Open 163 (Jungle Republic)- Game Over before 835
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
To ThAdmiral : I'd say it's just random squabbling as of right now.
But something that struck me peculiar, is that Cain's first (and what I read, only) post so far in this game is jumping on the Mastin bandwagon. Did he not realize we were still in RVS?
Vote: Cain
(Not random)ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
The way I read it he was just jumping on to get more votes on him, pushing him closer to lynch. Didn't seem real random to me, more scummy.Nikanor wrote:Toro: That's what the RVS is about. Have you never played a game on this site before?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
I put a vote on a guy who hopped on a bandwagon on the first page, and all of a sudden I'm scum.Nikanor wrote:
Are you kidding? I'll let Cow answer this one, but I feel it should be pretty obvious.Toro wrote:In other words, hasdgfas, how is that scummy?
/facepalm.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hasdgfas said that I looked scummy after I voted Cain, I responded by asking how that made me look scummy at all, so you're right, I never said I was scum, in a sense.Nikanor wrote:
Nobody said you were scum. Guilty conscience?Toro wrote:I put a vote on a guy who hopped on a bandwagon on the first page, and all of a sudden I'm scum.
While I do like my DTM vote, I believe this one will serve me better:
Unvote. Vote: Toro.
IGMEOY: DTMShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Problem with that is, it doesn't really make them look anti-town at all. And we've got a long deadline, I'm sure we're going to find scum without any distractions.Scott Brosius wrote:Nikanor wrote:
Are you kidding me? You really believe anyone with a differing opinion to be scummy?Scott wrote:It's null either way, and I think anyone perpetuating the issue to be scummy (has,nik)
DTM himself has acknowledged that his post can be interpreted as defending.
I don't like your vote, either. You call two people scummy, then vote for a completely different person. Why is that?
No I just think that continuing that argument is counterproductive and people continuing it 5 pages later might be trying to distract the town from finding scum.
Did you see Cain's gem of a post? Easily the most anti-town post in this game so far.
And oh that honor hasn't gone to me? Phew!ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Don't know how that makes me seem overconfident at all, just pointing it out.Scott Brosius wrote:Toro wrote: Problem with that is, it doesn't really make them look anti-town at all. And we've got a long deadline, I'm sure we're going to find scum without any distractions.
And oh that honor hasn't gone to me? Phew!
Well its better to voice one's opinions than not. It's extremely anti-town to just say "I don't know" and offer no reads.
Also the first line of your post seems weird to me. Almost over-confidence that would only be seen from an non-town player.
Anyway, I have never played in a game where there is a anti-town group that does not have NKs. Anyone have experience with this setup?
Umm...yeah, just think they're masons.Except they're bad.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
I had a feeling that Cain was just not really throwing a random vote around since it was just RVS, seeing how he quickly and without really saying anything else just latched right onto the Mastin bandwagon. I don't know Cain's meta really, so I think from looking at that we may have caught inexperienced scum.ZazieR wrote:Post 88 –Toro, can you elaborate how you get this impression?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Wait, he actuallyKill-kill wrote:
I think just inexperienced, period. He fake-claimed scum day one in the other game I am in, and just got lynched (vanilla townie).Toro wrote:
I had a feeling that Cain was just not really throwing a random vote around since it was just RVS, seeing how he quickly and without really saying anything else just latched right onto the Mastin bandwagon. I don't know Cain's meta really, so I think from looking at that we may have caught inexperienced scum.ZazieR wrote:Post 88 –Toro, can you elaborate how you get this impression?
ThAdmiral was quite quiet in the one game I have played with him. NK'd day one, town doctor. Stated that he often was quiet when asked about "lurking".
Zazie, I commented when I had something to say. About all I have now is a feeling that out of hohum, nikanor, and DTM one is scum. Cain could either be scummy or just plain weird, and Toro seems to be tunnelling on
Cain, without solid reasons (I understand there are reasons, I am just saying I don't consider them enough to bring out the pitchforks)claimedscum? Wow.
And I wouldn't really say that I'm tunneling on Cain really, I'm just throwing this out there and seeing what you guys say about it. I think he might just be eager to lynch, actually too eager to lynch.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
[quote="DTMaster]
@Toro
You disapproved on Cain's bandwagon vote when Mastin was at L-3 in the RVS? It's stretching that argument.
