![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
So, ummmm... Oh yeah! VOTE: SleepyKrew because I am exhausted.
In post 112, Cyberbob wrote:I'm not really looking for you to comment on any one thing in particular, just for you to comment onsomethingother than lazily berating SK for supposedly being so absentminded
SK's question wasn't terribly hard hitting but that only makes it weirder that anyone would bother to not answer it. What did Goofy have to lose?
In post 148, SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Goofy
As others have demonstrated, my knowledge is clearly at or below newb level, so please educate me as to why people do RVS
In post 37, Drew-Sta wrote:@ Farside. The guys been on the site for 3 years. How is he an eager puppy with a new toy?
He does read like he's on the spectrum though (that's not an insult, BTW, and is an observation based on his posting style - I have a friend who plays on another site who is on the spectrum and posts in a similar way) which means how he presents is going to be different to how we would assume a player would.
This isn't a defence of his poor questioning either; more his interaction.
Also, glad it didn't offend
In post 69, popsofctown wrote:
Sleepykrew seems like he legitimately wants to get out of RVS for the right reasons.
In post 196, popsofctown wrote:IAI, Redcoyote can be hard to read, but I'm getting a lack of initiative from him today that is pretty scummy, especially given his meta.
In post 219, SleepyKrew wrote:I was promised a Goofy wagon if he kept not answering me and I want my damn wagon.
But an RC wagon isn't terrible.
In post 261, Drew-Sta wrote:In post 260, Goofyd00d wrote:Drew, the 4 post scum read was me getting a scum read on you from the 4 posts you had made at the time. You only had 4 posts so that's not alot to scum read someone off of, which is why I didn't pursue at the time.
I'm not saying all 4 were scummy, just based on their combined content.
What content? I feel like you've misunderstood or misread me. Please be specific and I can walk you through it.
Its frustrating I have to prove myself like this but Konowa and RC have done a good job of fucking me over while I've been on V/LA. Mud sticks, yo.
In post 253, Goofyd00d wrote:Des, his reaction read scummy from him trying so hard to find someone to single out quickly, but rather than push that I was horrible scum immediately he went with "just answer the question" which read more like anyone who wanted to get the game rolling fast and have fun. Like I said someone else answered that particular question.
I would like you to explain why you provided nothing but questions with your comment when it was your first one in 24 hours. Did you gather nothing to share since then? Even with my posts during that period you are still on this?
Please stop pluralizing questions, that is the only one that I know of.
Also if not providing basic game theory in a non noob game qualifies as a PL from you, well, that's just sad dude.
In post 278, Drew-Sta wrote:@Skrew
Someone is an idiot for voting another player on D1?
No. Someone is an idiot when they change their vote more than they change their underwear in a week and without good reason.
In post 279, Drew-Sta wrote:Actually, just realised that jumping of Kon draws away from the wagon. I'll back myself in what I feel is the scum team and go back onto Kon. I believe both are scum and both deserve the vote though.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Kon
In post 283, Drew-Sta wrote:In my defence, I only changed it from one scum read to the next, then back to my original scum read. That counts, right? RIGHT?!?
In post 360, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 356, Goofyd00d wrote:If I were scum I would have been careful enough to not make that mistake. I believe if Reinoe has no other mafia experience they may be new enough to not think about the WIFOM that this would provide in order to do it on purpose.
Do you understand what a mistake is?
reinoe's been here longer than you and he certainly acts as if he knows all there is to know about mafia.
In post 469, farside22 wrote:In post 465, Goofyd00d wrote:It seems as though this day is down to drew and rei and it seems like nothing will stop it. I lean scum for them both, but if either was town I feel as though town would benefit more from rei not being here tomorrow. I'm going to have to reread this cluster fuck and try to separate points from shit slinging.
Because you are one of my scum reads, and if you're town you are so incredibly anti town that I don't care, VOTE: reinoe
Why is Drew a scum read?
In post 249, Dessew wrote:Phoneposting, so just addressing some stuff I can recall.
SK: you said your push on farside hadn't been serious. What on Earth did you expect, not to be called out?
Konowa: if I was damage controlling, I'd be doing a really bad job, I mean, read again, maybe?
Whoever asked why pops is town: their actions show town motivation and no scum motivation. I'll do a post with quotes tomorrow.
