Firestarter wrote:Is this it???
22 pages of incident, yet your gonna offer this... a mere 17 half lines?
Lol, i'm not sure what is more telling. The fact that you counted the amount of lines i wrote, or the fact you ignored my earlier post where i said i was keeping my analysis brief.
Firestarter wrote:
A few posts later you are pretty sure after only 6 pages of re-reading where your vote is?
________________________________________________________________________
Battle Mage wrote:Here's my completed analysis:
Firestarter and Iron Man vote for No Lynch. +subsequent interaction with scumbags.
FoS: IM, HoS: FS
Post 63 by Llama is fishing.
FoS: Llama
Page 3 really looks bad for FS. Zombie’s vote seems to be setting up multiple lynches, and has a lot of conviction. It’s pretty hard to see them as not being buddies…
Zombie doesn’t take his OMGUS vote srsly atall.
Page 6.
Just as the interaction between FS and ZS was looking less buddyish, Shadowgirl (also scum) replaces in, and immediately commences the bussing of the largest wagon. Friendly interaction REEKS of scumbuddies. 0.o
I should note, if FS is town, his OMGUS style is working brilliantly well.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Page 18.
After Zombie is killed, FS criticises the attack by DramaLlama on Shadowgirl. Not much later he hops on the hot wagon. Yep, im really feeling this at the moment.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Then tries to set up pressure on LF.
Vote: Firestarter
There is no such thing as a compromise lynch today.
BM
Theres pretty much nothing I can say about the 2nd No Lynch vote that I have not said already, everything to do with my thoughts was posted at the time. And my counter on ZS found us a scumbag....
For you to think that I and ZS are counterparts is a very strange conclusion for you to draw. It was I who originally drew up the case for ZS, or did you miss that?
Thats pretty irrelevant. Attacking a scumbag isnt a town tell lol. In fact, i find it more scummy than townie these days, because statistically, townies rarely successfully attack scum, whereas genuine scum knows exactly where to look. It's all in the interaction.
Firestarter wrote:
I can assure you now, my convictions have been founded since SG came in when she voted me straight off the bat....
I questioned why she would do such a thing so quickly, and she immediatly removed her vote. LF was onto her in a flash, and the vote count evolved in time.
She again was scum.
And I was extremely happy with placing my vote on her at the time.
Eh? I dont think lies are going to save you here bro. I've JUST read this game, and i dont normally suffer from short-term memory loss. You DEFENDED SG at the start of Day 2. Its only when she was perilously near a lynch that you decided to hop on, with no real thought process in between.
Firestarter wrote:This is very weak BM, I was hoping for quite a bit more analysis, but Ive never played with you before, so maybe I expected too much...
I'm not so much an analysis man as some people. I prefer to stick to the facts. All thriller, no filler, and all that.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
But, it's not weak atall. In fact, i'm rarely as beyond reasonable doubt as i am now. Even if you are NOT the last scumbag, you are by far the best lead we have, and i wont rest until you are dead. That's how i roll.
Firestarter wrote:
Almost all the points, the few you make here, have been bandied about quite a bit. And based on one of your first posts here, where you say that you are pretty sure where your vote is going, after only 6 pages of a re-read... is, IMHO, extremely scummy, and tells me you have come in to this game with an agenda, an agenda to remove a town player from the game.
Lol, the fact everybody else has said much of this should tell you something. IT'S TRUE. and you appear to be the only one who cant see it.
I had come to a pretty early conclusion, because i was looking for interaction between the scumbags and i found it in bucketloads. Its pretty WIFOMish to suggest that i had an agenda, and admitted that i had pre-conceptions. But i guess ur response is pretty consistent with your play this game. Which apparently centres around the fact that the scum are terrified of you and MUST get you killed asap.
Firestarter wrote:You have ignored every other player in this game with your synopsis, if I could even call it that,
And you do not seem
to believe the mason claim, both confirmed by each other. Please point out why?
where did i say that? lol
2 suspects is more than enough for now, with only 1 scumbag left. I've deliberately not commented on the mason claim for obvious reasons. Where did u get the impression i didnt believe it?
Firestarter wrote:
Im happy to go after [jas] at this moment, but Im happy to pursue you to boot....
lol, how did i guess?
Firestarter wrote:
TBH, your assesment of this game so far is awful....
I guess that's dependant on whether you are scum or not.
firestarter wrote:
1. How many scum are left in this game?
probably 1.
firestarter wrote:
2. Why have you failed to look at the rest of the players in your synopsis, and only target me and LF?
I dont think i've targetted LF either. Just you and IM. What is it with your obsession with him?
Firestarter wrote:
3. What are your thoughts on the LF/IM mason pairing?
More questions to follow....
Yeh...no.
BM