So yea... give me a bit to read through the 3 pages and I should be posting after dinner later (damn family are coming
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
urgh, great.....Battle Mage wrote:Ugh, this game sucks. I hate lurkers! [/Lol]
Just read through. Page 1 made me smile.
Vote: Battle Mage
Don't think i've done this before.
BM
Urgh.... again.Battle Mage wrote:Netopalis wrote:We seem to be locked in a perpetual RVS. I'm going to
Unvote: Battle Magesince he showed up.....Kind of at a loss of what to do from there, though.Confirm Vote: Battle Mage
As soon as he flips scum, you're going down!
Yeh, i'm clueless too. lol
BM
Not too sure really... I dont think jester would be in this game.DTMaster wrote:o-o. I smell jester play?
your wanting him to make a case on himself?DTMaster wrote:
@BM
:S. Your confirm vote makes me confused. I smell jester play or sarcasm. What's your case on BM?
not helpful....hitogoroshi wrote:Claim: Confused
Jesus christ........getting drunk here on the WIFOMBattle Mage wrote:Nah. I'd have to be the stupidest Jester in the world to self-vote in the random stage. lolDTMaster wrote:o-o. I smell jester play?
Unless it's a WIFOM gambit, but if you assume that, there's still very little chance of me actually being a Jester.
Claim: MOCTOD
I'm just being a schizo jackass, dw.
Thought i'd try something a bit different. Although, if everyone said that, i guess we'd end up with a game where everyone self-votes, and nobody gets anywhere haha.
Was just thinking how funny it would be if i claimed Scum, but then you'd kinda have to lynch me, or risk going down in history as the worst town ever.
BM
What??? what is a proxy vote??Battle Mage wrote:.Proxy Vote to Sotty for next 48 hours. Do with it as you please.
BM
what in the blue hell are you talking about?Battle Mage wrote:
Proxy your vote to someone! It's fun!
Double vote? HuhBattle Mage wrote:Actually, the man with the double vote has commented on it. I, for my part, agree with it. Nothing more to be said there lol.Netopalis wrote:(EBWOP: I know that one post does not equal not lurking either, but nobody seems to have commented on my post, so I was waiting to see something else to post about.....)
@ Haylen - Ok, so do you have anything on me? I'm just curious.
BM
Didnt you think it was over....CSL wrote:The RVS is fun. I think you shuld vote in it.
cut the BS and stop seeing this game as a joke and play it right damn it!Battle Mage wrote:Lol, i dont think i need to say that my policy differs from yours then.Netopalis wrote:BM - I didn't have anything to say. Better to keep quiet if I have nothing to add than to fill the thread with mindless ramblings.
I wanna see someone else proxy their vote to someone. Just for the lols.
As an added incentive, anyone who proxies their vote, gets to join mycliqueof voteless townies. I will not vote for anyone in the clique at any point during the game.
BM
For gods sake!Battle Mage wrote:the Clique is taking signups now. Sidenote: if nobody joins, i will spend the entire rest of the day lurking.
BM
CSL wrote:lol, Yes, my Evil Twin. The RVS is fun, and open to everyone.
Lurkers are mean. Don't lurk either, Twin. XD
Maemuki wrote:But but I like to lurk! It's my trademark!
And since when we are Evil Twins?
Jesus christ, what is with this babbling BSBattle Mage wrote:Proxy your vote to someone. Then you are family to me.Maemuki wrote:....Can I join? CanIcanIcanIcanI? Is it like a secret society? Isitisitisit?
[/overexicted]
And we better not get lurkers here. Or I'll be sad.
BM
For fuk sake, it is now page 5... discussion has been on going, can we please play the gameCSL wrote:Proxy vote to hitoPROXY BAAAAAAAAAANDWAGON!
Finally something serious said...Netopalis wrote:Wow. I step away for a few hours and when I come back, everybody's went bloody insane.
Vote: Battle Magefor stalling, obstructing and generally confusing and derailing the discussion.
I can understand your mood.... Im getting pissed of with all this rambling to the point I am feeling I wanna replace out if it continues... but ummm town vibe of Zach? Lol he is mod!KittyMo wrote:.
