Mini 1620 — The Mod is Using Comic Sans — GG
-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 16, Thesp wrote:Hello, everybody! As you may know, I prefer to open the game up with questions for people rather than an arbitrary vote. So, if you would, can you answer these two questions for me?
1. Do you like being scum in games?
2. How good are you at lying?
(Additionally, if this is one of your first games here on the site, welcome, and I'd like to know that as well.)
If you think my questions are stupid or unhelpful, please just answer them and I can move on to other things. If you think the questions are actually harmful or you think I am using them in lieu of participating, please state so. Thanks!
1) Yes. Though I've only had one completed scumgame here (out of six completed games), I've had several more offsite; those are quick-ish (a couple of days long) games and not as serious, but from what I've seen so far my enjoyment of playing scum applies in both.
I'm fine with town too, though.
2) I'd like to think I'm at least decent. Especially on forums when I can really think things through if I need to.
Why?
Also, you are voting Beck. Not Thesp. Maybe you should put your vote where your mouth is, if you really want to go after Thesp.
In post 40, Beck wrote:He didn't even answer his own questions...
That said, this is a valid point.
Thesp, why didn't you answer your own questions? Please do so.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 46, TheDudeAbides wrote:Lissa, do you still think that emogirl is scummy?
No.
She was basically a RVS vote. I figured a tiny, weak gameplay reason to vote (i.e. her not placing a vote) was better than basing it on someone's username or something. I don't find her scummy at this point.
UNVOTE:
In post 70, Beck wrote:I'm causing a distraction, trying to get the first real wagon of the game. Its working I think
And it's on you.
That's certainly an interesting way to get things started.
In post 58, Beck wrote:And sense you are new, let me explain why.
The game usually starts with RVs cause nobody really has anything to go on, the goal is to get out of rvs quickly and start scum hunting. The act of rqs is another thing people to do, though less effective. Even TheS admits it's not really effective. The problem I have with his line of questioning is he wants everyone to answer, which means he's going to keep us in this stage much longer than it needs to be. It also doesn't really help the game progress. Now I know I'd probably get back flack for starting in with him, but I don't really mind the pressure, I love pressure.
I don't like this. It can't possibly be scummy if it's something Thesp does EVERY SINGLE GAME.
---
That said. As a whole I don't find Beck particularly scummy, or Thesp. I feel like this whole Beck/Thesp thing is more of a distraction than simply answering the questions would have been, but I don't find Beck particularly scummy for it right now. I don't find them particularly townish for it either, though I feel like the way Beck is sticking his neck out with this resistance is somewhat townish.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
I can kind of see where Clusk is coming from on TDA - but it could just be newb awkwardness on TDA's part.
In post 118, TheDudeAbides wrote:Massive, specifically what makes Beck's attitude unsafe for scum? I am certain that scum can be argumentative and opinionated.
What I find town about how Beck is acting is that he is sticking his neck out with this resistance to Thesp.
In post 116, Beck wrote:and this is my last post on the topic
My post is not wrong, deep down you know my post is actually the most truthful statement made this game.
What is the goal to this game? To find scum and lynch them. Do these questions help you find scum? no they don't.
I won't be getting lynched todayso if you are town, your vote is being wasted. If you are scum carry on.
I don't really like this (the bolded), though.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 128, TheDudeAbides wrote:In each post she finds a reason to attack Beck and gives a reason to defend him,and if she thinks that he's town, it doesn't make much sense for her to look for reasons to find him scummy, like in the second post, where she attacks Beck over something that I don't understand at all.
Also, I disagree.
If I have a townread on someone, I'm not going to stop watching them and potentially noticing them doing scummy things, unless they're 100% confirmed town. I've tried to ignore evidence against an early strong townread before a few times and at least one of those times they flipped scum.
Like I said, Beck is a nullread... well, more along the lines of a weak townread, actually. But I'm not going to ignore it if he does things I find scummy.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 135, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 131, Lissa wrote:But I'm not going to ignore it if he does things I find scummy.
