Sorry, kids, I've been having internet issues since yesterday afternoon; this is the first time I've been online with time to post.
I'll be V/LA while I'm resolving that, probably for about a week.
As for the issue at hand vis-a-vis me, I haven't gotten my brain in this game yet, so also sorry for coasting. I'm gonna step it up starting now:
EPM, Glidder, Curious, and anyone I missed who's expressed the sentiment that there's scum presence on the EPM wagon:
Which of the people on that original wagon do you currently believe is the scummiest, and why? For me, Glidder caught my eye specifically because he jumped on the wagon quickly, with no reason given, right after saying how much he'd missed and giving no indication his motivations were anything but follow-the-leader. I'm not sure it's standing up to actual scrutiny though, so I'm going to
Unvote
. BJC would probably be my next best guess, if only because Catboi goes to all the trouble to triple post when he realizes he hasn't refreshed the page.
Whomever asked me about ABR's gambit (I know you exist, but I don't remember where in the thread your post is):
I honestly hadn't taken the time to follow up on the history between Pac and ABR when I got into the thread, so the only logical assumption was that ABR was attempting a gambit to gain information. It wouldn't make much sense to lynch Pac that early (except to get out of Day 1, which I loathe, so it's not an entirely bad idea), so it had to have a different purpose. I'm disappointed with the possibility our starting move in this game is to play follow the leader over a grudge.
Additionally, while I think Pac's criticism of LeMidget's early post is preposterous, I don't like his play since then. He jumps on the Pac wagon right in the middle just for OMGUS, and has been posting regularly as of late but only to drive home what he doesn't know. He's also hiding behind BJC and Curious' scumhunting in #137, without doing much of his own. In fact, let's look at that post, just because I'm noticing something else now:
In post 137, LeMidget wrote:@RBD:
A lot of my opinions are being voiced by bjc
and TMCT. I feel like Pac-Man was being ridiculously aggressive over the original bit (me being foolish) and, as TMCT mentioned, tried to simultaneously accuse five people on his wagon. So a lot of his(TMCT) arguments resonate with me.
As for bjc, he seems quite scummy
but he could be (and I hope is) bussing, it doesn't seem super likely but it is definitely a possibility. Those are my thoughts on the matter. He seems hyper-aggresive, but in a different way than ABR and bjc that makes him look (to me) scummier then either of them.
I feel that if Pac-Man flips town I'm voting bjc at the start of Day 2 unless something wild happens.
So, just to clarify, Midget, you agree with the opinions of someone you think is scummy? How does that work?
Vote: LeMidget