspect, to get Irons partner to claimZombieSlayer54 wrote:Ok, Alvinz is on top of my scum list right now. Even above Iron Man. However, I will keep my vote on Iron Man, just to get the mason buddy to claim.
Fishing for a reason to vote IronZombieSlayer54 wrote:I mean, if you can show me some reason as to not trust IronMan's reasoning, please do so.
It just seems that you want to get Iron lynched as much as possible at this point, and are now backing out of it since it has become obvious that it will not be happening.
---
With that said though, for now im going to do something a little odd andunvote. The Zombie wagon just seems to easy, no one is fighting it too hard.
Vote ShadowGirl
I would support a lynch of SG, ZS or FC at this point, so hopefully can generate some discussion on them. Amor not yet but he should be looked at closely tomorrow, especially if we get a zombie or FS flip.-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
I belive this constitutes a "claim or die" situation from Zombie-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California
Here is problem #1, everyone is assuming that there is a doctor and/or cop. This is a mini-game, and we have a mason pair. That means that we already have 16% of the players in this game confirmed town. If we start adding on more roles, well then mafia must all be godfathers or roleblockers, otherwise this game is lost.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:Llama, is there something wrong with asking for reasoning as to why my reasoning might be wrong? I imagine that improving my reasoning would only serve to help everybody.
Once again, if Iron's mason buddy claims, then we pretty much have two confirmed townies, heavily decreasing the chance for a mislynch. Of course, it is a double-bladed sword, in that the Mafia will know that, for all intents and purposes, they are just vanilla-confirmed townies, and will use their NK on somebody else, possibly hitting a doctor or a cop.
However, I think the benefits outweigh the loss. Two confirmed townies are always good, in my book.
I would be willing to be at most we have something along the lines of a bodyguard or one shot vig, anything else seems to tip the scale to the advantage of the town significantly.
For the reason that we do not know all of the power roles in this game, we should not make the mistake of assuming that we have a doctor who will be saving the masons. That simply is something that we cant and shouldnt do.
Therefore any confirmed townie seems to be the best player to kill for the mafia, and if we give them their choice of two players to kill, that only gives the mafia a greater ability to manipulate the happenings and gives a possible doctor type role a higher chance of missing a save due to WIFOM on the more useful mason.
We know so little about the game that we cant tell if outing the other mason is a good move or not. If we dont have a doctor, I feel the risk potential is much greater then the reward potential if a doctor does exist. Dont try to outguess the mod on roles, or push people to act on percieved roles.
Also am I to take that post as vanilla town claim?-
-
LlamaFluff Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9561
- Joined: May 3, 2008
- Location: California