I'm getting scumvibes from Neto based on meta (FOS: Netopalis), and I'm extremely irritated with Battle Mage, Haylen, and CSL. I'm getting townvibes from Nikanor, Hiro, and Zachrulez.
Sorry, I'm in a bad mood.
And you have no idea how much I hate people who talk crap and take away from the game with their BS rubbish.Battle Mage wrote:Give me some quotes that consistute actual discussion.Nikanor wrote:Unvote. Vote: Battle Mage.
Why are you extending the RVS with this proxy vote stuff? I was starting to see some actual discussion, then you come in with your proxy votes and ruin it all.
In fairness, if there had been any valuable discussion up till now, you'd have a serious vote out, based on that discussion. Instead, you've just proved that we were still in the random stage, until i introduced the proxy suggestion. Now we have some serious information to look at.
Also, you have no idea how much i hate people that whinge about a long RVS.... 0.o
BM
3> for both hereSotty7 wrote:I approve of this message.KittyMo Post 131 wrote:Anyways, we need to quit with the stupid proxy crap and the stupid let's-find-every-opportunity-to-complain-about-being-banned crap.
What is your meta on Neto KittyMo?
Haylen, is your vote serious?
would that not give you an advantage? I read into this post as it is, the only way they are allowed is if it is stated by the rulesBattle Mage wrote:Please explain. By PM if you like.Zachrulez wrote:Battle Mage wrote:
Mod- What is your policy regarding Proxy votes? Do you count them together, or can they be used separately?Proxy votes do not count unless you actually vote by the stated rules.
BM
there could have been, only you where acting like a jackass and a rambling maniac.. his vote is justifiedBattle Mage wrote:I'll repeat shall i? There WAS no serious discussion.Netopalis wrote:Wow. I step away for a few hours and when I come back, everybody's went bloody insane.
Vote: Battle Magefor stalling, obstructing and generally confusing and derailing the discussion.
Please explain to me why you are so panicky atm.
And then explain what you think i am stalling/obstructing.
BM
I agree, all of BM postings have been anti-town BS rubbishNikanor wrote:That is an anti-town stance. I've seen a game where the RVS flowed over into day three, simply because a majority of the players shared your opinion on the RVS.hito wrote:Whatever. It's been my experience that the game will begin when it begins
If nobody tries to start discussion, discussion won't start.
fancy adding anything to the on going conversation or are you just gonna ramble on like a lunatic... its page 7... you must have some thoughts by nowCSL wrote:Undo everything
Yes, screw secret societies.
Head/Desk... BANG!!!!!!CSL wrote:OMGUS, Battle Mage....
Vote: Battle Mage
INDIRECT, that is.
this vote reaks of crap.. there is no reason to itBattle Mage wrote:Maemuki wrote:Yup. It was for dramatic effect.Battle Mage wrote: Lol, you realise it was never proxied, right? haha
BM
And answer the question please, kthx.Unvote, Vote: Maemuki
I'm content.
BM
great question.Netopalis wrote:What.the.crap. Why the heck are you voting for Maemuki? Give us some reasons! You seem to think she's confirmed scum...why?
I see no reasons here, just more BS... you really are not taking this game seriously are you?Battle Mage wrote:Lol, damn you guys are crazy. xDNetopalis wrote:What.the.crap. Why the heck are you voting for Maemuki? Give us some reasons! You seem to think she's confirmed scum...why?
I love it!
I never said, or indicated that i felt Maemuki was confirmed scum. But if you want to interrogate someone, you cant pussyfoot around! lol
Whats with the "us" stuff? And why so panicky (yep, that word again) about me voting Maemuki?
BM
again my above point stands.#Battle Mage wrote:
Lol, i'm seriously thinking you forgot i'm human.
The last part implied that CSL is flirting with you.
BM
Jesus christ.......this is getting rediciliousCSL wrote:Now I do have a good reason to vote you, liar.Battle Mage wrote:The last part implied that CSL is flirting with you.
Still not very helpful....CSL wrote:I am. I'm just about ready to have about 4 others bandwagon your ass.
Still, Post. It. Now.
no, your just rolefishing....Battle Mage wrote:That's how games generally progress. lolMaemuki wrote:Why did you want me to claim?Battle Mage wrote: Lol, that's not a problem. If you're not scum, we'll run you up, you'll claim, and we'll believe you.