I think he was trying to get more reactions then forcing a lynch during this stage (besides it would be much more useful for the RVS wagon to go to lynch since we would know scum was part of that wagon).[/quote]
It was just peculiar to me how he just quickly jumped on.
/nodShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
OMGUS much?saberwolf wrote:and with that, in conclusion:
unvote; vote: ZazieR
I know others have tried to make me look bad, but you tried the hardest, and I don't like it, especially as I haven't really done anything anti-town. You put words in my mouth, misrepped me, and have not really done any effective scumhunting with that spam of yours.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
You know what, this is giving me a real bad feeling from you now.saberwolf wrote:and with that, in conclusion:
unvote; vote: ZazieR
I know others have tried to make me look bad, but you tried the hardest, and I don't like it, especially as I haven't really done anything anti-town. You put words in my mouth, misrepped me, and have not really done any effective scumhunting with that spam of yours.
So,UnvoteVote: saberwolfShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
I've already said before that I was not tunneling, I just voted Cain on the grounds of him just quickly building up the RVS-Mastin bandwagon.saberwolf wrote:ZazieR has tried to make me look scummy the best he can, and has put words in my mouth and misrepped me, which is what earned my vote.
the,whatever, part hascow, refered to the speculation of toro voting for me to look like he wasn't tunneling.
as for connections, Zazier tries to undo everything I've done. I've tried to stop the fight at the beginning so that tunneling wouldnt occur, and now ZazieR is undoing that by only ripping at the original talkers. Toro was mildly involved in the spam and was not as aggressively attacked. I thought it might have been a slight attempt at bussing. I also thought it could be a future setup to get cain off the hook for his BW vote. The rest that happened afterwards has convinced me enough that there is at least one connection between the three.
Good point.The Cow wrote:Um, aren't we the ones who are supposed to be deciding that? You're supposed to explain why it's not as anti-town as we think, not just saying that you haven't done anything anti-town.
When you say "others have tried to make me look bad, but you tried the hardest, and I don't like it," makes it definitely sound both like OMGUS and scum trying to aim the spotlight over to someone else. And rereading through that swamp of spam I read that ZazieR never put any words in your mouth at all. And that is some effective scumhunting, we found you.saberwolf wrote:is this to make it look like you're not tunneling?
Whatever, I just don't like the way ZazieR's throwing dirt around, and is def trying to twist things into an unpleasant spotlight.
also, please elaborate on why my post gave you a bad feeling, cause I already suspected you having connections to ZazieR before, but this def helps reinforce it.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
You could always call him Robotic Eye-Laser Shooting Cattle Unit 01.DTMaster wrote:Oh whoops. Yes Hasdgfas. >>;; It's easier to type hohum then hasdgfas (I will never type the cow).
MY BAD.
And as for this...
Well it certainly looks that way doesn't it? From what I read I don't really see Zaz twisting words at all.DTM wrote:Hmm I'm seeing a deja vu here am I not?
@Scott/Hohum/Toro
Do you three see Sabre's 187, 188, and 189 as OMGUS reasons and not actual, legit reasons that would make Zazier scummy. Can you debunk his argument to show how this is done?
I personally agree that with the statement that Zazier's posts can be seen as mudslinging among the four active players (fanning the flames again).ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Meh, your a cow, you're forgettable.hasdgfas wrote:
I wasn't on the list either, btw.Toro wrote:Anyone finding it fishy how Zaz, Cain, and lumi are the only onesnoton that list?
And it's a really weird list. I honestly don't understand the point of it.
I guess he's just posting his list of suspicion after catching up? But the way he posted it does sound weird.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
*Facepalm*lumi wrote:
I assumed I wasn't on the list because I just replaced in yesterday (real time) and didn't do much yet.Toro wrote:Here's a question, how do you feel being held off the list along with Cain?
Anyone finding it fishy how Zaz, Cain, and lumi are the only onesnoton that list?
That's right.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Other then nik, which I find peculiar.Scott Brosius wrote:
No reaction to it, half of the game is on the list and it just seems to be the people who posted some content before zaz replaced.lumi wrote:@Scott: how do you feel about being on Zazie's list?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Bolded is the part I find peculiar.saberwolf wrote:ZazieR: Def suspicious of why nik didn't make your list.I would of though that if anything he'd be up there at the top, given the basis of why your list was made. [but then again that's just me]So why isn't he on it? Actually after you answer that, please tell me why everyone else who isn't on your list is not on the list.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
So for people to be scummy, they have to rub you the wrong way? This is what prompted me to vote for you when you said this about ZazieR.saberwolf wrote:Mind you, by scummiest, I mean rubbed me the wrong way more than the others.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
DAMN STRAIGHT!!!saberwolf wrote:Hope that helps. Although, no doubt, you'll do your best to rip this to shreds too,or else claim ignorance.