What do you find scummy about him saying that he won't be getting lynched today?
It's... how do I explain it?
It felt like a tactic to deflect people from voting him, like a less blatant form of "you don't want to lynch me", and that is... very easy to fake. I'm not certain it's fake, though, or even really means much. I think it could also be a "we're not lynching me, we're done here, conversation over" kind of thing, which could come from scum or frustrated/fed up town, and the rest of that paragraph implied that. It just pinged my gut a little.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 143, TheDudeAbides wrote:It was.
I'm satisfied.
Unvote
Lissa, if you had to pick someone to vote, who would it be?
VOTE: thesp
See Beck's 149 + his hop on Luca.
And Beck - link the Thesp scumgame please?
Phijkchu is also kinda scummy.
Luca is due for a prod I think. I want to see if he actually posts content when prodded this time. If not, perhaps pressuring him might be a decent idea - or he'll be replaced. I don't think wahonibg him for pressure is the answer, at least not yet. I feel like he could be avoiding the game, but he could've just forgotten.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 203, Beck wrote:In post 197, Lissa wrote:See Beck's 149 + his hop on Luca.
And Beck - link the Thesp scumgame please?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=58255
Thank you.
Yeah, I read that and I agree with your assessment of it as very similar.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Egg and Luca, I really like your points on Emo.
Egg, you make a good case on Phij also.
Phij seems like somewhat of an easy target/lynchbait - but the last time I called someone that, they flipped scum. I'm not sure him being perhaps an easy target should be giving me pause.
Also, note- I did a quick skim of Flubber's isos in a few of his finished games and saw some Towngames where he mostly posted like in this one and some where he posted more substantial posts.
In post 245, Beck wrote:I'm kinda torn though cause meta suggests that thesp is probably scum here but PMs defense and attack of me suggests that thesp is town. Pm saying she/he doesn't understand them and 1. Doeantnevwn bother to ask me to explain them and 2. Commiting one of the exact arguments I made as a reason to defend thesp, heavily implies a non town mindset
P.edit -this post better explains why he/she is scum
I like this case on PM.
However, how does it make thesp town?-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
TDA - In both of the two finished scumgames I found, Flubber had posts of varying lengths. I saw a fair bit of that in his towngames as well.
In post 257, Beck wrote:I don't think scum would defend a buddy. They get more from defending a townie. Though I'm not completely ruling it out, just less likely
Meh.
I thought at first I could see him doing it.
However, I just checked his two finished scumgames. In the first, he literally never mentioned his buddy once. In the second, he interacted with his buddy once in a very non-alignment-indicative way, mentioned him perhaps once more I think, and never stated a read on him.
This makes me doubt he would be scum with Thesp.
VOTE: Emogirl-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Beck, Egg, you, TDA.
In post 349, LlamaFluff wrote:@Lissa - You say emo is "okay for now" when you vote PM. Elaborate on what "okay for now" means and how PM has become scummier. Your wording heavily implies that PM got scummy instead of Emo got town.
I liked/agreed with the further cases made on PM after my Emo vote. I found Emo's new posts after my vote somewhat townish, and felt she'd responded well to the pressure of the small wagon on her. Thus, I decided PM was a better place to put my vote. Because Emo got more townish, and PM got more scummy. A little of both.
I'm currently reading Emo as null/slightly leaning town. (I also found her stubbornness about the policy lynch/great lynch thing townish.)
Also,
V/LA until Tuesday, November 11
That's LA not V. I just have some school things I really need to focus on catching up on, so I won't have as much time for mafia in the next few days.-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 379, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 259, Lissa wrote:TDA - In both of the two finished scumgames I found, Flubber had posts of varying lengths. I saw a fair bit of that in his towngames as well.
My guess is that post length is not indicative of alignment in most cases.
Do you think that post-length is a good indicator of alignment? I'm not sure whether it is, but I am sure that you'll catch each player at most once with that tell.
