Mini Normal 1357: Game over.

Robbnva · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 17, 2012 5:11 am

Damn you, I wanted to be first.

vote: Konowa

Robbnva · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:00 am

lol yeah I came back just to torment you....

Seriously, have we played together before?

Robbnva · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:13 am

In post 9, Robbnva wrote:lol yeah I came back just to torment you....

Seriously, have we played together before?

ha, I just checked and we did. that game was an epic fail for me cause it was my first game on site and the mod had a glaring error in my role pm (had my name as John O'Connor instead of John Connor from terminator) , this error was getting me lynched so I thought i would be cool and copy/paste my entire role PM.

needless to say that did not end well

Robbnva · Post Post #13 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:34 am

In post 12, Konowa wrote:
unvote;
Vote: Robbnva

If you liked that story so much, I have a better one...

Robbnva · Post Post #27 (isolation #4) » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:53 am

In post 26, Konowa wrote:I’m more inclined to think KageLord and rblinker are scum, especially after 23.

unvote;
Vote: KageLord

FYI - KL is at L-1

maybe explain what you saw in that post you linked that makes you think they are connected?

Robbnva · Post Post #29 (isolation #5) » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:22 am

That's a good post actually

Robbnva · Post Post #38 (isolation #6) » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:34 am

I still think Konowa's post was good so I am not completely sold that KL isn't scum.

KL is still null for me, rblinker is leaning scummy but looking at the KL wagon the person who had the weakest reason and who encouraged a KL lynch is umoms

he has basically provided no content, voted for a p.weak reason, and than said he endorsed a KL lynch.

Vote: umoms

Robbnva · Post Post #48 (isolation #7) » Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:25 am

the sad thing is I actually contemplated hammering him just for the lulz but decided it's best if I didn't, especially since I wasn't convinced 100% he was scum.

Robbnva · Post Post #59 (isolation #8) » Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:46 am

Weird umom posts and ignores that 2 people voted him...

Anyway, I'm going to re-read the whole kl/rampage/blinker stuff when I get to a pc.

Robbnva · Post Post #60 (isolation #9) » Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:28 am

In post 23, rblinker123 wrote:Xvart, Im not sure whether your being serious or still just rvs’ing but if you are;

xvart wrote:I was going to vote Albert on principle but I really think that Albert and KageLord are buddies together. Am I the only one seeing this?

What makes you think Ablert and Kagelord are scum buddies. – Apart from him saying Albert was a ‘PR or scum’ I haven’t really seen anything else to hint that he’s scum, It’s a bit early to be gunning for his head.

blinker - why do you automatically assume he is "gunning for his head" and not just pressuring him? it sort of seems like you are paranoid to me

Also you changed your vote to Kagelord as you thought he is most likely scum out of the pair, care to explain why? Also you said ‘Plus he (Albert) already has a vote’, so did Kagelord?

this is a valid question and I like xvart's response

I’d just like to hear why you thought there scum buddies?

does it really matter why he thought they were buddies? What if he wasn't even serious and was reaction testing... yet again it seems like you are paranoid.

Umoms – Could you explain why your down for a Kagelord lynch aswell. You may just be messing around as its still kind of rvs, but if you’s are serious could you explain why you want him lynched?

this is a good question, and yet another reason to leave my vote on umom until at least he answers for himself, but if umom turns out to be town, this makes me think blinker and kage are a team

If you are just messing around this is all irrelevant, but if the two of you are serious could you explain your reasons.

again, this seems like paranoia type question..

am i off base or does someone else see the paranoia?

Robbnva · Post Post #62 (isolation #10) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:36 am

So u just ignore my post directed at you?

Robbnva · Post Post #70 (isolation #11) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:24 am

In post 66, xvart wrote:
In post 59, Robbnva wrote:Weird umom posts and ignores that 2 people voted him...
Do you think it was weird that Albert did the same thing with his second post of the game?

when albert posted, nobody had their vote on him, I don't see how this is similar at all...

Robbnva · Post Post #72 (isolation #12) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:34 pm

In post 69, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Scum on the Rblinker wagon. Just saying.

so you think blinker is town? could you explain why because from my pov I don't see him as obv town so I wonder what am I missing

Robbnva · Post Post #86 (isolation #13) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:41 am

Rampage, why is blinker town?

