In post 9, innocentvillager wrote:i rolled scum this game and I absolutely hate it
Well in that case, let's kill scum. Choo choo guys.
VOTE: InnocentVillager
As they are neither innocent, nor a villager.
Ducky, S_S, thor, whats up y'all? I'm back.
In post 9, innocentvillager wrote:i rolled scum this game and I absolutely hate it
Love you too man.In post 275, the worst wrote:welcome back <3 you were one of the reasons i joined this game.In post 270, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Ducky, S_S, thor, whats up y'all? I'm back.
and yeah we've been posting like, a lot. sorry.
This pings me. Like a) why is the wagon bad; b)is this even the only wagon at this point? And if it isn't, why are the other wagons good?
Oh shit this is gonna drive me crazy all game.In post 34, TheFourEyedDude wrote:The hunt of a meat beast is the greatest thing a man can do to be manly outside of being a proud Progressive from the Republican Party.
You think this much joking only comes from scum? You ever play with Hectic?
Is your vote here serious? Because i noticed you voted me after this? I actually liked you doubling down on the lavar vote here.In post 63, lilith2013 wrote:is it working?In post 38, Something_Smart wrote:We're not two pages in and lilith is already pocketing me :3right, my vote is now ~serious~What about him is objectively scummy?In post 45, Nepenthes wrote:Why would I throw my weight in with RVS votesIn post 27, the worst wrote:alright let's do this shit
Nepenthes, why did you pick SS over sausage / nor / me?
SS was/is objectively scummiest
Yeah, this slot is not giving me good feels at all.In post 70, LavarManos wrote:I am town.
Why?In post 125, Nepenthes wrote:Liliths also scummy
In post 205, Saudade wrote:You're not adding anything new nor you're making it easy to read you
I cant kill you today, congrats. Only the second person to get the reference (or at least say as much to me) and the first person is also in this player list.In post 279, TheFourEyedDude wrote:Someone was unstuck in time! BULLY!
Wtf? Why did you make the assumption that I didn't care about the answer? Rvs isnt an answer. You had multiple options, 12 to be specific, why that one?In post 280, LavarManos wrote:I doubt you really care about the answer to this question. I don't even think the answer really matters because it was clearly RVS vote.
VOTE: Billy Pilgrim
Its how I get into a game. You threw out a spicey take, so I engaged you on your take while I engaged with the wagon.In post 281, lilith2013 wrote:I enjoy the fact that you're questioning both the wagon itself and me saying the wagon is badIn post 278, Billy Pilgrim wrote:This pings me. Like a) why is the wagon bad; b)is this even the only wagon at this point? And if it isn't, why are the other wagons good?
See ducky has played with me before. I exclusively phone post so if this gets under your skin, sorry, its just the reality. And yeah, you get to track my progressions even when I'm out of the thread for hours. So sorry not sorry? Shrugs. Also, youre pushing weak sauce stuff so I think theres a better than average chance you're scum.In post 284, the worst wrote:there are pros and cons to consolidating his catchup into one post.
him doing it over multiple posts lets us see what he's seeing / not seeing and the way his thoughts ~flow~ through the thread.
sorry to jump in and like, shoot you down but i don't think that's a particularly valuable request
Very true, and I'm pretty sure you caught me. So let's see if thats AI (pro-tip - its not).In post 320, Something_Smart wrote:Though, the first time you said you wouldn't vote someone because they understood your username, you were scum... :thonk:
Because you jumped onto a wagon and it stuck out since the others seemed to be votint people they knew and you naked voted like the 3rd vote. So thats why. Gonna answer or keep up this game.In post 322, LavarManos wrote:Then why didn't you ask everyone else why they voted who they voted?In post 317, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Wtf? Why did you make the assumption that I didn't care about the answer? Rvs isnt an answer. You had multiple options, 12 to be specific, why that one?
#SQUADIn post 325, the worst wrote:oh i forgot this tidbit!! phonepost squadIn post 321, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I exclusively phone post
Great I got a guy who's barely producing meaningful content hopping on my wagon. How the hell am i supposed to read this slot?
