Confirming in, I'll post after the kids are in bed tonight.
Anything I should be aware of when I back read? Thanks in advance.
In post 571, Doctor Who wrote:Prod dodge, expect more from me within 24 hours.
In post 195, Banakai wrote:Also red ff is town
In post 198, Banakai wrote:Because his posts are a towns posts.
In post 174, redFF wrote:unvote
didn't kno it was l-1, still think ur scummy
mod we need a votecount pls
In post 204, Kmd4390 wrote:Hmm. Upset at the claim, but used "lol" twice in that post.
In post 221, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 168, redFF wrote:if u iso woodywoodpecker he has a LOT of posts, very little, if any, scumhunting. the posts are mainly contentless/defending himself
vote:woodywoodpecker
This is a bad jump on the wagon. There are a couple of votes that I want to look closely at regarding the Woody wagon and this is one of them.
Can you explain why it is scummy to defend yourself? In Woody's defence, it's extremely difficult to scum hunt when you have 4-5 people voting/attacking you.
In post 261, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 256, Kmd4390 wrote:BBT, how does Woody missing something imply he's read the game? I missed all of last night's posts because I was sleeping. Does that imply I've read them? No. I'm doing that now. I agree with you that he should have gone back to reqd what he missed, but why is that poor scum play and not poor town play? Why do you already seem to be scumhunting on the Woody wagon (Bulb, redff, absta) like you already know he'll flip town? You're also pushing Woody for not commenting on the Haschel wagon. I don't believe I commented on it either (I could be wrong). If I didn't, does that make me scum? Do you think Haschel is scum?
It was the wording. It made me feel like he had been reading the game but 'didn't notice' the votes piling up on Haschel. It's poor scum play because of the subtle changes in his story and the pure convenience of his stance on it.
Am I not allowed to look at who joined the wagon and why? Should I ignore all other people until Woody is lynched? Why are you firing loaded questions at me?
I'm pushing Woody for both his ignoring of the wagon until prompted and his reactions afterwards.I don't know if Haschel is scum, he has barely posted anything.
In post 283, Bulbazoor wrote:gree. I have no tolerance for players like he is playing in this game. Absta is ww or town. Instead of the latter, I believe him to he town because of the linez of thinking he posts. The conversation with kmd was fishy but It does not prove his alignment to be
In post 321, Banakai wrote:Maybe lazy wasn't the right word but mist of his posts are bandwagons/obvious things/low effort, especially recent ones. And his tone is just kind of suspicious
In post 373, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Yeah, it makes me think Woody is probably town.
Has no effect on my read or the awfulness of that post from Redff though.
In post 397, redFF wrote:i had ww as scum for his massive overdefensiveness, but now that he is replacing out because someone he "doesn't like" has joined the game, it makes his in-game behaviour more believable as he may be a sensitive person who cannot take attacks very well
therefore he is becoming less of a scumread for me, what are people's thoughts
In post 408, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 406, redFF wrote:cool, so you think the slot is town?
Yes, a town-lean on WoodyWoodpecker's slot at the moment - it was probably around page 10 (post #225 onwards) that I began to re-evaluate my read on WoodyWoodpecker - re-reading his posts I could see how his emotive posts could be from the perspective of a townie (even if I disagreed with his in-game attitude).
Taking a step back then allowed me to focus on the players who were both on WoodyWoodpecker's wagon and those who were sat on the periphery.
In post 413, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I thought you said you had played with me before? You don't seem to be aware of how I play Mafia. I'm always confident. I'm always 100% on my reads, I don't see the point in being wishy-washy.
In post 414, Doctor Who wrote:
Confirming in, I'll post after the kids are in bed tonight.
Anything I should be aware of when I back read? Thanks in advance.
In post 449, absta101 wrote:You should realise by spamming all these small posts you are hurting town. It makes the game harder to follow for everyone else.