You never answered that part of my question and that was the part I'm most curious about

Robbnva · Post Post #94 (isolation #14) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:15 pm

In post 71, umoms wrote:I've been extremely wrapped up this weekend. This is simply a post to avoid being replaced. I'll have a real post up in the next 24 hours. Sorry guys.

48 hours later nothing...

Robbnva · Post Post #97 (isolation #15) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:55 pm

well there are 2 people stalling the game, both are scummy and they both promised content. The difference is one has been online and posting and the other hasn't.
so let's see what happens when he is at L-1

Vote:blinker

Robbnva · Post Post #99 (isolation #16) » Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:10 am

In post 98, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I sense opportunistic scum on both these wagons.

Blinker may well be scum being bussed, but I think it's more likely to narrow down on the players on those wagons to determine which one is town looking for more information and which is sabotaging scum.

why do you continue to avoid answering questions? I have asked you at least twice to explain your town read on blinker but now you say it's possible he is scum?

Robbnva · Post Post #104 (isolation #17) » Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:33 am

In post 72, Robbnva wrote:
In post 69, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Scum on the Rblinker wagon. Just saying.

so you think blinker is town? could you explain why because from my pov I don't see him as obv town so I wonder what am I missing

I asked you this question

Your next post is where you say you answered my question (which you never did)

Had you actually answered my question to begin with I would not have to try and read your mind.

Usually when someone says " there is scum on that wagon" it's usually because the person getting voted is a town read.

It's day 1 and this setup probably only has 2 scum. If scum want to bus their partner day 1, I have no objections with that. Even if we have 3 scum, I'm still ok with scum bussing as long as we lynch scum.

Robbnva · Post Post #106 (isolation #18) » Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:44 am

In post 98, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I sense opportunistic scum on both these wagons.

Blinker may well be scum being bussed, but I think it's more likely to narrow down on the players on those wagons to determine which one is town looking for more information and which is sabotaging scum.

You realize blinker's vote on umoms was very opportunistic right?

I'm leery of Viscera also just cause his vote came so quickly after mine and he hasn't done anything since. Umom, blinker, KL, and viscera are all guilty of lurking or flaking.
IMO a blinker/kl scum team makes sense.

Robbnva · Post Post #111 (isolation #19) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 1:14 am

In post 109, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 106, Robbnva wrote:
In post 98, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I sense opportunistic scum on both these wagons.

Blinker may well be scum being bussed, but I think it's more likely to narrow down on the players on those wagons to determine which one is town looking for more information and which is sabotaging scum.

You realize blinker's vote on umoms was very opportunistic right?

Acute difference between L-2 and L-1. There's no comparison.

so you think konowa's reasoning for his vote on KL was bad?

actually there is a huge difference, usually scum want to blend in and if they are voting someone they know is town, they want to be in a less obvious spot. in a game where it takes 5 to lynch putting someone at L-2 is far less threatening than putting someone at L-1.

plus if you look at his reason, he essentially gives a long winded re-hash of my own reason for voting umoms

my reason

In post 38, Robbnva wrote:still think Konowa's post was good so I am not completely sold that KL isn't scum.

KL is still null for me, rblinker is leaning scummy but looking at the KL wagon the person who had the weakest reason and who encouraged a KL lynch is umoms

he has basically provided no content, voted for a p.weak reason, and than said he endorsed a KL lynch.

Vote: umoms

blinker's reason

In post 61, rblinker123 wrote:
The bandwagon on him early in the game, is where i get suspicions of scum, even though konowa and xvart have said that it was just putting out early pressure, I think a least one person on the KL wagon was scum. I feel even if it's just town putting out pressure, you would still give a decent reason for it, and it did come off as you two were actually up for his lynch with little reason which is against the town mindset, KL went L-1 with little reason, i don't think scum would have hammered him with theo last vote as it would look far to suspicious on them the next day so I think at least one scum was already on the bandwagon and so I find konowa and xvart somewhat suspicious.

However, I do feel that Umoms comes off looking the scummest, I found konowa and xvart little reason suspicious and Umoms gave no reason at all and was up for the lynch. I think Umoms looks most likely scum on the bandwagon. So

Vote: Umoms

see, it's essentially the same reason.