This made me laugh.In post 331, TheFourEyedDude wrote:With your eyes!
You said in the queue the playerlist was gonna be spicey.In post 356, osuka wrote:In post 355, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I don't believe that was a mistakeit wasn't. you people really can fucking post
I dont think I've played with you before either. I dont have a memory of it. Thor is a nickname that someone gave Norwegianboy and it stuck for that game so im bringing it back.In post 400, UnaBombaH wrote:Wait, thor is in this game?In post 270, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Ducky, S_S, thor, whats up y'all? I'm back.
And I don't think I've played with you before, but apparently you know all the right people..
(And btw, Liverpool has always been my favorite team in the Premier League, and Michael Owen used to be my childhood hero when I was still playing football every day..
I had one of those very dark green kits from the early 2000's for Owen..I wore that shit until it literally fell apart. )
Yeah, it was 287, why?In post 415, lilith2013 wrote:Okay, did you see my response?In post 319, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Its how I get into a game. You threw out a spicey take, so I engaged you on your take while I engaged with the wagon.In post 281, lilith2013 wrote:I enjoy the fact that you're questioning both the wagon itself and me saying the wagon is badIn post 278, Billy Pilgrim wrote:This pings me. Like a) why is the wagon bad; b)is this even the only wagon at this point? And if it isn't, why are the other wagons good?
I domt know if it is, but you throwing this out there this early makes me think that you are.In post 445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This feels like TvT.
I could get behind this, but I think the charmander is scum, so I want to be there.In post 505, Saudade wrote:Im voting zombie because i want more people to vote him so he'd drop his gimmick and provide some better content
Ok, please explain this.In post 516, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I would literally bet my life on LavarManos being town, by the way.
Lets say this doesnt mean anything to me. Who did Lavar vote that was voting poorly?In post 520, TheFourEyedDude wrote:169In post 519, Saudade wrote:tell me whyIn post 516, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I would literally bet my life on LavarManos being town, by the way.
I think my words there say enough
I liked your response thats why I didn't feel a need to follow it up. It was early I wasn't gonna get a whole hell of alot AI, but I liked your thoughts.In post 533, lilith2013 wrote:I don’t feel like you engaged with my response so I’m interested in hearing how my response helped you sort me or how you expected it to help you sort me when you asked about the wagon
And after their most recent post, they are coming out with content, so i don't wanna kick them.In post 579, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I could get behind this, but I think the charmander is scum, so I want to be there.In post 505, Saudade wrote:Im voting zombie because i want more people to vote him so he'd drop his gimmick and provide some better content
Ok, you were asked to explain why "you would bet your life that Lavar was town." You referred us to 169 and said "I think my words there say enough."In post 594, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I never said Lavar voted someone who was voting poorly, I voted for people who were voting poorly.In post 581, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Lets say this doesnt mean anything to me. Who did Lavar vote that was voting poorly?In post 520, TheFourEyedDude wrote:169In post 519, Saudade wrote:tell me whyIn post 516, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I would literally bet my life on LavarManos being town, by the way.
I think my words there say enough
I feel like emotional outbursts are easily pushable. So for thor to sit back from that rather than use it as an opportunity to push someone felt townie. I think the only world that comes from scum is when one of their partners were in the 1v1.In post 602, lilith2013 wrote:What about it was town-indicative?In post 577, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I domt know if it is, but you throwing this out there this early makes me think that you are.In post 445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This feels like TvT.
Did you see 609?In post 614, Something_Smart wrote:orly? how so?In post 577, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I domt know if it is, but you throwing this out there this early makes me think that you are.
Heard of it, in fact you literally used it this game, but its hard for me to distinguish between a tmi tell vs. a read I don't quite understand.In post 617, Something_Smart wrote:Have you heard of the TMI tell? It's actually one of the more reliable global tells, if hard to apply.In post 609, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I think the only world that comes from scum is when one of their partners were in the 1v1.
Good answer. Its Norwee. Sorry.In post 624, LavarManos wrote:Norse god of thunder.In post 622, innocentvillager wrote:wait who is Thor??? I need to know
Why are you defending me?