What do you think of CSL buddying you so conspicuously?
I'm voting you, because you have successively failed to answer the question i posed to you, which was:
Why did you proxy your vote for 48 hours, when i asked you to proxy it for 49 hours or more?
I dont understand why you would be so evasive as town. And btw, i'm not answering a question from you, until you answer mine.
Your attack on Haylen for self-voting is also very wierd, when such a big fuss was made over me doing the same.
Plus, you were keen to jump on the proxy bandwagon, until you realised i wasnt going to uphold my end of the bargain, at which point you bailed angrilly.
BM
not really, people change their minds.. changing votes is not scummy.CSL wrote:VOTE-HOPPER. That's a scumtell. BIG scumtell. I was about to unvote you, but look at that.
I really don't think it matters if they are or not... or are you talking about in game relationship... im confused now and getting really annooyed reading this crap.Maemuki wrote:BM. Seriously. Stop it. WeBattle Mage wrote:
are you in a relationship with Maemuki?
BMare noton a relationship. Get it or do I need to spell it out?
I completely agree with this post, we are getting no where with his antics and BSNetopalis wrote:Look, we're not going to get anywhere with BM around. His posts are absolutely ridiculous - the lunatic scryings of a madman. We've been through 8 pages of discussion and what have we learned? Zilch. Some newbie games went to completion - and won - in that amount of posting. Therefore, both because I think he's scum and I think it's a good policy, I have to
Vote: Battle Mage
why the hell are you posting vote counts???Battle Mage wrote:
7th vote count of day 1:
Battle Mage - 3 (Nikanor, CSL, Netopolis)
CSL - 2 (DTMaster, Sotty7)
Kittymo - 1 (Haylen)
Hitogoroshi - 1 (Maemuki)
Nikanor - 1 (ckool5000)
Haylen - 1 (Kittymo)
Maemuki - 1 (Battle Mage)
Not voting (jasonT1981, hitogoroshi)
With 12 alive it's 7 to lynch.
If I made any mistakes, let me know asap.
Deadline will also fall on Wednesday September 23rd at 9pm central.
the only thing learnt is BM and CSL are rambling idiots who are not talking this game seriously... I to have felt we have had ziltch progressionhitogoroshi wrote:Really? Zilch? I've learned a lot about CSL and Maemuki, here. It's not my favorite style of play by any means - I'm much more stoic than BM - and personally I find it to be a bit in poor taste to use personal jabs to get rises out of people, but it's giving us a lot more than zilch.
why, give reasons please why we need to lynch Mae?Battle Mage wrote:Lol, ok ok, i give.Netopalis wrote:Look, we're not going to get anywhere with BM around. His posts are absolutely ridiculous - the lunatic scryings of a madman. We've been through 8 pages of discussion and what have we learned? Zilch. Some newbie games went to completion - and won - in that amount of posting. Therefore, both because I think he's scum and I think it's a good policy, I have to
Vote: Battle Mage
But you'd better lynch Maemuki tomorrow!
BM
retarded but I would welcome a break from your rambling BSBattle Mage wrote:Actually, if you Unvote me, i might lurk for a bit. How does that sound?
BM
again more BS, yet to add anything to the game...CSL wrote:Unvote my Evil Twin, and we have a deal.
agreed.Netopalis wrote:For the record, BM, the only reason that my vote is on you is because I think that your continued presence will be a hindrance to the game. That and the fact that I could see this being a mafia play - something along the lines of "They'd never expect mafia to be this loud in the thread..."
And I suppose we have learned a few things...But I agree that it's not the way I'd like to play this game.
Im sorry, I fail to see any case on Mae as of yet from you, can you please sum it up for me?Battle Mage wrote:You're exactly right. How do you expect me to put up a fight, against a fairly significant wagon, which is founded on complete bs?hitogoroshi wrote:Oh come on, BM, don't pull that fatalistic crap. The 'case' against you basicially amounts to "BM offended me/someone else, and that is a scumtell" and you can't put up a fight?
The worst townies are the ones who give up too early.
The majority of the players who are participating actively, are voting for me.
My vote is on Maemuki, and the information is out there. What more can i do, hombre?