No, I don't think it typically is. That was in response to
In post 258, TheDudeAbides wrote:
In post 256, Lissa wrote:Also, note- I did a quick skim of Flubber's isos in a few of his finished games and saw some Towngames where he mostly posted like in this one and some where he posted more substantial posts.
What does he do in his scum games?
this, and that part of my 256 there was originally a response to
In post 223, Luca Blight wrote:Flubber is kind of floating through, not proactively scumhunting as such. Post a lot of one-liners, usually questioning points here and there. I don't know what to make of him, could be a good idea to check his meta to see if this is just his style or what.
this.-
-
Lissa Goon
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
emogirl feels town right now, but needs to post content. I'd like to see some reads/something from her.
Her stubbornness about the whole "great lynch/policy lynch" debacle and standing by it as a "great lynch" even after his townflip feels town. Scum could easily have backed down there to avoid getting heat/attention for it. And what she is saying feels genuine. And her reasoning for voting PM was perfectly valid.
Beck is still town.
I'm going to take a closer look at the Josh and Luca cases and some other things.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 579, Thesp wrote:The thing that gives me the most pause about Josh_B today is that his opening post feels very genuine to me.
I actually agree with this, which is a bit odd because I am scumreading Thesp and am not unhappy with Josh votes either. This doesn't change that though.
Luca wagon was/is bad, glad to see it dissolving somewhat.
Want to look closer at bookitty.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 691, Josh_B wrote:I'mve been trying to see if this develops any further, and it's taken long enough for it to get to this point but
Lissa is definitely scum so we should lynch her.
VOTE: Lissa
I thought she was scum with Thesp which is why I didn't move, but her recent post makes me less sure.
You haven't mentioned me at all today until now, or mentioned any sort of read on me all game. Where the hell did this come from?
It looks incredibly out of the blue and feels OMGUSy. Explain?-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 698, Josh_B wrote:My post 559 was SK hunting due to the odd Massive kill and speculation that the scum kill was blocked.
Thesp saying that the post was genuine seems like something scum would say.
Lissa's follow-up agreeing with the same but saying that she didn't mind the votes on me, even though she has,or at least previously had me as one of her town reads is a scum claim to me.
How the fudge is that a scumclaim?
I thought it sounded genuine, but it wasn't enough to make me sure you were town. I no longer have you as a townread. I don't think what Thesp said about what you said was especially a scummy thing to say in itself, but I think it's something that could well have come from scum. I also think it could easily be something scum would say about a scumbuddy.
And what post are you referring to? I think you've got the wrong number down, 559 isn't a post of yours.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
"Infatuation"?
I found Emo scummy at one point. She made some posts that made me hesitant about that, so I was like "alright, I think she's okay for now." Since then I have found her actions townish. I do not think her stance on the whole policy lynch/great lynch debacle is scummy, and I find her stubbornness about said stance townish.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Okay, let's see.
In post 837, Josh_B wrote:OK.
So real story. Either I'm town, which is why my SK hunting was recognized and called genuine(it was actually called scum posting by thedude), or I'm scum and I'm bussing, because my partners are just as interested in finding an SK as I am.
Either I know that there is for sure an SK, or I WIFOM'd it based on likely targets of both NK's and lynches.
SO.. you either have to lynch me or we have to lynch Lissa or thedude.
And then if I'm right we can move the game on from there.
pedit: book, Massive kill was awkward. I threw out some bait. I think it worked.
(Or 3. he is scum SK hunting and faked the genuine tone...)
Anyway
It reads to me like he is saying he, or Thesp, or me, or whoever would have to know it was true for us to find it genuine. His whole "lynch me, or lynch Lissa/TDA" thing, too. i.e. the main reason I can see for him calling it scum is that apparently my calling it genuine implies I know it's true? He's presented no further case on me beyond this. And - tangent - but I don't get why he's lumped TDA in there, either. I don't see a case on TDA from him, either.
He seems to assume that my calling it genuine means I thought it was definitely genuine town SK hunting. It doesn't really make a lot of sense for town to be SK hunting under the circumstances, and I was not saying the SK hunting or motivation was necessarily genuine, I was saying the tone/feel of the post was. I feel like he is interpreting "genuine" as meaning the former, when I meant the latter.
