![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Far too late for me to get a post out tonight but I'll catch up tomorrow.
^ I get the feeling Kitten doesn't believe in her attack.Ythill wrote:Then he gets in the squabble with kitten, which, like I said, seems very disingenuous to me, like two buddies having at it.
is very good posting. Rereading leak (especially in ISO) , I see him comment on things a lot but rarely give anything beyond a weak stance. He does ask a lot of questions but I can't see them leading anywhere.Kitty wrote: Basically, I'm voting for you for two reasons. The first is that you didn't take a stance on anyone until I called you out on it. I think scum is more likely to do this because they want to avoid connecting themselves to anyone; when someone flips town they don't want to have to take responsibility for being on the wagon (because it makes them look bad) and they don't want to connect themselves to their buddies for obvious reasons. Basically, I believe that not having a stance is a large part of what staying under the radar entails.
However, if scum just did that they would get caught pretty quickly. A nice, easy way to look productive without actually saying anything is to ask a bunch of questions without really doing anything with them. These questions may or may not be relevant, but most of the time they are pretty reactionary. That is the vibe I get from your questions.
tl;dr case: Staying under the radar and active lurking.
Budja wrote:Skimmed.
..and your quote-reply walls tend to be skimmed the most.Budja wrote:Note to self: read thread properly.
^Yep.Ythill wrote:Wick needs to take a seat in the hotseat if Elli flips scum. Otherwise, I'm open to look into pman more closely tomorrow.
Moriarty wrote:Impatient hammer-happy idiot Townie