And I haven't been 'ripping' your statement to shreds saber, why so defensive?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
[quote="saberwolf"the "ripping" part was ZazieR directed, the ignorance part was directed at you.[/quote
Okay, gotcha.
I was talking as if your ripping to shreds comment was directed towards me. Otherwise, this be true.I have to be defensive. If I wasn't defensive, ZazieR would walk all over me, and I will not let that happen. I'm trying my best to answer every question, but I seem to get more and more discredited every time I do.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Last paragraph is a joke, seeing as how in the other games people have been all over my ass.ZazieR wrote:Post 146 –Toro, who do you mean with ‘them’? Also, is the last paragraph a joke or not?
And by 'them' I was referring to whoever Scott was referring to, (Has, Nik, DTM, hohum).
Post 181 – Toro, Cain explained why he joined the bandwagon in Post 176. Why no response to it when you are attacking him over it?
I feel that we can still put the pressure on Cain over this issue if Saberwolf gets some of the pressure off of him, or on D2. But as of right now my vote is still with Saber and I'm happy to leave it there.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
With you just posting this and now just bowing out, youCain wrote:prod recieved! sorry, had my computer in the shop over the past three days getting fixed! all good now!
wow, three votes, some people really hate me. I have no role to claim to keep me safe, all i can do is tell you im town. The reason i sit back and watch is because this is only my third gama and im just watching, still having very little input, and yeah i know it looks scummy, but if i posted just lots of random posts then chances are i would be suspected of told im stupid. I cant decribe how hew i am to this game, and trying to pick scum tell things up to try and help.
Hope this make things clearer, if not just ask!
arestupid.
Sorry to make it all blunt like that. But yeah, and I'll get on this to add some more pressure...
Unvote
Vote: CainShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Check the wiki.Cain wrote:
what is OMGUS and AtE?DTMaster wrote:Found in my Post 301
Since you unvoted I want to edit my question 2 to: Why did you unvote?DTM wrote:
1. Both: What are your current town reads?
2. Cain: Are you still satisfied with your vote on Lumi/Mastin? It's past the RVS now, so if you still like the vote why are you keeping it? What's your case on Lumi?
3. Both: What do you have to say in defense to your lurkerish actions.
Also it's poor in your image to forget that you had this vote active since it suggests that you haven't been keeping up with the game.
The other thing is you are self imposing a scummy/lurker image (if you are townie) to inflict back at scum hopping on "an easy bandwagon". The issue here is the reasoning looks a lot like OMGUS, which is a weak argument to fight back, rather then opportunism. Also your recent statement reads as AtE, where you full claimed as townie in response to the new pressure.
More scumhunting less AtE nonsense please. (if you are townie)ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hmm...while I was reading back through the thread while reading your current analysis I discovered something strange about Kill-Kill's vote on Cain.ZazieR wrote:
The timing and that you only answered one of the three questions are both noted.Kill-kill wrote:
First of all, being noobish as a townie in no way helps the town. However, the main reason is his willingness to jump on the Mastin bandwagon. If he had been trying to use the bandwagon to scum hunt, he would have followed up with questions, suspicions, something. I think his inexperience led him to believe that he could lynch someone who wasn't in his faction early, when an experienced player would know that the wagon would never get a lynch without evidence.DTMaster wrote: 4. Kill-Kill: You are keeping your vote on Cain but you mentioned that his meta involved some odd mistakes (ie town claiming scum, etc). Why did you keep your vote if you knew Cain's town meta was poor and you outlined he was looked like he was acting noobish in your ISO 3?
After reading this I wondered why his stance on Cain has drastically changed to wanting to lynch him after discarding my reasons that I stated originally as reasons thatKill-kill wrote:
I think just inexperienced, period. He fake-claimed scum day one in the other game I am in, and just got lynched (vanilla townie).Toro wrote:
I had a feeling that Cain was just not really throwing a random vote around since it was just RVS, seeing how he quickly and without really saying anything else just latched right onto the Mastin bandwagon. I don't know Cain's meta really, so I think from looking at that we may have caught inexperienced scum.ZazieR wrote:Post 88 –Toro, can you elaborate how you get this impression?
