Mini 1483: Finagling of Flitter Hills
-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I haven't played with anyone on here before.In post 18, beastcharizard wrote: Have any of you played together before?
How many games have you played on this site?
What is your win ratio?
Why shouldn't I lynch you?
This is my first game on this site.
N/A.
Because I am town.
I was thinking everyone should self-vote today and give me hammer, then I will vote the mafia. This is a win-win opportunity everyone, take advantage!-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I have played a few games on TeamLiquid and of course with groups of friends IRL.In post 22, notreallygood wrote: Have you played in Meat World or other sites then?
Also you guys are doing it wrong, you are supposed to self-vote today and give me hammer.-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
In post 63, Kcdaspot wrote: @paper: the question that beast posed sthar i now pose to you:
Assuming you are actually serious are you going to state why or just sit there looking scummy?
My vote was to mock sthar8 and gauge reactions. When I first voted sthar8 it was more to get him to realize that what he was doing was not very town. You can't just vote people, and refuse to give some sort of reason for it. I don't know, maybe he is just trying to bait reactions as well? I will let my vote sit on sthar8. I am curious to hear about this logic he is keeping from us. Information is key in this game and him keeping anything hidden is suspicious to me.Feel It wrote: Paperscraps- was your vote a retaliation on sthar8 voting KCD or was there different reasoning to it?-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
Well obviously it didn't work or you are acting dumb, both seem plausible at this moment.In post 82, sthar8 wrote:Paperscraps wrote: When I first voted sthar8 it was more to get him to realize that what he was doing was not very town.
How?
Maybe I should have phrased that better. Silent voting is going to be seen as scummy.
Nonsense. Can and did. Unless you're trying to hurt KCDA's feelings by implying that he's not "people."Paperscraps wrote:You can't just vote people, and refuse to give some sort of reason for it.
This really just proves my initial point further.
NoPaperscraps wrote:I am curious to hear about this logic he is keeping from us.
I have already explained this in my previous post.
Why?Paperscraps wrote: him keeping anything hidden is suspicious to me.
sthar8 you obviously like being the center of attention. I have responded to your post in which really didn't need a response. So lets move this discussion along. It being centered around you isn't helping us regardless of your alignment.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
UNVOTE:
Some good stuff has happened since I last posted.
I am really diggingsthar8's recent posts. His reads are pretty solid. All of the forethought and explanations for his actions have been sound. My view has shifted pretty drastically from null leaning scum to. I really appreciate him bringing some life to this day 1.TOWN
Now enough butt kissing. Let's get into the meat of this. I have approached these reads from a new lens with sthar8 as town.
Spoiler:
VOTE: T S O-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I didn't really think about that too much. If there were only 2 scum this be would be heavily town favored. Actually 4 scum wouldn't be too mafia sided, so there definitely could be 4, anymore than that would be too scum sided. I haven't really been in the mindset of there being 4 scum, but I should re-evaluate this.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
@KcdaspotWhy is DJ town? (Besides his obvious moonbeams of course)
I like Elyse's last few posts. She isleaning townfor me now.
@ElyseWhat do you think of Kcdaspot? His posting style is pretty out there to say the least.
LOL. This reminds of some d-bag friend that gets mad at you for calling him out on something he is in the wrong for.don_johnson wrote:elyse: you just missed an opportunity for us to be friends. if you really want the notreallygood lynch, why not try and convince me? I've been gone a couple days. I am like clay waiting to be molded. but instead of taking the opportunity, you're all like "whatever, catch up yourself." well fine then. thanks for nothing. please don't complain that you are not getting the lynch you want if you aren't going to try when the chance jumps up and bites you in the nose.
vote: elyse
i'll start here for now. i'll post when I catch up.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
Mr. Johnston'srecent posts are hilarious. Forming a trust circle without being fully caught up in the thread is just bad. Forming a trust circle on day 1 is just funny to me in general. Especially with people who directly FoS each other in the circle itself. He seems a bit audacious to actually be scum though.