In post 838, Lissa wrote:When I said I agreed about that SK hunting thing you said being "genuine" I meant the tone and feel of it, and the way you just came out and said it. I feel like "genuine" has been misinterpreted here.
In post 839, Josh_B wrote:yea.. only scum wouldknowthat. Which is also part of my original Thesp scum read.
A blocked NK would indicate there are PR's out there to be hidden. Claiming to not want to out the PR's gives town cred.
I could still lynch Thesp.
And there's his use of the word "know" here. You do not have to know something is true to find it genuine, at least the way I am interpreting genuine.
There is also his calling my agreeing with it being "genuine" as a scumclaim earlier.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 852, Lissa wrote:
It reads to me like he is saying he, or Thesp, or me, or whoever would have to know it was true for us to find it genuine. His whole "lynch me, or lynch Lissa/TDA" thing, too. i.e. the main reason I can see for him callingmescum is that apparently my calling it genuine implies I know it's true? He's presented no further case on me beyond this. And - tangent - but I don't get why he's lumped TDA in there, either. I don't see a case on TDA from him, either.
EBWOP - not sure how that one happened, lol-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 866, Josh_B wrote:Oh this is fun. now we can argue about whether or not there's a cop. Let's fish that role out too.
You are utterly missing the point.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 874, LlamaFluff wrote:In post 864, Lissa wrote:Though if you are really town doc (doubtful), I doubt there is a cop, period.
Why do you think he is fakeclaiming?
Not interested in a lynch of doc claim. If he is scum it should be obvious shortly. His reaction is one of someone who thinks a kill is missing and he immediately was calling me town. If he was planning on fake claiming doctor with having protected me he lines up for that way earlier than I would think scum tries to line up a fakeclaim.
unvote
Vote Lissa
She actually was avoiding the wagon on Josh until AFTER he claimed doc and never really expanded on why she thinks he is scum that didn't apply before. Just seems like a vote because she doesn't think there is a doc "because" and then throws out "well he might not get killed due to scum PRs". The timing of the sudden swing in wanting him lynched feels like scum trying to get rid of a PR
Uh... no.
He claimed after I declared intent to hammer - I wanted him lynched before the claim. I didn't vote him before mostly because I was busy with RL stuff for a few days and didn't have much time to post (perhaps should have V/LA'd... oh well) and pretty much came back to him at L-1. He had a few votes before that and I said I didn't disagree with the wagon, but I didn't vote him because I liked my vote better on Thesp at the time. When I came on yesterday, I decided a vote on him was merited, so I stated intent to hammer.
JohnnyFarrar wrote:@Lissa what happened between voting Emo and voting here? Because you say Karp is looking increasingly bad but he didn't post between 261 and 291.
That shift in thought was triggered partly by Emo's posting, partly by a few things others pointed out about Karp in that time period (for example, in Egg's 280.)-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 966, Josh_B wrote:In post 672, Lissa wrote:In post 579, Thesp wrote:The thing that gives me the most pause about Josh_B today is that his opening post feels very genuine to me.
I actually agree with this, which is a bit odd because I am scumreading Thesp and amnot unhappy with Josh voteseither.
I was previously one of Lissa's strong town reads, and was at that time a strong advocate for a thesp lynch. Looks like she's opening the door to reverse stance on a Josh lynch, plus the confirmation of thesp calling my post genuine.
For the tenth time. "Genuine" in the way I used it did not mean "accurate" or "true" or whatever. It meant it felt genuine in tone. Are you getting this? The way you are interpreting it does not seem to be that way.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Bookitty's post above just about nails why I still want a Josh lynch.
I would vote Luca if that was necessary to reach a lynch by deadline, but that's about it.
I still think there's a fair chance Thesp is scum, and would vote him as well if needed due to deadline (and would prefer a lynch of him to Luca) but would prefer Josh today.