BM
this unvote is even more retarded than CSL's asking for the4 vote to be unvoted....Battle Mage wrote:lol,CSL wrote:Unvote my Evil Twin, and we have a deal.Unvote*shrug*
BM
this was only called for pages ago by both Sotty and Kitty, get with the bloody times...CSL wrote:Hitogoroshi, you are right. We really need to get more discussion going, and not risk an early lynch.
Unvote
I support a lynch on him right nowHaylen wrote:Pfft, I'm here to lynch scum, not lynch for fun. It would be quite...arousing...to lynch BM though.BM wrote: Bet Haylen will kick herself for missing the chance to lynch me in the first 10 pages. Lmao
why?Battle Mage wrote:lolHaylen wrote:Pfft, I'm here to lynch scum, not lynch for fun. It would be quite...arousing...to lynch BM though.BM wrote: Bet Haylen will kick herself for missing the chance to lynch me in the first 10 pages. Lmao
you're giving me townvibes, and that unnerves me.
BM
and your really pissing me offCSL wrote:HAHAHAHA! You crack me up...BM wrote:I was mucking around before, but im deadly serious atm. Maemuki is very scummy, and needs to be run up.
wow, first thing I like that you have said, BM is really annoying me and his constant hindering of this game is really anti-town.CSL wrote:hito, we may be hasty because of Battle Mage, and I'm still getting a scumvibe from him, but yeah, let's not rush things.
WTF??? really?Haylen wrote:I DIPPED MY ELBOW IN CUSTARD!!!
Thought I would announce that.
Daykill: BM
and you sir, are retardedCSL wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLHaylen wrote:I DIPPED MY ELBOW IN CUSTARD!!!
That's funny...
ok fair enough... I thought others where posting the vote count, my mistake...Zachrulez wrote:hitogoroshi wrote:
Mod, can we get avote count? People are flinging their votes around left and right.Yeah I know, I'm trying to catch up on that now. Look at the top of each page, I am putting one at the top of all of the pages.
I like your vote where it is, but thank youNetopalis wrote:Happy birthday, Jason! If it were a few days ago, I'd give you a birthday vote...
I have never played with him, is he always playing like this?KittyMo wrote:
CSL: CSL is being stupid, as usual. However, my meta on him is giving me more of a CSL-stupid-town than CSL-stupid-scum. *cannot go into meta*
Do an ISO on yourself, you will see stupid is actually a compliment to your play style so far...CSL wrote:hh, excuse me, just how am I stupid?
Why is this still being talked about?? Proxy votes? Im lostBattle Mage wrote:
Not unnerved. I just didnt understand whether he meant proxies werent allowed, or there was a specific way they had to be made.
BM
not really a great reason, I see it more as wanting to lurk so as you say nothing more stupid as you are leading the vote count. but ok... I hope your friend is okCSL wrote:I'm going toV/LAfrom every game for a few days. A close friend of mine hurt her ankle really bad, and I'm unable to concentrate on anything because of it.
BM, can you please give your reasons for voting Mae, I really do not see any case against her.... just you saying lynch herBattle Mage wrote:CSL was being dumb, and nobody else was biting. As far as you need to be concerned, i'm still voting Maemuki.Sotty7 wrote: BM isn't voting her any more. I would like him to explain why.
I'm happy with my vote on CSL at this point
I think CSL-scum is a pipe-dream, nothing more.
BM
To be honest, I summed this up in my last post... however CSL has yet to provide ANYTHING... I think BM started all this crap with his self vote but has at least tried to make some posts recently that are helpful, or at least not stupid. CSL is just.... well I don't want to say lol. He has added NOTHING to the game.Nikanor wrote:Out of those two actions, which do you think is scummier? Starting the rambling nonsense, or joining in on the rambling nonsense?jason wrote:right now I see BM as someone who is not wanting to play properly and is just a clueless idiot intent on rambling and CSL is someone who just wants to join in and not add anything to the game himself.
Firstly, my name is Jason not Justin...Battle Mage wrote:Ftr, i'm not responding to Justin's post. If you wanna post something when you're SOBER, i'll give you a fair shout.
Conversely, if your next post is as offensive, i'll take my qualm to Zach.
