In post 34, Clusk92 wrote:Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
VOTE: Espressojet
Scum found.
VOTE: Clusk
In post 34, Clusk92 wrote:Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
VOTE: Espressojet
Scum found.
In post 53, Prof Fridays wrote:In post 48, Espressojet wrote:It's just something that bothers me here, it's not specific to this thread. Things happen in life, my emotions change, and my mood with it. People keep getting on my case for change of tone and whatnot. It almost got me Iynched in my first game too.
In other news, Prof. Fridays has done no real scum hunting, so for the time being...
VOTE: Prof. Fridays
Uhhhh, okay.
Anatole Kuragin wrote:You're right I should have just indulged in dumb RVS jokes rather than my usual winning strategy of voting the first person who says someone's actions are null - which has a 70% success rate.
Interesting. I've not heard of this (not being sarcastic; I'm just somewhat new to meta/logic here). I'm willing to accept it, but you're not exactly convincing me, whether through argument or play-style.
chaoslord54 wrote:Vote:BJC
Don't really like your aggressive and pushy attitude to try and get SKOT or Espresso lynched. Even if you favor speed lynches, to try and get people lynched off of very little evidence screams scum to me
You can say that, but from my experience this is indicative of bjc-town, so I'm not going to support this wagon.
In post 84, Espressojet wrote:Anatole, why would you give town points to a slot just for a replace out?
In post 99, Espressojet wrote:Look at bjc here, trying to start a wagon without even voting in it himself!
In post 101, bjc wrote:Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?
Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.
In post 109, bjc wrote:In post 104, Anatole Kuragin wrote:In post 101, bjc wrote:Nice 70% success rate. Was it or was it not a real vote (the clusk vote)?
Also, espresso, I'm already on the wagon.
It was a real vote, thought it may get him to respond. obviously didn't work.
So when he didn't respond it made him more likely to be town than scum?
In post 100, Prof Fridays wrote:I'm actually kind of reconsidering Clusk. I'll have to think on it.
FoS: Clusk92
PEdit: Welp. Alright.
In post 128, Espressojet wrote:In post 121, Anatole Kuragin wrote:In post 100, Prof Fridays wrote:I'm actually kind of reconsidering Clusk. I'll have to think on it.
FoS: Clusk92
PEdit: Welp. Alright.
I'll take my vote off of you if you take your vote off of me.
Some clear bargaining here
In post 34, Clusk92 wrote:Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
VOTE: Espressojet
Scum found.
In post 287, Prof Fridays wrote:Anatole, you're scaring me D:
I'm down with the system. I suppose given Mark's trying to make a case on chaoslord Day 1 to distract from the Espressojet wagon would semi-clear him.
VOTE: SKOT