Open 100 - F + E x 2 + TOG OVER! before 712

sekinj · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:33 pm

/confirm

sekinj · Post Post #32 (isolation #1) » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:34 pm

hey wall-e

sekinj · Post Post #79 (isolation #2) » Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:31 pm

scary, dont' you guys have day jobs?

I this hp's question only slightly leans townie. I don't think scum would ask that first off and draw attention to it. However, that is full of wifom, which is why I think it is only slight evidence.

sekinj · Post Post #89 (isolation #3) » Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:23 pm

Tenchi wrote:
Budja wrote:I personally think HP's small statement is a null tell.
I actually agree, given with what has been said. The thing is, the way he handled this situation does not bode well with me.

What are you talking about? he hasn't handeled the situation at all because it has been less than 24 hours since he made the comment!
this goes for everyone - be sure to keep timelines in mind before accusing someone of not responding, or responding poorly.

sekinj · Post Post #130 (isolation #4) » Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:40 pm

I think blueheaven and tenchi are both playing like classic newbies. As such, I am willing to overlook some statements and behavior at this point, although it is noted for later. I think Pops is the most suspicious so far for his constant wifoming and it seems like he is trying too hard to push a lynch that everyone else agrees with.

sekinj · Post Post #166 (isolation #5) » Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:36 pm

ZazieR wrote:Sekinj, what in both BH and Tenchi's play do you see as classical newbies? What is different from Pops's play? What do you think of BH and Tenchi?
Also, does this classical newbie play 'defence' of Tenchi still count while he has said that he isn't a newbie?

i already said what I thought of BH and tenchi. They are scummy, but I'm marking it up to newbieness right now. bh asked a very newbie question, and tenchi is giving a very newbie "defense". and newbies will about 50% of the time claim they aren't, so *shrug* I'll make my own judgement on someone's play instead of trusting what they say. Right now I think pops is more scummy, but will keep an eye on the other two.

sekinj · Post Post #176 (isolation #6) » Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:35 am

Zazier wrote:Sekinj, you mentioned a 'newbie question' and a 'newbie defence'. Which are they?

Is anyone else having trouble figuring out what I'm refering too when I say blueheaven's question and tenchi's defense of himself?

@Z - I'm not a fan of the spanish inquisition without you adding your own opinions. IMO, this is not scumhunting, it is the appearance of scumhunting.

sekinj · Post Post #184 (isolation #7) » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:48 am

An idea: Let's lynch the next person who says the M***** word.

sekinj · Post Post #185 (isolation #8) » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:48 am

^a joke

sekinj · Post Post #196 (isolation #9) » Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:52 am

hp [leaves] wrote:
sekinj wrote:An idea:
Let's lynch the next person who says the M***** word.
I like you kind of approach here.
I also think the same thing that you do.

Pos is kinda bothering me as he's constantly "complaining" about "double standards".

Techni, why is it bad to speculate
mason
ry at the time being?

*palmface*

sekinj · Post Post #200 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:49 pm

Wall-E wrote:sekinj: In your opinion, has pops increased his "excessive wifoming"?

@walle - no. In fact his last several posts have me rethinking him as scum. I have agreed with a lot of what he said, and it is no longer coming across wifomy or scummy.

vote count

popsofctown (4): peter?, soveliss, doc, tenchi
tenchi (2): popsofctown, wall-e
soveliss (1): budja
doc (1): seraphim
budja (1): zazier

not voting: hp[leaves], sekinj, blueheaven

sekinj · Post Post #206 (isolation #11) » Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:48 am

@ wall-e: you seem to want to defend pops? why is that?

sekinj · Post Post #225 (isolation #12) » Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:15 pm

@tenchi - hate to break it too you, but I don't think you are making a ton of sense either. Please explain it to us like we are third graders if you must.

vote count

popsofctown (4): peter?, soveliss, doc, tenchi
tenchi (2): popsofctown, wall-e
soveliss (1): budja
doc (1): seraphim
budja (1): zazier

not voting: hp[leaves], sekinj, blueheaven

With 12 alive it is 7 to lynch

sekinj · Post Post #265 (isolation #13) » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:15 am

Pops had me pretty convinced of his scummitude until just recently. However, I think maybe he changed under the pressure, so he is still my best suspect for today.

Vote: pops

sekinj · Post Post #300 (isolation #14) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:53 pm

Wall-E: Please explain to me the reservations you had regarding pops lynch? what were the basis of your vibes?

vote count

tenchi (1): wall-e
wall-e (1): tenchi

not voting: everyone else

Prods going out to everyone who hasn't posted yet

still trying to find replacements for peter? and budja

sekinj · Post Post #305 (isolation #15) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:02 pm

Wall-E wrote:I essentially thought pops had softclaimed mason.

that's all you have to say on the subject? No reason why you thought the rest of us were making a mistake?

sekinj · Post Post #307 (isolation #16) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:24 pm

exactly. and I'd like to know why you denounced it. what made you think it was a bad lynch?

sekinj · Post Post #322 (isolation #17) » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:06 pm

hi... I'm here... busy withthe holidays...

sekinj · Post Post #347 (isolation #18) » Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:59 am

Asking for replacement