BM
why? it is a very good question, why would you not want it answered?Battle Mage wrote:lol, Nikanor, dont even bother.Nikanor wrote:Out of those two actions, which do you think is scummier? Starting the rambling nonsense, or joining in on the rambling nonsense?jason wrote:right now I see BM as someone who is not wanting to play properly and is just a clueless idiot intent on rambling and CSL is someone who just wants to join in and not add anything to the game himself.
Also, apparently i meant "Jason" and not "Justin" in my last post. *facepalm*
BM
exactly, I dont think he has either... not only has he voted you without reason but he has called for your lynch as scum tomorrow if he is lynched today... again with no reason.Maemuki wrote:Are you sure that you're not the drunk one BM?
Anyways. Why are you voting me again? I don't think you ever explained it.
by the time I had gotten to any actual discussion I was frustrated beyond belief by the game and just posted what I had. reads, well from what I can gather so far, these are the people I have been able to pick up on.Nikanor wrote:Unvote. Vote: Jason.
Your 264 was totally useless in itself. You realise that you just spent what is probably two pages of text bitching about what you thought was useless, right? Do you have any actual reads on anyone? Have you just skipped any post that looks like actual conversation?
Nikanor wrote:Some of BM's posts that you called 'useless' were actually pretty transparent in their intent, if you ask me. You're overgeneralising and tunnelling, Jason.
Well, if you or BM would like to point out what I and others are missing I would be more than willing to listen and consider.Nikanor wrote:I thought it was quite obvious, really. Am I seriously the only one who is seeing what BM is seeing?Jason wrote:Right now I want to concentrate on finding out why BM is so hell for leather on getting Mae lynched
Yes, that is true... I was actually unaware the game had begun for up to a day after until Zach made mention of it to me telling me it had started, It was then my birthday weekend and I was out celebrating in styleBattle Mage wrote:Erm, the game has only just begun, and i havent seen much of a contribution from you beforehand. You have made absolutely no investment in the game up till now, and you had no obligation to make a personal rant at anyone who you took a dislike to. If anyone has put a dampener on the game, it is you, because now we're worried that by trying to talk to you, we'll end up getting modkilled. So, thanks for that.
I respectfully disagree, I have said I feel you are scum. I felt alot of your posts where attempts to hinder the town and stop scum hunting and actual discussion beginning.Battle Mage wrote:You should also be aware of how this affects you- you havent really made any discernible assertions towards my affiliation, but you have insulted me, and i'm the kind of guy that gets put on the bounce pretty easily.
Now, if i'm town, it's very hard for me not to want you dead. And if you're town, that's bad for both of us.
I am sorry, but please show me where I have threatened the mod... I felt your early behaviour was also not conductive for a fun game. As i said I feel there was alot of useless rambling from you and CSLBattle Mage wrote:As far as replacing out goes, if your recent posts are anything to go by, that's probably for the best. Your attitude is not conducive to a fun game, and threatening the Mod is incredibly poor form
Well, you see now this is where we are going to have a problem.. if you are not going to read anything I say then I will have to accuse you of selective reading. And please, this is now the second time you have made reference to me being drunk when posting I would actually like to know how you came to this conclusion? I really ask for an answer on this please.Battle Mage wrote:IF you do decide to stick around, i'd like you to post some coherent comments on me. Because i'm not going to read any of your previous posts, as they will only make me angry, and that doesn't benefit anyone. And nobody is likely to get a good grasp on your alignment, if you are intoxicated when you post.
WIFOM can be very dangerous at times but I agree it is not something that should be disregarded.. I actually don't buy into your Meta or whatever as a player can change play styles and say oh look this is my town meta I cant be scum..ala you saying as town you are louder and as scum you are quieter? Meta can be something that scum can use to make themselves look more town if they adjust their style to their town styled play. I have been caught on many times on the old this is my town meta arguement.Battle Mage wrote:Lol, WIFOM isnt something that should be disregarded off-hand. Of course, you cant trust me, or my meta completely on this, but you CAN play the odds. Odds are, if my meta is how i say it is, for the past 115 games on MS, it's very likely that i wont have changed it completely for this game. I'm a fairly readable player. As town, i tend to be louder and bolder. As scum, i'm usually quieter, and sometimes lurk. These aren't ALWAYS the case, but generally that gives you a good indication of my alignment. Meta me.DTMaster wrote:BM 248: I hadn't thought of that. Multipressing and scumhunting from that angle of the RVS is very effective and would make scum frustrated. "takes notes"
Your question is very WIFOMic in nature and I dislike it. There is nothing to suggest that scum-BM would have controversial play or conventional play. As far as I know you could do both in both town-play as well. Suggesting that we consider if you would play this way as scum is a circular trap that gets us nowhere.