For now~
VOTE: Josh-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
On 83 - I didn't unvote purely because of him questioning it, his question simply reminded me it was there.
And I was uncertain about Beck/Thesp at the time. I wasn't going to force myself to take a side at the moment.
On 129 - I was still somewhat uncertain at the time.
On 140 - I explained myself. How is that OVER-explaining?
On 197 - I am aware that Beck did not vote Thesp himself in the post I referenced, but I found what he'd mentioned sufficient to merit a Thesp vote.
And I took TDA's post as him asking me to vote. But I would have voted Thesp at that point regardless of TDA's question.
On 256 - I do in fact have concrete evidence of this, thank you.
In post 147, Lissa wrote:Oka is actually kinda townish leaning. Partly for setup ignorance. Partly because he kinda just seems like scummy loltown. Though he could be scum,he kind of just looks like an easy target here.
In post 155, Lissa wrote:You clearly have a different experience, but I got somewhat of a loltown/town easy targetvibe from Oka. That was my gut reaction on him.
In post 156, Lissa wrote:
It might be different here, but my inclination is to think easy target = likely town.
In post 160, GuyInFreezer wrote:
On 259 - I found both PM and Thesp scummy, but they didn't seem plausible partners for each other. I wasn't sure which one was more likely scum at the time, so I turned to Emo instead.
On 291 - I found a few of Emo's posts townish. As stated earlier, 268 and 286. And there were further cases presented on PM, such as Egg's in 280, that highlighted some points I'd missed.
On 355 - Along with what I mentioned above, I found part of PM's 294 scummy.
In post 294, Phijkchu_Magikarp wrote:Let's start it off with this post where beck is still attacking me. With beck defending emo and vise versa on why I'm a good lynch they could easily be scum together idk about third scum maybe Luca but all she did was get me to l-1. Beck at this point is pushing for my lynch trying get people off other trains. Thesp seems to be the only one who actually understands my view on the current situation. And also why is everyone going after me for my view point on rqs? I feel like scum are just taking advantage of lynchbait right now and people are just joining along.
This was his reasoning for Emo and Beck being his top scumspects.
In post 293, Phijkchu_Magikarp wrote:In case someone hammers me before I can make my defense beck and emo are most scum most scummiest for me... Obviously I'll explain why in my last defense for now goodnight for now also we have 7 days left so give me a chance
It was not reasoning I found very good. And while considering his flip, it may have been more of a newb-tell than a scum-tell, at the time I found it scummy and thought it could very plausibly be newbscum reasoning.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1010, Luca Blight wrote:83 - Why did you feel the need to unvote while not voting anyone else? Did you not want to pressure anyone else at that point? You seem to be reacting, not being pro-active with your play.
129 - Your comment added nothing - it felt as if you were trying to comment on a relevant topic, but without actually saying anything useful.
140 - The manner in which you explained it seemed awkward. Perhaps that's just the manner in which you naturally come across, though.
197 - So why didn't you question why Beck wasn't voting Thesp, as you thought he had sufficient reason to do so? It seems a coincidence that both times TheDude has questioned your voting, you have unvoted/voted in a way which comes across as if you are trying to appease him. Also, you never question anyone or anything. As I said earlier, you react, rather than pro-actively scumhunting,
256 - fair enough. It still feels like you were being on the fence with Magikarp, though. Again, all your posts are just safe commentary for the most part.
259 - If you weren't sure, why not question them rather than just placing a naked vote on an easy target?
291 - I would disagree that those posts are townish. What is your current read on that slot?
355 - Err, hold on. You're vote for Magikarp came at 291, but you scumread him because of something that happened after your vote? Explain, please.
On 83 - I guess it just made sense to me to unvote at that time? And there wasn't really anyone in particular I wanted to pressure yet.
On 197 - It didn't quite cross my mind at first. Then it did - but he explained it before I needed to ask, in his 245. I then did question him about why PM-scum meant Thesp-town, and his response along with a little meta check convinced me that PM and Thesp were unlikely scumbuddies.
