I know that you know that I know why.
VOTE: Farside
And I also know that you know why. ^_^
In post 100, farside22 wrote:I lol'ed
Oh anem. Poor, poor scummy anem I need to ask why unsub post read back peddle and not paranoid.
In post 110, unsub wrote:@Aneninem I don't think we are on the same page here but ive been replying from my phone and hard to address all points from here. Maybe others can contribute with their perspectives in the meantime.
In post 113, farside22 wrote:
I have unsub in my town spot more because her wording and flow is newbish and fearless. Newbish and bad wording.
Newbish and having issues explaining it clearly. I wondered at the push on her because I feel scum would use her inability to word things and keep tripping over herself as a scum tell.
In post 113, farside22 wrote:
In post 68, RadiantCowbells wrote:Vote: Flubbernugget
Voting the mod is the biggest scum tell I've ever seen
This is complete garbage. I've done it at least once on this site as town, and never as scum.
Shitty absolutist extrapolation from incomplete data sets = scum.
Why did you not vote for the player who made this post?
In post 113, farside22 wrote:
Also on my town list is VDA ...
Light scum read on Demerine and troubled townie
In post 115, Aneninen wrote:I've just had a MomentryLapse of ReasonIntuition that RadiantCowbells and Pramitz are both scums...
In post 125, RadiantCowbells wrote:Post has been edited by me
So Pramitz essentially made 1 vote with reasoning, 180ed on it, voted me with no reasoning, 180ed on it but then 180ed on it again and said I'm still scum even though the vote was a joke?
It comes strongly across as inexperienced scum trying to avoid making enemies, failing in doing that, then trying to grab onto an unspecified tell as rationale for why his reads (which he 180ed on) are correct.
In post 152, unsub wrote:1. I am technically an alt but I've only played two games previously maybe 1 or 2 years ago. I just wanted a less identifying name change that I am not using elsewhere. 2. Yes, it seems that I need to explain and over-explain, otherwise others can just interpret as they wish. At least I am putting my thoughts out there. Scum can look for ways to turn it around on me but town will likely understand.
In post 153, RadiantCowbells wrote:
what's really happening is just Aneninen projecting his own chainsaw onto me.
In post 155, massive wrote:
150: Anen is playing his scum game AND voting in the scum spot? Awesome! Oh man I even get a pigeon in the preview!
In post 161, RadiantCowbells wrote:I wish I was confirmed town this game. Sigh.
vote: Anenin
My vote's not changing the rest of this game.
In post 163, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, anenin's early posts were him prematurely defending his lack of strong reads, now he's shitposting with super artificial duck crap and I just can't fathom how incredibly absurd he is to accuse me of chainsawing right while he votes me for pushing someone else.
In post 168, unsub wrote:
It's nice to know that you personally over-explain things when you are scum I guess. I would generally think the opposite is true. I will bet that we have 1 or 2 quiet scum right now. So much easier to fly under the radar now and let town target each other. If I was scum, why would I actually take the time to analyze and explain and only make it hard on myself to keep track of all the lies.
In short, commentary varies and if anything it makes more logical sense that scum stays quiet more often than not. Stats anyone?
I see a lot of vocabulary being used that I dont agree with in the context of things. Ex. Where do you draw the line between explaining vs. over explaining? Someone gets asked a question or wants to explain something and suddenly they are OVER explaining? Have I over explained enough to your liking?
In post 176, massive wrote:
I've seen your scum game. It looks a lot like this one. It has a lot of, as you say,looks likedoing work.
Massive wrote:He doesn't move on to another suspect, instead presenting some pseudo-helpful sort of "road map" for his next action, which is to examine the player who isn't actually playing.
Aneninen wrote:I'm re-examining everyone soon.
In post 274, pisskop wrote:In post 272, farside22 wrote:Anem: why did you think pram and rc was scum together?
She stole my question, but since you didn't answer it I get to ask again!
In post 150, Aneninen wrote:
What RadiantCowbell says seems to be a good observation but, I strongly think it's "overdriven": it looks like an early scum-scum interaction, containing distancing and "soft-bussing".
