I seem to miss out on all the insight jokes though
![Sad :-(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
I agree with you, that's why I find it strange that you vote without giving any reason.ibaesha wrote: PBug, you're looking kinda scummy with the whole Vote 1 person and FOS two others over a bandwagon. We need a bandwagon and a bandwagon with a reason is better than a bandwagon without one.
I'm not sure what you mean with this, can you explain??Fritzler wrote: what would you rather have hapen if there was no bandwagon?
a day kill?
Nope, didn't miss it, that's the reason I'm not voting for you.ibaesha wrote: However, I did give a reason later. Did you miss that?
Why are you confused? My vote was random and it still is. I don't mind a bit of discussion, and I don't people starting it. What I do mind is blind bandwagonning and votes without reason or giving any form of explanation.Lostprophet wrote: I'm confused by your actions, Corsato. You seem to be questioning the wagon/Day 1 tactics, yet you neglected to remove your random vote, keeping me comfortably in the yellow. Oversight? Devil's advocacy?
At the moment, I do not prefer anyone. But that will change.ibaesha wrote: Why don't you want him lynched? Who do you want to lynch?
I do not want to specifically not lynch Lostprophet. Just as much as I do not want to specifically lynch PBug, or Pooky. At the moment I do not have a "favourite" candidate for lynching. It's just too early to tell, and I do not want to lynch someone "because it's day 1 and we have to do something". If we don't learn something from today we'll face the same problems tomorrow.ibaesha wrote: Why specifically would he not want to lynch LostProphet? He didn't say he wasn't ready for a lynch yet. He said he didn't want to lynch LP. Why?
I wish I had a perfectly good explanation, but I haven't . There's nothing in my role description that's even hinting towards a result like that. I wish I could be more helpfull inPooky wrote: *taps his foot as he waits for CorsatoSK to show up and explain*
Agreed. If we don't lynch scum today, and the scum and SK (I'm sure everyone agrees that we have a SK and not 2 maffia families) do not kill eachothr tonight, we will have lost tomorrow. Then it's either scum or SK that wins.Lostprophet wrote:That's a lie. In lynch or lose (I'm pretty sure), we just need to out with it and go from there.
You shouldn't count me and my counterpart (if he exists) as 2 cops. We are not even worth one cop, seeing how we need eachothers results to actually pinpoint some scum. We both should investigate the same players, chances on that are small I think (and now I hope there isn't a mathfreak here who can actually proove that the chance to that is bigger then 50%Adele wrote: Corsato's counterpart, who would make his role useful - the supposed rolename cop.
I'm really beginning to get suspicious of audacesiuvat, who manages to post without actually saying something. He's doing it this entire game, and it's typical behaviour for scum trying to avoid attention.audacesiuvat wrote:Unless someone can come forward with a list of names to validate your claim, it's lynching time.
Why would a Serial Killer be there? Why would he be on a private party? Why is the boss killed? Because of the people gettign fired? If so, how did the scumbags find that out? You should not look into these things so much, as it is usually just some 'flavour', a background setting of the game instead of actual information.Pooky wrote: Frankly it doesn't make any sense for his role to exist in the game, why would a PI be at a party for office employees before any murder had taken place?
I am hired by the boss, thus one of his employees. It would be logical for him to have some sort of record of me.Adele wrote: lol; looking back, he said that he didn't know how lostprophet could have got this result at the same time as claiming a role that would inevitably give that result. How disingenuous.
Thank you.Pooky wrote: Corsato, me and you both know that you're a fairly intelligent man.
Because I was trying to keep a low profile. I'd hate being killed n2 or something like that. I figured that my role could become more important in the endgame then in the beginning.Pooky wrote: With a role like that and the fact that the moderator had already told us that nameclaiming would be absolutely useless in the games rules, why did you not even hint or say a word about a mass-nameclaim?
The fact that you would've played it differently doesn't make me evil. That's not an arguement you should use.Pooky wrote: Then you'd have a real powerhouse of a role later. Instead you've chosen to play it passively so that you get absolutely little use at all. I can't see you doing so as a protown player and being truthful.
No idea, wasn't specified. I was just hired.Pooky wrote: What murder did the boss hire you to investigate?
What he means with that is the fact that names by itself don't mean anything. E.g. someone named 'Al' isn't evil because there once existed a man named Al Capone. He didn't say that the names are just flavour, he DID say that our role description might contain some hidden information.Pooky wrote: And lastly I would consider it incredible bastard-modding if the Mod did tell the players that names don't matter and name-claiming won't do anything in the first post when clearly it has very much to do with the game if your role exists as you claim it does.
Chances of me getting the info I want are slim. It did cross my mind to come out on day 1, but I decided it was better not to do so. Error in judgement? Could be, but that's really easy to say that now.Pooky wrote: Why would you care about getting NKed if to not get this info would make your role useless?
Maybe that's because you haven't said anything usefull in this entire time.audacesiuvat wrote: We seem to be following a trend here:
1. LP finds bad guy.
2. Scum makes last ditch effort to throw suspicion onto me.