My scum read onTitusfeels weaker now as well. He is drawing some weird conclusions, but seems to be trying to scum hunt. I can see why he wants to lynchRunnerman.
I don't know why you keep associatingTitus wrote:I wouldn't care if it was before or after. His play is scummy as shit. He and Paperscraps did chainsaws for each other. It will take a lot to get me to move my vote from these two.Runnermanand I. 247 You can't seriously be trying to push that connection.
I don't know what to think ofKcdaand how people are so handily town reading him. I am wary of this. He is still pretty null in my book.
Beasthas move back to null for me at this time. I don't agree with his scum read onElyse. Other than that, reading through his ISO and recent posts I like what I see.
Elysehas been congruent and logical so far. Her recent posts are on point and good. She is town
Re-readingnotreallygood'sISO brings him back to null for me. His last few posts have gone down hill. 292 and 309 just aren't doing it for me.
Runnermanis leaning scum for me now. Too much filler for my tastes. His vote onBeastis interesting though.
Feel itis still town in my book. He has a bit of filler, but some decent posts and reads as well.
I want to see a push fromSmudgeror something. I don't know what to think of him.
Yessireehas fell of the face of the Earth. Where you at bro?
T S Ohasn't done anything to change my opinion of him.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: T S O
Guys I just voted the same person assthar8. Make sure to draw ten different conclusions from this.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I brought this up in my latest post. I don't get it all. I thought chainsawing was voting against the grain to seem town. Like say player A is being lynched, you vote player B because you know player A will flip town to seem town yourself?sthar8 wrote: Also, you know chainsaw's not indicative without a flip, right?
In any case, I don't think paper was chainsawing. He just doesn't possess the subtlety necessary to try shifting yes back to you with his vote (no offense paper). Iamcurious about that vote switch though. @ paper- can you comment please?
What Titus is getting at is me trying to deflect attention away from a scum partner, Runnerman, by voting right after someone foses him. Which would be a pretty bad play in general. I could make the same argument against pretty much everyone else in this thread.
These foses seem a bit bland and elementary to me. I mean the things they are doing are scummy on a basic level, but you have to look for motivations and if scum are likely to be so obvious day 1.In post 330, notreallygood wrote:I've got two possible scum in my mind currently: Kcda and don.
Kcda: None of his posts makes sense. He first voted on sthar and encouraged don to get on the wagon, then voted Titus because of his ISO but did not explain exactly where it was scummy, and then he suspected Paper without explanation. Finally, he trusted don was town and voted yessiree, and again, did not explain why.
don: His first two votes didn't make sense. After a while, he listened to kcda and voted sthar. When people started to suspect him, he exaggerated his innocence.
Also, I laughed at what don had posted recently. 'Alliance'? 'Lynch pool'? What sorcery is this?-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
In post 323, don_johnson wrote:kcdaspot, elyse, beast, sthar8, runnerman.
if we form an alliance here we should be good. I am pretty sure most, if not all of us, are town. at most I could see one scum in this group. outside chance of two, but lifes not fun without a little risk. in any case, it would be a great way to start. if you agree to vote with me, I will lead us to victory. of course I will need to read the game first, but I will give us scum. we keep the alliance for today and tomorrow. if we aren't in position to win the game on day 3, i'd be ok if we dissolved, but I just don't see that happening. let's do it!
@Dom, so runnerman went from being in the alliance to a possible lynch for you. What happened? I wouldn't feel bad about lynching runnerman at this point, but walk me through your logic here.In post 398, don_johnson wrote:maybe we should be lynching between runnerman and paperscraps.
grim: if you have any questions for me, just lay em out.
Also, why is everyone calling T S O a policy lynch? I don't get it. Reading through T S O's ISO again, I see pissed off town now. His reactions to all the pressure, especially in his last few post seem genuine.
UNVOTE:
Grim's post so far are delightful, his reads are good. He seems pretty objective. His cases against NRG and beast are decent.