Robbnva · Post Post #124 (isolation #20) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:09 am

hmm, that is an interesting observation actually...

time to - reread

unvote

Robbnva · Post Post #131 (isolation #21) » Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:10 pm

In post 128, KageLord wrote:
In post 124, Robbnva wrote:hmm, that is an interesting observation actually...

time to - reread

unvote

lol that observation was made twice already at least...

It wasn't laid out like that, And I dont recall someone saying all 3 people were on both wagons.

I've sort of been tunneled and want to re-read to see what if anything I missed.

Robbnva · Post Post #140 (isolation #22) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:11 am

yeah reading back, all of the votes by the three that rampage pointed out look fairly legit and you can't really do a pre-flip VCA so just cause they were on both people could be telling or it could not, without a flip though it's nothing but speculation, not to mention it is actually possible to catch scum in 2 pages, though it is rare I don't think this is the case here. I personally don't see KL being scum but blinker probably is.

I don't see anything convincing to lynch konowa. Rampage is doing it cause he didn't announce L-1 and pacman is doing it based on what looks like meta. (not to mention pacman seemed immediately biased towards konowa the moment he replaced in, it didn't seem like he had finished his re-read yet was convinced konowa was scum. I have only ever seen this come from scum)

when konowa put KL at L-1 I was suspicious but when i asked why he immediately was able to put his thoughts down and they made sense to me.

Vote: rblinker

back to L-1 for him, this konowa wagon attempt feels like a counter wagon

Robbnva · Post Post #149 (isolation #23) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:21 am

request deadline extension

Robbnva · Post Post #150 (isolation #24) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:03 am

In post 142, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think that somebody's been trying to rush the first lynch which I perceive as fairly scummy. It's not just a few things but several that add up to a certain profile of bloodthirsty killer.

Is there any evidence that supports speed lynches are bad?

I mean sure they aren't common but I would think a speed lynch would be easier to decipher as people have less time to think and reactions are more genuine.

Robbnva · Post Post #152 (isolation #25) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:24 am

lol, I have no idea what an IC is let alone do I have one

Robbnva · Post Post #155 (isolation #26) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:57 am

In post 133, rblinker123 wrote:Responding to prod. Sorry for my lack of contribution, its been poor. Will add more today.

Blinker posted Saturday.

Robbnva · Post Post #182 (isolation #27) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:29 pm

In post 165, Konowa wrote:So, Natalie replaces in calls two people scummy, FOS' a third, and votes a fourth.
Whaaaaaat?

In post 167, Konowa wrote:My point is that you have called over -half- of the game scummy.
We are in a nine player game.
You are throwing accusations everywhere to see what sticks.

these posts bug me, but mainly because that is how I used to play too, I would suspect lots of people and got criticized for it. often times it was scum trying to paint me in a bad light.

most current example was this game - http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21920

zoraster post - http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4080261

he was scum, I was town

ugh, now I have to re-read again.

Robbnva · Post Post #184 (isolation #28) » Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:53 am

the below quotes are taken from post 164, I broke them up so I can respond to them.

In post 164, Natalie wrote:These are general thoughts as I read:
- Post 17 by KageLord is scummy. He never wants to be on a wagon?

it has been argued by KL that this was a joke, so do you believe him or no?

- Post 37 by Konowa seems scummy. He's making bad excuses for himself.

so given the fact that what he said was actually true (his vote did come in the very next post after the VC) how convinced are you that he is lying?

- Albert isn't answering questions.

as much as I wish it was, this isn't a scumtell, so why mention it?

- Post 127 by VisceraEyes. Great promised content.

Meh most of the action was focused on my replacement, who is a huge facepalm. There's not much to go on, but I don't want lurker VE to slip by.

FoS:

VisceraEyes

I will actually +1 the FOS, only because lurkers are the worst thing to happen to mafia and there is no town motivation for doing it.

I have a slight scumread on Albert for being so against my wagon and voting Konowa for bad reasons. I think he is scum trying to get towncred by being against my wagon, and then use that as evidence tomorrow to lynch Konowa.

VOTE: Albert

but earlier you said this

- Post 37 by Konowa seems scummy. He's making bad excuses for himself.

and that is essentially is the case that rampage started his case with, if you think it is scummy what konowa did, than how can rampage's reason be bad? i'd love you to explain this in more detail please.

my issue is my gut still thinks this slot is scum, the vote on rampage confuses quite a bit...

