![Mad :mad:](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
Anyway, Delta, tell me why you voted enomis at first.
In post 109, DeltaWave wrote:In post 108, kondi2424 wrote:Well, I gave a reason. If you would give me a specific reason for suspecting me, maybe I wouldn't be calling it OMGUS. You also didn't respond to anything I called you out on, so I'll assume I'm right.
You voted for me because you thought that my vote on enomis was "OMGUS"; even though his reason for voting was weak.
I said I suspect you because your reasons for voting me are weak; your argument was that this was "OMGUS."
Is OMGUS your catchphrase or something? Are you capable of formulating an argument without using it?
In post 112, DeltaWave wrote:In post 111, kondi2424 wrote:In post 109, DeltaWave wrote:In post 108, kondi2424 wrote:Well, I gave a reason. If you would give me a specific reason for suspecting me, maybe I wouldn't be calling it OMGUS. You also didn't respond to anything I called you out on, so I'll assume I'm right.
You voted for me because you thought that my vote on enomis was "OMGUS"; even though his reason for voting was weak.
I said I suspect you because your reasons for voting me are weak; your argument was that this was "OMGUS."
Is OMGUS your catchphrase or something? Are you capable of formulating an argument without using it?
Wrong. Se post #100 for a summary of the reasons I voted for you, and then come back. Your reason was weak; he seemed eager to jump on your wagon, but he had as good reasoning to vote you as you did to vote him back. You then threw my whole argument to the side by accusing me of throwing OMGUS around.
Your argument is weak on its own. Your reliance on OMGUS is just the cherry on top.
In post 162, DeltaWave wrote:In post 161, Demyx wrote:In post 159, DeltaWave wrote: If that were the case, it would make sense that he would be perfectly trapped by my strategy. Everything fits.
A stopped clock is right twice a day.
In other words, your strategy, which boils down to acting scummy to collect votes, could've really "trapped" anyone, town or scum.
You make it sound like there's a fool-proof, always-right strategy for scumhunting.
In post 190, Bub Bidderskins wrote:kondi's voting for basically OMGUS reasons
DeltaWave wrote:Was I not clear enough? It's a very long shot, but possible.
In post 250, Demyx wrote:I do agree that Delta's posting has been unhelpful and arrogant, absolutely. But is he scum? I find it hard to believe a scum would be so, well, ridiculous. In particular, I feel that scum tend to be more cautious about pushing on one person than Delta has been.
In post 307, enomis wrote:May i remind you all that the deadline is nearing and our best shot would be delta. I dont really have anything to add.
Demyx wrote:several of the votes were crap (Empking and Kondi)
In post 383, enomis wrote:In post 382, kondi2424 wrote:Empking, link me to a game where you found scum with that scumtell.
No kondi, answer demyx and my questions first.
In post 367, enomis wrote:In post 365, kondi2424 wrote:@enomis: Citizen was likely killed because she was obvious town and was a logical poster.
Demyx wrote:several of the votes were crap (Empking and Kondi)
My vote was crap? Explain.
Kondi, how is citizen obvious town? I agree that she was a logical poster and a good one at that. But couldnt that be a pro scum posting? Where did you get that obvious town thing from? (although i have a townread on CK too but mine is not for the logical posting thing). Explain your townread. Is it just because of the logical posting or is it because you are scum so you see her as obvious town.![]()