In post 513, Keyser Söze wrote:the game had just begun, so naturally they would all be null I thought it was funny, personally
True, I could have listed myself as a "town read" incase I forgot who I was
Reeks of "look at me, I'm town"? I hope so! You're obviously not a fan of Liam Neeson are you. Anyway, I'd hate for my posts to reek of "look at me, I'm scum"
Welcome to the game.
In post 523, Bulbazoor wrote:Doctor Who, can you explain what you got out of the wagon analysis?
In post 528, TonyMontana wrote:Hey, sorry for the slow start, busy weekend, reading up now.
In defense of me posting elsewhere, thats only low-effort phone-posting in a game near end-game which didnt require much of me.
In post 26, TonyMontana wrote:Having been away for a few years, I might ask about certain lingo.
For starters, i understand what a Pedit is, but why is it called that?
In post 528, TonyMontana wrote:Hey, sorry for the slow start, busy weekend, reading up now.
In defense of me posting elsewhere, thats only low-effort phone-posting in a game near end-game which didnt require much of me.
In post 530, TonyMontana wrote:Up to page 15 note:
Boonski has been making a lot of posts, yet have been saying little of note.
In post 561, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 497, Doctor Who wrote:BBT seems to be laying the foundation of mislynching me should RC flip scum, based on Woody not being around.
Can you go into this some more please?
In post 61, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:they're not paying attention to. For example, should we lynch Haschel at any point and he flips scum, I will look back at RVS and be
In post 563, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Apologies for incoming wall, tried to break it up by boxing my reply to Haschel's 502.In post 500, Doctor Who wrote:This early in the game I can't help but think it was loaded with scum.
Can you explain this? What about the timing of the wagon makes it more likely to have scum on it?
In post 659, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 645, Doctor Who wrote:These help me to see who is flying under the radar. My replacement is still carrying me.
Spoiler: Updated Activity
@Doctor Who - what are your thoughts about thelow-activityposters?
RedCoyote - I'd prefer him to see him scum-hunting in the-thick-of-the-action, reacting on the spot, instead of timed responses to events. I am not a fan of long periodic catch-up posts (possible sheeping tactic). However, RL may obviously restrict his online activity.
TonyMontana - he was the late joiner to our party, jumping on the Boonskiies-hate wagon - can I blame him? Was suspicious to see him focus purely on Boonskiies with his first scum-analysis thought. Need more input from him. He has hinted at reads, but not explained them.
In post 662, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 648, Doctor Who wrote:
Posting before backreading does not make one scum. In fact, if when you back read you re-read what was "current" you get more context and the benefit of reading things twice. Pushing a bullshit case is scummy.
Regarding redFF's premature L-1 on Woody, I'd argue that it is infinitely more scummy than posting before backreading. Now the kicker is that BBT recognized it too, and said that it was a bad jump on the wagon. Yet BBT (so far) isn't hunting redFF nearly as much. The BBT quote above is only part of a much larger post on many other topics.
Scum coming in late on a wagon and claiming they didn't know the vote count is one of the oldest tricks in the book.
Firstly, what you spoilered was me explaining my position on Woody. The fact you spoilered it as an 'infatuation' shows that you're intending to scum read me because of it no matter what.
I don't get your back reading comment? Who is it referring to?
In post 692, Haschel Cedricson wrote:I would like everybody in their next post to give their thoughts on Banakai. Multiple sentences are preferred.
In post 646, Doctor Who wrote:@Banakai, what did redFF specifically do in his eight posts before 195 that made you think he is town?
In post 653, Doctor Who wrote:
In post 321, Banakai wrote:Maybe lazy wasn't the right word but mist of his posts are bandwagons/obvious things/low effort, especially recent ones. And his tone is just kind of suspicious
Up to this point, Banakai could use this reasoning to vote for himself. Timing is interesting as it happened just after two votes on Vinkah.
In post 746, RedCoyote wrote:DW 647 wrote:kmd scores townpoints because he's the first to point it out, and the "lol" he is referring to was from redFF regarding woody's claim. The double lol makes me think that redFF is scum and in reality loves that the town is already claiming.
