Pretty sure it's not all it's cracked up to be.
But seriously now, since it's out there,
82% of the time when questions are asked as part of the opening posts they are posted by scum.
In post 25, Future wrote:BP's "I don't reply to stupid questions" seems unnecessarily confrontational.
Peregrine, how serious are you about your Slandaar vote?
Wherefrom does your first impressions come from? And what connects them as a team?In post 23, Baezu wrote:First impressions: BP/Grimgroove scum team. Consider yourselves FoS'd. It would be cool if this would actually turn out to be a crumb later on in the game
town-Darthe is lots more active. But, this is also a smaller gamesize than the other I've played with him where he was more town-active. So, I want more from them than they have provided.In post 110, Grimgroove wrote:What do you mean by the "looking for a direction"-read?
Play seems more new than scummy. But, refuse to give a town-pass to new players anymore. That burned me once. So null for now.In post 111, Slandaar wrote:How can Baezu be null PV?
I'm from Missouri.In post 143, Baezu wrote:@Elyse I just feel like scum will want to nk me because I've been causing a lot of ripples in the water and making accusations. Creating controversy is usually something scum wants to quiet. I know it may be early to use caps, but I wanted to emphasize the fact that I am indeed town. I'm not really worried about a lynch but I don't think people have to wait until they're at L-1 to make a case for their alignment. I want it to be clear to everyone that their votes need to be elsewhere. The fact that future's vote is on me is prob indicative that he is indeed scum. I'm not going to apologize for being eager in this game. It's because I know I'm town and I'm doing my best to ensure that votes go where they need to go.
Scum doesn't argue for No lynches, because they want to mislynch instead.
In post 177, Slandaar wrote:Note to self: sort this game out.
Note to Red: No lynch is completely experience related not alignment related on D1.
Perpetrating the stereotype...why?In post 194, Nachomamma8 wrote:Thanks for being useless!'
Perpetrating the stereotype...why?In post 194, Nachomamma8 wrote:Thanks for being useless!'
Maybe it is, but you sound pretty definite. When is it "wise" to hammer?In post 200, BP wrote:Well, I just want to prompt anyone from hammering Future. It's unwise to do so this early.
If you can meta yourself for a minute, how many times have you read a player as "null" and they ended up flipping scum?In post 275, Red Dragon wrote:I'm not saying the he couldn't be scum or that he is town, I just have a null read on him and I don't see much coming off the wagon information wise.
Answered this pre-tiger, but his first real post expresses a concern with the perception he may still be in RVS.In post 320, Ztife wrote:@PeregrineV
How confident is your read on gooner? Any particular highlights why he seems scum to you?
Since I doubt scum will kill or play based on your reads, I'd like to hear your stance on everybody.In post 717, SunnyDays wrote:Actually looking at the player list I feel like everyone is exactly where I thought previously, varying shades of towniness other than my top three of four scumreads, which I'd rather not talk about because then scum will know who I'm reading as town and scum (besides Elyse and Darthe). If anyone NEEDS a specific read let me know.
VOTE: Darthe
Agree with this part.In post 866, Nachopappa wrote:Red Dragon hasn't come back and defended himself the way I'd expect him to as town, especially with the recent pressure. It's such a whole different Red Dragon we are seeing D2. That worries me immensely
I shouldn't be awake, but I'm off today/tomorrow, so will catch up. What's up?In post 914, Slandaar wrote:Come and play with us Peregrine
I shouldn't be awake, but I'm off today/tomorrow, so will catch up. What's up?In post 914, Slandaar wrote:Come and play with us Peregrine
Try PeptoBismal, cause your guts all wrong.In post 888, Baezu wrote:Your case has also shown the ztife has not been involved very much in the voting. Not sure what that means but just pointing it out. I'd be willing to change my vote since PV was originally who I suspected to be scum and hence wanted to investigate him. Also the case that grim made on ztife is very convincing. My top two scum reads right now are PV and ztife.
you know what? RD can wait. We need to lynch scum and lynch scum now! I'm putting my vote with what my gut has been telling me all along. ..
VOTE: PeregrineV
In post 920, Slandaar wrote:Can you link me to this Red Dragon game also please.
This is it.In post 921, Baezu wrote:Slandaar not sure if this is the game PV is referring to but RD was in it...
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=26891
There's not enough information. Trying to do relational tells doesn't make sense without a scum flip. So his "analyis" is currently in the state of limbo, since I think all he did is say "Person X voted Person Y 3 times."In post 922, Nachopappa wrote:Well, Peregrine, now that Slandaar has compiled information, do you mind giving us conclusions that you make of the data? Show us what's missing in Slandaar's conclusions and what you think his evidence points to.In post 918, PeregrineV wrote:Slandaar
I like the appearance of trying. You would think analysis would uncover information, and conclusions would be reached from that information. Instead, it looked like analysis but turns out it was only conclusion support? Why not just say so and give evidence as such instead of crouching it into "I'm going to look at this info and see what conclusions I can draw."?
