Doublevoter isn't normal.In post 18, AnimatedWiz wrote:
I fear we may have a Doublevoter D1 claim—careful everyone.
VOTE: BlueSnakelet
Doublevoter isn't normal.In post 18, AnimatedWiz wrote:
I fear we may have a Doublevoter D1 claim—careful everyone.
Your tone seemed like you were trying too hard to fit inIn post 32, ZZZX wrote:Id vote you but I forgot what that term was called... time to get back to the wiki.
But I will bite, why is it scummish?
Pretty muchIn post 37, BlueSnakelet wrote: With the "Choo choo" vote?
I don’t see it either, I was just trying to start discussion
My guess is just that he felt like doing so in the moment. Random Nurse doesn't feel like the type to be self-conscious about being scumread as scum. I think the NM hammer is probably just completely NAIIn post 102, AnimatedWiz wrote: What do we think of Random Nurse quickhammering? I have to admit, encountering some WIFOM trying to decipher the reasons he would have to do so.
I thought the same tooIn post 147, Random Nurse wrote: Heip kind of pings to me as NewbScum a bit scared to make a move.
entirely just gut feeling. And not a particularly strong gut feeling at that. Given his complete lack of reaction I'd be inclined to say that he's slightly more towny.In post 154, heipizhu4 wrote: Passenger, what's your read on Hold? Is it simply a gut feeling or any specific reason to vote?
is that the wording of your role PM?In post 156, AnimatedWiz wrote: vanilla Villager.
is your theory that I’m trying to get BlueSnakelet limmed so that I can replace into the neighborhood and thus have your traffic analyst result on me not matterIn post 190, Random Nurse wrote:
...
Hm.
A Backup Neighbor that can't currently communicate, but if is Scum would still show up as being able to privately communicate (I'm under the assumption Mafia have Daytalk).
I think they’re both Mafia Neighbors. That’s the only way I can make sense of this setup in my head if you and I are both town.In post 194, Random Nurse wrote:In post 191, Passenger wrote: I don’t doubt that BlueSnakelet and heiphizhu are neighbors, but my theory is that they are Mafia Neighbors who are informed that there is a backup neighbor in the game so they have to do scum theater in that neighborhood in case one of them dies and the Backup comes into the hood and is protected by the doctor???
What?
Oh yeah I’m actually stupid. Although now that you said that I’m just going to die tonight lmaoIn post 195, Random Nurse wrote:If I target someone and they can't communicate that means they're a VTIn post 193, Passenger wrote: RN, in my world, I’m a Town Backup Neighbor and you’re a Town Traffic Analyst and heiphi and Blue are both Mafia Neighbors.
In my world, you are a negative utility PR, you contribute nothing. Neighbors are generally neither positive or negative utility, so the moderator then needs to add another role to the setup to balance it out. In this case, the role the mod adds is a Town Indecisive Doctor.
I guess you could lim me but there is also guaranteed scum in at least one of the neighbors
I’ve thought of running a similar setup in the Normal queue before with 1 scum neighbor and 1 town neighbor and 1 backup town neighbor but I never actually got around to itIn post 199, AnimatedWiz wrote: I would like to state, regardless of whether this is truly the set-up or not, having two scum Neighbors with a back-up Village Neighbor would be really funny.
I said the 4 VT’s thing from a setup perspective. I highly doubt that the reviewers would ever approve a 9 player setup with 3 VT’s. It’sIn post 271, JacksonVirgo wrote: It's a blatant lie that is not even remotely close to any other normal run, and is easily confirmable. Yet it was greatly exaggerated
I was not presenting the 4 VT’s as a minimum theory as a hard and fast fact.In post 288, JacksonVirgo wrote:This is another lie. You said specifically that 4 was the MINIMUM amount of VTs. Not what you suspect to to be the minimumIn post 286, Passenger wrote:I said the 4 VT’s thing from a setup perspective. I highly doubt that the reviewers would ever approve a 9 player setup with 3 VT’s. It’sIn post 271, JacksonVirgo wrote: It's a blatant lie that is not even remotely close to any other normal run, and is easily confirmable. Yet it was greatly exaggeratedpossiblebut unlikely.
In post 204, Passenger wrote: We are in a 9 player game. We have 2 dead VT’s and 2 VT claims. 4 VT’s is the minimum number of VT’s in a 9 player normal. Thus, ZZZX and AnimatedWiz are completely clear.