I will do some more hunting, since my reads are getting all muddled.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
1. I believe at the time I was the only one voting T S O. So he wasn't really being pressured.In post 433, Grimgroove wrote:
In 235, I did not understand why he switched onto Titus. His vote was on TSO, but he moves his vote away from him and onto Titus, while still saying in that same post that TSO is still in his scumteam.Can you explain this move? Your argumentation for 1. dropping pressure from TSO and 2. increasing pressure on Titus is not clear here.
2. Voting Titus with others was to get a reaction from him and see if anyone else would wagon onto him as well.
One thing I don't like about T S O, was after we stopped the most recent pressure on him, he just disappeared. If anything he is free and clear now to actually scum-hunt and be hindered by being in a defensive position.
Also we are on page 20 and it seems like Dom is just now reading through this thread. This is weird since he has been throwing around reads like he was been caught up. I don't even know what to think of this. You can actually tell he is reading through the thread from his most recent posts, but that just striked me as odd. The whole offering the alliance without having read the entire thread thoroughly just rubs me the wrong way.
@Grim, you are a machine. I just skimmed through your most recent posts, but will read them more in-depth later today. You seem to be garnering a following around the beastcharizard lynch. I am not against it. I think beast's lynch will give us a TON of information based on his flip(on which I am leaning scum). I am not voting yet, because I want to read through the last couple of pages more in-depth.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
Hey guys, I will catch up and post some more later today. I have been skimming on the whole beast lynch thing, but was hesitant to vote because of some of the people voting him(i.e Elyse and runnerman). The cases and things said against beast make sense, but doesn't necessarily lead to him being scum. On the topic of his claim, I don't like it. But we obviously aren't lynching a PR day 1. Stop grouping runnerman and I with "chainsawing". This is not a thing. With the skimming I have done, I could get behind lynching NRG or don, but I need to dig into some ISOs.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
To start off, I am going to address the votes against me. I don't have any cases against me to respond to, so I am going to be proactive here.
-T S O(No case against me, just voted me out of frustration or because he was taunted by Feel it. His vote on me is reactionary and not prompted by actual scum hunting. T S O seems to be a bit on tilt since his exchange with sthar.)Would I be ok with lynching T S O today?He still seems like angry town to me. This decision is also tentative on his future posts and if he actually makes a case against me (this would be a townie thing for him to do).
-Don(Reading through his ISO, he doesn't have a singular case against me, but has posted some little things here and there against me. Nothing to warrant an actual response towards. We don't see eye to eye on some things and I have called him out on some questionable plays he is trying to make. 488 this post is good and probably the best reason by him to be voting me today. The point about today being mostly a guessing game with who to lynch is very true. I am curious as to why he would be voting me when he scum reads Elyse and T S O's vote is suspicious.)Would I be ok with lynching Don today?No. (BUT PAPERSCRAPS YOU JUST SAID YOU WOULD BE OK WITH LYNCHING DON IN YOUR PREVIOUS POST, OMG CONTRADICTION!!! YOU ARE SCUM!!11!!) At that point in time I hadn't read through his ISO in-depth in awhile. We don't agree on a lot of things, but Don flipping scum would surprise me at this point.
-Elyse(Voting me on a gut read, which I don't have a problem with. Playing mafia with only logic will not win you games, you have to throw some gut into the mix to do well. I do say into the mix though and not relying completely on gut. Elyse's gut read is wrong. Two options I can see here: 1. Elyse is town and really does have a gut read on me as scum. 2. Elyse is scum and using this "gut read" to vote me without seeming too scummy and not having to actually make a case. I could see Elyse being scum. I can also see Elyse being town. I could make a case for both alignments. Without any meta I am stuck on my Elyse read until the game develops further. Her motivations won't be apparent until we see some flips.)Would I be ok with lynching Elyse today?No. I like her agressive style and if she is town, I believe she will be an asset in the later game. I wouldn't be ok with lynching Elyse at this time.
My town circle right now:.sthar,Smudger,Feel it
Who I would be against lynching but not in my town circle circle:,Grimgroovebeastcharizard,don_johnson,Elyse.