Miss Stranger
Like the posting style, but wayyyyyyyyyyyy too much theory talk on her part is not going over well with me. And reads are seeming a little too convenient.
Overall, I think your two reads on Slandaar and Miss Stranger are spot-on. Especially Miss Stranger.
The major points against you seem to be you pushed for a lynch of town. That doesn't make you scum, that's how the game is played.In post 923, Red Dragon wrote:It is just hard to defend yourself when the points against you are valid. I know that I'm town, so the only thing I really ask is make sure that you guys have a backup. I really see no world where a good town would not lynch me to be honest.
Right now I still think nacho is scum. Slandaar is impossible to read as always... but that is really all I have.
665- About No lynching, self-lynchingIn post 925, Miss Stranger wrote:@PeregrineV:Excuse me, but the only theory talk on my part was in regards to Elyse's role (someone had to point it out, and I don't see how that is incriminating in any way). In fact, theory talk is only incriminating if it takes priority over scumhunting - clearly not the case with me, and clearly the case with Ztife. Funny thing you don't even mention that. But I already suspect him anyway, so even more the reason to lynch him after you flip scum.
Why are you reading Slandaar's posts backwards? Of course analysis leads to conclusions and supports them. If this was an attempt to make Slandaar look scummy, I'm sorry but it backfired.
VOTE: PeregrineV
It's time to go where scumses belong to.
@Red Dragon:If that's all your reads, you have stopped following the game long ago. I wonder why.
@SunnyDays:What are the reasons, please?
Not a misrep, my opinion/interpretation.In post 945, Miss Stranger wrote:Way to misrep me, PeregrineV:In post 934, PeregrineV wrote: 665- About No lynching, self-lynching
1 sentence taken out of context.
666- About NL, and NK WIFOM
Analysis, not information.
669- Darthe vote when there are 3 3-vote wagons already.
If you actually read my reads, I was not leaning scum on either of those. So why sheep someone I don't find scummy enough instead of someone I had a strong read on? You prefer sheeping, really?
707-Seems more like white knighting Beazu while attacking Darthe using some weird theory
Look closely. I'm not whiteknighting Baezu, the "town tells" in this case are things Darthe himself admitted.
708-No Lynch reminder
Taking things out of context. This post was meant to remind people to vote and not that NL is bad.
739-Elyse accusation is INVALID while Darthe was SCUMSLIP
Honestly can you even read? I'm not accusing Elyse, I'm saying Darthe's accusation is void. The scumslip was the polar switch on Baezu from town to obvious scum based on the void logic and hopping on the wagon when it gained steam.
745- Two scum inNachomamma8, Elyse,Darthe, Nachopappa, Ztife, Lucky2u
At that point most of those looked pretty scummy, Darthe specifically.
821-Town is Grim, Baezu (the claimed cop), Slandaar and SunnyDays, RedDragon, Nachopappa a null
So calling an obvious town "town" is now "too convenient"?
I don't know. I guess you could be town upon closer scrutiny. But sometimes your posts seem to be....wordy without being informative.
Every post of mine is informative.
But, I like your posting style.
What are you complaining about then?PeregrineV (-1)Peregrine (-2)
I stand by my vote. This attack was nitpicking at its finest.
@SunnyDays:I do find him scummy. I just want to know YOUR reasons. Mine are already stated, and I don't think I'm the first one who noticed them.
Guarantee the PereV wagon is bad.In post 952, Lucky2u wrote:Are we set on the current wagons? After spending some time with the thread I have a question about the Baezu claim. Why is noone jumping on her for fumbling it? First making a claim, then conveniently getting role blocked, and then forgetting who she investigated. The mod PMed her to correct her? I don't really believe that a mod would do that, or atleast I wouldn't. Also the way she told the thread that if you call her out on that scummy appearing action it's only because your scum, is suspect as hell. She of course then followed it up by actually doing it on the people who did.
Also the whole thing with the way Miss Stranger has a point system bothers me. It's kind of like "Hey look how town I am! I have charts and a point system, no scum would do this!". It's dangerous because I assume she does it when town and scum and that she must never get called out as scum because of it.
John 11:35In post 953, Grimgroove wrote:VOTE: PeregrineVIn post 951, PeregrineV wrote: In addition to the Darthe scumslip that never was (because he flipped town),
Right, but, Darthe was town. Therefore, he could be scummy, and he could play badly, but he could not scumslip.In post 956, Grimgroove wrote:You do recall being on the Darthe wagon yourself, right?
