'cause I like the name. it has to do smthn with knives, right??
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
So basically everyone that have mad at least a tiny bit of an impression is under attack?Maverick wrote: Right now I'd have to say Serinah, Rosso, and Delibird are the only three I have any reason to think twice about, but for now my vote stays where it is.
ChannelDelibird got my meaning. I forgot that you use the word "impress" with a positive meaning only in English. My apologies.I think you're confusing the word 'impression' with 'argument' here. But anyway, I see the point you're trying to make about the random votes, serinah, but really after you've done one it's a bit pointless and needlessly confusing to do a second. I would normally interpret it as a way to mask not wanting to lynch the person you originally random voted for.
- Maverick.Alright, Unvote: Serinah80, Vote:ChannelDelibird
You keep coming in and agreeing with what everyone else is saying, you don't add anything to discussions that is your own opinion to help us get more information. All you have done is make votes for no reason, and then agree with what other people are saying when you unvote. To me it seems like a desperate attemp to get the finger off of yourself.
that's why I wrote "like". I saw the join date. The reason I see you as one is probably that I'm just as much n00b as you are.Erotomachia wrote:My, my, quite a surprise. I'm flattered that you would view me as an experienced player, because I am in fact a huge newbie!serinah80 wrote:Varian, TB, Erotomachia - They act like experienced players .(This is only my 3rd game, and the 2nd one's still in progress.)
no need to get to get agressive again. I'm not even voting. just giving MHO.ChannelDelibird wrote:
You think I'm scum because I play differently to you? WTF?FoS: serinahIt is not in your best interests to just get rid of everything you 'don't understand'.
Well not exactly. I felt he was suspicios but I thought that it might be because I don't quite understand everithing.yellowbounder wrote:
serinah80 = The self claimed "teenage girl" that is suspitious of ChannelDelibird meerly because of his logical and Sherlock Holmes demeanor.
B Rob wrote: What??? Where the hell are you getting that from??? I was the 5th vote on him, and I didn't even consider lynching him until this wagon started developing!FOS Maverick
1 - Now I think I have discovered, what I might have in mind writing that CDB might be scum because he's too logical. Reading some of his responces I have a feeling that every time he contributes he is saying something to accuse someone. Sometimes he does it directly sometimes covertly. I didn't skim everything through to check but that's my opinion of the moment.Twito wrote:
My gut still puts CD on a bit scummy side but that's not very clear and noticeable. /.../
I feel like he is acting like scum and if that is coz he is a jerk(his own words not mine) then I'm very sorry but you shouldn't act like scummy jerk and get away with it on a mafia game. /.../
3. I support roleclaims. /... / You can also see a lot from the way those who are forced to claim attempt to defend themselves. My gut is pretty good with this kinda stuff and since roleclaims help me get a read on ppl I obviously support them.
My actions might have seen like jumping but I have only voted you twice or if I'm mistaking 3 times. First vote was random, I think I motivated it by you being rude.Rosso Carne wrote:In review:
What bothers me the most are serinah's on again, of again relationship with me. It seems like every other post she changes her view of whether it's ethical to lynch someone for being a jerk, based on if the votes are falling my way. She jumps on every wagon started and pulls off whenever anyone else does, each time saying either "we cant lynch Rosso for being rude" or "let's lynch Rosso, no jerks in this town!" That just strikes me {as is I'd hope be obvious} of scummish behavior. YOU serinah, want someone lynched, and the votes have hit me the most, but once they fall away, youre gone too. EVERY TIME like clockwork.
yeah, I'm with you on that. There's no other wayTwito wrote:Uuh busted. Yeah I'm Finnobviously
What is "Juhannus"(=Midsummer day) without campfire, sauna and beer..? Is there some other way to celebrate it?
it was all sarcasm which doesn't mean shit right now. WE ARE NOT KILLING ROSSO AS QUICKLY AS TWITO!warpdragon wrote:So you want us to lose our cop too?serinah80 wrote:will you just be as quick next time? I hope when it happens, it will be our cop. would serve you right.I'm going to assume that was sarcasm, otherwise, major FOS Serinah.want to lynch me next maybe? sure, why not. scummy vibes, right?
If that is directed at all of the players remaining, does the ending "that would serve you right" mean that would serve us, the town right.. in other words you arn't part of the town? I couldn't tell if that was a slip or if I didn't understand your meaning.[/quote]Serinah80 wrote:
will you just be as quick next time? I hope when it happens, it will be our cop. would serve you right.
I'm not saying he can't be cop. I'm saying he couldn't be around Rosso last night. But then again why claim being investigator? Couldn't he make smth else up?ChannelDelibird wrote:unvote: Rosso Carne
Not sure who to believe at the moment. I'm fairly confident there would be some sort of investigative role in the game, and PBuG would have known the chance was high - if he was scum surely he would have expected a counterclaim? Obviously, therehasbeen a counterclaim butFoS: PBuG <-/-> FoS: Serinah80 & Rosso Carne.
I'm sorry, what is the question? I told twice about who I checked the N0.Smashy wrote:I meant that your role was out in the open if you are telling the truth (and if you're full of it then we know you're scum). You still didn't answer my question.serinah80 wrote:ok, I didn't understand all of it. language problems here, sry.Smashy wrote:serinah, if you've outed yourself too, then did you search N0, and who did you search?
how have I outvoted myself?
Ookey...Maverick wrote:Alright, so I've missed a lot but I've read everything and have an idea of the truth.
I think that PBug telling the truth, obviously due to my vote on Rosso and that Serinah is telling the truth as well. We have PBug the cop, and Serinah the roleblocker. In most games where there is a rolerblocker and multiple mafia, the mod makes the mafia group choose one of the members to make the kill, that way the roleblocker can't just choose one of the mafia and block a kill.. It makes it to where they have to choose the exact mafia member who is actually making a kill. I think that Rosso is scum, due to PBug's investigation and Serinah saw Rosso there still because he didn't actually make the kill. And as far as you not seeing each other in the cabin, that seems irrelevant. I'm pretty sure that has nothing to do with roles.
My vote stands, I'm pretty sure that Rosso is scum.. and If I'm wrong we have a sure scum tomorrow. But claiming cop Day 2 as scum would be a very stupid move especially when you don't have any suspicions on you and you have no reason to be targetted for a bandwagon.
I agree, I feel that Rosso must be scum.Maverick wrote:Hmm, well the first thing you said is a good point. Forgot about that bit. But the second thing is because a roleblocker would be too leet if they only had to block one member of the mafia to stop a kill, because they could then just block the same person each night and town would automatically win. So if Rosso were mafia but not the selected one then u could still target him but nothing would result from it.
But my point is demolished, because I wasn't thinking and PBug did find him out of the cabin.
I say we lynch Rosso today though, because I'm pretty sure about him being scum, and if he's not then Serinah for sure is so either way we have one.
none taken. but inconsistensy with what? I only cliamed one role and am sticking to it.PBuG wrote:I'm going to investigate serinah next, so if I live through the night, we'll know about her. No offense, serinah, but the whole thing with the inconsistency of our roles in confusing me, and I want to sort it out.
You are the Head Counselor. You can't believe that your camp has come under attack. Just try not to think about the pending lawuits. You've instituted a curfew, and must make sure it is upheld.
- Each night, you may patrol the cabin of one camper. If you find him breaking curfew, you will march him right back to his bunk, therefore preventing him from doing whatever it is that he was going to do.
- You win when only good campers remain.