Who is null to me circle:Titus,T S O.
Who I would be ok with lynching circle:.Kcda,runnerman,NRG
runnerman, Kcda and NRG don't really strike me as a scum team and there is possibly/probably a 4th scum. I am a bit stuck on who to vote, so many starting days end in a mis-lynch. There is plenty of material against NRG and I could hop on that, but Elyse's point about some many people being ok with it is good. Lynching runnerman or Kcda at this point is meh. Kcda is active lurking and runnerman is being replaced so that lynch would just be bad form, until his replacement gets a chance at redemption. GUYS LOOK AT ME BEING ALL INDECISIVE AND ON THE FENCE.
I am getting a bit antsy here at the end of this day as I believe a lot of everyone else is. We all want to see some blood, so we can move on and have some solid information to go from. I am not going to let it be my blood if I have my way. By the end of tonight I will vote some one and have some sort of a case made. This is where I stand right now. To be continued...-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
Withrunnermanandkcdabeing replaced it seems awkward to make a case against them when they wont be able to defend themselves. Less information will be gained from lynching them than say lynchingNRGimo.Titus' last few posts have been pretty poor quality, his vote onDonis consistent with his ISO so I don't really find that too scummy, but the tracker thing is bad.
We still have 3 days left, once the replacement process is completed which is good. I want to hear what the newrunnermanandkcdawill have to say.
This leaves me with votingNRGtoday and even though there isn't much opposition against it, if any, I am still good with it. Reading through his ISO, I don't see much of him trying to find and lynch scum. He has been under the lens for awhile now and defending himself. I don't see much offense though. His play is reactionary and he has regurgitated ideas and points from other players. A lot of his posts are filler where he seems to chime in and respond to stay active, but without doing anything to help town. Lecturing us on grammar and the intricacies of the English language doesn't make you pro-town. I am wary of people who get focused on silly things that have no bearing on finding mafia. His scum reads are pretty elementary and this struck me as inexperience at first, but under the pressure of others it could have been him trying to just get something out there to get the attention away from him.
So we have deflection(maybe), reactionary play(which implies no scum hunting), fixation on silly things(i.e. grammar, foul language, how2English) and general filler(to stay active and seem productive).
Singularly the above tells don't makeNRGmafia, but as a whole they give me a decent scum vibe.
VOTE: notreallygood-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
"'if it turns out I'm not scum". What kind of player talks like this? You should know you are town right? A bit ironic for some one who is critical of grammar and proper English. (jab jab)In post 637, notreallygood wrote:@Everyone
I just want to know if it turns out that I'm not the scum, who would be your next target? What is your next strategy?
Since the heat has turned up on NRG his last few posts have been weak. He isn't doing anything to make me second guess here.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
In post 637, notreallygood wrote:@Everyone
I just want to know if it turns out that I'm not the scum, who would be your next target? What is your next strategy?
The "if" bothers me. Well first off I wouldn't be trying to defend myself the way you are in general, but I would have phrased what you said "when" I flip town, what are you going to do about it? You are essentially talking in the mindset of you yourself believing you aren't 100% town and that bothers me.In post 653, notreallygood wrote:
What's wrong with that?In post 652, Paperscraps wrote:
"'if it turns out I'm not scum". What kind of player talks like this? You should know you are town right? A bit ironic for some one who is critical of grammar and proper English. (jab jab)In post 637, notreallygood wrote:@Everyone
I just want to know if it turns out that I'm not the scum, who would be your next target? What is your next strategy?-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
UNVOTE:
Hmmm. Need to think about NRG's claim. Lynching a PR today would be stupid imo.
Titus and Feel it have both associated me with runnerman now. Feel it's push/case against me is out of context and warped. This smells of one of them indirectly bussing runnerman(maybe) by trying to associate his scuminess towards me. It is laughable that you would vote me over him at this point in any case. My ISO is leaps and bounds more townie than his.