I don't follow. Then why put yourself out there?
DW 652 wrote:Interesting that
1) you go out of your way to identify the only two possibilities for absta (not rocket science)
2) you list him as ww first (people generally put their best guess first)
3)"Instead of the latter" - the latter as you stated is town, so you essentially wrote "Instead of town, I believe him to be town"
I"m not sure what to make of it.
I liked this post until the last sentence. I'm assuming you're thinking scum, but why do you not state that?
---
In post 775, redFF wrote:dont see how my l-1 vote on ww was scummy, i unvoted as soon as i realized
also i re-evaluated the slot after his replace out because i thought it was a childish and idiotic and selfish and bad player thing to do, which meant me reconsider my scumread as just village idiot town, i gotta check your iso out dr who but u taking so long to catch up isn't too great tbh
In post 787, Kmd4390 wrote:Redff, how do you distinguish from childish idiotic selfish bad VI town and childish idiotic selfish bad VI scum?
Doctor Who, do you think Boon and BBT are scum together? If not, what was the purpose of that statement?
I agree with Doctor Who and absta that people should pick a wagon.
In post 500, Doctor Who wrote:Here is the wagon that got to L-1 on me. This early in the game I can't help but think it was loaded with scum. My favorite part was when rediff cast the L-1 vote. I'm anxious to see if BBT gets in his grill for not paying attention. He hasn't posted yet in my read through after these happened.
At least everyone has shown up now.
Day 1: 7 votes required out of 13 players - Deadline is ?EST; updated through post 175
Name_______________Count___Voters (Post)
WoodyWoodpecker_____6______Vinkah (9), BlueBloodedToffee (66), Keyser Söze (72),, Bulbazoor (138), redff (168)absta101 (132)
no vote_____________2______Banakai, RedCoyote
absta101____________1______Zoronos (102)
BlueBloodedToffee___1______Kmd4390 (144)
Haschel Cedricson___1______WoodyWoodpecker (51)
Kmd4390_____________1______TonyMontana (13)
unvote______________1______Haschel Cedricson (76)
In post 652, Doctor Who wrote:In post 283, Bulbazoor wrote:gree. I have no tolerance for players like he is playing in this game. Absta is ww or town. Instead of the latter, I believe him to he town because of the linez of thinking he posts. The conversation with kmd was fishy but It does not prove his alignment to be
Interesting that
1) you go out of your way to identify the only two possibilities for absta (not rocket science)
2) you list him as ww first (people generally put their best guess first)
3)"Instead of the latter" - the latter as you stated is town, so you essentially wrote "Instead of town, I believe him to be town"
I"m not sure what to make of it.
In post 761, Doctor Who wrote:In post 449, absta101 wrote:You should realise by spamming all these small posts you are hurting town. It makes the game harder to follow for everyone else.
Boonskiies is hurting town, but then who are the "everyone else" in your second sentence?
In post 789, Bulbazoor wrote:In post 778, Doctor Who wrote:In post 763, Bulbazoor wrote:So doctor... Your thoughts on red analysis and reads?
red who?
SorrynI meant coyote
In post 821, absta101 wrote:@DoctorReally, Is this what you are going for?In post 808, Doctor Who wrote:Finally, it seemed like he started off acting like town in his first sentence, but in his second sentence I believe he identifies himself as scum. Why complain about making the game harder for everyone else (as in not town) if he is town? I don't believe I got a response to my question either.
"It makes the game harder for everyone else" literally means it makes the game harder for everyone to follow (other than the person spamming the thread). How would you even think this is a scum-slip? You are obviously making up these shit reasons just so you can park your vote on me.
Why was it scummy? You can't just quote my vote and call it scummy...Absta put a pretty scummy vote on me earlier today.
Look how much sense this makes:
Doctor put a pretty scummy vote on me earlier today.I'm willing to go with VOTE: absta101
In post 130, absta101 wrote:In post 128, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:In post 126, absta101 wrote:I'd say the most scummy thing about Woody is that all he has been doing is defending himself rather than trying to find scum.