BM
I don't agree with this as something for his case against her at all, it is a pointless questioning bickering about a proxy vote that is not even allowed.Battle Mage wrote:
Why did you proxy your vote for 48 hours, when i asked you to proxy it for 49 hours or more?
This is an interesting point towards the reaction of Mae but in regards to his vote on her, it seems based on the point she didn't proxyBattle Mage wrote:Plus, you were keen to jump on the proxy bandwagon, until you realised i wasnt going to uphold my end of the bargain, at which point you bailed angrilly.
Battle Mage wrote:Maemuki wrote:Yup. It was for dramatic effect.Battle Mage wrote: Lol, you realise it was never proxied, right? haha
BM
And answer the question please, kthx.Unvote, Vote: Maemuki
I'm content.
Battle Mage wrote:There's no point looking at the proxy stuff until we've dealt with Maemuki-scum anyway.
BM
I fail to see any reasons here for his case against Mae...Battle Mage wrote:What's your favourite type of cheese?Maemuki wrote:Getting to know the answer to the question?Battle Mage wrote:How would it be helpful?Maemuki wrote:Nope. I forgot about that. And answer the question while you're at it, it would be very helpful.Battle Mage wrote:did you do that when i self-voted?Maemuki wrote:....Okay what the hell? Why vote for yourself?
BM
BM
Much as id love to know the answer to the question, i dont think knowing that answer would be helpful.
Try again, and also respond to everything on the previous page.
BM
Maemuki wrote:
And we better not get lurkers here. Or I'll be sad.
seems quite weird to say about lurkers make her sadi then lurking is her trademark... maybe I am missing something here..Maemuki wrote:But but I like to lurk! It's my trademark!
And since when we are Evil Twins?
Maemuki Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:00 pm wrote:.
Proxy vote to Haylen for 48 hours, because I'm feeling generous.
if so it is a redicilious case.....Maemuki Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:58 am wrote: And let me unproxy my vote.
Unproxy vote
Screw secret societies.
this is what lead to the vote right?? this coment here?Maemuki wrote:Yup. It was for dramatic effect.Battle Mage wrote: Lol, you realise it was never proxied, right? haha
BM
And answer the question please, kthx.
Yea, im confused as hell by this... I don't see any reasoning for the voteBattle Mage wrote:Maemuki wrote:Yup. It was for dramatic effect.Battle Mage wrote: Lol, you realise it was never proxied, right? haha
BM
And answer the question please, kthx.Unvote, Vote: Maemuki
I'm content.
I don't like the call by BM, but I do not like the answer either.....Maemuki wrote:The problem here being: I'm not scum. :3Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Maemuki
There's no point looking at the proxy stuff until we've dealt with Maemuki-scum anyway.
BM
Reasons, please?
And stop chainsaw defending me CSL, I can take care of myself.
BM is this the post you are refering to me being drunk? If so i think you fail to get my meaningjasonT1981 wrote:Jesus christ........getting drunk here on the WIFOM
Thats the part that I get BM, that's the part that confuses me and makes me see the case a bit clearerBattle Mage wrote:
You cant deny it's a BIT wierd that she did something she felt was a bad idea, but in such a manner, as that she didnt expressly do as i asked...
Wierd, and more anti-town than pro-town imo.
BM
That would have been BM, only thing I brought to the table on her was the I hate Lurkers/I lurk posting from Mae...Nikanor wrote:I believe BM or Jason has outlined the points against you pretty clearly in one of their recent posts. You can address them point-by-point, if you like. I think that would be the most efficient way to handle them.Maemuki wrote:And now that I have time, I'm not sure on how I'll make that same defense.