From my fairly extensive experience modding and playing in normals that I believed the 4 VT’s as a minimum rule with ~95 to 98% certaintyIn post 291, JacksonVirgo wrote:You didn't say unlikely. You tried making it appear to be a fact that there MUST be 4 VTs. You were not saying you beleive it's unlikely. You did not say that.You're saying thatIn post 289, Passenger wrote: I guess I could see a world in which 1 Neighbor and 1 VT claim is scum but it just feels awfully unlikelynowsince you're getting called out on your lie but you most certainly did not say or mean it back then.
I’m tempted to say that this is a dumb push and that you should know better
Okay, I phrased things weirdly, got too excited, didn’t realize that I had phrased things weirdly after-the-fact, whatever.In post 299, JacksonVirgo wrote: I understand making a mistake but your words right in this conversation prove that it wasn't just a mistake. You're playing it off like you never said it, therefore you're just wolf here.
I have never seen a full town neighborhood, actually!In post 309, JacksonVirgo wrote:As I said here. I believe they're pushing a hard agenda to get out one of the neighbours so they can't get caught as scum by the TA. It would align with why they'd lie about the VTs so the discussion stays where they want. In the same post where they lied they said "I've never seen a full town neighbourhood" which is just an awful reason to SR in the neighbourhood and it's just all nonsense reasoning and nonsense reasoning is almost certainly coming from wolf. Let alone they're literally lying about what they said and meant because it's very clear what they meant, and they're flat out denying it and they're stuck flat out denying it since they already went down this pathIn post 247, JacksonVirgo wrote: I doubt they're not a backup neighbour. Claiming that is suicide in the lategame so regardless of alignment, that'd be their role. It's very much possible that the setup was designed for this type of interaction where the wolf backup wants to get rid of a neighbour fast before they get schmacked by the TA. Interesting thought experiment at the very least, would make sense why they'd go for both neighbours equally
Yes, and I almost entirely stand by these lock town VT claims.In post 312, JacksonVirgo wrote:It's not just phrasing things weirdly though. You literally lock-towned two VT claims because of it.In post 308, Passenger wrote:Okay, I phrased things weirdly, got too excited, didn’t realize that I had phrased things weirdly after-the-fact, whatever.In post 299, JacksonVirgo wrote: I understand making a mistake but your words right in this conversation prove that it wasn't just a mistake. You're playing it off like you never said it, therefore you're just wolf here.
Town. I was leaning town on him by his play.In post 317, JacksonVirgo wrote: Answer my question btw. What's your read on ZZZ
A lot of his posts felt genuine, that's really it. There have been much scummier players than him.In post 320, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can you elaborate further? What part of his play has you leaning town?In post 319, Passenger wrote:Town. I was leaning town on him by his play.In post 317, JacksonVirgo wrote: Answer my question btw. What's your read on ZZZ
He’s the doctorIn post 382, AnimatedWiz wrote: Honest question: why do you think Steady would be the nightkill?
In post 383, TheHoldSteady wrote:OK. Can you quote me maybe one or two of his posts you thought were genuine?In post 378, Passenger wrote:A lot of his posts felt genuine, that's really it. There have been much scummier players than him.In post 320, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can you elaborate further? What part of his play has you leaning town?In post 319, Passenger wrote:Town. I was leaning town on him by his play.In post 317, JacksonVirgo wrote: Answer my question btw. What's your read on ZZZ
JV’s predecessor was slightly scummy and JV has been quite scummy here IMO. JV’s push on me is bad. I just think that town!him would have a voice at the back of his head saying “okay, what if Passenger accidentally worded things unclearly and didn’t realize that he did so” or “okay, what if Passenger was being stupid town.” So far he hasn’t even remotely expressed these sentiments. He’s a perfectly good player and I think that town!him would read my posts in at least a slightly better faith than he is doing now.In post 384, TheHoldSteady wrote: And which players do you think have been scummier?
In post 451, JacksonVirgo wrote:I have considered you doing this as a Town, I just don't believe that to be the case. Why am I scummy for realising this over the multiple people who have reciprocated the reasonings?In post 446, Passenger wrote:JV’s predecessor was slightly scummy and JV has been quite scummy here IMO. JV’s push on me is bad. I just think that town!him would have a voice at the back of his head saying “okay, what if Passenger accidentally worded things unclearly and didn’t realize that he did so” or “okay, what if Passenger was being stupid town.” So far he hasn’t even remotely expressed these sentiments. He’s a perfectly good player and I think that town!him would read my posts in at least a slightly better faith than he is doing now.In post 384, TheHoldSteady wrote: And which players do you think have been scummier?