Especially since RadiantCowbell moved her vote for Unsub in 130. It seems to be a kind of "Chainsaw-in-advance", I mean, she votes for a player whomaylaunch a fight with Pramitz later.
In post 277, massive wrote:
I don't see anything that would cause me to say her responses specifically to Ozgin look like they're "frustrated." Unsub's last scum list is RadiantCowbells, Pramitz, Ozgin (152) -- you have these as town, scum, unsorted in that order. Is unsub doing justbadvalid scumhunting?
In post 277, massive wrote:
In post 265, Aneninen wrote:Pisskop. unsorted – the Fubber-vote was bad, the early posts were "they look like contentful but they aren't". His later posts are better. He could have jumped on the RadiantCowbells wagon if he were scum. (Remember: Pisskop posted that he has some experience with her and he tried to explain us what he knows.)
This is WIFOM at best. I don't necessarily have a scum read on pisskop but presenting this as evidence of "better" later posts is quite wine-laden.
In post 277, massive wrote:
Klingoncelt as scummy is also a gimme read. Unfortunately for you, some of it is that she's buddying you.
In post 265, Aneninen wrote:Demerine/Titus. scum – 50 is silly, 96 "If he's scum, he'll slip. If he's not scum, someone else might." is WTF, 121 looks like a contentful post but it contains nothing, 149 is pretty much the same, 158 "Okay, now it really is serious time. I'm trying to be a good little worker bee today. – and she replaces out. Titus! We need posts!
f-ck that 150 now, really wrote:
If we check Pramitz's ISO, we can find
– a vote for Flubber with a silly reason (24)
– a naked vote for RadiantCowbell (83)
– a null about his experience level (84)
– a "180-ing" about his Flubber-vote, saying that it was an RVS (102), I'm unwilling to buy it
– a wall-quote about RadiantCowbell with a null-comment (114)
– saying that Flubber is town (118), and at that point the Flubber-wagon has already lost its momentum
– a nonsense-post about backpedalling and about his RadiantCowbell-vote (120)
In post 297, massive wrote:
In post 291, Aneninen wrote:You've been doing nothing for a long time but scumreading me REGARDLESS OF MY POSTS.
What does the rest of the town think about this sentence? Because I would say I am scumreading Aneninen BECAUSE OF his posts.
In post 297, massive wrote:
In post 296, Aneninen wrote:You called my reads "gimme reads" and other names – you could have thought that at least I've been trying to do something. But no, my readlist is scummy because you say so.
I did not say your reads list was scummy. I said that some reads are so basic that we all have the same read. There's nothing exotic in them, there's nothing particularly insightful in them. "So and so with 7 posts is null-town." Well whoop dee doo, we all think that. I'm not saying it's scummy, I'm saying that they don't factor into whether you're scummy or not. They're throwaway reads.
In post 297, massive wrote:
In post 291, Aneninen wrote:And that "Can you link to where you've already talked about this?" – Oh REALLY??!
What do you think this was? "In contrast, Demerine's question may have come from a townie, but also may have come from a lazy scum who was trying to "test the water" (whether the RadiantCowbells wagon was strong and viable) before jumping on it."
You even USED this part when you wanted to strengthen your case because I'm "straight up guessing" and you simply FORGOT about it when you wanted to strengthen your case by something like "I'm not answering your questions".
Interestingly, I was actually hoping you had said something substantial that I had missed, and would point me to it. The question was legitimate. I will admit, I didn't expect you to answer one questionable statement with a reference to another statement I found questionable. Your statement "I already talked about this" made it sound like you had made a more concrete statement about Demerine, and not that you were going to stand by your bad WIFOM statement.
In post 297, massive wrote:
Here's the problem. I did none of these things. You have no reason to claim that I would do any of these things except to push your interpretation of the events as tunnelling.
In post 339, massive wrote:In post 334, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Votes Adenine, then tries to get me on the Anen wagon...
I know people hate lynching unCCed PRs Day 1, but seriously, Radiants given up the pretense of being town at this point.