Scenario: One person on the scum team is looking pretty bad, i.e. runnerman. Titus or Feel it being one of the other members is trying to capitalize on the situation to save their partner. So instead of voting runnerman, they vote me who is more way more towny, but with the guise that I "chainsawed" and distanced myself from runnerman. If you believe two people are scum, why would you vote the more townie of the two?
That is all hypothetical, because we don't know runnerman is actually mafia or is even being indirectly bussed. Runnerman has promised to deliver more content, yet I don't see much a change in behavior.
The shift that Feel it just made from town reading me to scum reading was too quick and a huge scum tell imo. His reasons for voting me are weak.
I am so down to lynch runnerman. If he is mafia, then one of Titus or Feel it is probably his partner. Leaning towards Feel it over Titus, the shift in Feel it's last few posts isn't town. I town read Feel it early on, but I am questioning that now. (inb4 OMGUS haha)
VOTE: runnerman-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I am not liking these reads. Your reason for voting Titus is that "her playstyle is easy to play scum as". You aren't actually saying she is mafia or that you even believe it yourself. Where is the conviction! Also explain the results you think you got from your "insulting post".In post 741, runnerman wrote:
Not on purpose. My playstyle probably looks really scummy to her.In post 730, notreallygood wrote:
All the games? She's only been with you in one game (excluding this). And why would she do that?In post 729, runnerman wrote:Btw titus is trying to get me lynched in all the games she is in with me. In another game I actually got lynched (I was a villager duh) so please take in mind that for some weird reason she has it in for me.
I made an insulting post yesterday to see to what degree people just emotionally lash back, you can see the results.
Just read through NRG's iso, he says this early on "Personally, I like just playing naturally instead of using plans. That's just my style, though."
Which seems true, he's mostly being diplomatic (even complaining when people are rude) and asking questions giving small commntary. I don't like his lynch.
Paperscraps' ISO is strangely small.
I looked at beast, He plays a very open style (sharing his ideas) which means we can keep him around as he's not a threat even if he is scum. I'm still keeping an eye on him though.
TSO is a kid, in his behavior in everything, what else is there to say. He is a lynch target I have in mind but not voting him because there is nothing in particular that stands out as all that scummy so I'll wait to see more.
I still like my Titus vote. She has this obtuseness that'll make it hard to figure out if she is scum because she only sticks to very unsophisticated reads to make her decisions. It's easy to play scum with a playstyle like this.
Some of your reads are filler. What does my ISO being small mean? I believe we are all keeping an eye on beastchizarf right now. Your posts seems like a list of potential lynch targets. Why are NRG or Beast even being considered?
You gave us one scum read on beast awhile back and were leaning town on Titus. Now you have shifted to Titus with the reasons she is trying to get me lynched (so she must be mafia) and her play style is advantageous for scum. Do you have any scum reads? I am not seeing any scum reads above.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I disagree. Let us argue about it for 5 pages now.In post 768, T S O wrote:
Him calling an argument bullshit does not constitute fire.In post 728, runnerman wrote:
This is one of the most BS arguments I have ever heard. I'm not linked to anyone I'm just a villager, except in the minds of a few based on incidental randomness.In post 723, Paperscraps wrote:Titus and Feel it have both associated me with runnerman now. Feel it's push/case against me is out of context and warped. This smells of one of them indirectly bussing runnerman(maybe) by trying to associate his scuminess towards me. It is laughable that you would vote me over him at this point in any case. My ISO is leaps and bounds more townie than his.
Scenario: One person on the scum team is looking pretty bad, i.e. runnerman. Titus or Feel it being one of the other members is trying to capitalize on the situation to save their partner. So instead of voting runnerman, they vote me who is more way more towny, but with the guise that I "chainsawed" and distanced myself from runnerman. If you believe two people are scum, why would you vote the more townie of the two?
That is all hypothetical, because we don't know runnerman is actually mafia or is even being indirectly bussed.
I've already noticed the level of play on this site is pretty low but is that really what anyone would consider an argument? One the one hand I feel I have to take this kind of a town read but on the other hand could also be deliberate.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
runnerman was just put at L-1. I don't town read any of the people voting with me. Feel It has just jumped way up on my scumdar.
