Yes, I was on for two seconds this morning on my way to a meeting. And for future reference, I am just about always offline from Friday afternoon until Tuesday morning, so this is likely going to happen again. And keep in mind that the game started only yesterday, so please give some people a break. If someone hasn't shown up after three or four days, then you have my support on going after people who aren't posting.Jaguar in V/LA on Friday, Feb 3, 2006 wrote:Limited to no access until Tuesday... Have a good weekend everyone
On another note, I am a her (points at little female sign in profile) and it's been a while since I've played regularly. I don't know a lot of you, including playing styles, but Fiasco is certainly raising the hair on the back of my neck.
Fiasco wrote:You have a point, but do take into account that based on numbers, the scum are already pretty close to winning, so they can afford to take fairly big risks. I'm going to unvote, vote draygn_mage, because he's the only one so far caught in a knowable falsehood (of sorts).
But a scum win is never guaranteed. I think you are being very defensive and it would be very unwise for scum to all be on the same wagon. Out of 40 posts in the thread, you have 12. You are dominating the thread with some unnecessary posts (A couple of one-liners) and double posts. If this is your normal playing style, it is certainly not helping you any.
For now no vote, as the one person I would be voting for is already at three votes at the moment.
I like LML's last observation about lurkers. Perhaps I'm a bit prejudiced, but at this time I can't call it lurking. After all, the game only started yesterday, so Kingpin's vote is even more suspicious.