Uh ... who is Adenine?Is it relevant to your jump back onto RC, that there's no player in this game named Adenine?
In post 340, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 339, massive wrote:In post 334, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
Votes Adenine, then tries to get me on the Anen wagon...
I know people hate lynching unCCed PRs Day 1, but seriously, Radiants given up the pretense of being town at this point.
Uh ... who is Adenine? Is it relevant to your jump back onto RC, that there's no player in this game named Adenine?
Are you saying RC meant to vote Anen?Hmmmm
UNVOTE:
In post 341, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Rereading 331, assuming that vote was meant to be for Anen, then we have RC basically try to move from the Ozgin wagon to Anen.
I still feel good voting either RC or Ozgin now.
In post 354, massive wrote:In post 352, Aneninen wrote:WTF was that? Am I the only one who thinks that this interaction just doesn't add up?
Do you think I was coaching VDA there? You should go ahead and say it if you think this, rather than allude to it.
In post 354, massive wrote:
In post 353, Ozgin wrote:I find it interesting how you thumb yourself in your "Likely towns" list. It reads almost as sarcastic to me, and that you only use the word likely to describe your town alignment, as opposed to saying "I am town" or not even mentioning yourself as to imply that you are town.
I thought the exact same thing. And I evidently can't get the Klingon-Anen partnership out of my head, because look who's second on that list.
In post 382, VictorDeAngelo wrote:OK, we only have a couple of days to deadline so I think it's time everyone started doing one of two things:
a) Jump on either the Anen or Ozgin wagons.
b) Make a case why we should be lynching someone else toDay.
In post 385, farside22 wrote:Anem: Can you tell me what changed your reads on Kling from town read to scum read?
In post 411, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
...As for the rest of the post, I never, ever seen scum caught through timestamp analyses and it is as a bad a method of scumhunting as possible. You will actually making it harder for me to get my preferred lynch if keeping giving people reasons like this to vote you. Just stop already.
In post 411, VictorDeAngelo wrote:And given that I basically said that people could either get one of the wagonsorneeded to start pushing another wagon now (since there wouldn't really be time otherwise) it's absurd to say I basically tried to force town into one of two mislynches.
In post 415, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 403, TroubledTownie wrote:
![]()
A very reassuring start for a slot I was scum-reading. Let's see where this goes.
VOTE: Ellie
Waste of a vote here. Move it onto one of the bigger wagons please.
In post 419, massive wrote:I'm around right now and reading. I'm not online on the weekends and Boon should know that, considering how many games we've played together. Anen should probably remember it since Nero made a Big Deal out of it in the one game we played together. I'm reading.
In post 422, Titus wrote:I want an unsub flip...but I think it's too late.
In post 425, pisskop wrote:Also Scum Oz flip will get RC lynched
In post 426, massive wrote:In post 356, Aneninen wrote:
It wouldn't have made any sense as coaching. Why did you think that I had been thinking so?
That dialogue was simply illogical. And sooner or later I'll find it out, why.
Because I can't understand why you think it's suspicious, aside from tunnelling. Clearly I'm trying to get more information from VDA / get him to slip, because his vote makes no sense. What question would you have asked him in that scenario?
VDA moving onto Ozgin in 363 is kinda dumb. It's based on associative tells without any flips.
Well I was considering moving my vote from Aneninen up to 383 but "associative tells without flips" PLUS "setup speculation to fill in the necessary leap in logic" is ridiculous. Yeah I'm not moving. Seriously, that's silly.
In post 429, massive wrote:Of course I understood that RC meant you while saying "Adenine." Which is why I asked about it. The misunderstanding seemed impossible to me. Do you read my question to think I don't know who Adenine is?
In post 429, massive wrote:
In post 427, Aneninen wrote:
As for "setup speculation to fill in the necessary leap in logic": I found an answer which could explain that interaction whichisabsolutely illogical in itself.
The problem is that your "answer" requires that you either know the scum setup, or are just blindly guessing. Neither is a reason I'd think you'd be willing to continue supporting in many more posts.