It's early
Not a great excuse; there's enough content and a lot of us have already started scum-hunting.
In post 822, absta101 wrote:In post 809, Doctor Who wrote:@absta - who are your top three suspects and why?
Nothing has changed other than your slot looking scummy again. Your reason for voting me doesn't seem genuine at all.
In post 836, Bulbazoor wrote:What bad thing did tony do?
In post 767, Doctor Who wrote:Three posts in sequence from Tony's ISO
In post 26, TonyMontana wrote:Having been away for a few years, I might ask about certain lingo.
For starters, i understand what a Pedit is, but why is it called that?
In post 528, TonyMontana wrote:Hey, sorry for the slow start, busy weekend, reading up now.
In defense of me posting elsewhere, thats only low-effort phone-posting in a game near end-game which didnt require much of me.
17 minutes between these two posts, and based on when you posted you went from page 2 (post 26) to page 15. Frankly, when someone is able to catch up so quickly it makes me think they are scum since they already know who their buddies are and they just need to bandwagon a townie and make sure one of their scumbuddies doesn't get lynched.
In post 530, TonyMontana wrote:Up to page 15 note:
Boonski has been making a lot of posts, yet have been saying little of note.
In post 848, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 729, Zoronos wrote:I have basically no opinion about Banakai. He doesn't have a ton of content, is a null and I haven't had time to work on sorting him.
Hoping this changes. You really should have a read on someone when they're one of the leading wagons, and if you don't, you should probably do something about that.
In post 734, Banakai wrote:The above is the reason I discarded the case. It was not a good case in the first place. Also you seem to be selectively reading my posts, as I also mentioned what I meant by the last quote. At the time of making the case I wouldn't call myself passionate. Afterwatds and looking back at it only then could you call it "passionate". When I made the case I wasn't even sure who I wanted to vote.
But this isn't what you said when you discarded it. You said that Boon had made himself so obviously scum that you felt like you didn't need to post your case. Which is radically different from what you're now claiming.
In post 753, redFF wrote:
BBT is striking me as super over the top in his agressiveness, and his attempts to instill himself as the town 'leader' feel like a way to suppress dissenting opinion. he just seems to be a control freak who thinks he's better than the rest of us tbh
You're scum reading me based on play-style and you should stop doing that.
In post 758, Doctor Who wrote:So you started a BS wagon on me because you didn't know it was an open setup!?!?
No...where the hell did you get that from?
In post 770, RedCoyote wrote:
Zoro is busy looking for associative tells on D1, which is kind of fake scumhunting, imo. Further, I think his points against redFF are lazy and uninspired.
I'm not seeing this at all RC; can you expand on it? I don't get your town read on the redff slot.
In post 771, Doctor Who wrote:
I had the name wrong, it wasn'tRC it was theHC wagon. This is the post.
In post 61, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:they're not paying attention to. For example, should we lynch Haschel at any point and he flips scum, I will look back at RVS and be
Wow, what a great way to misrep somebody by completely taking their post out of context. Keyser asked me what I thought it could mean, I answered by providing an example.
I was thinking you were suffering from some serious conf bias on my slot but I'm really starting to doubt that now.
In post 772, Doctor Who wrote:
1) The case against Woody was based on him not backreading before posting, which you yourself have noted isn't scummy anymore. It ended up being a wagon that just let the scum know a claim.
2) The flurry of votes that it picked up, again for no good reason.
3) The accidental L-1 vote, it could have been a hammer had there been another vote
4) That all this happened by post 168 - how much info was out there by then? How many people hadn't posted anything of substance? Scum would have loved a Day 1 mislynch with the town having almost nothing to go on.
This isn't rocket science BBT.
OK, so I asked you about thetimingof the wagon and you go ahead and give me youranalysisof the wagon which in no way answers my question. I mean, I guess *4* answers the question but the obvious flip-side is that if the wagon was picking up steam and it was town who was jumping on; why would scum feel the need to get involved?