At this stage of the game, I'm trying to settle in. I dont have much of a read on either of you. I liked your questions to me about my questions of you, so your probably a couple shades above the null line. I dont have much on Una at all. Right now, I'm interested in pushing Lavar, and I wanna know whats up with Four and this bizarre defense of them.In post 640, lilith2013 wrote:Are you townreading both me and una?In post 609, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like emotional outbursts are easily pushable. So for thor to sit back from that rather than use it as an opportunity to push someone felt townie. I think the only world that comes from scum is when one of their partners were in the 1v1.In post 602, lilith2013 wrote:What about it was town-indicative?In post 577, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I domt know if it is, but you throwing this out there this early makes me think that you are.In post 445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This feels like TvT.
+1 but I didnt see that.In post 642, lilith2013 wrote:I can’t find it now (can someone please help me find this) but someone said that it seemed like lavar was pocketing foureyes, and I actually think foureyes has been buddying lavar for a while now
Maybe they’re just scumbuddies?
I dont think its not the tmi tell, and I dont think I said i did. That double negative drive me crazy so let me say, it could be the tmi tell. I know that in real time I said that that comment made me think he was probably town after you commented about the tmi tell, but i only read your comment after I already put my thoughts in the thread. And then I read it and thought hmmm... thats interesting, I have no idea how to evaluate that.In post 646, Something_Smart wrote:I did see it now, that was what my TMI question was about. If it's hard for you to distinguish a TMI, what makes you think that Norwee's post wasn't it?
Eh read too much into it i guess.In post 653, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Billy, i haven't stated a TR on you. And i didn't do anything other than ask if IV had any reason for changing his vote to you.
Why is that me defending you?
Who said you were pocketing foureyes?In post 656, LavarManos wrote:Do you think he is scum trying to fake paranoia? I can see it going both ways.In post 654, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That was such a weird comment to make that i wanna go here for now.
Also, how was I pocketing foureyes? I haven't even interacted with him at all!
I was +1 that it felt like foureyes was buddying lavar. I didn't see the comment that lavar was pocketing foureyes.In post 696, Nepenthes wrote:What are you plus oneing if you didnt see itIn post 649, Billy Pilgrim wrote:+1 but I didnt see that.In post 642, lilith2013 wrote:I can’t find it now (can someone please help me find this) but someone said that it seemed like lavar was pocketing foureyes, and I actually think foureyes has been buddying lavar for a while now
Maybe they’re just scumbuddies?
Nope.In post 704, innocentvillager wrote:BP does this change your opinion on four eyes slot?In post 703, TheFourEyedDude wrote:I am not on you
Hi *waves*
Her read seems genuine. Like i don't know that she'd push back this aggressively when meeting resistance, but this is my first game with her so thats not like an experiential read.In post 783, Saudade wrote:BILLY WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT LILITH SCUMm READING YOU FOR YOUR AWFUL POSTS
Were you looking for points? Or their defense?
Pretty transparent rolefish here. You worried?In post 794, lilith2013 wrote:are you claiming a shot?In post 791, Saudade wrote:alright dont blame me if I just sort him by shooting him at nightIn post 789, lilith2013 wrote:I can carry myself just fine thanksIn post 786, Saudade wrote:better chance of me carrying youIn post 785, lilith2013 wrote:what do I get out of doing that?In post 781, Saudade wrote:tell me now
There's 13 players in this list. Lavar is playing strange, defensive, and in ways that don't make sense to me. On top of that you have these bizarre statements from four which basically amounts to hes town because i said so. So maybe its buddying maybe they're both scum.In post 811, Nepenthes wrote:Whend you go from lavar scumread to thinking four was buddying lavarIn post 698, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I was +1 that it felt like foureyes was buddying lavar. I didn't see the comment that lavar was pocketing foureyes.
