And I knew you were trouble when you walked in
so shame on me now.
In post 55, FourTrouble wrote:In post 50, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I looked at the post activity and I saw 1 post players, I forgot there could be 0 post players as well, my bad.
I know that scum like to lurk to avoid attention/taking stances etc. I see post activity as a general towntell.
I also think FourTrouble could be trying to defend some of his scumbuddies that are 1 or 0 post players.
Dude, lurking is scummy LATER in the game.
Seriously, what you're doing is totally avoiding the responsibility of taking any position regarding Mozamis... which just happened to be the main wagon we had going.
Oh, and your weak OMGUS didn't even come with a vote? Yea Monkey is scum.
In post 58, FourTrouble wrote:In post 57, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You don't think you can attack someone without voting them? It wasn't an OMGUS, it was refuting your misguided/scummy position.
Where did you address my point that it is too soon in the game to start calling anyone a lurker? What about the point that you completely ignored Mozamis? Oh right, you didn't refute anything.
All you did was imply I'm scum... which is called OMGUS, cause you're "refuting" my position by calling me scum.
In post 60, unseencamo wrote:OMGUS is voting for somebody in response to the vote they put on you. Pretty basic, no theory. FourTrouble is tripping. That being said, I really am distrustful of MonkeyMan's less than superb logic and accusatory nature. To me it seemed like he was trying to shift to the "lurkers" and get a wagon started or something. I don't know, there hasn't been enough material for me. I will leave my vote on MM for the time being.
In post 69, Elleran wrote:the director wrote:In post 50, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I looked at the post activity and I saw 1 post players, I forgot there could be 0 post players as well, my bad.
I'm all for intimidating lurkers early. You will get no complaints from me on that one.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: thenewearth
That was a terrible sequence from you.
I don't like this. Trying to steer town toward an obviously newer player isn't really a townie move.
Rob13 wrote:Unvote
Vote thenewearth
SO MUCH NOPE.
Newbies voting no lynch before realizing it's anti-town is nothing new and isn't alignment indicative. Newbies voting no lynch but switching to a vote when someone questions them on it is scummy though. It shows that they're trying to take the path of least resistance rather than do what they think is best for town.
New players are VERY likely to avoid getting involved and follow the path of least resistance. Why? Because they haven't become familiar with online mafia or the meta around here. It makes sense to me that TNE is switching votes rather than hitting on anything.
Give TNE a chance before we dogpile on him. He's made two posts and he's obviously new (at least based on his posts and his joined date). Did you guys really expect some intense scumhunting from a new player after three pages of very mild bickering?
In post 184, Hiraki wrote:You're calling him out for acting differently when he's already shown that he's acted this way in a different game.
Not to mention, the original examples you gave were false. Aren't you an agitator of Lynch All Liars?
MonkeyMan576 wrote:Unvote:
Vote: Carey
I'm annoyed with him too. He obviously has no plan to be productive. You can't threaten the town with saying your bad play is town meta and expect to live.
four wrote:In post 221, FourTrouble wrote:In post 211, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Four is starting to lean scum to me. He's attacking perceived poor players and buddying with perceived strong players, rather than attacking based on scumminess. This is classic scum play, trying to get "strong players" on your side to avoid being lynched and trying to get "weak players" lynched.
When Monkey made this post, I had my vote on Elleran and was both attacking him and criticizing his play. Then, we have this:
In post 219, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Four thinks Ellaran is "strong" and I am "weak"(a common misinterpretation).
Lolwut? I don't know where Monkey got the idea that I perceive Elleran as strong (for the record, I think his reads are pretty good but his playstyle sucks), but what is really hilarious is the fact that I was attacking (not "buddying") Elleran.
Can whoever is not voting for Monkey explain why they're not at this point... He's been obvious scum from his first posts in the game.
four wrote:Elleran, your reads are actually pretty good, somewhat similar to what I have been thinking.
In post 400, tigerzone wrote:TNE, qwints claimed. there's really no reason right now to not believe it. you need to vote mozamis because he's scum. and if you're really curious on my case i'm sure mozamis will be delighted to tell you all about it.
In post 406, tigerzone wrote:not being pro-town isn't necessarily scummy.
In post 409, CareyHammer wrote:Hey monkey, who are you talking about?