Fast moving early wagons are generally not considered pro-town so it's dangerous for scum to hop on, especially if they don't have sound reasoning. So, yeah, I don't get your timing comment at all.
In post 774, Doctor Who wrote:
You didn't comment on the main part of what I wrote. According to your value system, woody was scummy for not being aware of what happened in the game for a lack of back reading. That would make redFF's L-1 vote on Woody (where he didn't even know it was L-1, it could have been L-0) even scummier. You've clearly been pushing for a Woody lynch, yet redFF does something scummier and it hardly pinged your radar.
Town would go with their strongest scum read. One way of catching scum is observing when they don't play consistently.
It would seem the majority of your read on me is based on the assumption that Redff is scum; which I'm sure I don't need to tell you is a horrible way to scum hunt. Especially if you're going to try and lynch me first based off of it.
In post 852, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 776, Doctor Who wrote:
I find it hypocritical (therefore scummy) for someone to say someone is is scummy for doing X when they too are doing X.
Being a hypocrite is not scummy.
In post 780, Doctor Who wrote:
My main issue with the whole thing now is how hard BBT rode Woody, but given another example of not knowing the situation (your woody vote) BBT didn't go nearly as hard on you. Does this part make sense to you? Town BBT has to lynch all of the scum, but scum-BBT just needs to lynch one townie a day.
OK, so why doesn't scum!BBT push Redff's 'obviously bad vote'. That would have been a pretty easy push for me to make, no?
Like, I thought your whole 'BBT is scum for ignoring Redff's awful vote on Woody' was based on Redff being scum. Now it seems you have no explanation other than it was scummy of me to ignore such an obviously bad vote even though you think the vote come from town.
Can you clarify? What are my scum motivations for ignoring the vote?
In post 782, redFF wrote:the boonskies wagon is terrible and has scummy looking players on it
This.
In post 790, redFF wrote:I'm gonna do a bunch of reading, look at this banakai wagon
Speaking of reviewing wagons, how did your review of the Absta wagon go?
In post 791, absta101 wrote:I find it scummy how you are trying to create a counter wagon this close to the deadline.
What is scummy about trying to start a new wagon?
In post 801, redFF wrote:cause scum aint that obviously bad, it's been a while since ive looked at woody's posts tho id have to go check to give you examples
Well, that's just an awful reason to start town reading someone. Sometimes, scum are just bad.
#
In post 803, Keyser Söze wrote:
Something which unnerves me, was BlueBloodedToffee's vote and unvote on absta101. He is now emphasing that we have enough to go on for D1 and is happy to jump on one of the leading wagons (personally, I think he has concentrated more on absta101, TonyMontana and redFF):
Is anyone arguing against this? I don't know why you have posted that; it's quite obvious who I have spent the day focusing on.
In post 805, Keyser Söze wrote:
Uncomfortable zone:
Bulbazoor
Boonskiies
BlueBloodedToffee
Uncomfortable zone:
Banakai
Tony Montana
absta101
Even though I believe a Boonskiies flip would tell us alot about other players, I do not want to lynch a player I town-lean (weak) read. But I would prefer a Boonskiies/Banakai lynch than a no lynch. I currently do not like the Banakai lynch because I fear possible opportunistic scum-play by BlueBloodedToffee and absta101.
Couple of things;
Can you clarify the 'uncomfortable zone'? I interpreted it as 'lean scum' and 'scum reading' sections but I'm obviously wrong if you're weak town reading Boon. This is far too ambiguous. Secondly, it would appear I can change the titles of your 'reads' to 'In no danger of getting lynched Today' and 'Possibility of getting lynched Today.'
In post 808, Doctor Who wrote:
I'm willing to go with VOTE: absta101. I'd rather see BBT hang, but I was the only one on his wagon.
If there was an example in a dictionary of an opportunistic vote; this would be it.
The ONLY mention of Absta in your ISO before this vote is the sentence where you're accusing him of scum slipping, which quite frankly, is absurd. I see nothing wrong with that sentence.