In post 499, massive wrote:I'm around. I'd probably be happier with Klingon or, hell, even Titus or Ellie, butI may just not get the Oz wagon because it happened counter to Aneninen who I still think is scum.
In post 521, massive wrote:My instinct is to keep VDA alive so he'll shoot RC overnight.
In post 256, massive wrote:In post 241, RadiantCowbells wrote:It's clear that he's trying to emulate his actions in that game in this with the bird posts and such, but they come across as insincere and artificial here where they fit better in their original usage.
This is really going to irritate me, but also see Open 573 where he was scum and doing the same. You know, if you improved your bedside manner even a smidge, people might actually listen to you rather than stubbornly set up walls and policy lynch you. Mafia is a social game, and frankly you're rubbish at that part.
In post 499, massive wrote:I'm around. I'd probably be happier with Klingon or, hell, even Titus or Ellie, but I may just not get the Oz wagon because it happened counter to Aneninen who I still think is scum.
In post 521, massive wrote:My instinct is to keep VDA alive so he'll shoot RC overnight.
In post 570, Flubbernugget wrote:vote: RC
Did not put 2 and 2 together.
Claims role but no action boo
In post 576, TroubledTownie wrote:In post 559, farside22 wrote:
Also it ignored the fact I stopped the wagon on vda do to info I have, which titus seems to ignore.
Uh, wat? I think VDA claiming might have had something to do with the wagon stopping.
Also, you didn't share your reasoning for why you believe VDA, so it's not like you convinced anyone else.
This looks like you trying to sneak away with some towncred you don't deserve.
vote: Farside22
In post 577, massive wrote:But answer me this - if I'm scum and seriously want RC dead overnight, why don't I just kill her myself? How does "wanting someone else to get rid of her" equate to scum?
In post 584, massive wrote:In post 583, Aneninen wrote:Suggesting the Vig getting rid of a town-PR because of policy reasons = scumplay.
Why do you believe this?
In post 584, massive wrote:
In post 583, Aneninen wrote:
Also, if you had really wanted to make a useful suggestion for VDA, you should have suggested your scumread. ME!
I have every intention of getting you lynched, and of having the satisfaction of you flipping scum, so why would I need him to kill you?
Going back now.
In post 584, massive wrote:
In post 563, Aneninen wrote:He was "shadowing" the VDA wagon in 426, posted this: "Do that claim thing if you're gonna. I'm OK to lynch." in 473, right after Ozgin had put VDA at L–1.
Why is this scummy? Players at L-1 need to know that someone is willing to lynch if you expect them to claim. Putting someone at L-1 is immaterial otherwise.
In post 584, massive wrote:
In post 563, Aneninen wrote:Also,
In post 499, massive wrote:
I'm around. I'd probably be happier with Klingon or, hell, even Titus or Ellie,but I may just not get the Oz wagon because it happened counter to Aneninen who I still think is scum.
Underlining is yours. Are you saying I'm scummy because I think you're scum? Or are you trying to say "despite saying he doesn't 'get' the Oz wagon, he still hopped on it later"? Why is that scummy?
In post 584, massive wrote:
Regarding you cherry-picking quotes to suit your "case" -- you missed:
In post 256, massive wrote:This is really going to irritate me, but also see Open 573 where he was scum and doing the same. You know, if you improved your bedside manner even a smidge, people might actually listen to you rather than stubbornly set up walls and policy lynch you. Mafia is a social game, and frankly you're rubbish at that part.
In post 256, massive wrote:In post 246, RadiantCowbells wrote:
Maybe if there weren't a bunch of useless players like massive
But you can still go F yourself.
In post 475, massive wrote:Will you PLEASE THE FUDGE stop calling him by the wrong name on purpose.
In post 584, massive wrote:
Titus and Pisskop blindly and embarassingly following Aneninen onto me, when their previous only interaction with me was leading up to the lynch at the end of D1.
In post 556, Titus wrote:Based on that, it's clear that pisskop, massive and and farside have been on most of the popular wagons. Yet, none of these wagons at 1.03 took off. Is it possible because they are on scum rather than town?