And even regardless of the hypocrisy, I find almost nothing scummier than blaming the people who tried scumhunting for mistakes they made. Darthe didn't make a scumslip, but his "switch" to Baezu was objectively speaking scummy as hell.
Yes.In post 978, Slandaar wrote:PV YOU MUST CLAIM EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE FULL DOC IS YOUR CLAIM?
Because he would be the obvious protection target, I didn't protect him.
Actually, that's the part of the Elyse claim that bugs me the most, the protect part.In post 987, Lucky2u wrote:Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the JOAT say he protected the cop claim? Clearly PV knew that the JOAT would do exactly that and saw no reason to do it himself. Either that or it was a scum slip. I wonder which is more likely...
Because, in my experience day1 cop claims have pretty much 0 effectiveness. They are blocked or killed or scum. Sometimes scum takes a chance and let's the town cop do their thing, but since that would confirm another town player, it's dumb to let that happen.In post 995, Slandaar wrote:If she lived through the night and a doc didn't protect her then it would be because she was roleblocked if town yes.In post 993, PeregrineV wrote: And I had no clue whether the cop was the cop, but if he lived through the night he would be roleblocked or they would try to kill him later.
But, why would you assume there is a roleblocker and not protect the Claimed Cop?
Why does try to kill later matter?
And while he does that, thread avoidance bad-bad.In post 997, Grimgroove wrote:Ztife, could you give your reads on people?
Vaguely half-formed, but through day1 no thoughts really, leaving at a null.In post 1000, Grimgroove wrote:What are your thoughts on Lucky?
But they don't have to RB you every night, since you claimed odd-night cop, right?In post 1001, Baezu wrote:Why will I have to he lynched if I survive the night? I am effectively a VT now because scum can just RB me every night. Also I'm not necessarily obvtown so instead of wasting a nk on me they would be wiser to take out someone that is not just as likely to get lynched as nk'd, which I believe I am.
Yes.In post 1003, Slandaar wrote:Bolded: Not if you as a doc protect them. Are you a Doc Peregrine?In post 998, PeregrineV wrote: Because, in my experience day1 cop claims have pretty much 0 effectiveness. They are blockedor killedor scum. Sometimes scum takes a chance and let's the town cop do their thing, but since that would confirm another town player, it's dumb to let that happen.
Baezu lowered the chance of n1 kill by claiming odd cop.
So, I figured I'd protect a universal town read that is not up for a lynch later in the game.
And Baezu, if allowed to live at night, will have to be lynched.
Scum can ignore possible results from n2, so can decide to NK her n2 or n3 without fear of a result.In post 1003, Slandaar wrote:How did Baezu lower her chances by claiming ODD cop? she would get a result N1 I agree if she claimed EVEN but not ODD.
Because if she's the odd cop then why would I want to lynch her? See 1004, but day2 is not the day to lynch the cop claim.In post 1003, Slandaar wrote:Why is it you have not been voting Baezu since she has been allowed to live?
How what?In post 1006, Slandaar wrote:How?In post 1005, PeregrineV wrote:Scum can ignore possible results from n2, so can decide to NK her n2 or n3 without fear of a result.In post 1003, Slandaar wrote:How did Baezu lower her chances by claiming ODD cop? she would get a result N1 I agree if she claimed EVEN but not ODD.
The same RBer that blocked Baezu blocks me and kills her.In post 1006, Slandaar wrote:You are a doc right? how does this magical kill happen if you don't allow it?
It depends on the setup, really, doesn't it? Tomorrow will be another flip, another NK or two, and more chance to find scum.In post 1006, Slandaar wrote:Well when is? tomorrow? nothing will have changed at that point, the day after?In post 1005, PeregrineV wrote:Because if she's the odd cop then why would I want to lynch her? See 1004, but day2 is not the day to lynch the cop claim.In post 1003, Slandaar wrote:Why is it you have not been voting Baezu since she has been allowed to live?
In the way of night actions, nothing. In the way of scumhunting & hardcore posting, alot.In post 1006, Slandaar wrote:What are you expecting from a cop claim who says they are roleblocked?
Thanks for running this. I enjoyed my time in it. I will fill out the survey within a few days.In post 1433, ac1983fan wrote:In my humble opinion...Town were basically screwed when MattP replaced in as SunnyDays and all three of its active power roles were outed/lynched by the end of Day 2. So the fact that they brought it down to 3p lylo was pretty impressive, because that's probably the best town could have gotten in this game unless there was a super-sharp megaplayer on the town side.
I have an endgame survey for people to fill out if you could:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19iLjyI ... 0/viewform