ThAdmiral was quite quiet in the one game I have played with him. NK'd day one, town doctor. Stated that he often was quiet when asked about "lurking".
Zazie, I commented when I had something to say. About all I have now is a feeling that out of hohum, nikanor, and DTM one is scum. Cain could either be scummy or just plain weird, and Toro seems to be tunnelling on
Cain, without solid reasons (I understand there are reasons, I am just saying I don't consider them enough to bring out the pitchforks)weren't enough to warrant a Cain-lynch.
I dunno, I could be reading too much into this, or I could be onto something. Zaz, your thoughts?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Problem with this, your vote is not even on me Kill-Kill. And what caused you to change your mind about me?Kill-kill wrote:
I already answered this, but, with his activity, I didn't see the point. I also already explained why I only answered one question: namely, I misread and didn't think the other two were addressed to me, and I answered them in my next post.ZazieR wrote: Secondly, I was the one who asked Cain about his vote. I replaced into this game, and looking at the time stamps, you could have asked him before me. You choose not to do so. Why?
Toro, his behavior since then has changed my mind. He is my number one scum candidate, so my vote is on him.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Okay then,Kill-kill wrote:
Well, I can't vote for two people.... In any case, nowhere did I say you were scummy. I said I didn't like how you appeared to be tunneling. Regardless, weak chainsaw defense of Cain noted, despite the fact you are voting for him.Toro wrote:
Problem with this, your vote is not even on me Kill-Kill. And what caused you to change your mind about me?Kill-kill wrote:
I already answered this, but, with his activity, I didn't see the point. I also already explained why I only answered one question: namely, I misread and didn't think the other two were addressed to me, and I answered them in my next post.ZazieR wrote: Secondly, I was the one who asked Cain about his vote. I replaced into this game, and looking at the time stamps, you could have asked him before me. You choose not to do so. Why?
Toro, his behavior since then has changed my mind.He is my number one scum candidate, so my vote is on him.FoS: Kill-Kill, nice try trying to say that I'm trying to defend Cain, would you mind pointing out where?
And with the bolded part that I bolded I facepalmed myself over and over, as this was directed at someone else, I thought you were calling me scummy. So, forget about that part.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
You do realize that Cain and peacesells are two different people right?Scott Brosius wrote:My vote is staying on Cain/peacesells. His lurking, wanting to be replaced at L-2, and his analysis ONLY of the people who voted Cain still sound anti-town to me. Also the little comment about how SW is acting scummiest seems like he's attempting to buddy up to town.
peacesells wrote: With one read through my general feeling is Saber is scummiest acting (well actually, I would have voted Cain had I not been him as he appeared as a newb scum to me.)
I'm still not sure about SW. The wagon built up so quickly then crumbled, not really sure what to think of that. He certainly has not been acting very town, but I think peacesells is still a better lynch for today.
SW:are you still content with your vote on Nik? What do you think of Cain's replacement?
Getting town reads from DT
I wasn't getting good vibes from hohum, but alas he has vanished. Need to hear more to make an opinion.
Toro has a weird style, but I would lean town for the time being. Not enough to go on here though.
Toro:Why did you unvote?
Still retain my earlier suspicions of lumi.
I am pretty neutral on nikanor, cow, kill, Zaz at the moment.[/quote]
I unvoted as I see that peacesells has at least taken a liberal position in this game and asking plenty of questions. Of course this doesn't mean that I completely believe that he's town, but he's looking town to me now.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
So you were going to come back and just say.Nikanor wrote:But I never actually promised a big post. You just took it as a given that I was going to make a large post.
'Saber's guilty. Vote, DO EET NAO!'?
ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Nice catch there Nik. So far I'm still deciding whether to vote for either Saber of PS, the catch you just made with the Lumi thing just made Peace just drop down my townliness list. And saber's interpretation of peacesells taking off his vote sounds suspicious to me as well.Nikanor wrote:peacesells wrote:Kill Kill: I'm a bit confused about Kill Kill. He voted for Cain but subsequently put forth reasons how Cain would be town...not sure what to make of this.Fence riding with a hidden vote? Trying to make it seem like he was defending someone while still voting for them? Like I said, confused.Lumi: Seems a bit paranoid that people continue to "singel" him/her out.Not sure what to make of thisbut seems really worried about players directing attention his/her way without any actual votes.