Are you talking about Yellow Bunny here or CSL? I presume CSL as YB has not posted yet.. I understand your vote if it was on CSL for his actions, but I would like to hear from YellowBunny first before I make any decisions on YB, I do think though Bunny has ALOT to dig himself out off, but lets give him a chance to do so/Battle Mage wrote:read the 3 games as town he has in his wiki. In all 3 he is very nervy and unsure with his vote, and tries to actively scumhunt with PBPA's and stuff. Very unlike his approach here.
Unvote, Vote: Yellowbunny
BM
Question was answered in post 268DTMaster wrote:
Jason 280:
Unless I skimmed past it on your wall of hatred you failed to answer Nik's question:
jasonT1981 post 268 wrote:To be honest, I summed this up in my last post... however CSL has yet to provide ANYTHING... I think BM started all this crap with his self vote but has at least tried to make some posts recently that are helpful, or at least not stupid. CSL is just.... well I don't want to say lol. He has added NOTHING to the game.Nikanor wrote:
Out of those two actions, which do you think is scummier? Starting the rambling nonsense, or joining in on the rambling nonsense?
I don't understand...Battle Mage wrote:hello snidey.jasonT1981 wrote:My posting is gonna be sporadic this weekend, I along with my entire family is dosed with the flu and I am planning on spending as little time at the computer as possible. However I will say Sotty makes a very good point against BM
BM
hmmm, not sure I like this.. I made the point of selective reading earlier when you said you skimmed my post and would not read the rest, now you are doing the same to YB post?Battle Mage wrote:skimmed the Yellowbunny post. Big surprise.
Not a terrible play given his position, but obvscum nonetheless.
BM
I think CSL was scummier, hence my vote. I have a scum read from another game as do many others in this game and it matched identical to how he played as scum in that game also.DTMaster wrote:
Jason 375: You didn't take a stance on which is scummier though. That was the question. You just said CSL was less productive as BM, therefore voted for him. Which action is scummier Jason?
See, the thing is that CSL while on V/LA was still able to come back and repeatedly post once game ended a few days later, and I mean post alot. He even went as far as bashing his replacement. So while he was actively posting in end game there quite a bit, he was requesting replacement here after doing exactly the same thing in Sotty's gameyellowbunny wrote:
Secondly, I wonder if you even checked to see what the other thing CSL posted right after going V/LA? If you did, then you would have seen that the only things he posted in the other games was THE EXACT SAME V/LA MESSAGE he posted in this game...and then ceased to post in all games for 48 hours. If you didn't check, then I want to know why did you not check this out since you consider this a part of the case against CSL?
I don't think defeatist is the right word here. Scummy might be the optimum wordMaemuki wrote:Fixed. Stupid right arm and it's tendency to break.Nikanor wrote:Where's Maemuki? She needs to quit lurking and provide some thoughts on the game.
Anyways.
Regarding CSL's play, he's very defeatist. I mean - just look at his meta.
So why don't you? quit stalling please.Netopalis wrote:Sure, I can answer any of the questions...Honestly, the whole point of the questions was to get people talking in a productive manner, although I didn't get a whole lot of new information from it.
Ah this explains it... but this is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.Netopalis wrote:Sorry, I can't - I'm already straddling the line on discussing games in progress.
No, just no.. how can you defend CSL play yet say you would still be ok with a lynch of CSL/YB... as good as anyone else? your reluctant to go on CSL's actions but are willing to lynch CSL replacement?Netopalis wrote:Fine, fine, I'd be OK with a YB lynch, I guess...She's about as good as anybody at this rate. In re: Hito, though, the reason that I was reluctant to attribute CSL's actions to her....
This comment makes me LOL so damn much....Netopalis wrote:
Sotty7 - Early on, we didn't see much content from him, and that does make him somewhat suspicious. He has improved, however.
Ummm, I was the one who said 'sorry to ask' I didn't analyze it.... that was BM. if this whole thing is an attempt to make your attacker (me) look bad, . Your accusations are laughable especially since you are completly wrong and have it the wrong way around. and especially since you say I am doing things I did not.Netopalis wrote:jasonT1981 - I find his rather spurious attacks over the last few days to be suspect. Especially his very, very odd analysis of the whole "sorry to ask" thing. It's a common enough phrase. Do you really need to jump on it like that? It seems as if he's a scum who's trying to lynch just about anybody right now.