Goofy: I've had a very long conversation in my head with many obnoxious players and other people from my life while walking back and forth in the flat (which makes the cat extremally annoyed) and drinking like one and a half litres of water all thanks to your incompetence.Answer the questions.You're withholding information, or at least that's what you claim. Here's what I want you to do: 1. Find some catalogue of BS (a Coelho generator or whatever) and post it labelled as 'answer to SK's RVS question'. 2. Tell us what SK's posts during the RVS told you about his alignment. I need your thoughts from exactly that point of time, use only the posts from that time. I personally honestly mistrust your capabilities of understanding what I mean by the things said above, partly because of my past experiences, but do what you can, please. In the meantime, I might be just oversensitive because I had to explain someone that things imply themselves, but I'm seriously contemplating a PL on you right now. Jsyk.
Drew: I'd like to hear how I'm '... interesting.'
157 Dess wrote: but SK fisrt[sic] posts do tell plenty of people to just lynch him
In post 50, reinoe wrote:reinoe puts on his dazzling thinkingcapfedora...
Your questions looked like fake scum huntingso I placed a serious vote just like you asked. Not every vote is to lynch scum. Some votes are for pressure. And just like an insecure teenager who wants to be a non-conformist while hanging out with his friends you gave in to pressure and in doing so exposed your hypocrisy.
A gust of wind blows off reinoe's hat!!!
In post 638, Dessew wrote: I'll just go with this and never ever learn that if I specifically ask someone what their read was at a certain point of the game, why they feel the need to use 200 other posts fromafterthat point.
In post 595, Goofyd00d wrote:I was making it a point to ignore the why RVS question at first and was watching for his reaction to being ignored when Rei answered of what his reaction gave me. "[His] questions looked like fake scum hunting".I assumed at that point that that was sufficient an answer, and since noone but Skrew pushed right then I believed that it was. Once another player asked it again I answered completely as I chalked the original ordeal up to starting the game and thought we had moved on.
In post 353, Drew-Sta wrote:Just because a series of 'old heads' consider it an invalid approach doesn't mean it is.
Declaring 8 from 10 people as town and then lynching the 9 / 10 person is, in my view, as legitimate as finding the 9 / 10 and voting for them. That you're so stubborn on this is frustrating but I'll accept is part of this community (the view, not your stubbornness).
In post 411, Drew-Sta wrote:In post 398, Cyberbob wrote:Village idiots overthinking things is the most frustrating thing, I swear.
Ouch!C'mon mate, you've seen how I'm playing this game. You know I'm not a VI. Like I've said - if Reinoe does something I specifically think is scum-like, I'd most definitely help lynch him. But the fact is I don't think he has curled his argument so much that he's blatantly contradicted himself. He's definitely not gone about it in a pro-town way, but he's not mafia in my mind.
In post 438, Drew-Sta wrote:Right, so you have a problem that he has put 2 sets of 3 people into brackets, called them scumreads and you think this is a contradiction... why?
No, I am paying attention doofus - you're about as clear as mud in your explanations. If you worked harder at being understood when you wrote shit you'd get a lot further in life
In post 646, reinoe wrote:In post 501, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 485, Goofyd00d wrote:Like I said, the flip will help us more with drew, than Drews would with rei.
If rei flips scum drew could be mistaken town, but if so we at least hit one.
If rei flips town it is good for drew unless he's taking a huge risk as scum defending the loudest of town's scum read.
If we went for drew and he flipped town we might back off on rei assuming drew was right and letting rei skate to the end.
Seeing as how town has been binary for the last 4 or 5 pages, this is what made my vote.
Damn dude, stop being so lynch hungry.
This is pings as coaching now.
In post 701, reinoe wrote:The attacking farside is definitely damning because she's been really pro-town in her behavior.
I'm starting to think that the Beck/Konowa slot could be town and that the Cyberbob slot could be scum. His most recent posts, are riddled with scum motivation.
@goofydood, Cyberbob, RedCoyote, CoolDog...
whom are your scumreads and why.
In post 707, reinoe wrote:In post 703, Cyberbob wrote:In post 700, farside22 wrote:Cyber bob: I'm not sure why not double checking things and accusing the wrong player = scum.
If you don't see why failing to pay attention is scummy then I guess I don't know what to say really.
And if you think failing to pay attention IS scummy then you should have vote parked on SleepyKrew like page 5 and never moved it!
This is what I'm talking about. People are attacking me in a non-protown way and are stretching for their justifications while ignoring the 800 lb elephant in the room. The whole "not paying attention" argument is dead on arrival and is the most hypocritical argument made this game to date.
I'm willing to vote CYBERBOB NOW. We can wagon that.