We still have 3 days after the replacement goes through. Feel It's votes have been rushed and he just jumped on to runnerman's wagon with no reason. I don't like it. His switch to me prior wasn't natural and now this switch to runnerman is bad. I am not seeing any attempt at lynching scum behind Feel It's votes. He is just trying to get this day to end.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Feel It-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I was joking about us arguing. So sure T S O, you are right and I am wrong.In post 774, T S O wrote:
It's not like it's an opinion, though. You're dead wrong. He insulted someone mildly. No fire, no brimstone.In post 769, Paperscraps wrote:
I disagree. Let us argue about it for 5 pages now.In post 768, T S O wrote:
Him calling an argument bullshit does not constitute fire.In post 728, runnerman wrote:
This is one of the most BS arguments I have ever heard. I'm not linked to anyone I'm just a villager, except in the minds of a few based on incidental randomness.In post 723, Paperscraps wrote:Titus and Feel it have both associated me with runnerman now. Feel it's push/case against me is out of context and warped. This smells of one of them indirectly bussing runnerman(maybe) by trying to associate his scuminess towards me. It is laughable that you would vote me over him at this point in any case. My ISO is leaps and bounds more townie than his.
Scenario: One person on the scum team is looking pretty bad, i.e. runnerman. Titus or Feel it being one of the other members is trying to capitalize on the situation to save their partner. So instead of voting runnerman, they vote me who is more way more towny, but with the guise that I "chainsawed" and distanced myself from runnerman. If you believe two people are scum, why would you vote the more townie of the two?
That is all hypothetical, because we don't know runnerman is actually mafia or is even being indirectly bussed.
I've already noticed the level of play on this site is pretty low but is that really what anyone would consider an argument? One the one hand I feel I have to take this kind of a town read but on the other hand could also be deliberate.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
I would like to reinforce what Grim wrote about the runnerman lynch. A day one lynch with very little opposition should be sending some warning signals to the brain. The majority of players are on board with lynching runnerman, or willing to compromise on him. Yes, he is scummy. So is mafia bussing him today? Or he is just a weaker town player that is succumbing to all the pressure on him? I am thinking the latter now. You can believe whatever you want for me defending him here, but with everyone "willing" to lynch him I am thinking he is town. I have much more confidence in Feel It flipping scum than over runnerman at the moment.Grimgroove wrote:There's having a compromise lynch and insisting on one. The people on the wagon, the reasons for them.... not liking any of it.
How can we discern the people calling this a compromise lynch that they can live with from opportunistic scum? You're giving them the foliage with which they can use their camouflage-equipment.
With runnerman being replacement I'm imagining there will be another deadline freeze. USE IT. Instead of filling the air with compromise-talk.
Let us visit the last few posts from Feel It:
I agree that you can talk yourself out of good lynches the more time goes one, but using this as the sole reason to vote some one is bad as town or scum. I agree that lynches provide information to help the town move forward, but again using this as the sole reason to lynch some one is bad. Feel It provides no reasons as to why he thinks runnerman will flip scum here. The last line isn't true. This reaction speaks more of Feel It being "butthurt".In post 777, Feel It wrote:
How observant, in case you haven't noticed we've hit a brick wall and the only people who actually know who's innocent or scum is the scum. This town has discussed and dragged itself through so many circles I'm honestly quite bored and confused and we really need a lynch to move this game forward. I think runnerman has a pretty good chance of flipping scum. Also your vote and scumread is mostly just butthurt I nearly got you lynched.In post 773, Paperscraps wrote:runnerman was just put at L-1. I don't town read any of the people voting with me. Feel It has just jumped way up on my scumdar.