Bolded is the part that makes it fencesitting.DT: If there is a player type in this game I can relate to the most it's DT. His early discuss about Mastin is probably one I would have agreed with. Why jump on someone who hasn't even showed up yet? FWIW I've played with Mastin and his Wall of text was tiresome...along with his insistance that we must META-game him. I have a hard enough time reading everything in one game let alone reading someone elses 5 other games. Sheesh! Anyway, back on topic.I don't see anything particularly good or bad about DT so far.
Your Toro analysis is only slightly fencesitting because you seem to say you agree with him. I assumed from that you were saying you find him pro-town.
Also,you have gone from 'not sure what to make of this' to 'second on my scumlist' on lumi. Care to point out what about her you find scummy?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
The way you put it, just found it peculiar.saberwolf wrote:toro: is it my thoughts of what it meant that is suspicious, or that you think that the way i put it makes peacesells suspicious?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Okay I will offer my opinion, I've got a feeling that you were trying to pull a "Ooo look over there!" with the Hohum post and redirect attention over there. This isn't making me get as strong of a scummy-feeling from Cow however. The way you jumped on sounded as if you were saying "F**K it, lynch the one who isn't doing anything worth a s**t."saberwolf wrote:
quit asking others to do stuff for you then follow on the coattails. If you have a problem with 444, address it yourself,then let others follow suit.Toro wrote:Nik, peace, I'll offer my opinion on this after you two do, but do either of you want to respond to Saber's 444?
And interesting how you didn't scold peacesells as how you did me.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
First off, welcome to the game SttB!
And secondly, this is just bulls**t (w/ hohum), it's been about 18 hours now so I feel ready to put a vote on now. Although I say we don't put on anymore 'til a couple hours from now.
Unvote
Vote: HohumShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
In that case then my vote stays where it is.DTMaster wrote:Wait my bad.
Unvote
Vote: Hohum
Hohum posted in other games after the 17th. Some are lengthy posts I just checked the September time stamps and misread. Has' case is verified.
Kill-kill wrote:He has flipped from the peacesells bandwagon to the hohum wagon, the two competing wagons to saberwolf.*Headdesk*
If Saber was scum why would I vote for him earlier in the game and not take it off when he was atL-2?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Ah Christ, let me reword this.Toro wrote:
In that case then my vote stays where it is.DTMaster wrote:Wait my bad.
Unvote
Vote: Hohum
Hohum posted in other games after the 17th. Some are lengthy posts I just checked the September time stamps and misread. Has' case is verified.
Kill-kill wrote:He has flipped from the peacesells bandwagon to the hohum wagon, the two competing wagons to saberwolf.*Headdesk*
If Saber was scum why would I vote for him earlier in the game and not take it off when he was atL-2?
Earlier you said that I'd look really scummy if Saber is lynched and came up scum, because I avoided his bandwagon. Don't you think I'd have taken off my vote on him of his original bandwagon if we were aligned together when it reached L-2?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
I don't really see how any of my votes were bad wagon jumps, let's see here...
Cain- First off, I was the one who started it, and I had legit reasons for it as well.
Saberwolf- If you can honestly tell me that you wouldn't have placed a vote down on Saber after that whole debacle, you've got to be kidding.
Hohum- The overall lack of participation and the whole "\o/" remark almost looked like he was mocking us and egging us on to lynch him, at least to me that's what it looked like.
I honestly don't see any reason you can call any of my votes bad.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
This is giving me a really bad vibe from both you and Scott now, sounds as if you two are werewolves and you'd want to make sure that Hohum (if he's the seer) doesn't speak to try and clear himself.saberwolf wrote:I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynch
UnvoteVote: SaberwolfShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
No, with saber agreeing with you about not having hohum claim at all when he could be the seer makes it sound as if you two just want to hurry up and not give the seer a chance to speak up. And you two (if you're werewolves) would want a quicklynch of the seer.Scott Brosius wrote:
Why can we only be werewolves? Since you are mafia and know your other members? Mafia-slip perhaps?Toro wrote:
This is giving me a really bad vibe from both you and Scott now, sounds assaberwolf wrote:I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynchif you two are werewolvesand you'd want to make sure that Hohum (if he's the seer) doesn't speak to try and clear himself.
UnvoteVote: SaberwolfShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0