Phoebus wrote:Vote: Panacea
I like your style.
Panacea wrote:Hell, yes! L-2 in less than 20 player-posts. Personal record for me.
Charter, what style exactly could you possibly glean from a non-reason-less (and therefor boring ) Random Vote?
UNVOTE: Hiplop, because I have a feeling I'll want it freed up.
Panacea wrote:Yeah. You're so right. I'm so excited at the prospect of being at L2. This is sad. The main thing I was looking forward to in a mini-normal was the potential for more humor...charter wrote:I don't like how you're posting a ton but saying nothing. I doubly don't like how you're excited that you're at L-2.
hiplop wrote:Nitpicking way too much for page 3. From what i remember; he never played like this, grasping for too many straws, too quickly.
hiplop wrote:The same could be said for a few. But he's going too hard for such a small thing. Its not a big deal, warrants a vote, for me at least.
hiplop wrote:We're still early on. It was more-or-less a RV, but tacked on with something i noticed that could be an early scumtell. No need to get angry, i just don't want to bring soeone to L-1/ go on a wagon i don't think is needed (phoebus)
I do agree that shes active-lurking too hard, but it gained steam really fast. You're going just a little too tough.
This is merely a compromise.
hiplop wrote:charter wrote:
Anyway,unvote, vote Hiplop
He tried to give some serious reasons to a self admitted RVS vote, and when called on them, backtracked and changed them.
It twas as serious as RV's come. At this point, you're my only scum-read. Not liking the OMGUS either.
Juls wrote:Beck, are you scum?
Budja wrote:vote: Juls
My gut is quite close to Charter's.
Namely, bad uncorrected vote, odd questioning of Beck + the switch after pressure.
Balter wrote:I'm not sure how I feel about the Juls-charter situation. On the one hand, Juls does seem like she doesn't really have her footing yet. On the other hand, I haven't cared for Beck's contributions to this game much other than one point he made about hiplop awhile back.
VP Baltar wrote:If I was picking between you and hiplop, hiplop is the obv scum. He's probably my second suspect behind pappums. I don't see how I baited him into responding the way he did though actually. He made an initial comment about how much he was pushing the Panacea wagon in Post 71. This tripped my trigger and I asked him to expound on it with an open ended question:
pappums rat wrote:VP wrote:
Pappus Rat - how much of the panacea wagon do you think is your doing? What exactly are the suspicions you see about me regarding her?
I think Phoebus and I have about equal responsibility for the Panacea wagon.
I'm not sure how that's baiting. It wasn't a leading question in any way whatsoever.
juls wrote:I think I want a Panacea lynch more due to her lack of scumhunting and the information we glean from it.
panacea wrote:I see what looks like scumhunting. How genuine does it feel to you? I can say that yes, I've posted way less, but at least they've for the most part counted. Beck had 56 at the time I iso'ed him, and a chunk of them were filler. Is that better? And I'll give you that. I know I haven't contributed much. I really am sorry for that, and I'm trying to turn it around.
VP Baltar wrote:2) I actually like Panacea's play after she gets her head on straight. Charter's vote on her is bullshit and sets off huge alarm bells for me. I haven't liked your play for much of this game charter because your de facto argument is 'people not contributin,' which is a very easy thing for a veteran of MS to attack noobs for and still look legit. Yeah, she flips her read on Beck after her giant PBPA. I hated that PBPA post as much as anyone. However, her follow up posts are pretty decent scumhunting and it is obvious she is really trying at that point. I think it's pretty illogical for you first to attack her for not scumhunting and then to follow that up by attacking the scumhunting she does do when starts putting more effort in. It's damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Budja wrote:I don't see that I'm been too horribly inconsistant.
The only thing Beck has got there is that he didn't hammer me.
I was amused by Psyche's view of me. A compliment, really!?
Still Psyche looks like he is reading as he posts which explains a lot of the oddness.
Still Town.
VP Baltar wrote:Why stick with Budja in this case? Honestly, I'm torn on Budja and your pappums case seems pretty decent. You feel Budja's laziness outweighs the pappums case you made?
@pappums - ok, I get the misunderstanding now...but why switch from Budja? You're pretty convinced they are both scum at this point?
VP Baltar wrote:charter, out of you and me, who do you think is going to die tonight? Also, people should realize it's almost deadline and do things (like voting hiplop).