Some find her defense scummy while others ask her to explain his actions?Netopalis wrote:
Yellowbunny - Already posted my thoughts. I think that the case against her is largely constructed from whole cloth and a hatred for CSL's style of play. Some find her defense of CSL's play to be scummy, others keep asking her to explain his actions. She's stuck in a catch 22.
I was talking about him replacing out as scum in the last game, and showing how his actions where true to his scum meta and could be used in this game.Nikanor wrote:The italics in particular appear to be a slip implying knowledge of alignment.(Italics mine) Jason wrote:Post nothing but nonsense
refuse to scum hunt
replace out as scum
YB..the similarities here are identical to Sottys game.
no, quite simply saying that it was not a question to him and mearly a statement others can back up.Nikanor wrote:This looks like a really scummy attempt to throw some dirt on YB.In post 455, jasonT1981 wrote:I fail to see how my statement about CSL's actions can be regarded a question as no such question was asked. I was merely making a factual comment based on CSL's scum meta that has been backed up by other players in this game
EXCUSE ME? Bullying? please show me where I am bullying anyone. This is a BS accusation and nothing but a complete appeal to emotion. In fact I don't think I have seen ANY bullying in this game.Netopalis wrote:YB: To answer your question,I capitulated because I'm honestly tired of being bullied by BM, Jason and Nikanor.
Its very interesting, but all the asking people to claim not doc on top of Nets claim could be a trap to lure out the real doc, scum sacrificing himself to out the doc maybe a fair trade in their eyes. They lose one person but take out a powerful town role.Nikanor wrote:Vote: Maemuki.
Best deadline lynch I can think of.
@Jason: What do you think of Netopalis's doc claim?
DTMaster wrote:@Town
Wait what... are you guys seriously going to vote the town tracker off?FoS on YB for not unvoting post-claim. All PR claims today are best dealt with day 2. Deadline or not, lynching an unCCed investigation role is poor play.
So you FOS someone for not unvoting the countered claim....yet then vote the uncountered claim yourself in the exact same post?DTMaster wrote:Vote: YellowBunny
Sorry Sotty, drugged up on Amatriptyline and Tramadol at this moment. Impares my judgement. I thought it was a lynch.Sotty7 wrote:No, I don't think Yellow is near lynch at this point. I think she has four votes including her own.jasonT1981 Post 599 wrote:bah at Self Hammer
Why aren't you paying attention Jason?
wait, your FOSing me because your to lazy to look up my reasons for voting? sigh, if you are too lazy, here you go.DTMaster wrote:
@Jason
Actually laziness on my part. Why are you still voting for Neto?FoS: Jason
to add to this further, he accuses me of bullying him for this post. Basically trying to make me scummy looking by accusations of bullying.jasonT1981 wrote:So why don't you? quit stalling please.Netopalis wrote:Sure, I can answer any of the questions...Honestly, the whole point of the questions was to get people talking in a productive manner, although I didn't get a whole lot of new information from it.
Ah this explains it... but this is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.Netopalis wrote:Sorry, I can't - I'm already straddling the line on discussing games in progress.
No, just no.. how can you defend CSL play yet say you would still be ok with a lynch of CSL/YB... as good as anyone else? your reluctant to go on CSL's actions but are willing to lynch CSL replacement?Netopalis wrote:Fine, fine, I'd be OK with a YB lynch, I guess...She's about as good as anybody at this rate. In re: Hito, though, the reason that I was reluctant to attribute CSL's actions to her....
Not good enough... pandering, stalling and generally being ok with any lynch by the sounds of 'as good as anybody at this rate' of someone you are defending
vote Netopalis
Just saying it was 'worth a punt' So close to the deadline?Battle Mage wrote:that was if Haylen flipped town. So yeh, something along those lines. The complete opposite in fact!Nikanor wrote:I'm willing to lynch Jason.
Also, what happened to treating Mae as confirmed town if Haylen flips scum? I can't remember the exact words, but you did say something along those lines.
Vote: Jason
Worth a punt i guess.
BM
How is this BLATANTLY knowing YB is town?Battle Mage wrote:What is this Jason? You BLATANTLY know YB is town.jasonT1981 wrote:bah at Self Hammer
BM