As such
Sorry I'm late I have four other games going on right now, and I forgot that this one started. I will be here from now on.
iamausername wrote:I don't think that saying someone "seems to be the most pro-town player" is particularly helpful, particularly when there's no accompanying list of who seems to be the most scummy, but I don't see why it's such an unbelievable thing for him to have such a read at this point. It's not like he's saying "sekinj is 100% confirmed town and anyone who votes for her is scum scum scum!".strife wrote:But saying "Sekinj seems to be the most pro-town player" is not something I see a pro-town player doing. This statement needs to be backed up - how could you get such a read so soon?
When I am scum, I often defend those that I know to be innocent, for two reasons. Firstly, if they get lynched I will have been proven right, and this will reduce suspicion from me. Second, if I get lynched and am proven to be scum, it will look as though I am partnering up with the innocent one and may get them lynched. This is what I think that iamausername is doing. As suchiamausername wrote:Unvote, Vote: Mirth. Az could definitely do with being less vague, but I'm still finding Mirth considerably scummier than him at this point.
Is the default claim not regular townie? Are we not all trying to convince everyone else that that is what we are?
Wow, way to softclaim townie here. This post bothers me soooooo soooooo much. We don't know if you're innocent. Don't claim it.
I am not. There is a role blocker and we may not have a doctor. I was about to suggest it when I realized that the role blocker would get him/ her. I am of the opinion that an early out is better than a late one as the mafia has more to lose and is less likely to try to claim the role themselves. Also having a confirmed innocent makes things much clearer for everyone.Azrael's asking for the cop to claim.
I would think that being one of four people voting would not put me under that much pressure, especially if I was voting in as indecisive a spot as third. Also, I am often tempted to start votes against my slightly suspected teammates in anticipation of the end game.Iamausername wrote:you could have set either Mirth or retro up to be hammered, yes, but you'd be under heavy scrutiny tomorrow when they turned up town (assuming you'd go for the one who wasn't your buddy if one of them was).
Except that saying that that I am trying to prove my innocence in this manner would be dumb if that was what I was actually doing(it actually was a dumb move anyways, but that's beside the point).Iamausername wrote: When he made his vote, I was thinking he looked more pro-town for it, for pretty mush the reasons he states here, but when he immediately followed it up with this post, it seemed more like he deliberately chose a less popular target for his vote just so he could say this and "prove" he isn't scum.