Robbnva · Post Post #196 (isolation #29) » Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:16 am

Why would you hammer when I just asked Natalie questions?

Why are you in such a rush pacman?

Mental note: if Natalie flips town, lynch pacman.

Robbnva · Post Post #198 (isolation #30) » Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:38 am

Probably not but doesn't mean I didn't want a response.

At this point why hinder discussion?

That 12 hours could have been spent trying to convince people to vote Konowa with you. Obviously you don't want him lynched that bad since your case was essentially phoned in. You provided nothing convincing enough to support your scum read IMO. Neither did rampage

Robbnva · Post Post #205 (isolation #31) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:56 am

I may have to drop my obvtown read on Robbnva. He's still playing town but his reads are so off it seems like intentional misleading to me

FUCK YOU

Natalie is at L-1. I'm gonna hammer right now. I'm pretty sure she's gonna flip town

why hammer if you think she is going to flip town? oh yeah you be bussing.

Natalie's obviously a counterwagon for Konowa which probably means that both scum are probably on Natalie.

vote: Natalie
I know there's no claim but I'll be surprised with anything but a VT flip, since town is likely on the weaker side to balance 7:2 a bit better.

nice try but this is obviously you trying to get town cred.

well that's a stupid kill considering I was just about to lynch the fuck out of him

you were pushing the same lynch wagon as he was...

Kagelord, Konowa, Robbnva,
myself
, and xvart are all confirmed town. So it's either this or VE.

ROFL you were pushing the counter wagon and when you couldn't convince anyone you hammered your partner.

vote: evilpacman

you don't get to criticize the people on natalie's wagon and than act like you are obv town with us when she flips scum. nice try but I am not changing my vote.

bottomline, your reasons for voting konowa were shit and it was an obvious attempt at a counter. OUt of the 2 of you Rampage was the more townie of the two.

Robbnva · Post Post #206 (isolation #32) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:00 am

In post 203, evilpacman18 wrote:well that's a stupid kill considering I was just about to lynch the fuck out of him

vote: drchrist

Kagelord, Konowa, Robbnva, myself, and xvart are all confirmed town. So it's either this or VE.

this is so fucking stupid anyway.

why is kagelord on the list and not drchrist? drchrist was on the scumlynch and KL wasn't.

Natalie - Konowa, Xvart, Drchrist, Robbnva ( these people are obv town)

Pacman, Viscera, and KageLord are the people who are NOT obv town.

Robbnva · Post Post #210 (isolation #33) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:22 am

Pacman is scum so yeah my vote is good for a town agenda.

The whole "I was going to lynch you rampage" is so fucking phony. And declaring himself obvTown is seriously the most ludacris thing I've ever heard.

Pacman isn't a VI and those comments would only come from scum or a VI

Robbnva · Post Post #212 (isolation #34) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:51 am

No I'm voting you cause you bussed your buddy. I even said so when I voted you.

Nothing, and I mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about your play has been pro-town.

You couldn't even fabricate evidence on Konowa properly. Your vote/push on him day 1 was an obvious counter attempt.

Robbnva · Post Post #215 (isolation #35) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:17 pm

Point is that good town wouldn't take that risk for no reason. Assuming good play, more likely explanation would be a scum bus since you knew she wouldn't flip town PR, which would cause us to become more suspicious of you

This 100%

Town would not hammer like that

Robbnva · Post Post #218 (isolation #36) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:38 pm

Well if you are town, I am extremely disappointed in you. I'd expect this play from someone like dk, drmy, or some other known Vi

I'm literally shaking my head right now

unvote

Does anyone on MS take this game serious? I mean if I wanted to play epic mafia style, I'd literally go play epic mafia.

Robbnva · Post Post #222 (isolation #37) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:09 pm

You have never seen scum hammer their buddy before?

Robbnva · Post Post #225 (isolation #38) » Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:23 pm

I'll bite

vote: kage

Robbnva · Post Post #231 (isolation #39) » Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:41 am

I'm on my phone now but I just wanted to respond to this

Third, for the record, do the people voting me think that Natalie intended to bus me?

How did she bus you when she voted rampage?

