Sidekick wrote:I come away from it seeing Ophanium as the scummier of the two. SC called him out on committing to a policy lynch with his 1st post of the game, Oph backtracked to saying that he'd vote dram until a better option arose and Oph generally overreacted to a simple, straightforward question. An overreaction like that so early in the game seems scummy to me. Not sure what to make of his disappearance though.
Agreed.
MacavityLock wrote:Hmm, another case of not paying close attention to the thread, this time, re: vote count and someone actually at L-1. I think I dislike this more than xvart's flub.
Well, in a serious context, at least this shows I'm consistently half reading the thread.
Netopalis wrote:Sidekick - Attacks DC for the supposed rolefishing only after others have voted him for it, despite making a post after it in which he doesn't even mention it. This shows that he is largely just interested in being on whatever line of suspicion is gaining the most support, which is a scummy motivation.
I may not getting this in the correct context, but I'd believe it much more if there were more instances if he did it. It's entirely possible that he just was "late to the party," to use a term.
Netopalis wrote:I believe the Miller claim. We should treat Dramonic as a normal, unconfirmed townsperson until his play shows us otherwise.
This is somewhat strange. You ask us to treat dramonic as a normal player...except many players have mentioned that his claim means his demise before the end of the game. Therefore, we would not be treating him as just another player, but instead, a player who we must lynch before the end of the game.
Also, Netopalis, aside from game stuff, when you make larger posts you use solid lines to break up points in your posts, and sometimes I confuse it for your signature. Just a thing to note.
I agree, (1) is a very useful question. I read it a general playstyle, while SC obviously didn't. Oph, why did you ask (2) without letting Neto respond to (1) first? If Neto was asking specifically about scum-style, I agree that it's kind of a ridiculous question, potentially one that distracts from main discussion. By pointing that out, haven't you let him off the hook?
I may be a little late to respond, but I don't read it as general playstyle. We're obviously playing "Mafia" here, and we all know what a "playstyle" is. Netopalis's wording sounds as though he were specifically asking for the playstyle in a Mafia role, which, as Ophanim said, doesn't make any sense.
MacavityLock wrote:Sorry, busy weekend, so I've got a bit to catch up on. I took a look at the claim etc, and I have no major issues with anyone hammering DC. The saying "doc" instead of "cop" issue is much bigger for me than the "I claim..." issue, but yeah, not really believable.
Slightly confused here. You said you were rushed, but yet you looked at the claim and were OK with a DC lynch. So why didn't you lynch him yourself?
StrangerCoug wrote:Now that we have a DiamondCrash flip, Cyberbob is very suspicious for his interactions with him. I'd like to hear his thoughts.
Agreed.
MacavityLock: can you explain "!=" ? I've seen so many people use it and I don't know what it means.
---
MacavityLock and Cyberbob are my two biggest suspects at this point, although neither is near scummy enough to put a vote on.