@Percy:
I still disagree. Even if we have one/two cases that everybody is honed in on, we can still analyze all of the players:
-A lurker avoiding participation in the case discussion is more suspicious, in my opinion, than a lurker avoiding participation in the RVS;
-A mafia is given more opportunities to manufacture scum-tells when we're honed in on a case, thereby giving us more information to work with than we would have in the RVS;
Just look at Kabenon and Kirr. Players are suspicious of them because of the case on you, not because of the RVS. While the focus started out on you, we've expanded to more players as the case unfolded.
Like I said, I find you anti-town, but that's mostly because I disagree with your playstyle. I don't think you're scummy.
---------------------------------
@Kabe:
Kabe wrote:
Wagons are used to lynch. Getting on them serves the town. I jumped on as vote four. If you're going to get pissed at someone for a wagon, go after the ones who put him at -2 and -1.
Scum would like to be on the wagon early, wouldn't they?
Kabe wrote:
I jumped on because I believed at that moment that Percy was the scummiest, therefore my vote would rest with him. I witheld my reasons for reactions, which I got.
Care to share with us the conclusions you've reached from the reactions you got?
---------------------------
@Kirr:
Kirr wrote:
Oh! I see. Thanks for clearing it up. I felt it suspicious because I thought RVS was over, and yet Percy voted for someone without any reason at all and the person whom he voted for was the person who showed a tiny bit of suspicion of me at that time, so I thought he was trying to buddy up. Sorry, I'm a bit paranoid. ^^;
This is your response to Pablo, who pointed out that Percy voted for him because of the want-more-RVS reasons, and not buddying. This caused you to unvote.
Yet, Percy explained the exact same thing two posts above Pablo's
. Why is that Pablo's word has more weigh to you than Percy's?
Unvote;
FoS: Kirr
Agree with iamausername on Kirr's vibe.
--------------------------------
Now, I'm going to switch gears and talk about my role.
After spending some time thinking about it, I think I'm going to claim, because otherwise I don't see how my role is useful.
I'm a
Self-Watcher
, which means that (unless blocked or jailed) I get a list of players night-targeting me at the beginning of each day.
From what I understand, this is a doubly-edged sword. On the one hand, other than a potential doctor protection, the mafia has no night ability that would not kill or block me. That means that anybody who appears on my list at the beginning of the day is either town or a mafia doctor.
On the other hand, if I reveal my "investigation" results, I would be outing the town's power roles.
I'm still trying to figure out the best play for town with this information, but the reason I claimed is that my role requires others to target me at night, and outside of me being purposefully scummy or a stellar scum-hunter, it's not likely to happen.