All she did was say you were one of her scum reads. That's not bussing

Robbnva · Post Post #234 (isolation #40) » Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:14 am

I know. My question is more about whether you think she would have moved on to me

So you asked if we thought she was bussing you off something she didn't even do yet? lol

If she was smart she would have moved onto Konowa as he was the counter wagon. Obviously she wasn't smart.

Robbnva · Post Post #238 (isolation #41) » Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:32 pm

so you ask if she would bus you when she didn't and than argue that she could have?

smh

bottom line is it isn't uncommon to list one of your scum buddies as a scum read. I am not going to assume one way or the other.

someone once said the best way to catch scum is to put them into an uncomfortable situation and see how they react. That is how we basically caught blinker, his reaction to your wagon getting run up to L-1 on page 2. To me it looks like he was freaking out trying to protect you.

plus I don't really seeing you make any arguments that are logically sound, it looks like you are reaching because you know your days are numbered

BUT - if you are town, there is good news.

Lynching scum day 1 we earned a free lynch, so if you actually are town, your lynch will definitely add clarity and should help narrow down who scum is. we really don't have any other option today imo

Robbnva · Post Post #241 (isolation #42) » Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:08 pm

who is viscera eyes?

:checks playerlist:

:checks iso:

oh yeah F' that dude. replace him.

Robbnva · Post Post #250 (isolation #43) » Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:22 am

pacman, do you always suck up to people?

I actually 2nd KL's request that nobody should hammer until konowa posts

Robbnva · Post Post #263 (isolation #44) » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:16 am

@ pacman - why is hoopla a longshot to be lynched? Last i checked she wasn't obv-town and neither was her predecessor.

Robbnva · Post Post #270 (isolation #45) » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:32 am

@ hoopla

Looking at Robbnva, his early focus on umoms could easily be construed as avoiding having to make an early stance on blinker when he's under pressure - scum typically try avoid committing too heavily either way on their buddy in such situations.

rblinker wasn't under any pressure at all when I voted umoms. He had 1 vote on him. last I checked 1 vote =/= pressure

A strong scum or strong town read is very polarizing and unintuitive because it looks obvious, so responses like focusing on another player instead, casual jabs at someone else like in post 59 to create alternatives for the town, and mild suspicious/interrogation on the buddy like post 60 are all viable responses as scum to the situation.

how was post 59 a casual jab and who was I jabbing? I was clearly commenting on the fact that umoms posts and ignores direct questions, I do that to blinker also during this game.

regarding my post 60 - it can only be mild interrogation of a buddy if I were scum, which I am not. I noticed very distinct paranoia in his posts and in my mind, a townie should never have to be paranoid.

Meanwhile, also on page 3 around the same time as Robbnva's posts, Drchrist beats Robbnva to a blinker vote, right when the umoms/blinker metric is in the balance. I think this is a protown play, as it makes the wagons equal at 3-3, as opposed to skipping umoms ahead 4-2. If it's a bus, it's an aggressive one, as that vote has a lot of influence in swinging the direction the town takes.

how does Dr "beat" me to a blinker vote? I'm confused here.

Robbnva takes the wagon to L-1 a little while later, so if there is bussing involved, I'm inclined to believe it's this vote, particularly when he found a way to get off the wagon again at some point.

I put him at L-1 because an entire week went by and we only went less than 2 full pages. blinker was posting on site and umoms had legitimately flaked (hence the replacement) I had detected paranoia in his post and combined with the fact that now it seemed he was avoiding our game, I made the switch.

when a game is stalling - lynch all lurkers.

Robbnva · Post Post #272 (isolation #46) » Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:26 pm

Quite a few were laying low or were inactive. When you move 2 pages in a week, that's a slow game.

Robbnva · Post Post #283 (isolation #47) » Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:19 pm

what did you tell us?

I have no issues with a massclaim

Robbnva · Post Post #287 (isolation #48) » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:26 am

Well majority rules, doubt that xvart would object. So pacman goes first.

Robbnva · Post Post #292 (isolation #49) » Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:32 am

I am batman...

Wait, wrong movie.

I'm a VT also.

Xvart for formalities. U claim now.

Robbnva · Post Post #294 (isolation #50) » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 am

Nah, masons is pretty powerful, especially if they make it far. The fact mafia didn't kill you last night is dumb, I knew right away you and xvart were masons OR you were an innocent child (saying you could confirm your role)

Assuming no trickery, we have 1 scum left because 3 scum w/ only masons is too scum heavy.