On 291 - null/weak town lean
On 355 - I quoted a post after my switch that made me happier with it. I ALSO mentioned some reasons that occurred before said switch. My "main reasons" did not come after the vote.
In post 1009, Lissa wrote:On 291 - I found a few of Emo's posts townish. As stated earlier, 268 and 286. And there were further cases presented on PM, such as Egg's in 280, that highlighted some points I'd missed.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1020, Luca Blight wrote:
The fact remains, the main reasons for putting Magikarp at L-1 came after her vote.
No. They did not.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Luca -
Let's see.
The thing about PM not entertaining the idea that he could possibly be wrong.
The opportunistic timing of his Beck vote.
It wasn't JUST Egg's case making me decide to switch, it was also Emo seeming less scummy. But those are the bits of Egg's case that stand out now to me.
Sometimes things set off my gut and I'm not really sure why and then someone else comments on them/explains it and I'm like "Oh! That's it!" but I am trying to avoid "me too-ing" too much so I don't always comment on it. When I'm asked to explain reasoning for stuff and I haven't already I go back and find it. Sometimes I don't have something concrete already and I'll look again and go "ooh, that's why." Because usually when my gut pings it's for a reason I just can't place yet.
But like, what bookitty said about josh a couple pages ago
She said what I was on some level thinking and couldn't quite place/put into words
Gut might not be quite the right word because usually something concrete sets it off that I just can't quite place, but this is kinda how I roll.
This is some sort of self-meta I guess, but this is why I don't always explain things right away.
Anyway.
Johnny, I did take a stance on Beck/Thesp a bit later. I just took a bit longer to sort them.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Town: Beck, Bookitty, Egg
Weak town lean: Johnny, Luca, TDA
Unsure: Flubber
Scum: Thesp, Josh, Llama
I ISO'd Flubber and my internal dialogue was something (a bit more detailed) along the lines of "town lean... wait? scum lean... no? town lean... wait, no, that's kinda scummy". Really not sure there.
The Llama interactions with the Josh claim/situation are too odd to ignore.
Llama's logic in 983 is missing something - if there is in fact a SK, someone with a blocked kill on them is NOT confirmed town. Crosskills are a thing.
I don't like this in Josh's logic either - his calling Llama unquestionably town.
I find Llama and Josh very plausibly scumbuddies. There's their weirdly defending each other today after Josh's claim, for one, and the fact that Llama is a strange doc protect choice IMO. Well, Josh's defending Llama in itself isn't that weird, I suppose, though it is missing something, but Llama defending Josh like he is, is.
Llama was actually going after Josh earlier toDay, also. He did this early toDay, then goes after me in following Josh's vote in 874, but in that post, he doesn't actually call Josh town (he doesn't do that until his next post, 973, in which he develops a strong townread on Josh), and his comment about me only wanting Josh lynched AFTER the claim kind of feels like a misrep. Even if not blatantly that, I dislike the way he continued to insist that I want Josh lynched because of the claim.
And I did a quick command-F check of Josh's ISO and not ONE mention of Llama D1. No interaction with him or anything. Especially considering Josh supposedly chose to protect Llama, I find this odd.
By the way~
In post 973, LlamaFluff wrote:So yes or no, if he did not claim doctor you would have preferred a lynch of Thesp. As far as I can tell you think he is scum BECAUSE of that claim.
I thought I answered this earlier, but I guess not.
No, if he had not claimed doctor I would STILL have wanted him lynched over Thesp at that point. My reason for thinking him scum is NOT because of the claim. The claim simply does nothing to alleviate that thinking.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Bookitty. That is... kind of weird considering how yesterday ended.
I think Josh just made a really off assumption. Especially given only one kill again last night, I don't think this is multiball at this point. I'm not sure what to think of Llama now.
One thing I find... interesting is that Bookitty thought Llama was likely scum regardless of Josh's flip. That is a pretty WIFOM-y thing to draw info from, though.
