A bit of gut, a bit of Monty is right and everyone slamming on him for being right should feel bad.
Disingenuity
My, my, my, aren't we a grumpy gus. Care to try again without the blatant logical fallacy?In post 491, petapan wrote:he was joking are you scum or dumb as hell
I explained exactly how I came to that conclusion. Exactly how is noting the use of subterfuge "atrocious?"In post 498, Bomberman wrote:this reasoning is atrocious and i'm not sure how you come to this conclusionIn post 490, Belisarius wrote:VOTE: Demon
A bit of gut, a bit of Monty is right and everyone slamming on him for being right should feel bad.
Disingenuityisa scumtell because scum are always acting. They have to pretend to know less than they actually do. What motivation does town have to pretend to be fighting a language barrier? For scum, it's a way to wave away a failure to notice a clue.
This game has been a lot of words, words, words but light on actual content. I have gut scum reads on Bomberman and banana guy, but can't consciously home in on what's causing that so I'm not going after either.In post 502, Demon wrote:1) No one stated intent to hammer.
2) He's not at L-1 anymore.
Preferred lynches today are Arc and Belisarius (done literally nothing to improve Nunez's previous slot). Do you have any other reads, Beli?
In post 591, rmpeacoc wrote:I am looking at both Belisarius and SafetyDance. You and bomberman are also not giving me a chance to do anything but defend myself right now.
If a lot of votes in a short period of time isn't a flashmob, what is? I certainly haven't seen enough scummy behaviour to justify the speed of that wagon build, and that makes me think it's scum-driven.In post 600, Goodbar wrote:@belisarius - there really wasn't a "flashmob" on her and she hasn't said anything redeemable all game
It's the attacks that lack substance. I don't like mysteries, Dahno, and you shouldn't either.In post 627, Goodbar wrote:Uh are you serious? The people that voted her all gave individual reasons except I can't recall Bomberman's. 4 people in an 11 person game is not a fucking flashmob (and even then the votes were spread out, with Bomberman unvoting eventually). There is no flashmob, just a bunch of people giving extraordinarily shitty defenses of her which have basically no substantiationIn post 609, Belisarius wrote:If a lot of votes in a short period of time isn't a flashmob, what is? I certainly haven't seen enough scummy behaviour to justify the speed of that wagon build, and that makes me think it's scum-driven.In post 600, Goodbar wrote:@belisarius - there really wasn't a "flashmob" on her and she hasn't said anything redeemable all game
Nor do I, really, other than the lack of towntells.In post 634, petapan wrote:okay i read it anyway and i do not understand the case on rmpeacock
Flatter the Idiot.In post 639, rmpeacoc wrote:what is FtI?
Elaborate.In post 665, Demon wrote: @Belisarius - Your analysis on me is fairly lackluster. Your immediate dismissal of NK analysis as WIFOM is antitown
I said his reads were gut; I spoke of the end result, not the process leading up to it.The fact that you stated that Jake did no scum hunting only goes to show me that you did nothing more significant than a skim on the thread.
I did go back and read it. You threatened someone with death for a reason other than being scum--which in itself qualifies as, in your words 'a supplemental contribution rather than the sole reason I want you lynched.' In short, it's a microtell, but an accumulation of microtells paints a damning picture.You try to discredit me by taking my post directly out of context - no, scratch that, you completely strawmanned what I said. You provided the link; you can go back and read it. 356 talks about a supplemental contribution rather than the sole reason I wanted him lynched.
Again, insufficient in isolation, but cumulatively it becomes worth mentioning.You're also attempting to say that my saying 'To be honest...' is scummy?
Putting words in other peoples' mouths is bad.I could take the rest of his arguments on me to town, but it'd really just be a waste of time. A synopsis of what he's calling me scum for there amounts to very trivial bullshit like "speed lynching is bad" and "???fluff posting bad".
Methinks you misunderstood. HowIn post 682, Demon wrote:@Belisarius - Literally everything you just said can be refuted by *reading posts*. Hardly any sort of high level of reading comprehension necessary.
He was. Meta says that's a null tell for Nero.In post 740, rmpeacoc wrote:Wow I really thought he was trolling.
Wherefore?I also expected to die...
no she's townIn post 763, Bomberman wrote:belisarius vote rmp
Elementary; Zero scum-minded content, and I liked his stance on Demon--outcome notwithstandingIn post 798, Goodbar wrote:Can you maybe elaborate on Monty?
Also simple: what you should take out of it is that if you're going to try to lynch Monty today, you're going to do it without my vote.In post 807, Goodbar wrote:I'm not sure what I can take of it personally
As I said, to even the score, endgame being to stop rmp from being lynched by providing a viable alternative.In post 841, Goodbar wrote:Belisarius - ...why?
That, combined with the fact that I didn't really have a popcorn choice, was the joke, yes.In post 875, RachMarie wrote:umm Bel you do realize that is the mod right?
I'mIn post 894, rmpeacoc wrote:My only struggle is my fear that Belisarius is buddying me.
Depends on who lives through the night, assuming we have a night.In post 905, rmpeacoc wrote:So who would you team him with?
Elaborate.In post 932, Klick wrote:My slot is obvious town.
Here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jRhgNp-fNcIn post 985, Klick wrote:Yeah, I wanted to see Beli's reaction. But I didn't really expect you to pick up on it.
Dunno about that, Klick's opening play caught me completely off-guard.In post 999, rmpeacoc wrote:I knew it was going to be extremely difficult.
Yeah, that would have been better.In post 1020, Jake from State Farm wrote:should have been an odd night jk though.