This game was a nicely balanced game.

I'm cool with a Dr vote, Konowa was a town read for me.

Robbnva · Post Post #296 (isolation #51) » Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:39 am

I'm here, not really much to add

Robbnva · Post Post #298 (isolation #52) » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:22 am

I was giving xvart the time to make his post, once he does I will toss a vote down

Robbnva · Post Post #300 (isolation #53) » Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:41 am

I came to that conclusion after pacman hard "soft claimed". Basically the way you defended him and his willingness to not suspect you made me think mason. The fact that he said he could confirm himself made me think possibly innocent child but I immediately assumed mason. Especially since people on MS love using masons.

I'm really suprised you and he arent on the same page with regards to Dr, figured you guys would have ironed out those details during night phase.

With regards to DR, You actually make a good point about DR voting rblinker, he votes him 3rd. But his reason wasn't that great IMO and the votes were sort of spread all over the place. Could be that he wasnt thinking blinker would get lynched.

Robbnva · Post Post #306 (isolation #54) » Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:00 pm

Work was busy today, and I'm disappointed nothing new has been posted.

Dr is holding up progress.

Robbnva · Post Post #309 (isolation #55) » Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:18 pm

In post 307, Drchrist wrote:I'm going to VOTE: Robbnva simply because looking back at the situation pre rblinker lynch Konowa being at the head of the wagon and pushing it the way he did makes him less suspicious. In addition, Robbnva's reaction to pacman's hammer makes it seem like he may have wanted to buy time to keep nat/rblink alive, and got screwed over by pacman's sudden hammer.

Well that post was underwhelming.

So when I was voting umoms, I decided to leave that wagon and bus my scum buddy? Riiiiiiiight.

I was the one who pointed out that blinker was posting on site and ignoring the game. Meanwhile your request for an extension "looked" like your partner was getting lynched and you were hoping to buy him time.

If you look at the 3 of us, Konowa and myself push hard for a blinker lynch, while you don't really. You add nothing to of value. Either you are scum or one of Konowa/myself bussed like a mother fucker. I'm not scum and I dont think Konowa bussed.

I don't really see any other option for me. Konowa if you bussed, nice job

I'll wait til xvart posts again before I vote

Robbnva · Post Post #310 (isolation #56) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:42 am

Thinking about it, nothing xvart could say or do that would make me change my mind. I honestly dont think Konowa is scum.

vote: DrChrist

He is at L-1

Robbnva · Post Post #314 (isolation #57) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:45 am

Now dat be a hammer. Hopefully this is game over cause I hate lylo.

Robbnva · Post Post #315 (isolation #58) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:50 am

I'm bored. Sup dead people

Robbnva · Post Post #319 (isolation #59) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:38 am

Yay!!

It's good to win. That's why I like quick wagons, scum have to fake react town and usually over does it.

QTs please?

Those mafia NKs were horrible btw.

Robbnva · Post Post #320 (isolation #60) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:41 am

Duh, missed where you said you will post them soon. Never mind.

~ It's ok, you are excited. : D It's warranted.

Robbnva · Post Post #322 (isolation #61) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:58 am

Robb is 95% scum,

From the dead QT. rofl dude

Konowa and I were more obv town than the masons. That blinker lynch basically confirmed us as town.

Robbnva · Post Post #325 (isolation #62) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:17 am

I think you did a good job mod. Your 12:00 am deadlines were odd but that's just me

Robbnva · Post Post #327 (isolation #63) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:19 am

I assume the NKs were made to set people up. After the blinker lynch killing someone off the wagon just helped town out. Not killing the hard claimed PR was just dumb

P.edit - most do 72 hours from when the lynch was announced.

Robbnva · Post Post #331 (isolation #64) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:08 pm

In post 329, evilpacman18 wrote:why am I the only one who thought drchrist was pretty clearly scum?

It makes sense that I almost got lynched. I played the game with a bigger ego than normal cuz I knew I could confirm myself town so I was just like a total dick and not really trying to give off town vibes like I normally do as town. I guess I shouldn't let being a PR get to me. That was well played. I think just the way everyone interacted with blinker sealed the game, once his slot flipped scum, there was way too many confirmed towns for drchrist to stand a chance.

Would have helped if you actually explained your reads. You came out of left field, even xvart had trouble seeing it.