You have thenaddedreasoning onto your read in order to try and justify it. I'm back to thinking this slot is scum.
In post 813, Keyser Söze wrote:
IMO, TonyMontana has got to catch-up with the thread first ,thenwe smash his back doors in
Except for he could be lurkingbecausehe is drawing no attention?
In post 865, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:feel like people aren't even reading my posts.
This game is really fucking me off at the minute.
In post 869, absta101 wrote:Why are you quoting me for?
Also of course the Doctor who vote on me is opportunistic. Just LOOK AT IT. Look at his reasons for voting me.
Look at my response to his vote on me. I go over why it's bad.
In post 935, redFF wrote:bbt as a possible scumread i even pushed him earlier but whaddya gonna do we got less than 48 hours
In post 788, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Alright, we still have 5 days but I think 32 pages for D1 is more than enough and nobody seems interested in Tony lurking out the whole of D1 so;
VOTE: Banakai
In post 791, absta101 wrote:5 days is cutting it close and you know it. I highly doubt you'll find 7 people who want to lynch me above these other two in that time. I find it scummy how you are trying to create a counter wagon this close to the deadline.
In post 796, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Redff, why the change if vote?
In post 797, redFF wrote:cause i doubt ur getting lynched today tbh
In post 798, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're right but why would you not want to push your top scum read and at least try?
Why jump ship to a more 'achievable' lynch?
In post 982, absta101 wrote:VOTE: BBT
This is a good start.
I will come back to post more in depth in a few hours.
In post 983, redFF wrote:haschel was the obvious nightkill, not sure what angel was doing
im fine with lynching absta or bbt
In post 985, Kmd4390 wrote:I agree with Absta. Boon is probably town now.
Doctor Who, no one should be claiming unless they have a guilty. If someone is the N1 Angel, and they claim, all it accomplishes is getting them NK'd tonight. Later on, scum have to either confirm that player as town or risk being lynched in a counterclaim. The best time is later on some time, not now. The only advantage you mention that makes it almost worth it is your point 5 that the seer won't get killed. Your two listed disadvantages kind of outweigh that too. I'll say this much. If I'm the Angel, I'm not claiming it today unless I'm about to be lynched.
When I have some time, I want to ISO redff and Zoro. I was reading what I missed over night and they stood out as possible Ban buddies.
In post 938, Doctor Who wrote:Current situation
Day 1: 7 votes required out of 13 players - Deadline is (expired on 2015-08-07 13:30:00); updated through post 854
Name_______________Count___Voters (Post)
Banakai_____________4______Haschel Cedricson (502), RedCoyote (649), Bulbazoor (702), Boonskiies (710)
Boonskiies__________4______absta101 (422), Banakai (472), Kmd4390 (592), TonyMontana (839)
absta101____________3______redff (790), Keyser Söze (805), Doctor Who (808)
TonyMontana_________2______Zoronos (850), BlueBloodedToffee (854)
Prior happenings
In post 788, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Alright, we still have 5 days but I think 32 pages for D1 is more than enough and nobody seems interested in Tony lurking out the whole of D1 so;
VOTE: Banakai
In post 791, absta101 wrote:5 days is cutting it close and you know it. I highly doubt you'll find 7 people who want to lynch me above these other two in that time. I find it scummy how you are trying to create a counter wagon this close to the deadline.
In post 796, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Redff, why the change if vote?
In post 797, redFF wrote:cause i doubt ur getting lynched today tbh
In post 798, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're right but why would you not want to push your top scum read and at least try?
Why jump ship to a more 'achievable' lynch?
Absta is sticking to his vote, but BBT peeled off onto Tony when he was previously questioning if a Tony wagon was feasible. I'm not sure how less time makes a Tony wagon more feasible. BBT has also voted for Absta, so I'm not sure why he's dragging his feet on switching wagons.
In post 975, absta101 wrote:Alright, Boon is likely-town due to that flip on Banakai.