We still have 3 days after the replacement goes through. Feel It's votes have been rushed and he just jumped on to runnerman's wagon with no reason. I don't like it. His switch to me prior wasn't natural and now this switch to runnerman is bad. I am not seeing any attempt at lynching scum behind Feel It's votes. He is just trying to get this day to end.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Feel It
This post is mafia trying to rush a lynch through or he is actually bored town. I could see both.In post 770, Feel It wrote:I'm okay with runnerman lynch, this day has dragged on way to long already
VOTE: runnerman
In post 755, Feel It wrote:Keep attacking me baby, I like it rough.
These next two posts resonate with mafia joking to deflect and down play things. Not really substantial, but these reactions to being called out for a bad vote don't sit well.In post 753, Feel It wrote:Lel, she thinks scumhunting is scummy.
A weak case against me, although I am biased here. Agreeing with people's points is fine, but it was more how Feel It arrived to this point so quickly that bugs me. He town read me not too long before and this shift to me being scum with runnerman isn't natural, imo. He is riding the coat tails of Titus's "chainsaw theory" and provided a twisted view on the quote from me.In post 717, Feel It wrote:
That's an interesting thought between paper and runnerman, neither has voted for each other and seemed to have distanced themselves today. runnerman hasn't mentioned paper once, while paper has given a scumread on runnerman without voting him.In post 703, Titus wrote:I believe nrg's gunsmith claim. Beast's claim can be verified if he tracks me. Even if I die, it will give the town powerful information.
I was not putting forth a terribad case on you. It is a damn good case on you. You said you wouldn't lynch beast yet place an opportunistic vote.
Being willing to lynch to ensure a lynch is generally protown but it is you runnerman and paper that are likely the scums.
Dat subtle defense while dissociating through scumtell, lel.In post 592, Paperscraps wrote:Lynching runnerman or Kcda at this point is meh
I will reiterate my points as to why Feel It is scum:
- I don't see motive behind his votes to actually lynch scum.
- His reactions to being called out for sketchy actions are scummy.
- His shift to thinking I am scum with runnerman wasn't natural(seems forced).
- His general voting pattern has been onto easy lynches. He has been on the beast wagon, NRG wagon and now runnerman wagon.
GUYS THERE HAS TO BE A CONNECTION BETWEEN ME AND RUNNERMAN NOW RIGHT? I JUST DEFENDED HIM!!! THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE "CHAINSAW" VOTES IN THE BEGINNING OF THE GAME WERE COINCIDENCE. YOU HAVE TO GO AT LEAST 5 META LEVELS DEEPER TO UNDERSTAND.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
This flip ontoBowseris weird. We won't get nearly as much information from his lynch as we do theT S Olynch. I mean if you legit thinkBowseris mafia then sure keep voting him. Reading his ISO, I don't see it.
His reads list is weird. His post 1063 read genuinely being upset to me. You could make the case he hopped onto theT S Owagon too fast then unvoted when people suspected him and back peddled on himself. That isn't enough for me to vote him right now.
T S Ois more toxic to town than helpful and was my gut read as mafia initially. I like theT S Olynch.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
We should man/woman up and lynchbeasttoday. With the three flips we have had so far, mafia is running this town at the moment. We are looking in the wrong places for lynches. I wantedFeel Itpretty bad yesterday, but I was wrong on that front. I am ok withTitus' claim right now.Beast'sclaim and what he said today doesn't sit well. I don't buy it.
Let's say there is 4 mafia. With the general assumption thatNRG,Feel ItandTitusare town, that leaves us withSmudger,beastcharizard,Bowser,Elyse,Huntress,Me,sthar8. With 4 mafia we are potentially at mylo right now. I feel this setup would be more balanced around 3 mafia, but assuming the worst is always good. I have just stated the obvious.
I am trying to wrap my head around if I should be trustingstharanymore. I have been town reading him for awhile now. The thing that erks me isT S Oflipping town and the chaosstharandT S Obrought to town. It wasn't necessary.
Then we haveElysewho seems to be playing a lot with her gut. She has voted me a couple times now. She hasn't given one reason as to why I am mafia, just that her gut is pinging me. I feel like mafia would at least make up a reason here, but she hopped on theFeel Itlynch yesterday with no original content towards that lynch. Seeing asFeel Itis probably town, this is pretty scummy to me.