In post 1052, Lissa wrote:Town: Beck,Bookitty, Egg
Weak town lean: Johnny, Luca, TDA
Unsure: Flubber
Scum: Thesp,Josh, Llama
I still strongly believe that Beck and Egg are town.
I need to reread and reevaluate things.-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
@Egg - I didn't put Josh at L-1 then because I hadn't yet really considered that he wasn't aalready at L-1 anymore.
In post 1132, Beck wrote:In post 1129, Lissa wrote:Not catching up really - rereading
Haven't had too much of a chance, trying to work on it, sorry about that, should be done soon
when you do catchup i'd like your top 2 scum reads and why.
I'd also like to see you explain your actions about lying day 2 about catching up and instead just declare intent to hammer on the largest wagon at the time.
I did catch up then, I just didn't have a whole lot else I felt the need to say to what had recently transpired at the time.
Oftentimes I sheep because I have trouble finding why something pings, and the case someone else makes just nails what I couldn't quite find. I need to get better at finding things myself, but whatever.
Anyway~
I have a Flub townread I am not going to explain right now. My stance on Egg and Beck is not changed.
That leaves: Johnny, Luca, TDA, Thesp, Llama for me to look at.
The last two were my scumreads yesterday. But: my Llama scumread had some to do with his interactions with Josh and some of the backing crumbles with Josh's townflip. Though llamascum could also make just as much sense with joshtown, maybe I'm just paranoid after the josh townflip. I also feel like it may have been a bit OMGUS-biased. And my Thesp scumread has lasted all game and I'm not sure whether it still makes sense or I'm unintentionally just clinging onto it.
VOTECOUNT 1.15
(1)Beck—Phijkchu_Magikarp(L-6)
(0)Bookitty—
(0)Egg—
(4) emogirl123(JohnnyFarrar)—Flubbernugget, Luca Blight,massive, Thesp (L-3)
(1)Flubbernugget— LlamaFluff (L-6)
(0)Josh_B—
(0)Lissa—
(0) LlamaFluff —
(0) Luca Blight —
(0)massive—
(7)Phijkchu_Magikarp—Beck,emogirl123(JohnnyFarrar),Josh_B,Egg, Lissa,Bookitty, TheDudeAbides (L-0)
(0) TheDudeAbides —
(0) Thesp —
(0) Not Voting —
VOTECOUNT 2.12
(0)Beck—
(0)Bookitty—
(0)Egg—
(0)Flubbernugget—
(0) JohnnyFarrar(emogirl)—
(6)Josh_B—Egg,Lissa,Bookitty, Thesp, TheDudeAbides, Luca Blight (L-0)
(2)Lissa—Josh_B, LlamaFluff (L-4)
(0) LlamaFluff —
(2) Luca Blight —Flubbernugget,JohnnyFarrar(emogirl)(L-4)
(0) TheDudeAbides —
(0) Thesp —
(1) Not Voting —Beck
Egg, me and Bookitty are in the same order on both. Cute.
So removing the people I think or know to be town, who does that leave.
PM wagon: emo/Johnny, TDA
Josh wagon: Thesp, TDA, Luca
Who is on both? TDA.
Also, I don't like his entry to either.
He scumread PM for what looks to me like a large portion of D1 but only voted him as the hammer. I am a total hypocrite for finding this a little scummy, and considering that I probably shouldn't read too much into it, but whatever. Also, he didn't have a vote down at all for a while there. Why, TDA, did you leave your vote unplaced when you unvoted Luca, instead of putting it back on PM or, say, Massive?
And he comments on lynching a claimed doc being the wrong move then helps it happen anyway
Who is on neither? Llama. Interesting. It seems like a scum off both wagons makes a lot of sense. Based on my townreads on said wagons and some stuff.
And I don't think all three of thesp/tda/luca are scum, and I don't think Emo is scum, and if I am right on that, he is scum. Hmm. And I only have two non townflips/townreads on one of the wagons so if my townreads are right theres scum off that one
If TDA is scum, likely only one of Thesp/Luca is. All three scum in a row like that on a wagon would be bizarre.