How on earth does this paragraph equate with your follow-up vote of me? It doesn't. In fact, the only interaction you and I had leading up to your vote of me was you pressuring me to vote for any of the leading trains in 518 and 522. So guess what?
VOTE: Titus
In post 591, TroubledTownie wrote:In post 583, Aneninen wrote:
As I said, jumping off the VDA wagon is not a towntell in itself.
But, why do you think she's the scummiest?
She tries to defend herself against titus, and simultaneously paint titus in a bad light, by claiming towncred she doesn't deserve. She's not the reason VDA didn't get lynched, and by withholding her reasoning, she didn't convince anybody. Revisionism is scummy.
In post 593, Titus wrote:The three of you were all on nearly every wagon but the ones I highlighted. Why? My VCA tends to flesh out as the game progresses but it's ok for day 2.
Obviously the two are not mutually exclusive but your vote pattern doesn't match your words.You have a heavy scumread but you do not suggest vigging thatscumread and now you OMGUS me instead of pursuing that.
In post 594, massive wrote:In post 592, TroubledTownie wrote:What? You're really going to defend that?
Any consideration that I want to hear Aneninen's answer to this question?
In post 596, Titus wrote:Why are you concerned just out of the gate about who is capable of being lynched versus who is actually scum? You haven't made any effort to get Anen lynched. Most of your effort is discrediting me.
In post 599, unsub wrote:
I think Titus as a replacement has been quiet and opportunistic only at relevant times not giving us many thoughts. Unless I missed something, as soon as he joined he proceeded to say not much throughout but was active enough in the last few hours before the deadline.
I haven't read the latest posts yet. Boarding a flight now. If you dont think I am active enough let me know and I can ask to be replaced.
In post 608, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 601, farside22 wrote:TT: I figured people followed me off vda because of what I said. No one argued.
Kling still scum.
Massive: why are you attacking titus theory as scummy?
You're starting to piss me off. Why do you assume I'm Scum? Please don't derp and say it's a meta thing, those that know me will tell you that my meta is unreadable.
I'm Town. Deal with it.
In post 655, Klingoncelt wrote:Okay. Ozgin flipped Town. Very likely there were 2 or more Scum on the wagon: unsub, VictorDeAngelo, Flubbernugget, farside22, pisskop, massive, Ozgin (who self-voted)
VDA was NK'd. So: unsub, Flubbernugget, farside22, pisskop, massive
On Massive's wagon we have 4 totally different players: Aneninen, Titus, pisskop, TroubledTownie.
If he flips Scum, it's unlikely any Scum will bus him unless he makes some major slip. So we can take out Massive himself, and we can take out pisscop, who voted on both wagons.
That leaves unsub, Flubbernugget, and farside22 as the likeliest Scums on Ozgin's wagon, if Massive flips scum.
In post 659, massive wrote:In post 603, Aneninen wrote:
And how those things are relevant at all?
Those are telling nothing about yourreadson RadiantCowbells.
Because they are counter to your claim that I was legitimately trying to get VDA to vig RC, and not that I was simply frustrated at RC's playstyle and lashing out. And THAT is the biggest problem with your argument, and why you had to leave them out.
In post 668, massive wrote:
I didn't say they contained "reads" on RC. I said they were indicative of my overall mindset in relation to RC. My point is that you cherry-picked quotes from me to promote this idea that I had a "read" on RC when, if you take the entire picture, it's obvious I'm just irritated by their playing style. And the biggest "read" that you are happy to ignore is the fact that I left the RC wagon to jump onto you -- wouldn't that at least contribute to me reading RC as town?
In post 673, RadiantCowbells wrote:v/la because I'm without computer access
btw this massive wagon still sucks.
In post 687, massive wrote:In post 685, Aneninen wrote:So you had a townread on her... yet you wanted to get her Vig-killed. Despite her PR.
It's ... it's almost like ... like ... I was being frustrated at her gameplay and not really wanting her to be vigged! WOW! You're soooooo close to making this argument for me, which is only what I've been saying all along.