Who hated my poker post?In post 733, Nepenthes wrote:This applies to iv too imo like even on this pageIn post 728, lilith2013 wrote:in general I feel like his posts have been more geared towards seeming like he's sorting people than actually attempting to sort people. The questions he asked me were very.... like I'm not actually sure how my answers were going to help him sort me, it looked like he asked me questions just to look like he was doing things. He also questioned both sides of the wagon (ie both lavar and me) in the same kind of way. And when I asked how my response helped him sort me, he basically just said my response was good. I think also the early townread on me feels kind of buddying-adjacent, and so does the townread on Norweeeeeej
Somebody hated the poker post from billy but i kindve liked it it is a fucking weird post but in an i want to be heard kinda way
Thats at Nepenthes. Please direct me to the post you're talking about.In post 814, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Who hated my poker post?In post 733, Nepenthes wrote:This applies to iv too imo like even on this pageIn post 728, lilith2013 wrote:in general I feel like his posts have been more geared towards seeming like he's sorting people than actually attempting to sort people. The questions he asked me were very.... like I'm not actually sure how my answers were going to help him sort me, it looked like he asked me questions just to look like he was doing things. He also questioned both sides of the wagon (ie both lavar and me) in the same kind of way. And when I asked how my response helped him sort me, he basically just said my response was good. I think also the early townread on me feels kind of buddying-adjacent, and so does the townread on Norweeeeeej
Somebody hated the poker post from billy but i kindve liked it it is a fucking weird post but in an i want to be heard kinda way
I think i now understand what's going on. I wasn't scumreading you or even him I think at the time I made that post. I dont think i got to scumreading him until the i am town response when he started feeling pressure. As for you, I dont think i ever scumread you. Yeah, the objective fact that there was more than one wagon doesn't help me sort you, but your response, that you called out the false dichotomy that I had set up did help me. Also the more sorting question of asking why the wagon was bad also helped. It let me know you are also looking for reasons and have an innate hesitation towards naked votes. But if you think my questions mean I'm scumreading people then I think I get why you hated this post so much.In post 848, lilith2013 wrote:Like here’s Billy questioning Lavar about his vote and implying that Lavar’s vote was badAnd here’s Billy saying I’m scummy for thinking Lavar’s vote was badAfter I voted him, he changed his mind to say he was townreading me by saying he liked that I doubled down on my Lavar vote, but that contradicts him saying it was scummy for me to question Lavar’s vote originally (and I think is an attempt to get me to back off). Also note he calls it a “spicy take” the second time he talks about it (which is, again, after I voted him).In post 319, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Its how I get into a game. You threw out a spicey take, so I engaged you on your take while I engaged with the wagon.In post 281, lilith2013 wrote:I enjoy the fact that you're questioning both the wagon itself and me saying the wagon is badIn post 278, Billy Pilgrim wrote:This pings me. Like a) why is the wagon bad; b)is this even the only wagon at this point? And if it isn't, why are the other wagons good?
How could my saying Lavar’s vote was bad ping him while he simultaneously agreed with it? How does asking me whether this is the only wagon and whether the other wagons were good help him sort me? What is my answer to that (which is going to be factual regardless of alignment) going to say about me that is AI and that he couldn’t have read himself on the page he was reading?
I also just hugely dislike this fencesitty positioning of “oh I’m engaging with both you and the wagon” and somehow managing to scumread both sides of it
Literally just caught scum as a result of them doing this.In post 1052, Something_Smart wrote:ErrIn post 1028, Saudade wrote:Refusing to cooperate and no signs or indication of a game solving mindset.
Those are towntells...
This is not a good way to read the foul. He played a newbie scumgame with me and he hyperposted and I think I only caught him when he claimed a pr and I was a mason.In post 1067, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess Worst is town. They’re posting a lot.
[Redacted]In post 1111, Something_Smart wrote:Link?In post 1109, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Literally just caught scum as a result of them doing this.
I'm flipped and so was the other player so I dont think it violated the spirit of the rule, but i don't wanna link directly to it since its ongoing.In post 1114, Billy Pilgrim wrote:[Redacted]In post 1111, Something_Smart wrote:Link?In post 1109, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Literally just caught scum as a result of them doing this.
Thats fine, but im making it clear that I dont see it as a towntell.In post 1116, Something_Smart wrote:I'm just gonna pretend this conversation never happened.