SmudgerI have no idea how to read now. He likes to focus on details and call people out for bad logic or using definite articles. I need to dig more into his ISO.
It is hard to readBowserandHuntressas town, because of who they are replacing.Huntresshasn't done anything to change my view on that slot and I think we all agreedrunnermanwas a good lynch. Maybe this is a bad thing though. I mean a lot of us wantedrunnermandead.Donwas defendingrunnermanI believe and now he is dead. Not sure what to think at the moment.Bowserhas posted no content in my eyes. I could lynchBowserplain and simple.
My pecking order would beBeast->Bowser->Elyse/Huntress.-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
You are one of my top mafia reads right now. I don't care what questions you have for me. You are grasping on my lynch.. Beast is most likely mafia and suggesting he isn't means you aren't reading the game or you are mafia, in my eyes. Titus' claim lines up with there being two deaths and no counter-claims to vigi. There probably being a gunsmith is too much to not think Titus is town at this point. Beast's track makes zero sense. It is almost as if his "tracking" IS KILLING PEOPLE.In post 1274, Huntress wrote:
Seeing as you have only two completed games that weren't either open or semi-open that's hardly a valid reason for discounting the possibility of a mafia tracker in a closed game.In post 1252, Titus wrote:I have never seen a mafia tracker role in any game I have played.
@ Feel it and Paper:How about an answer to the questions I asked you?
If anyone is doubting that Paper is the best lynch for today just read 1217; particularly the second paragraph. He presents the idea that we could be in mylo (extremely unlikely), says we should assume the worst, but was voting Beast who is odds-on to be town?
@ Paper:Why Bowser, who seems to be more of a policy lynch for you from your comments, rather than Elyse who you described as "pretty scummy"?
Mafia are always one meta-level deeper than town, but Grim goes hard on Beast. Grim dies. Draw whatever conclusion you want.
Elyse hasn't really done anything at this game. Her votes have no convinction or backing behind them. I will lynch any of you(Beast-Elyse-Huntress), but Bowser is basically saying he isn't going to be playing at all anymore. That isn't cool at all. His slot before he came in was scummy. He is a great lynch. It is both policy and a read. I don't think there are enough people right now to get behind the Elyse lynch.
Huntress you are trying to hard, but that isn't enough right now to put you over Bowser.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
It is obvious who Beast tracked.
So either Beast and NRG are lying or Smudger is lying.
VOTE: Smudger-
-
Paperscraps
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
So we are at 7 with three confirmed town,beast,feelandelyseand four unconfirmedme,sthar,titusandhuntress.
Titusreally has no reason to retract here and put herself into a lynchable position as mafia. It could be a play, but meh I don't see it.
StharI liked early game. He kind of feel off a bit in the middle relative to now, but overall hasn't rubbed me the wrong way.
Huntressa.k.a.runnermanneeds to die. Regardless of whatHuntresshas contributed.Runnermanwas always a great lynch.
So if there is 4 total mafia we have 1 mislynch and 3 total mafia we have 2 mislynches. (super obvious stuff here).-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
Ok, I am confused then. Is Titus still a PR? I thought this was a retraction. Is Titus is still a vig and just not a joat?In post 1360, Titus wrote:By the way, it's probably time to say I'm not a joat at all. I was faking to try and get shot. It got us one additional investigation but it seems the scums have called my bluff.-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
So put yourself in Huntress' shoes. If she is the last mafia (with 3 mafia being more likely than 4 I think) and you don't claim a PR here, the game just ends. Claiming VT as mafia would just seal the deal for your lynch all the faster imo.In post 1378, Elyse wrote:
We have three PRs: Titus, NRG, BeastIn post 1376, Paperscraps wrote:Could you clarify what you mean by 4th PR?
You said you liked VA's VT claim.
Did you expect her to claim a PR?-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
-
Paperscraps Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: August 1, 2013
-
- Paperscraps
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-