In post 558, killerjester wrote:Innocent, what have you read so far?
Not much. I tend not to read the thread when I am a night replacement until I ensure I survive the night. I'll read up over the next few days.
In post 558, killerjester wrote:Innocent, what have you read so far?
In post 570, Cheery Dog wrote:
I don't feel anything exciting enough has happened that I currently need to reveal this.
In post 561, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
And I'll go for a bit of a reread and review - especially of Paschendale - and see if that gets me anywhere.
In post 568, Melmond wrote:I'll be rereading some of the game and look at some of the players on the NS wagon. I also think it's possible NS might also be scum, but I'm not sure.
In post 591, Idiotking wrote:
Scum should let the town kill PRs, just because that lets them focus on others and let them maybe get another PR at night. So smart scum should still have let Paschendale get lynched. I'm still going with inactive/absent scum.
In post 620, pieceofpecanpie wrote:In post 619, I Am Innocent wrote:This I am okay with jester's decision excluding myself of course is scummy and I want you to do more than just blindly following town on likely town mislynches.
Uhhh, what exactly are you referencing here?
In post 583, pieceofpecanpie wrote:In light of what's been going on I'm inclined to agree on jester's scum pool. (Besides myself of course)
In post 620, pieceofpecanpie wrote:What made you decide I'm okay with everything jester decides?
In post 644, Nobody Special wrote:IK is spending a littletoomuch effort in defending himself. Defending yourselfto a pointis fine, just don't over-do it.
In post 617, pieceofpecanpie wrote:What an odd post to make, Cheery. Who did you expect to be killed?
In post 600, I Am Innocent wrote:
In post 583, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Un momento por favor.
Almost two days ago, what do you got? Whose scum? Top 2 or 3 list of suspects and why please?
Well I've had quite a busy time lately, but I've got some thoughts spinning round.
In post 667, killerjester wrote:My gut doesn't agree because he's honestly said nothing about Melmond all game until this point. Not willing to string up a claimed doc just yet though.
In post 679, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Nobody Special - Twice a counter wagon to Lupo, early Day 1 and Day 2, and they're buddies? That's rare
In post 679, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Señor Ockham is on your side.
So the following people are excused...
- Melmond
killerjester
Cheery Dog
Idiotking
These members of class may have some poor grades, but aren't the trouble makers...
- Nobody Special - Twice a counter wagon to Lupo, early Day 1 and Day 2, and they're buddies? That's rare
basketballstar24 - This guy just doesn't smell right for scum, VI more likely
The following should report to the principals office immediately...
- I Am Innocent
Triangle123
Kublai Khan
If class is in favour of an I Am Innocent wagon, please raise their hands and vote.
In post 692, Nobody Special wrote:Well, since my IK wagon has totally stalled,
unvote
Vote: I am Innocent
(which he likely isn't, IMO.)
In post 700, pieceofpecanpie wrote:And although I'm mildly annoyed at you Idiotking, I want to *****slap NS right now.
In post 713, Cheery Dog wrote:None of us had claimed before pecan's vote, seeing as Idiot got to L-1 before claiming, what makes that vote that bad?
In post 713, Cheery Dog wrote:also I'll now be going where I said early from jester's lynchpool that I was willing to lynch, and your claim of that being bad because you know you're town doesn't actually mean anything, lies may exist.
In post 716, Idiotking wrote:
At this point I'm willing to lynch killerjester or NS. I need to look through IAI and Kublai Khan more before I make up my mind on them.
In post 359, pappums rat wrote:First off, I would just like to apologize for my actions late yesterday, playing like I did was ******* HORRIBLE PLAY and it shouldnt have happened.
My reads at this point:
Town:
triangle123
Probably/Maybe Town:
Cheery Dog - claim
Killer Jester - overall townie-mindset play (strongest townread based on play in this category)
Kublai Khan - overall townie-mindset play
Melmond - I dont see scum motivation in his posts
Other:
pecanpie - miller claim
Nobody Special - hasnt said enough to come to a conclusion either way
I could see as Scum:
Paschendale - late on the HH wagon and gut
Idiotking - hammered CDB w/o letting him claim or catch up. I know I said it didnt matter to me if he was lynched w/o these things, but I didnt feel Idiotking had enough suspicion of him to hammer in that fashion.
Best chance at Scum:
basketballstar24 - very WTF scummy posting late yesterday
Lupo - scummy counterwagon to HH
Lupo and Hellhound were counterwagons to each other, so for the moment at least I am going to:
Vote: Lupo
In post 94, Lupo wrote:In post 93, Hellhound1 wrote:Anyone else not happy at the lack of content from NobodySpecial? Maybe its just me, but he's clearly not posted anything of value to the game yet.
@CD I'd have to agree with pecanpie here, you've posted a load of filler. Will you elaborate more on your reads then?
I feel that way on both Nobody Special and Kublai. With what I've heard about each one I would think that they would be more active. Yeah, Kublai has posted some content but not what I would expect.
In post 498, Nobody Special wrote:You people. You should listen to reason, you know.
unvote
Vote: Lupo
That's L-1. Any scum on my wagon, feel free to jump over here and hammer.