In post 695, massive wrote:In post 692, Aneninen wrote:In post 687, massive wrote:In post 685, Aneninen wrote:So you had a townread on her... yet you wanted to get her Vig-killed. Despite her PR.
It's ... it's almost like ... like ... I was being frustrated at her gameplay and not really wanting her to be vigged! WOW! You're soooooo close to making this argument for me, which is only what I've been saying all along.
So, are you saying that you wanted RC to get Vig-killed, because you had been so frustrated at her gameplay?
I don't normally quote walls within walls like this, but I wanted you to go back and read what I said right above your comment. Specifically "not really wanting her to be vigged." That should answer your question fairly completely.
In post 706, massive wrote:I like that you say my actions "might not have come from a townie" and yet still push for my lynch in the same post. Way to hedge.
In post 713, massive wrote:
In post 708, Aneninen wrote:Maybe my punctuation was bad and I'm an ESL player, as you might know.
The same sentence in other words: Whenever you get interrogated or caught because of a scummy post, you fabricate a reason for the particular post later.
Hey, guess what. You're going to nitpick word choice and analyze submeaning under submeaning, be prepared to get it back. Easy for you to say "this is your obvious motivation" and then throw ESL up as a defense when you clearly just slipped.
In post 717, RadiantCowbells wrote:Literally, everyone currently voting Massive is either a scumread or explicitly not a townread of mine.
In post 718, Titus wrote:
You need to recalibrate then. Massive's contradicting himself and desperately doubtcasting rather than pushing who he thinks is scum.
Why is everyone on the wagon scum? Why is massive obvtown?
In post 720, Klingoncelt wrote:The wagon started falling apart as quickly as it formed. And with no counterwagon to jump onto. This is new to me.
In post 594, massive wrote:Look, let me mess with Aneninen,eventually he's going to slip on something that people can't keep ignoring. And don't go biting on Aneninen and Titus trying to push my "let VDA kill RC" as anything other than a snarky comment.
In post 706, massive wrote:In post 700, Aneninen wrote:I still think you're fabricating reasons for your actions which might not have come from a townie.
I like that you say my actions "might not have come from a townie" and yet still push for my lynch in the same post. Way to hedge.
In post 713, massive wrote:In post 708, Aneninen wrote:Maybe my punctuation was bad and I'm an ESL player, as you might know.
The same sentence in other words: Whenever you get interrogated or caught because of a scummy post, you fabricate a reason for the particular post later.
Hey, guess what. You're going to nitpick word choice and analyze submeaning under submeaning, be prepared to get it back. Easy for you to say "this is your obvious motivation" and thenthrow ESL up as a defense when you clearly just slipped.
In post 723, massive wrote:
In post 722, Aneninen wrote:
Something is strange. I mentioned in C9++ that I'm ESL. You made no conclusions out of it. In that game I was scum and you were town...
Are you really going to push your slip as something players should meta ME on?
In post 806, Klingoncelt wrote:
Honestly, I'm lost here. I have to wait for Massive's flip.
If Massive flips Town then I've got 4 players on my Scum list.
If he's Scum, then I have Farside as his partner, and either Dierfire or RC as the 3rd Scum.
In post 822, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Sup bitches?
Will catch up tonight (I'm not reading the whole game) will mostly be skimming.
I'm town which means massive is scum so we should lynch him.
In post 826, Dierfire wrote:@Radiant
You don't want a lynch on Massive, and you do want a lynch on me. Do you therefore disagree with Pisskop's perception of an association between Massive and my slot?
In post 828, massive wrote:If I'm lynched today, I will be very interested to see Aneninen's defense of his rubbish case.Titus can always throw her VCA under the bus, and the other votes currently on the wagon are either stubborn (TT) or blind (Kilngon, Flubber) and indefensible.
In post 830, massive wrote:
This would be cruel and unusual. Oh a fate deserving of someone who has played BBT in the past. Unfortunately you came in here and let everyone know that when I flip town they should run you up next, so I don't think you can be so cavalier with that hammer quite yet.