Emo's approach to the PM wagon/vote still feels town to me.
Luca and Johnny as scum together makes no sense.
If Thesp is scum, there's probably at least one scum on the PM wagon, too.
I think scum is likely thesp/tda/llama.
Looking at llama's behavior close to pm getting lynched. It seems like llama hopped off pm close to a lynch and pushed a totally different wagon with little/no support. I mean I guess his unvote when he did makes sense kind of but not the flubber vote really. It was at a point when everyone wanted to lynch pm and a pm lynch was probable which is interesting. Could be distancing from a wagon he knew'd flip town
Llama's tda vote today is interesting. Hmm. I dont' know if a bus makes sense right now. I feel like it does.
VOTE: TDA
I think that's l-1
gawd I've done that a lot this game, I don't care
goodnight-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1147, Beck wrote:In post 1143, Lissa wrote:I dont' know if a bus makes sense right now. I feel like it does.
why do you think a bus makes sense right now?
Llama could have realized TDA looked scummy (while he was the first one to vote him, he wasn't the first one to think so, and Egg commented on looking at him), felt others would vote him, and decided to vote him first.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1151, LlamaFluff wrote:Wouldn't you almost call it a good thing Lissa is on it? She is already trying to call people scum for bussing TDA without the flip actually confirming him as scum. That feels more like scum knowing their partner is about to be lynched and being a bit too quick to start building on it.
I don't think he is scum with you BECAUSE you voted him. I just think your vote on him doesn't change that.
It would really be nice if TDA would talk.
In post 1160, Luca Blight wrote:I think Farrar is probably scum with Lissa, it's something I've thought for a while.
Farrar/Lissa, and the third is probably someone out of Egg/Thesp/Flubs.
If I had to guess at a third I'd probably say Egg.
See I think you are town but your reads are so out of sync with mine and I don't know what to think. It makes me paranoid how one of my townreads has reads that are literally almost completely opposite to mine.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1184, Egg wrote:In post 1181, JohnnyFarrar wrote:PoE townreads are a thing?
Usually not when you only have two scumreads...
Really? How I see that post of his, he has three. How are you seeing it?
I'd like to see what TDA's replacement says.-
-
Lissa
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
Okay so thinking llama is pretty town now. Is a scum/scum neighborhood even a thing in normals? Seems super unlikely even if so. That'll mean some reevaluating tomorrow I guess.
I don't believe the JOAT claim. Doesn't make sense. Seems like a last ditch scum attempt to save himself. Along with that the amount of town power that'd mean doesn't make sense.
Note to self: Luca's 1203 is... interesting.
Do not want massclaim today.
1253 is freaking wifom stew. I don't like it.
1309 feels like a subtle attempt at discrediting.
Still agree with TDA lynch. Good with hammer on him after he returns once more.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
So it was multiball after all. Oh.
I don't think having any more protective/blocking roles makes sense with what we've already seen Town has. So it could have been a no kill, I just don't get why one would be done, it doesn't make sense to me strategically, but another role that can prevent a kill makes little sense either. I don't know.
And only two scum doesn't seem likely given the Town power we know exists (a doc, masons, and neighbors to boot.) I think we have three.
I agree that no-lynch makes sense, yeah.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1362, Luca Blight wrote:
Scum have actually no-killed the last two nights, assuming TheDude killed Bookitty.
Yeah, no.
It is far more logical that mafia-scum also killed Bookitty, or they shot TDA, who was 1-shot bulletproof. Or that there is some other mystery kill preventing role that got them last night too, but that doesn't strike me as likely.
Why the hell would they no kill like that two nights in a row? Why would they even do it once, for that matter? It makes NO sense to me.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
In post 1365, Luca Blight wrote:@Lissa - I meant no-kill as in they didn't kill.
Obviously I, as Town, don't know the circumstances behind it...I suspect you do.
I know perfectly well what you meant by no-kill. I just think it's implausible.-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
Lissa Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 662
- Joined: July 29, 2014
-
-
-
-
-
-